Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Atkinson wrote: Steven Sullivan wrote: Arny Krueger wrote: I don't have a manuscript of this article, but I believe that Mirabel's account is factually correct. I have it. I'll scan it and send it to you. I'm tired of seeing floobylovers bull**** about it. As I have pointed out before, you need to take care reading this article, as subsequent discussion with Dr. Greenhill revealed that much of the published analysis of the data and the resultant editorializing that appeared under his byline was not written by Greenhill. Instead, it was written by some of the editors of Stereo Review, particularly, I understand, by the magazine's long-time technical editor David Ranada who, sadly, left SR's succesor, Sound & Vision, last week, along with editor Bob Ankosko and other members of staff. The changes made in the editing to Dr. Greenhill's text were examined at length in International Audio Review and Stereophile in the mid-1980s, whose editors were supplied copies of the original manuscript. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile Mr. Atkinson, with all due respect this won't do. The issue was raised before in RAHE with the same non-resolution. I understand Greenhill is alive and well. Until and unless he corrects the only text available to the public the contradictory opinions printed are the only ones we have and can quote. If he does not care that's his privilege. If he is misquoted that's ours. Ludovic Mirabel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Just for Ludovic | Audio Opinions | |||
STEREO: Scam of the Century? | Tech | |||
Stereo: Scam of the Century? | Audio Opinions | |||
Bose 901 Review | General |