About Us

a écrit :
Lionel wrote:

Ludo a écrit :

I can add that like many frontal cortex-disadvantaged when he's short
of an argument he resorts to forgery, quotes nonexistent sources and
makes sweeping affirmations about what his imaginary researchers are
doing.

OTOH there is also *very* intelligent persons who exactly act like this.
This is the big, big problem with your above conclusion Ludo.
Doing that, you implicitly include yourself in your description of the
"frontal cortex-disadvantaged".

Common sense and its corrolary *happiness* have nothing to do with
intelligence.
As long as you will prefer the *strass* to the reality you will remain
like *your* "frontal cortex-disadvantaged"... A life casualty. :-(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Your point is well-taken: intelligent people can have no use for
intelectual honesty in debate. My model was an argument at eg. the
medical rounds where you're either factual and can quote your sources
or you're a laughing stock. Pop psychology is quite, quiite different
and one can easily find support for any dearly held notion that one
holds.
Generalisations apart it remains that NYOB stands out as a forger and
a cheat even by the elastic RAO standard just like Pinkerton is an
aggressive sociopath seeking his cow-waste missiles in a gutter as soon
as crossed and desperate for an argument.
These are my lessons from the RAO debates.

I'm sorry Ludo but in *this* case "generalisation apart" isn't
acceptable not to say *impossible*.
Minus has written that McKelvy should have an IQ of 95 to 100.
Which is the case of *most* human beings, right ?

It is very important to note that you have associated most of the human
beings with the following description : "frontal cortex-disadvantaged".
Moreover you have written that "As a result I ceased any exchange of
views with your patient."
This *implicitely* means that because of its "poor" IQ the living
experience of the majority of the world population hasn't any interest
for you.

So my question is : if you feel so much repulsion for McKelvy why do you
feel obliged to compete with him ?

--
Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?

Dave Weil - Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 -0500

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Just for Ludovic		Audio Opinions	64	November 19th 05 04:17 PM
Mikey said this	Robert Morein	Audio Opinions	6	October 29th 05 08:04 AM
The continuing saga of Mikey the Bug Eater, lover of abx/dbt.	EddieM	Audio Opinions	21	September 15th 05 11:28 PM
Mikey "IQ=103" speaks	[email protected]	Audio Opinions	11	September 2nd 05 06:35 AM
What are they Teaching	Michael McKelvy	Audio Opinions	199	October 15th 04 07:56 PM

Menu

About Us