Scott Gardner said:

If certain people didn't keep replying to Krooger's lies, I would
never have seen this amazing admission from Mr. ****.

... until his retirement.

Been there, done that too.
If I told you how many years ago, you'd REALLY think I was bragging.

Thank you for admitting you are, as I surmised, a formally diagnosed
head-case who is totally reliant on long-term disability payments.

As usual, this admission comes after years of denials, just like your
other recent admission about your pedophilia.


Just curious - how are you translating "It's been a long time since I
retired" to "I'm a formally-diagnosed head-case who is totally reliant
on long-term disability payments"? Seems like quite a leap to me.

I keep forgetting how new you are to RAO.

Do you really have a question, or are you just bored?

On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 17:28:15 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Scott Gardner said:

If certain people didn't keep replying to Krooger's lies, I would
never have seen this amazing admission from Mr. ****.

... until his retirement.

Been there, done that too.
If I told you how many years ago, you'd REALLY think I was bragging.

Thank you for admitting you are, as I surmised, a formally diagnosed
head-case who is totally reliant on long-term disability payments.

As usual, this admission comes after years of denials, just like your
other recent admission about your pedophilia.


Just curious - how are you translating "It's been a long time since I
retired" to "I'm a formally-diagnosed head-case who is totally reliant
on long-term disability payments"? Seems like quite a leap to me.

I keep forgetting how new you are to RAO.

Do you really have a question, or are you just bored?

Yes, I do have a question - It was the sentence in my post
that ended with a question mark. I'll ask it again. How is it that
you cobble together two lines from a different thread, and start a new
thread claiming that they represent a "Startling Admission" from
Krueger that he is "a formally-diagnosed head-case who is totally
reliant on long-term disability payments"?
I asked the question because we've had a discussion before
where I said that I thought your standards of proof are somewhat
"lacking". A logical leap like the one you're making in this thread
would seem to bear that out.

Scott Gardner

Scott Gardner said:

If certain people didn't keep replying to Krooger's lies, I would
never have seen this amazing admission from Mr. ****.

... until his retirement.

Been there, done that too.
If I told you how many years ago, you'd REALLY think I was bragging.

Thank you for admitting you are, as I surmised, a formally diagnosed
head-case who is totally reliant on long-term disability payments.

As usual, this admission comes after years of denials, just like your
other recent admission about your pedophilia.


Just curious - how are you translating "It's been a long time since I
retired" to "I'm a formally-diagnosed head-case who is totally reliant
on long-term disability payments"? Seems like quite a leap to me.

I keep forgetting how new you are to RAO.

Do you really have a question, or are you just bored?

Yes, I do have a question - It was the sentence in my post
that ended with a question mark. I'll ask it again. How is it that
you cobble together two lines from a different thread, and start a new
thread claiming that they represent a "Startling Admission" from
Krueger that he is "a formally-diagnosed head-case who is totally
reliant on long-term disability payments"?

I keep forgetting how new you are to RAO.

I asked the question because we've had a discussion before
where I said that I thought your standards of proof are somewhat
"lacking". A logical leap like the one you're making in this thread
would seem to bear that out.

Logic? Bwahahaha etc.

Do you really have a question, or are you just bored?