Where's Forrest Gump when we need him? ;-)

Nobody wants you to believe anything. All they want is for you to buy
their stuff.

Then why all the agitprop about better sound?

Who taught you that word, Mickey? Robert has been trying to school you in
avoiding these explosions of language abuse.

In your persistent delusional state, you believe that marketing is theology. In
reality, it's entirely mundane. Grow up.


Apparently you believe nobody can enjoy their stereo unless they've been
brainwashed. Too bad your brain is too pickled to respond to ordinary
stimuli.

Wrong again, so far you're batting a thousand.

No, I'm quite right. Your patent inability to distinguish marketing from
proselytizing proves my point.

I think people should be informed, after that whatever decision they make is
on them.

If they want to be informed, that's their choice. It's not up to marketers to
inform buyers. Their role is to inflame buyers' interest in their products.

The problem is that they are being told by reviewers that stuff sounds
different when it can't actually be demonstrated that is so.

You're just plain dumb. No two ways about that.



..
..
..
..
..

"George Middius" wrote in message
...



Where's Forrest Gump when we need him? ;-)

Nobody wants you to believe anything. All they want is for you to buy
their stuff.

Then why all the agitprop about better sound?

Who taught you that word, Mickey? Robert has been trying to school you in
avoiding these explosions of language abuse.

In your persistent delusional state, you believe that marketing is
theology. In
reality, it's entirely mundane. Grow up.


Marketing is about selling, reviewing is about showing the efficacy or lack
of for the device being reviewed. I don't expect reviewers to be part of
the marketing.

Apparently you believe nobody can enjoy their stereo unless they've been
brainwashed. Too bad your brain is too pickled to respond to ordinary
stimuli.

Wrong again, so far you're batting a thousand.

No, I'm quite right. Your patent inability to distinguish marketing from
proselytizing proves my point.


Marketing is what the advertisers pay for. Reviews are supposed to be
independent of that.

I think people should be informed, after that whatever decision they make
is
on them.

If they want to be informed, that's their choice. It's not up to marketers
to
inform buyers. Their role is to inflame buyers' interest in their
products.

Reviewers aren't supposed to be part of the marketing.

The problem is that they are being told by reviewers that stuff sounds
different when it can't actually be demonstrated that is so.

You're just plain dumb. No two ways about that.


Nasty comments from you are a badge of honor for me George, since you have
not a clue about audio technology, and have made your sole purpose on RAO
one of name calling an attacks against any sort of discussion of the
technical merits of audio gear.

duh-Mikey takes a bath with Oil of Irony.

You're just plain dumb. No two ways about that.

Nasty comments from you are a badge of honor for me George, since you have
not a clue about audio technology,

If you say so. Bear in mind G that the subject at hand is not technology but
marketing, and the auxiliary issue is how dumb you are.

and have made your sole purpose on RAO
one of name calling an attacks against any sort of discussion of the
technical merits of audio gear.

Is that what you believe, Mickey? You also believe that Arnii Krooger is an
exceedingly honest individual, that the aBXism religion is real science, and
that everything sounds the same. Nobody should be worried about your "thinking"
process overturning accepted wisdom in any area of human endeavor. ;-)

"George Middius" wrote in message
...



duh-Mikey takes a bath with Oil of Irony.

You're just plain dumb. No two ways about that.

Nasty comments from you are a badge of honor for me George, since you have
not a clue about audio technology,

If you say so. Bear in mind G that the subject at hand is not technology
but
marketing, and the auxiliary issue is how dumb you are.

and have made your sole purpose on RAO
one of name calling an attacks against any sort of discussion of the
technical merits of audio gear.

Is that what you believe, Mickey? You also believe that Arnii Krooger is
an
exceedingly honest individual,

I don't know who that is. Arny Kruger is a guy who happens to be surly and
knowledgable about audio. He tends to share this temperment with Dick
Pierce who tends to agree with Arny on virtually every audio technology
issue.

that the aBXism religion is real science,

Becuase it is and because it is widely used by people doing audio research.

and
that everything sounds the same.

Nope, I think LP sounds like **** compared to a CD.
I think SET's sound different than SS, in that SET's sound bad.
The tings that sound the same and the reasons they sound the same have been
stated many times.

Nobody should be worried about your "thinking"
process overturning accepted wisdom in any area of human endeavor. ;-)

Like you'd know.