Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.


And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact. If you care to
refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:27:30 GMT, trotsky wrote:



dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:18:02 GMT, trotsky wrote:


One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.


That was a bit predictable.


In the real world, many of us straight people have close friends that
are gay,


Wait, so you're saying that the majority of contributors to
rec.audio.opinion have close friends that are gay?

I'd hope so.

Devil, do you agree with this?

He probably would.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:28:26 GMT, trotsky wrote:



dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:49 GMT, trotsky wrote:


dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Gayipus is envious of dave.



dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.


That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.


That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.


It's only *my* motto for *me*. What others do is their business.



Wow, it's like the Spin Doctors just made a comeback.

Why, are you hot on red-headed,scraggly-bearded singers? Maybe you
could snag Mick Hucknall instead...

Gayipus Dishonestus misses the Truth-Time Trolley.

Your credibility is zero, Greg.

No, that's not true either.

On the contrary, it's so true that Krooger is envious of you.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:39:51 GMT, trotsky wrote:



Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.

Yes, it's the pedantic Greg on the loose again...

And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact. If you care to
refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.

Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
your enemies to buy your product.

In article , trotsky
wrote:

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.

You said "no such record". There is such a record, for which I have
posted the catalogue number.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:01:56 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

In article , trotsky
wrote:

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.

You said "no such record". There is such a record, for which I have
posted the catalogue number.

Way to fight pedantry with pedantry. That should stick in his craw for
a while.

I was going to point out that there *is* a record called Take Five,
since I still call CDs records as well (and it's a fair thing to call
a CD a record actually), but I decided not to play that card.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:59:09 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Gayipus Dishonestus misses the Truth-Time Trolley.

Your credibility is zero, Greg.

No, that's not true either.

On the contrary, it's so true that Krooger is envious of you.

Well, Arnold *is* giving him advice these days.

In article ,
dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:01:56 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

In article , trotsky
wrote:

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.

You said "no such record". There is such a record, for which I have
posted the catalogue number.

Way to fight pedantry with pedantry. That should stick in his craw for
a while.

I was going to point out that there *is* a record called Take Five,
since I still call CDs records as well (and it's a fair thing to call
a CD a record actually), but I decided not to play that card.

Someone snickered at me years ago for calling an lp an 'album'. I doubt
he had a 78 collection!

Stephen

Greg Singh wrote:

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.



Yourr analysis is wrong. Of course, the fact that you have promoted numerous
li9es about6 me over the years completely destroys your ability to judge my
credibility in an objective fashion. And I'm well aware of teh various
different time signatures used in the selections on the Time Out album, whether
we'are talking about Take Five, or any of the other selection on the album.
The fact that I made a slip of the tongue has nothing to do with my credibility
whatsoever. And only a petty flamer such as yourself would even notice it -
but then again, your sole purpose for being on RAO, as most of us know, is to
try and fight with others. (Many of commented on this before).



And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact.

There is no reason that anybody should believe you, since to promote your
products, you resort to the old, tired salesman's ploy of bashing other
products such as Quads, Martin Logans, Dunlavys and probably many others as
well.

If you care to
refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.






There is no fact that you given to refute, other than your biased opinion -
which is not a fact. You've made no effort whatsoever to provide any evidence
- other than your questionable words - that your speakers are superior to any
others. And when a relatively objective reviewer found even the smallest flaws
(in his iopinion) with your speakers, you immediately resorted to personal
attacks upon him. So why should anybody bother to try and review your
speakers, since you have no tolerance for either suggestions or constructive
criticism?




Bruce J. Richman

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:39:51 GMT, trotsky wrote:



Bruce J. Richman wrote:


Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.


Yes, it's the pedantic Greg on the loose again...


And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over

and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact. If you care to
refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.


Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
your enemies to buy your product.


Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
your enemies to buy your product.


Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.

I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Greg Singh wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:


Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.




Yourr analysis is wrong. Of course, the fact that you have promoted numerous
li9es about6 me over the years completely destroys your ability to judge my
credibility in an objective fashion. And I'm well aware of teh various
different time signatures used in the selections on the Time Out album,


Wait, now you're acknowledging that there is a "Time Out" album?


whether
we'are talking about Take Five, or any of the other selection on the album.
The fact that I made a slip of the tongue has nothing to do with my credibility
whatsoever. And only a petty flamer such as yourself would even notice it -
but then again, your sole purpose for being on RAO, as most of us know, is to
try and fight with others. (Many of commented on this before).


So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse. We are talking about one of
the most well known jazz recordings ever, of course. Do you also think
that Jethro Tull lived five or six hundred years so he could make
records, too?


And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over

and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact.


There is no reason that anybody should believe you,


That statement makes dave weil look like you consider him to be nothing.


since to promote your
products, you resort to the old, tired salesman's ploy of bashing other
products such as Quads, Martin Logans, Dunlavys and probably many others as
well.


I bashed Quads? When was this? I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys. Your
misrepresentation of the facts here is tantamount to lying.


If you care to

refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.







There is no fact that you given to refute, other than your biased opinion -


So dave's opinion is meaningless?


which is not a fact. You've made no effort whatsoever to provide any evidence
- other than your questionable words - that your speakers are superior to any
others. And when a relatively objective reviewer found even the smallest flaws
(in his iopinion) with your speakers, you immediately resorted to personal
attacks upon him. So why should anybody bother to try and review your
speakers, since you have no tolerance for either suggestions or constructive
criticism?


I'm not sure what you're trying to say he dave was only capable of
finding the smallest of flaws, and you still say there's no reason to
believe me (or him)?

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
your enemies to buy your product.


Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.


I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...


Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
on the internet "friends"? Is that how you know the gay guy?

Greg Singh wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Greg Singh wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:


Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.




Yourr analysis is wrong. Of course, the fact that you have promoted
numerous
li9es about6 me over the years completely destroys your ability to judge my
credibility in an objective fashion. And I'm well aware of teh various
different time signatures used in the selections on the Time Out album,


Wait, now you're acknowledging that there is a "Time Out" album?


whether
we'are talking about Take Five, or any of the other selection on the album.

The fact that I made a slip of the tongue has nothing to do with my
credibility
whatsoever. And only a petty flamer such as yourself would even notice it
-
but then again, your sole purpose for being on RAO, as most of us know, is
to
try and fight with others. (Many of commented on this before).


So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.

As usual, you've attempted to lie about me and what I've said. What else is
new?
Of course, it may just be a carryover of your "salesman days" when you probably
tried to twist what people actually said on a regular basis, correct?


We are talking about one of
the most well known jazz recordings ever, of course. Do you also think
that Jethro Tull lived five or six hundred years so he could make
records, too?


Do you have any evidence for any of your ridiculous lies about things that I
have said? Or would you rather just continue to exhibit your delusional claims
on RAO?





And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over

and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well.
Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact.


There is no reason that anybody should believe you,


That statement makes dave weil look like you consider him to be nothing.


Once again, you demonstrate your (a) inabiloity to colmprehend English, and (b)
propensity to lie about what others have said. Dave Weil found both positive
and negative things to say about your speakers, a *fact* that you are now
trying to avoid conceding.



since to promote your
products, you resort to the old, tired salesman's ploy of bashing other
products such as Quads, Martin Logans, Dunlavys and probably many others as
well.


I bashed Quads? When was this? I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys. Your
misrepresentation of the facts here is tantamount to lying.


You lost no time in ridiculing Scott's ownership of Quads and implied that your
speakers were superior. You've also claied that your speakers are "really
good" is a fact. It is nothing more than your opinion, on all counts.
Therefore, your attempt to represent cloaims about your speakers that you make
as facts - is clearly an example of self-serving lieing in an effort to sell
your products.




If you care to

refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.







There is no fact that you given to refute, other than your biased opinion -


So dave's opinion is meaningless?



That would be your projection of your incorrect and false beliefs on to others,
but as with most of your attempts to twist what others have said, you' would
appear to be either again incapable of comprehending what one of your flame
tarrgets has written, or more likely, you're just lieing again.



which is not a fact. You've made no effort whatsoever to provide any
evidence
- other than your questionable words - that your speakers are superior to
any
others. And when a relatively objective reviewer found even the smallest
flaws
(in his iopinion) with your speakers, you immediately resorted to personal
attacks upon him. So why should anybody bother to try and review your
speakers, since you have no tolerance for either suggestions or
constructive
criticism?


I'm not sure what you're trying to say he dave was only capable of
finding the smallest of flaws, and you still say there's no reason to
believe me (or him)?




It's indeed unfortunate that you can't understand clearly written sentences
that don't correspond to your self-serving, prejudiced views of your speakers.
Your attempts to misrepresent what I have written tend to corroborate what I've
said earlier about your credibility.



Bruce J. Richman

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:56:48 -0600, dave weil
wrote:

Devil, do you agree with this?

He probably would.

I do. Gerg is hung up about gays because he wants nine inches of veiny
jism justice raining on his fat ass.

--

td

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:56:48 -0600, dave weil
wrote:


Devil, do you agree with this?

He probably would.


I do. Gerg is hung up about gays because he wants nine inches of veiny
jism justice raining on his fat ass.


Hey, no fair, you're being unfairly influenced by your family members
and the Royals.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:


So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.

Apparently, so does grammar...

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:

I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys.

I'd like to see the scoring sheet.

Did your friend cheat off of your paper?

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:57:45 GMT, trotsky wrote:



dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
your enemies to buy your product.


Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.


I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...


Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
on the internet "friends"?

I actually *have* made quite a few friends through the internet.

Is that how you know the gay guy?

No. Although I *do* know some gay folks through the internet.

I know *you*, don't I?

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:


So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.


Apparently, so does grammar...


That's grammatically correct, dave. Maybe your gay internet friend
Middius will help you out on this one.

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:


I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys.


I'd like to see the scoring sheet.

Did your friend cheat off of your paper?



Zzzzz.

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:57:45 GMT, trotsky wrote:



dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky wrote:



Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
your enemies to buy your product.


Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.


I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...


Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
on the internet "friends"?


I actually *have* made quite a few friends through the internet.


That wasn't what was being discussed, dave. Care to try again?



Is that how you know the gay guy?


No. Although I *do* know some gay folks through the internet.

I know *you*, don't I?


I'm less gay that you, dave. I'll tell you what, though, it must be
funny as hell to see you in those Nashville gay bars telling dudes "I'm
with someone."

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:08:21 GMT, trotsky wrote:



dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:


So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.


Apparently, so does grammar...


That's grammatically correct, dave.

No it's not. "So "facts suck" is basically you are excuse" is
grammatically incorrect.

Maybe your gay internet friend Middius will help you out on this one.

Well, we'll see, won't we...

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:09:02 GMT, trotsky wrote:



dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:


I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys.


I'd like to see the scoring sheet.

Did your friend cheat off of your paper?



Zzzzz.

SCoRE'RE!

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:11:25 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
on the internet "friends"?


I actually *have* made quite a few friends through the internet.


That wasn't what was being discussed, dave. Care to try again?

So, you didn't mean "Oh, are you one of those people that call people
that you interact with on the internet 'friends'?" when you wrote
"Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact
with on the internet 'friends'?"

Cool.

Is that how you know the gay guy?


No. Although I *do* know some gay folks through the internet.

I know *you*, don't I?


I'm less gay that you, dave.

Grammar's a bitch, innit?

I'll tell you what, though, it must be
funny as hell to see you in those Nashville gay bars telling dudes "I'm
with someone."

Yes, it would be funny if it ever happened.

dave weil wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:08:21 GMT, trotsky wrote:



dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:



So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.


Apparently, so does grammar...


That's grammatically correct, dave.


No it's not. "So "facts suck" is basically you are excuse" is
grammatically incorrect.


Oh, well, you've caught me misspelling a word I guess. Naturally you're
going to ask Bruce Richman how he managed to spell the word "lying" as
"lieing", right?

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:25:27 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Oh, well, you've caught me misspelling a word I guess. Naturally you're
going to ask Bruce Richman how he managed to spell the word "lying" as
"lieing", right?

After hundreds of cases of "misspelling", one would think you'd give
it up.

It's not misspelling - you can't tell when your supposed to use you're
pronouns (mistakes intentional)...

Gregipus Grammaticus tiptoes through the tulips.

I'm less gay that you, dave.

Is this a grammar lecture or a dick-sucking demo? Take as much time as
you need, etc.

Glans, I said:

I'm less gay than you, dave.

LOL!

Now that was funny, wasn't it.

George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus Grammaticus tiptoes through the tulips.


I'm less gay that you, dave.


Is this a grammar lecture or a dick-sucking demo? Take as much time as
you need, etc.


Hey, did those wacky scientists ever get around to identifying the gay gene?

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:01 GMT, trotsky wrote:



George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus Grammaticus tiptoes through the tulips.


I'm less gay that you, dave.


Is this a grammar lecture or a dick-sucking demo? Take as much time as
you need, etc.


Hey, did those wacky scientists ever get around to identifying the gay gene?

Yes, he's depicted on your web site. He's appropriately enough on your
"Kontact" page, replete with chic white Ethan Allen sofa and a bottle
of "Zinf"...

....hmmmm, I wonder if this web site is just a cleverly coded dating
service...

dave weil said:

Yes, he's depicted on your web site. He's appropriately enough on your
"Kontact" page, replete with chic white Ethan Allen sofa and a bottle
of "Zinf"...

...hmmmm, I wonder if this web site is just a cleverly coded dating
service...

Now that Gregipus has revealed he's exclusively a rough trade
customer, maybe the clues will be subtler. Is there, perhaps, a whip
hiding behind the roses, or a set of cuffs in the shadows in the
"factory"?

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:39:34 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Hey, no fair, you're being unfairly influenced by your family members
and the Royals.

'****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
does it?

--
td

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:39:34 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Hey, no fair, you're being unfairly influenced by your family members
and the Royals.


'****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
does it?


No, but it does sound like a particularly good night out with your
mistresses.

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:28:22 GMT, trotsky wrote:

'****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
does it?

No, but it does sound like a particularly good night out with your
mistresses.

That's the second time you made me laugh in as many years. Well done.

--
td

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:28:22 GMT, trotsky wrote:


'****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
does it?


No, but it does sound like a particularly good night out with your
mistresses.


That's the second time you made me laugh in as many years. Well done.


Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
because he's gay though--right?

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:49:45 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
because he's gay though--right?

You make as much sense as Greg.

Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.

--
td

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
because he's gay though--right?

You make as much sense as Greg.

Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.

I would like my "symapathy" now, please.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:21:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky wrote:


dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky
wrote:



Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how
bad a job you did when attempting to review my speakers.
Unfortunately, George's comments are mostly agenda driven these
days, so the chance of getting anything useful out of him is
slim. As ever, this group isn't much on useful information.


Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.

I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
speakers.


I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random
comments.


That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.



That's all I deal in.

So, you've come out of the closet then?

Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up
with a few random comments too.


And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?

s******


It cost me a lot more than that.

I'm sorry if it cost you sales. Maybe if you hadn't interfered and
****ed me off...


Yup, Weil is really impressed with his own power as a market maker. Brings
out the dominatrix...