http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

--
td

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?



When did your gay family members decide to get into the speaker biz?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
news


The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.

Robert Morein wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
news

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:


http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?


No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.


How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?

You can crawl back in your rat hole now.

Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.

How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?

Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
Did you try to wing it without research when you were in college?

George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.


No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?


No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.



How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?


Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.


I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?

Greg, how many times have you mistaken the Chicago sewer system for
the Ganges River?

How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?

Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

Inability to answer noted.


FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.

I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?

For the fourth time, you may not suck my dick.

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:56:59 GMT, trotsky wrote:

When did your gay family members decide to get into the speaker biz?

When all the ******s started growing a pair of testicles.

--
td

P.S. Now we've seen your limited-editon, UK-only 'orchestration', what
will you be listening to in your Ford Focus?

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:56:59 GMT, trotsky wrote:


When did your gay family members decide to get into the speaker biz?


When all the ******s started growing a pair of testicles.


Are you making fun of Middius? Why I laugh?

George M. Middius wrote:

Greg, how many times have you mistaken the Chicago sewer system for
the Ganges River?


How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?


Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?


Inability to answer noted.



FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.



I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?


For the fourth time, you may not suck my dick.



Oops, audio related. Kryptonite!

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:44:08 GMT, trotsky wrote:



George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.


No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?


No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.



How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?


Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.


I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?

Greg, why don't you just ask George for a date outright? It will do
you good to come clean with yourself.

dave weil said:

Greg, why don't you just ask George for a date outright? It will do
you good to come clean with yourself.

He knows he can't touch that.

dave weil wrote:
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:44:08 GMT, trotsky wrote:



George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.



No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.



How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?


Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.


I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?


Greg, why don't you just ask George for a date outright? It will do
you good to come clean with yourself.


Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
much on useful information.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
much on useful information.

Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.

I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
speakers.

So, when George turns you down for a date, do you think you'll cry?

Robert Morein wrote:


"George M. Middius" wrote in message
news


The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.









There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements, they still
beat Gerg's claim that all the public needs to do is trust his "years of audio
experience".
I'd also want to know if these speakers have passed the famous Chicago/Gerg
"limp dick" test for speaker potency.




Bruce J. Richman

"trotsky" wrote in message
...


George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.


No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?


No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.



How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?


Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.


I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?

Just the good ones.

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
much on useful information.


Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.

I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
speakers.


I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.
Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
few random comments too.

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Robert Morein wrote:



"George M. Middius" wrote in message
news

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:


http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?


No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.










There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements, they still
beat Gerg's claim that all the public needs to do is trust his "years of audio
experience".
I'd also want to know if these speakers have passed the famous Chicago/Gerg
"limp dick" test for speaker potency.


Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here that
doesn't think that I'm more capable of recognizing good sound than you?
Show some honesty for a change.

Michael Mckelvy wrote:
"trotsky" wrote in message
...


George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.



No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.


How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?


Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.


I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?


Just the good ones.


Mine are very good. I must've spent gobs of cash on research.

On 10 Nov 2003 04:51:21 GMT, (Bruce J. Richman)
wrote:

There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements,

LOL!

--
td

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky wrote:

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
much on useful information.


Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.

I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
speakers.


I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.

That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.

Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
few random comments too.

And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?

s******

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here

Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
the closet.

Why do you try alt.scourged.priest?

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
On 10 Nov 2003 04:51:21 GMT, (Bruce J. Richman)
wrote:


There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements,


LOL!


You lie. You've never laughed at a Richman post in your life.

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky wrote:


dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky wrote:



Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
much on useful information.


Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.

I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
speakers.


I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.


That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.



That's all I deal in.


Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
few random comments too.


And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?

s******


It cost me a lot more than that.

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here


Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
the closet.


dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays. Nashville has a lot of
them, right. Aren't you going to tell us some of your best friends are
gay, or something equally fruity as that? Do you rationalize it as
being a part of the "queer eye for the straight guy" concept?

"trotsky" wrote in message


Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance
of getting anything useful out of him is slim.

Refresh my memory. When was it that George's comments weren't agenda-driven?

;-)

Methinks you are just a very slow learner, Singh.

As ever, this group isn't much on useful information.

Ask a honest audio-related question and if I can, I'll give you an honest
answer.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:21:43 GMT, trotsky wrote:

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky wrote:


dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky wrote:



Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
much on useful information.


Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.

I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
speakers.


I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.


That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.



That's all I deal in.

So, you've come out of the closet then?

Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
few random comments too.


And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?

s******


It cost me a lot more than that.

I'm sorry if it cost you sales. Maybe if you hadn't interfered and
****ed me off...

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:23:57 GMT, trotsky wrote:

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here


Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
the closet.


dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

More than you? I don't think so.

Nashville has a lot of them, right. Aren't you going to tell us some of your best friends are
gay, or something equally fruity as that?

One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.

Do you rationalize it as being a part of the "queer eye for the straight guy" concept?

No, I rationalize it as it being the orientation of one of my close
friends.

Gayipus is envious of dave.

dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Gayipus is envious of dave.

dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.

That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.

(How's *that* for a straight line)?

dave weil said:

Gayipus is envious of dave.

dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.

That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.

(How's *that* for a straight line)?

Very manly.

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:23:57 GMT, trotsky wrote:


dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky wrote:



Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here


Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
the closet.


dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.


More than you? I don't think so.


Nashville has a lot of them, right. Aren't you going to tell us some of your best friends are
gay, or something equally fruity as that?


One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.


That was a bit predictable.

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Gayipus is envious of dave.


dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.


That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.


That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:18:02 GMT, trotsky wrote:

One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.


That was a bit predictable.

In the real world, many of us straight people have close friends that
are gay, so I guess it would be predictable. In fact, I HOPE that it
would be predictable. Homophobia is so 50s, you know.

You're not going be able to fight your gayness much longer Greg. Might
as well track down that model on your web site now rather than later.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:49 GMT, trotsky wrote:

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Gayipus is envious of dave.


dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.


That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.


That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.

It's only *my* motto for *me*. What others do is their business.

dave weil said:

You're not going be able to fight your gayness much longer Greg. Might
as well track down that model on your web site now rather than later.

Now that Gregipus has so little steady income, he might consider
branching out. After all, most hustlers are "straight". Of course,
most of them are good-looking too.....

Greg Singh wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Robert Morein wrote:



"George M. Middius" wrote in message
news

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:


http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?


No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.










There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of
data
in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements, they
still
beat Gerg's claim that all the public needs to do is trust his "years of
audio
experience".
I'd also want to know if these speakers have passed the famous Chicago/Gerg
"limp dick" test for speaker potency.


Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here that
doesn't think that I'm more capable of recognizing good sound than you?
Show some honesty for a change.









Your credibility is zero, Greg. And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


Bruce J. Richman

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:18:02 GMT, trotsky wrote:


One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.


That was a bit predictable.


In the real world, many of us straight people have close friends that
are gay,


Wait, so you're saying that the majority of contributors to
rec.audio.opinion have close friends that are gay? Devil, do you agree
with this?

dave weil wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:49 GMT, trotsky wrote:


dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
wrote:



Gayipus is envious of dave.



dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.


That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.


That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.


It's only *my* motto for *me*. What others do is their business.



Wow, it's like the Spin Doctors just made a comeback.