Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Lionel" wrote in message


sam a écrit :


Gosh - what did I make today - $9575.00 only.
Yep - a slow day!

So much money !!!
Nothing better to do ? LOL !

You might want to ask what the $9575 was. Just guessing,

but

it was probably a commission on a real estate sale. That
means that the $9575 was gross income for a sales
organization, not an amount of money that a single
individual added to his taxable gross income for the

year.


Arnie, you moron.
$9575 would be a 7% commission on a $127,667 house.
More likely it is his 25% selling or
buying agent's cut of a 7% commission on a $510,667 house.

Those are just derivatives of what I said, Art. Since you
claim that I am a moron, that makes you a person whose best
efforts are derivatives of statements from a moron.


You know that he doesn't work in the slums of Detroit.

Just goes to show what an idiot you are, Art. There's plenty
of $500,000 properties in the slums of Detroit, they are
just not typical single-family dwellings. I guess Art that
you are so stupid that I need to point out to you that real
estate encompasses a wide range of properties including
multiple dwellings, stores, factories, large parcels of
land, and other commercial properties.




Thanks for admitting that Surf's commission was on a $500,000+ property!

So what ?

"Lionel" wrote in message

Clyde Slick a écrit :

Thanks for admitting that Surf's commission was on a
$500,000+ property!

So what ?

Exactly. "So what" is a valid response to most of what
Sackman posts here. What he finds remarkble is to most
people, less than trivial.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Clyde Slick a écrit :

Thanks for admitting that Surf's commission was on a
$500,000+ property!

So what ?

Exactly. "So what" is a valid response to most of what
Sackman posts here. What he finds remarkble is to most
people, less than trivial.


Well it was anything but trivial to *YOU*. You lost it completely, again.

Cheers,

Margaret


PS. How's your wife?

Margaret von B. said:

Thanks for admitting that Surf's commission was on a
$500,000+ property!

"So what" is a valid response to most of what
Sackman posts here. What he finds remarkble is to most
people, less than trivial.

Well it was anything but trivial to *YOU*. You lost it completely, again.

Now Margaret, maybe we should give poor Krooger a break. He has confessed on a
couple of occasions that he gets into so many arguments, he can't be expected to
remember what he's claimed in every single one of them.

As you noted, earlier in this same thread poor Arnii claimed that Tom was
exaggerating the amount he earned on that sale. Arnii invented a fact-free way
of interpreting the reported commission in order to rationalize his baseless
claim.

Now Krooger is, uh, feigning stupidity in order to admit he was talking out of
his ass as usual. (Was Arnii feigning? Only the unconsulted psychiatrist knows
for sure.)

When it comes to the Krooborg and its trio of Kroopologists, any dodge is
acceptable. This is the "debating trade", after all. ;-)

"Margaret von B." wrote
in
message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Clyde Slick a écrit :

Thanks for admitting that Surf's commission was on a
$500,000+ property!

So what ?

Exactly. "So what" is a valid response to most of what
Sackman posts here. What he finds remarkble is to most
people, less than trivial.


Well it was anything but trivial to *YOU*.

OK, so I was having a little fun at Art's expense.

You lost it completely, again.

All I lost is my composure, laughing way too hard.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Margaret von B." wrote
in
message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

Clyde Slick a écrit :

Thanks for admitting that Surf's commission was on a
$500,000+ property!

So what ?

Exactly. "So what" is a valid response to most of what
Sackman posts here. What he finds remarkble is to most
people, less than trivial.


Well it was anything but trivial to *YOU*.

OK, so I was having a little fun at Art's expense.

You lost it completely, again.

All I lost is my composure, laughing way too hard.



Sure. At least 2 umm..."things" believe you.

Cheers,

Margaret

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...


OK, so I was having a little fun at Art's expense.


You owe me a qaurter, "at least".



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...


OK, so I was having a little fun at Art's expense.


You owe me a qaurter, "at least".

So what's a qaurter, Art?

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...


OK, so I was having a little fun at Art's expense.


You owe me a qaurter, "at least".

So what's a qaurter, Art?


The portion of SackO's brain that still functions?

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...


OK, so I was having a little fun at Art's expense.


You owe me a qaurter, "at least".

So what's a qaurter, Art?



A country in the Middle East?
Learn how to psell, maroon!!



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----