Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"sam" wrote in message
What are the nature of the audio discussions here? Mostly flames and personal attacks. Many written at the third grade, or lower level. Many scatological references. Continual bashing of most religions, political, and sexual persuasions. Some years ago some highly pathological individuals decided to take this place over to elimiate opinions that they disagreed with. It takes a lot of intense work to keep an entire Usenet group this fouled-up, but they are willing to make any sacrifice in an ongoing futile attempt to have their way. If you remember that old-old Star Trek episode about a creature that spawned conflict and strife so that it could feast on hatred and malice, you've got a pretty good idea about what's been happening here for the last 5 or more years. When opinions are solicited, do responses come from personal experience or from theory? Most responses here are full of personal animosity, bile and crap. There are other Usenet and HTML-baed audio groups. If you are serious about audio, go there. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
James Randi gets clarified on audio biz | High End Audio | |||
ALL amps are equal?? | Car Audio | |||
A comparative versus evaluative, double-blind vs. sighted control test | High End Audio | |||
Comments about Blind Testing | High End Audio | |||
Mechanic blames amplifier for alternator failing?? Help>>>>>>>>>>> | Car Audio |