George M. Middius wrote:
This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.


I did not say that. I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to determine
validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his reputation has to be
proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
ink.net

George M. Middius wrote:
This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.

I did not say that.

Of course not. It's the Middius "Big Lie" technique.

I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to
determine validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his
reputation has to be proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the month,
will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that he won't feel
that he totally wasted his money.

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the month,
will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that he won't feel
that he totally wasted his money.


LOL you really are dense. I prefer you don't answer the lawsuit. This is about
the 10th time I have said this in no uncertain terms. You are amazingly stupid.
I have said I think you are not because you are basically a coward who has no
desire to face off with anyone in the real world. But the fact remains that
life is much simpler with a default judgement. I also think you are simply
incapable of answering the lawsuit by yourself. You cannot even find filing
fees and you have yet to show any understanding of the law.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the
month, will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that
he won't feel that he totally wasted his money.


LOL you really are dense. I prefer you don't answer the lawsuit.

That's an amusing change for you, sockpuppet wheel.

This is about the 10th time I have said this in no uncertain terms.

Prove it.

You are amazingly stupid.

You are amazingly vacuous,

I have said I think you are not because you are
basically a coward who has no desire to face off with anyone in the
real world.

A reply to a lawsuit intentionally filed thousands of miles away to put me
at a maximal disadvantage is hardly "facing off". It just shows what a thug
you are, sockpuppet wheel. You hide behind an alias everytime you post. That
says enough about your cowardice for most to see.

But the fact remains that life is much simpler with a
default judgement.

It's simpler for the court.

I also think you are simply incapable of answering
the lawsuit by yourself.

Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a lawyer
and colleted on it, eh?

You cannot even find filing fees and you have yet to show any
understanding of the law.

You're wrong about that, but what is new?

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:35:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a lawyer
and colleted on it, eh?

Case number, liar?

--
td

"The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra" wrote in message
news:l77bpv4pqps4v3bjopjaavgq3dmmtl0f8o@rdmzrnewst xt.nz
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:35:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a
lawyer and colleted on it, eh?

Case number, liar?

When I cashed the settlement check, I disposed of all the paper work.

I leave it to you and your great genius to figure out why.

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:03:11 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra" wrote in message
news:l77bpv4pqps4v3bjopjaavgq3dmmtl0f8o@rdmzrnews txt.nz
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:35:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a
lawyer and colleted on it, eh?

Case number, liar?

When I cashed the settlement check, I disposed of all the paper work.

I leave it to you and your great genius to figure out why.

Because you're lying.

I'm afraid that didn't take much figuring out.

--
td

Arny said

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the
month, will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that
he won't feel that he totally wasted his money.


I said


LOL you really are dense. I prefer you don't answer the lawsuit.

Arny said


That's an amusing change for you, sockpuppet wheel.


No. You just don't pay attention.


I said


This is about the 10th time I have said this in no uncertain terms.


Arny said


Prove it.


Why? You think I care what goes on in your screwed up head.

I said




You are amazingly stupid.


Arny said


You are amazingly vacuous,


I know you are but what am I?

I said


I have said I think you are not because you are
basically a coward who has no desire to face off with anyone in the
real world.

Arny said

A reply to a lawsuit intentionally filed thousands of miles away to put me
at a maximal disadvantage is hardly "facing off". It just shows what a thug
you are, sockpuppet wheel.

Go cry to your mommy then. Coward. You were pretty puffed up about running up
my legal fees and putting a lien on my house before I filed. What happened?
Could it be you were full of ****?


Arny said

You hide behind an alias everytime you post. That
says enough about your cowardice for most to see.

Yeah my e mail address is an alias. that shows what an idiot your are.


I said


But the fact remains that life is much simpler with a
default judgement.

Arny said


It's simpler for the court.

And for me.

I said


I also think you are simply incapable of answering
the lawsuit by yourself.

Arny said


Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a lawyer
and colleted on it, eh?


I still think you are all talk.

I said


You cannot even find filing fees and you have yet to show any
understanding of the law.


Arny said


You're wrong about that, but what is new?

Bull****. But of course you were never one to let the facts get in the way of
your fantasies.

Joseph Oberlander said:

This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.

I did not say that. I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to determine
validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his reputation has to be
proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.

Let's reinforce the general impression of how ignorant you are. Here's
another of your gems:

Usenet alone is well known for being a massive flame and ****ing
contest comparable to IRC. No judge will consider anything said
in such a forum seriously.

Your exact words, Obie. I've never yet seen you retract any of the
little nuggets of stupidity you plop on Usenet. Of course nobody will
sue you for saying stupid things. But why don't you have any pride in
the way the rest of us see you?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message


But why don't you have any pride in the way the rest of us see you?

If irony killed...

It's a well-known fact that Middius is one of the most-hated individuals
among all the audio groups in Usenet. He gets less and less sympathy on on
RAO because some of his *supporters" are sockpuppets, others are afraid of
him, some are naive, and a few of them are as sociopathic as he is.

George M. Middius wrote:

Let's reinforce the general impression of how ignorant you are. Here's
another of your gems:

Usenet alone is well known for being a massive flame and ****ing
contest comparable to IRC. No judge will consider anything said
in such a forum seriously.

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every single
posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every single
posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.








Oberlander joins Arny in his inability to tell the difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accusation.

S888Wheel wrote:

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every single
posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.









Oberlander joins Arny in his inability to tell the difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accusation.

Do you really need my point of view ?

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every
single posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.

Oberlander joins Arny in his inability to tell the difference between
an opinion and a libelous false accusation.

Let's talk about a bozo who reads a post in rec.audio.opinion and says:
That's not an opinion.

LOL!

I did not say that. I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to determine
validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his reputation has to be
proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.

You can say anything you want when you are just making things up.

S888Wheel wrote:

I did not say that. I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to determine
validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his reputation has to be
proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.


You can say anything you want when you are just making things up.

No, that's the nitty-gritty part of civil award cases. At some point,
it moves from proving your case to proving that you are worthy of
$5000.

Of course a free 5 minute consultation with a lawyer would have
determined if the case was winnable for more than pocket change.

Joseph Oberlander wrote:

Of course a free 5 minute consultation with a lawyer would have
determined if the case was winnable for more than pocket change.

LOL!

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:10:03 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote:

I did not say that. I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to determine
validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his reputation has to be
proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.


You can say anything you want when you are just making things up.

No, that's the nitty-gritty part of civil award cases. At some point,
it moves from proving your case to proving that you are worthy of
$5000.

Of course a free 5 minute consultation with a lawyer would have
determined if the case was winnable for more than pocket change.

How much hair do you have bursting out of your nostrils, you revolting
thing, you? Would you care to refute this claim, you mother****ing
piece of trash?

--
td