You just came up with another reason why any suit filed by any of the 21 or
more Scott Wheeler's would be laughed out of court were he stoopid enough to
waste his money filing.

Libel is harm to a specific individual or legal entity or legal class
thereof.

Since the most I can possibly know is that "Scott Wheeler" is one of 21 or
more different people in California (none of them have specifically
identified themselves to me), it's impossible for any of the 21 or more
Scott Wheelers to prove in court that I specificially libelled him.

Because I am well-known on RAO to be a very specific person (one with a
proper address and published picture) it comes down to the ironic fact that
sockpuppet wheel can libel me, but until he properly establishes his
identity, he can't properly be libelled.

IOW there's a lot more reasons why I can sue Greg Singh, Marc Phillips or
George Middius, than reasons why sockpuppet Wheel can sue me. Obviously,
Greg Singh is the easiest target since he lives so close, and is so easy to
trace down through his new business.

Come to think of it, this would be public service I could perform. I could
sue Greg for libel, and save lots of people from wasting their money on his
speakers.

LOL!








You know what you have to do to avoid a lawsuit and you know the deadline. Sept
20th.

S888Wheel said to ****-for-Brains:

You know what you have to do to avoid a lawsuit and you know the deadline. Sept 20th.


As all RAO regulars know, Michigander Arnii Krooger accused
Californian Scott Wheeler of being a pedophile, and Wheeler took such
offense that he threatened to sue Krooger for libel unless the
accusation is retracted. So far, Krooger has attempted to ply his
"debating trade" garbage rather than comply. This has consisted of
impugning the legal knowledge of everybody who has offered an informed
opinion of libel law, making up alleged "legal principles" out of thin
air, and (as usual) twisting what people say and throwing in a
generous helping of meaningless lies. In short, Krooger has been
unable to recognize that Wheeler is not just playing the RAO game as
usual, but apparently intends to pursue his claim to a court in the
real world. Wheeler gave Krooger until Sept. 20 to retract the post
and apologize for it.

My prediction: On Sept. 19 or 20 -- but not before -- Krooger will
comply in a half-assed way. He will claim that he consulted a lawyer
or lawyers earlier, but the lawyers lied to him. He'll also claim he
did voluminous research on libel law in Michigan, California, and the
U.S., but the books he read lied to him. He'll further claim that
although he made the post, it wasn't really his fault, because
Wheeler's "teammates" or "co-conspirators" or "fellow paid character
assassins" have made the same accusation against Krooger. Or because
RAO has been a nasty little playground for years. Or because Wheeler
"insulted" Krooger at some point. Or some other flimsy excuse. In
short, the apology will be unsatisfactory because Krooger will avoid
taking responsibility for what he said.

George M. Middius a écrit :

S888Wheel said to ****-for-Brains:


You know what you have to do to avoid a lawsuit and you know the deadline. Sept 20th.



As all RAO regulars know, Michigander Arnii Krooger accused
Californian Scott Wheeler of being a pedophile, and Wheeler took such
offense that he threatened to sue Krooger for libel unless the
accusation is retracted. So far, Krooger has attempted to ply his
"debating trade" garbage rather than comply. This has consisted of
impugning the legal knowledge of everybody who has offered an informed
opinion of libel law, making up alleged "legal principles" out of thin
air, and (as usual) twisting what people say and throwing in a
generous helping of meaningless lies. In short, Krooger has been
unable to recognize that Wheeler is not just playing the RAO game as
usual, but apparently intends to pursue his claim to a court in the
real world. Wheeler gave Krooger until Sept. 20 to retract the post
and apologize for it.

My prediction: On Sept. 19 or 20 -- but not before -- Krooger will
comply in a half-assed way. He will claim that he consulted a lawyer
or lawyers earlier, but the lawyers lied to him. He'll also claim he
did voluminous research on libel law in Michigan, California, and the
U.S., but the books he read lied to him. He'll further claim that
although he made the post, it wasn't really his fault, because
Wheeler's "teammates" or "co-conspirators" or "fellow paid character
assassins" have made the same accusation against Krooger. Or because
RAO has been a nasty little playground for years. Or because Wheeler
"insulted" Krooger at some point. Or some other flimsy excuse. In
short, the apology will be unsatisfactory because Krooger will avoid
taking responsibility for what he said.





Unfortunatly Georg "Nostradamus" Middious' predictions are never very
useful for himself.
If yes, he would immediatly stop posting on RAO... CQFD !
I've already told you that Middious you should turn your thumb 1,000
times in your ass before typing anything...
Caution : I suggest you to suppress all spaces in you futur texts (LOL)

I wrote:

This Google search returns 2 phone numbers for Scott Wheelers in CA,
one residing in Benicia and the other in Glendale:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...+Wheeler%22+CA

Is either one of them you, Scott?

There's even more Scott Wheelers, including a few attornies:
http://www.google.com/search?sa=X&oi...+Wheeler%22+CA

Looks like you may be in trouble here, Arny.

Even if Scott does not ultimately prevail in his lawsuit against you, it
appears that you're
going to have to spend quite a bit of money to defend yourself, whereas Scott
will be
getting all the legal advice he needs for free from his father.

Holy guacomole, even more Scott Wheelers, 21 in total:
http://www.google.com/search?sa=X&oi...+Wheeler%22+CA


GeoSynch




Why the sudden interest in Scott Wheelers?