Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings,
This is my first post to the group and I think I've come to the right place based on some Google searches. I've been thinking about putting together my own home studio, all digital, for a few years now and only lately have been very seriously trying to make sense of all the gobbledygook that the digital pro audio/engineering world has to offer (especially those cryptic ads where there's a lot of talk and buzzwords but after you're done reading, you have no idea what they are trying to sell you). At any rate, I've been a musician for probably two-thirds of my life now, have done a little recording work on a four-track of my own and have also participated in a few small studio sessions, so I'm no stranger to the whole prospect of having my own studio. Furthermore, I'm an electrical/software engineer so I'm not at all intimidated by anything the pro audio world has to offer, given enough time to experiment and understand it. Ultimately what I am going to do is be recording mostly instrumentals -- my saxes, guitars, and synthesizers. So I figure I can get by with something that has a fancy mic preamp for the audio stuff, MIDI and line ins for the synths, and line ins for the guitars. I don't envision this studio being a big thing where a band can actually come in, just me messing around, one track/one instrument at a time, and perfecting a great mix. ![]() Okay, to get down to brass tacks, what I'm looking for is a direct-to-computer (I have a top-of-the-line Alienware system that would easily handle digital recording), so I started by looking at the smaller units to get my feet wet -- the Lexicon Omega and Digidesign Mbox bundles, both available at musiciansfriend.com. Thus far, this is what I've decided: Lexicon Omega ------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, "just enough" inputs and connection types, comes with Cubase Cons: Comes with Cubase ![]() Digidesign Mbox --------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, comes with Pro Tools Cons: No MIDI connections, fewer connections than the Omega Furthermore, in doing my research, a couple of other things came to mind. One, Pro Tools seems to be the gold standard for software, although I have heard nothing bad about Cubase or any of the other software packages. Two, price-wise, it goes from the relatively modest Mbox ($300-$500) to the Digi002R ($1300). That's a lot of shekels! So the Lexicon is both more attractively priced and has more of the types of inputs I think I'd need (I'd call them more generous than Digi) but it would put me into the Cubase camp (and I really don't want to try cross-platforming, using Cubase on a Digi or Pro Tools on the Lexicon -- the bundles that are being sold are tailored for each device). So right now, I'm leaning towards Digidesign, but I'm having a hard time "getting over the hump" in moving from the Mbox to a Digi002(R). I really want to be able to "put Pro Tools on my resume" as it were but I'm concerned that there's no intermediate box between the Mbox and the 002R that has MIDI (and, ignorant as I am about such things, I'm *assuming* I will need MIDI connections to get the MIDI from the Korg KARMA and Yamaha S90 I'm planning on buying) into my Alienware -- does that sound right?) Here's a few more parameters to keep in mind if you are planning on providing some advice: a. Space is not an issue, or won't be in the future when I buy a house b. Money is not too much of an issue, but it quickly could be depending on what I wish I could buy Anyway, I really appreciate any help you old pros could provide for me. I'm really looking for all feedback, good, bad or indifferent. Many thanks, Mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Jan 2005 19:45:27 -0800, "Zerex71" wrote:
Lexicon Omega ------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, "just enough" inputs and connection types, comes with Cubase Cons: Comes with Cubase ![]() Digidesign Mbox --------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, comes with Pro Tools Cons: No MIDI connections, fewer connections than the Omega I'm not familiar with these two units but I would guess that these "everything-in-one" boxes are usually a compromise. If you are serious about good sound, you'd be much better off getting a dedicated mic pre and dedicated converters, or a sound card/midi interface such as those made by RME. Software such as Samplitude or Nuendo can sound just as good or better than ProTools. You said money "wasn't too much of an issue" so why not shoot a little higher? Al |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Jan 2005 19:45:27 -0800, "Zerex71" wrote:
Greetings, snipped The toughest thing for most folks wanting to record at home is hearing what you're doing. It seems like a gimme until you get rolling; then, it's a serious issue. Good fortune, Chris Hornbeck "someone might think it's more valuable in the future than he did in the pasture." -Mike Rivers |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're going for seamless integration with VSTi's and high end DSP cards
like the UAD-1 and Powercore without using wrappers and other workarounds my advice for a full featured native system that is easy to learn and use would be to go with Cubase SX or Nuendo. Samplitude would be another very good option. If you're serious about this and have the budget you will put your money into good gear, not an MBox or Lexi. I would start by analyzing the room you will be using and treating it appropriately. The best gear in the world will be of little use to you if you can't hear what it's doing. Though the marketing mooks would like you to believe that everything can be done on the cheap if you just buy *their* magic box, it's just ain't so. :O) DJ "Zerex71" wrote in message oups.com... Greetings, This is my first post to the group and I think I've come to the right place based on some Google searches. I've been thinking about putting together my own home studio, all digital, for a few years now and only lately have been very seriously trying to make sense of all the gobbledygook that the digital pro audio/engineering world has to offer (especially those cryptic ads where there's a lot of talk and buzzwords but after you're done reading, you have no idea what they are trying to sell you). At any rate, I've been a musician for probably two-thirds of my life now, have done a little recording work on a four-track of my own and have also participated in a few small studio sessions, so I'm no stranger to the whole prospect of having my own studio. Furthermore, I'm an electrical/software engineer so I'm not at all intimidated by anything the pro audio world has to offer, given enough time to experiment and understand it. Ultimately what I am going to do is be recording mostly instrumentals -- my saxes, guitars, and synthesizers. So I figure I can get by with something that has a fancy mic preamp for the audio stuff, MIDI and line ins for the synths, and line ins for the guitars. I don't envision this studio being a big thing where a band can actually come in, just me messing around, one track/one instrument at a time, and perfecting a great mix. ![]() Okay, to get down to brass tacks, what I'm looking for is a direct-to-computer (I have a top-of-the-line Alienware system that would easily handle digital recording), so I started by looking at the smaller units to get my feet wet -- the Lexicon Omega and Digidesign Mbox bundles, both available at musiciansfriend.com. Thus far, this is what I've decided: Lexicon Omega ------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, "just enough" inputs and connection types, comes with Cubase Cons: Comes with Cubase ![]() Digidesign Mbox --------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, comes with Pro Tools Cons: No MIDI connections, fewer connections than the Omega Furthermore, in doing my research, a couple of other things came to mind. One, Pro Tools seems to be the gold standard for software, although I have heard nothing bad about Cubase or any of the other software packages. Two, price-wise, it goes from the relatively modest Mbox ($300-$500) to the Digi002R ($1300). That's a lot of shekels! So the Lexicon is both more attractively priced and has more of the types of inputs I think I'd need (I'd call them more generous than Digi) but it would put me into the Cubase camp (and I really don't want to try cross-platforming, using Cubase on a Digi or Pro Tools on the Lexicon -- the bundles that are being sold are tailored for each device). So right now, I'm leaning towards Digidesign, but I'm having a hard time "getting over the hump" in moving from the Mbox to a Digi002(R). I really want to be able to "put Pro Tools on my resume" as it were but I'm concerned that there's no intermediate box between the Mbox and the 002R that has MIDI (and, ignorant as I am about such things, I'm *assuming* I will need MIDI connections to get the MIDI from the Korg KARMA and Yamaha S90 I'm planning on buying) into my Alienware -- does that sound right?) Here's a few more parameters to keep in mind if you are planning on providing some advice: a. Space is not an issue, or won't be in the future when I buy a house b. Money is not too much of an issue, but it quickly could be depending on what I wish I could buy Anyway, I really appreciate any help you old pros could provide for me. I'm really looking for all feedback, good, bad or indifferent. Many thanks, Mike |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Zerex71 wrote: Ultimately what I am going to do is be recording mostly instrumentals -- my saxes, guitars, and synthesizers. Percussion of any kind ? So I figure I can get by with something that has a fancy mic preamp for the audio stuff, MIDI and line ins for the synths, and line ins for the guitars. You may be want to allow a mic channel for guitar, be it electric -or- acoustic. Furthermore, in doing my research, a couple of other things came to mind. One, Pro Tools seems to be the gold standard for software, Yes, it's a legend in it's own mind ;- although I have heard nothing bad about Cubase or any of the other software packages. Two, price-wise, it goes from the relatively modest Mbox ($300-$500) to the Digi002R ($1300). That's a lot of shekels! So the Lexicon is both more attractively priced and has more of the types of inputs I think I'd need (I'd call them more generous than Digi) but it would put me into the Cubase camp (and I really don't want to try cross-platforming, using Cubase on a Digi or Pro Tools on the Lexicon -- the bundles that are being sold are tailored for each device). Not so. The only restriction here is Digi/ProTools. ProTools MUST see Digi hardware to run. Any other s/w can record/play with any other hardware, with very few exceptions and none that I'm aware of for Steinberg. So right now, I'm leaning towards Digidesign, but I'm having a hard time "getting over the hump" in moving from the Mbox to a Digi002(R). I really want to be able to "put Pro Tools on my resume" as it were but I'm concerned that there's no intermediate box between the Mbox and the 002R that has MIDI (and, ignorant as I am about such things, I'm The 002 IS the 'intermediate' box. *assuming* I will need MIDI connections to get the MIDI from the Korg KARMA and Yamaha S90 I'm planning on buying) into my Alienware -- does that sound right?) You may already have MIDI functionality and just need a pigtail to interface. Does the PC have any exising soundcard ? You might just add a 2 channel mic pre into that to start (and maybe a decent 2 channel sound card- Maudio,Echo etc.) and get a trial version of Cubase or something similar. Here's a few more parameters to keep in mind if you are planning on providing some advice: a. Space is not an issue, or won't be in the future when I buy a house b. Money is not too much of an issue, but it quickly could be depending on what I wish I could buy Anyway, I really appreciate any help you old pros could provide for me. I'm really looking for all feedback, good, bad or indifferent. Many thanks, Mike Ever do any 'jamming' ? It's easy to use up 4-5 record channels when 2 people start playing together, and don't shut out the idea of having a vocal at some point. Don't sell youself short with a limiting factor like a 2 channel Mbox or such. If you decide Digi/PT the 002R is the real starting point. Do you have any mics ? Does the PC have a sound card ? rd |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Zerex71" wrote in message oups.com... Greetings, This is my first post to the group and I think I've come to the right place based on some Google searches. I've been thinking about putting together my own home studio, all digital, for a few years now and only lately have been very seriously trying to make sense of all the gobbledygook that the digital pro audio/engineering world has to offer (especially those cryptic ads where there's a lot of talk and buzzwords but after you're done reading, you have no idea what they are trying to sell you). At any rate, I've been a musician for probably two-thirds of my life now, have done a little recording work on a four-track of my own and have also participated in a few small studio sessions, so I'm no stranger to the whole prospect of having my own studio. Furthermore, I'm an electrical/software engineer so I'm not at all intimidated by anything the pro audio world has to offer, given enough time to experiment and understand it. Ultimately what I am going to do is be recording mostly instrumentals -- my saxes, guitars, and synthesizers. So I figure I can get by with something that has a fancy mic preamp for the audio stuff, MIDI and line ins for the synths, and line ins for the guitars. I don't envision this studio being a big thing where a band can actually come in, just me messing around, one track/one instrument at a time, and perfecting a great mix. ![]() Okay, to get down to brass tacks, what I'm looking for is a direct-to-computer (I have a top-of-the-line Alienware system that would easily handle digital recording), so I started by looking at the smaller units to get my feet wet -- the Lexicon Omega and Digidesign Mbox bundles, both available at musiciansfriend.com. Thus far, this is what I've decided: Lexicon Omega ------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, "just enough" inputs and connection types, comes with Cubase Cons: Comes with Cubase ![]() Digidesign Mbox --------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, comes with Pro Tools Cons: No MIDI connections, fewer connections than the Omega Furthermore, in doing my research, a couple of other things came to mind. One, Pro Tools seems to be the gold standard for software, although I have heard nothing bad about Cubase or any of the other software packages. Two, price-wise, it goes from the relatively modest Mbox ($300-$500) to the Digi002R ($1300). That's a lot of shekels! So the Lexicon is both more attractively priced and has more of the types of inputs I think I'd need (I'd call them more generous than Digi) but it would put me into the Cubase camp (and I really don't want to try cross-platforming, using Cubase on a Digi or Pro Tools on the Lexicon -- the bundles that are being sold are tailored for each device). So right now, I'm leaning towards Digidesign, but I'm having a hard time "getting over the hump" in moving from the Mbox to a Digi002(R). I really want to be able to "put Pro Tools on my resume" as it were but I'm concerned that there's no intermediate box between the Mbox and the 002R that has MIDI (and, ignorant as I am about such things, I'm *assuming* I will need MIDI connections to get the MIDI from the Korg KARMA and Yamaha S90 I'm planning on buying) into my Alienware -- does that sound right?) Here's a few more parameters to keep in mind if you are planning on providing some advice: a. Space is not an issue, or won't be in the future when I buy a house b. Money is not too much of an issue, but it quickly could be depending on what I wish I could buy Anyway, I really appreciate any help you old pros could provide for me. I'm really looking for all feedback, good, bad or indifferent. Many thanks, Mike Hi Mike, Have you ever considered purchasing a 4 - 8 track open reel recorder and mixer setup ? It's brutally simple that way, will get you recording right away and will most probably sound more natural than some of the digital stuffs that way. Sorry to not have answered your question but it seems painfully complex what you want to do. Good luck, Daniel |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're serious about this and have the budget you will put your
money into good gear, not an MBox or Lexi We have Pro Tools systems ranging from HD to Mix to Mbox. Aside from the i/o and the amount of processing available, there's very little you can't do with an Mbox that you can do with a larger Pro Tools system. Run it on a dual proc G5 and there is very little you cannot do. I do agree with you that the room is of paramount importance. Joe Egan EMP Colchester, VT www.eganmedia.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am starting to think that way, but the main reason I suggested the
all-in-one boxes is that it's me just checking out the entry-level stuff and seeing what they have. To explain what I'm looking for another way, I am well aware of all the engineering that goes into studios -- room layout, modes, standing waves, iso booths, etc. but I'm nowhere near that level and to tell you the truth, I doubt that I ever will be (if I record something pro, I'll go to the studio). The home thing is going to be relatively modest but not "cheap". I am still leaning towards Pro Tools, mostly on the theory that so much pro work is done with it, it would be a good thing for a non-practicing-engineer to be able to go into a studio and understand. Thanks for writing, Mike |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just as a point of clarification -- I'm not going to get into too much
detail as far as analyzing a room and so forth. Right now I have a second bedroom which is my computer room in an apartment, and when I move again (probably to another apartment and then onto a house), I'll be faced with those limitations. That's okay. I'm not trying to get too Right Track Studios on anyone here -- basically, I have heard some simple setups of friends and they have some entry-level gear that they can use to pump out mp3s and wavs and you know what? They sound great for the money. I never buy into the marketing ploys so I am seriously investigating other options, such as dedicated audio units, MIDI units (e.g. MOTU), etc. to interface with my computer. Thanks for writing, Mike |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Joe,
I'm glad to hear someone with some actual exposure to the products I'm talking about, so that's a good reference. My view is that an Mbox system isn't "cheap" and would be just fine, however, I'm starting to think about the question of having enough inputs is important to me. I certainly don't want to get everything set up and and put together only to find out I don't have enough "ins and outs". My only concern is, while I don't know a lot about MIDI (enough to know the basics), if a box can't get MIDI from a synth to my computer, I *know* that's going to be a problem. (Incidentally, the only MIDI devices I'm looking at are two synths -- Yamaha S90 and Korg KARMA, the latter of the two contains a built-in sequencer which would allow me to use the drum kits on either unit as my percussion.) Thanks for writing, Mike |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Percussion: Will be all done by the two synths I'm planning on having,
the Yamaha S90 and the Korg KARMA. The latter has a sequencer which will allow me to control drum kits on either unit. I'm not going to be recording any live drummers because this is just for my own home use, and because I'm not at a musical level where I feel comfortable playing with someone else. (If you knew how much playing I'd done you'd probably think I was nuts, but I'm very very picky about these sorts of things...) Guitar: I'm assuming I can just hook up an output from my Line 6 Vetta II to "the box" (whatever that ends up being). I really don't want to fool with mic'ing a guitar amp. They may have done it that way in the old days but if there's a line out, I'm just going to use that. Digi/Pro Tools: Just to understand you, you're saying that Pro Tools will NOT play with anything but Digi hardware. Is that correct? What about MOTU? PC: It does have a soundcard, oh boy does it ever. Creative Labs SB Audigy 2. Smokes, and I believe it does have a MIDI port but I'm *not* entirely certain. Jamming: Not so much. I've spent so much time in various apartments I gave up the idea of being able to play ANYTHING without headphones. One of these days I'm going to get a house and blow the walls off practicing nonstop. So right now I'm in my "learning" stage where I'm learning all of this stuff, especially about recording, so that when it comes time to record with other people, I won't be figuring it out on the fly. Thanks for writing, Mike |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get a ProTools system, forget Digi002
-bg- -- Hey Hay! The music's gettin' better all the time at www.lchb.ca "Zerex71" wrote in message oups.com... Greetings, This is my first post to the group and I think I've come to the right place based on some Google searches. I've been thinking about putting together my own home studio, all digital, for a few years now and only lately have been very seriously trying to make sense of all the gobbledygook that the digital pro audio/engineering world has to offer (especially those cryptic ads where there's a lot of talk and buzzwords but after you're done reading, you have no idea what they are trying to sell you). At any rate, I've been a musician for probably two-thirds of my life now, have done a little recording work on a four-track of my own and have also participated in a few small studio sessions, so I'm no stranger to the whole prospect of having my own studio. Furthermore, I'm an electrical/software engineer so I'm not at all intimidated by anything the pro audio world has to offer, given enough time to experiment and understand it. Ultimately what I am going to do is be recording mostly instrumentals -- my saxes, guitars, and synthesizers. So I figure I can get by with something that has a fancy mic preamp for the audio stuff, MIDI and line ins for the synths, and line ins for the guitars. I don't envision this studio being a big thing where a band can actually come in, just me messing around, one track/one instrument at a time, and perfecting a great mix. ![]() Okay, to get down to brass tacks, what I'm looking for is a direct-to-computer (I have a top-of-the-line Alienware system that would easily handle digital recording), so I started by looking at the smaller units to get my feet wet -- the Lexicon Omega and Digidesign Mbox bundles, both available at musiciansfriend.com. Thus far, this is what I've decided: Lexicon Omega ------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, "just enough" inputs and connection types, comes with Cubase Cons: Comes with Cubase ![]() Digidesign Mbox --------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, comes with Pro Tools Cons: No MIDI connections, fewer connections than the Omega Furthermore, in doing my research, a couple of other things came to mind. One, Pro Tools seems to be the gold standard for software, although I have heard nothing bad about Cubase or any of the other software packages. Two, price-wise, it goes from the relatively modest Mbox ($300-$500) to the Digi002R ($1300). That's a lot of shekels! So the Lexicon is both more attractively priced and has more of the types of inputs I think I'd need (I'd call them more generous than Digi) but it would put me into the Cubase camp (and I really don't want to try cross-platforming, using Cubase on a Digi or Pro Tools on the Lexicon -- the bundles that are being sold are tailored for each device). So right now, I'm leaning towards Digidesign, but I'm having a hard time "getting over the hump" in moving from the Mbox to a Digi002(R). I really want to be able to "put Pro Tools on my resume" as it were but I'm concerned that there's no intermediate box between the Mbox and the 002R that has MIDI (and, ignorant as I am about such things, I'm *assuming* I will need MIDI connections to get the MIDI from the Korg KARMA and Yamaha S90 I'm planning on buying) into my Alienware -- does that sound right?) Here's a few more parameters to keep in mind if you are planning on providing some advice: a. Space is not an issue, or won't be in the future when I buy a house b. Money is not too much of an issue, but it quickly could be depending on what I wish I could buy Anyway, I really appreciate any help you old pros could provide for me. I'm really looking for all feedback, good, bad or indifferent. Many thanks, Mike |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mike,
I think you've given me the best response so far. Rather than go point-by-point, let me answer back with some more ideas. For starters, regarding the money issue, I think I am pretty much settled that it's going to take a couple grand to get, say, a rack setup that will do the trick. I actually today for the first time sketched out what such a rack might look like: Furman power module Lexicon MPX550 multi-effects unit (for FX inserts) Good mic preamp (got any suggestions?) Audio-USB/FireWire interface box (e.g. MOTU/Digidesign 002R) MIDI-USB/FireWire interface box (e.g. MOTU/Digidesign 002R) and from out of all this, a minimum of cabling to get the sound into my PC. The jump from, say, $450 to $1200 is not really that much of a problem -- I was just kind of shocked thinking you go from this "dinky" Mbox to the 002R and yet the Mbox has so few connections, it seems a bit of a cheat. I guess I knew all along I'd get pushed in the more $$ direction, but I really don't have the desire to turn into solely an audio engineer and have a $50k setup, and yet I absolutely *hate* a cheap, limiting setup, so I'm willing to spend some money in that vast wasteland between $1k-$50k. Know what I mean? The thing about the standalone hard-disk recorder doesn't seem too bad of an idea but the first thing that immediately comes to mind -- because I've looked at these -- is the limitation of a tiny screen whereas a nice LCD flatscreen like I have now on my system would work great for Pro Tools-type work. I'm sure I could totally whip up a nice mix on a standalone but about 10 seconds after I took it home and set it up I'd say to myself, "Why didn't you just use your Alienware? It's built specifically for high-end apps and has the high-speed burning capabilities you want." Plus, I think the computer's going to be, for now, the centerpiece of the setup. I have, on the advice of an old work buddy who sells pro audio gear on the side, looked very closely at the Alesis ADAT, but not close enough to see for myself how it would work for me. Sure, it's got a lot of fancy connections and such but when all is said and done, it has 1-2 40GB hard drives for saving my work to. Well, I already have an internal 250GB drive on the PC and an outboard 120GB drive for backups, so I have more space already. I am staying away from DAWs for now because honestly, I have this mindset at least right now that says, If you have the software package on the computer, which has all the virtual knobs, sliders and controls, why would you need a physical DAW? I'm not particularly wedded to real live equipment (though I am a knob jockey so I totally understand that mindset). So here's a real question I have for you then: Say I get interface boxes to get my signals into my computer. Doesn't Pro Tools then become the software equipment of the DAW (with all the controls)? In other words, why not take advantage of the computer's power rather than buying yet another piece of dedicated hardware? I'm glad you wrote -- please feel free to keep englightening me. Thanks. Mike |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:08:39 -0500, bg** wrote
(in article XeyHd.126397$Xk.105518@pd7tw3no): Get a ProTools system, forget Digi002 -bg- Or don't forget Pro Tools and get a Digi 002. Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Jan 2005 19:45:27 -0800, "Zerex71" wrote:
Ultimately what I am going to do is be recording mostly instrumentals -- my saxes, guitars, and synthesizers. So I figure I can get by with something that has a fancy mic preamp for the audio stuff, MIDI and line ins for the synths, and line ins for the guitars. I don't envision this studio being a big thing where a band can actually come in, just me messing around, one track/one instrument at a time, and perfecting a great mix. ![]() Okay, to get down to brass tacks, what I'm looking for is a direct-to-computer (I have a top-of-the-line Alienware system that would easily handle digital recording), so I started by looking at the smaller units to get my feet wet -- the Lexicon Omega and Digidesign Mbox bundles, both available at musiciansfriend.com. Thus far, this is what I've decided: You do not have to spend much to get your feet wet, but you do if you want the best possible signal path ( mic preamps, AD converters, etc) to record through.Having a decent sounding room to record in, a seperate room to mix in, and a good pair of reference monitors are also necessary for the best quality. Lexicon Omega ------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, "just enough" inputs and connection types, comes with Cubase Cons: Comes with Cubase ![]() Digidesign Mbox --------------- Pros: Inexpensive, small footprint, comes with Pro Tools Cons: No MIDI connections, fewer connections than the Omega Any of the audio interfaces on the market in this price range would allow you to get your feet wet. Furthermore, in doing my research, a couple of other things came to mind. One, Pro Tools seems to be the gold standard for software, although I have heard nothing bad about Cubase or any of the other software packages. Two, price-wise, it goes from the relatively modest Mbox ($300-$500) to the Digi002R ($1300). That's a lot of shekels! So the Lexicon is both more attractively priced and has more of the types of inputs I think I'd need (I'd call them more generous than Digi) but it would put me into the Cubase camp (and I really don't want to try cross-platforming, using Cubase on a Digi or Pro Tools on the Lexicon -- the bundles that are being sold are tailored for each device). Pro Tools is fairly easy to use and is the industry standard for a lot of studios. This does not mean it is the best or the only option. If you do not plan on taking songs to a bigger studio to mix, then Pro Tools compatability should not be a concern, unless you want it on your resume.I personally like many other programs better, including Samplitude, Nuendo, and Logic Audio platinum.However Logic is only available for the Mac. So right now, I'm leaning towards Digidesign, but I'm having a hard time "getting over the hump" in moving from the Mbox to a Digi002(R). I really want to be able to "put Pro Tools on my resume" as it were but I'm concerned that there's no intermediate box between the Mbox and the 002R that has MIDI (and, ignorant as I am about such things, I'm *assuming* I will need MIDI connections to get the MIDI from the Korg KARMA and Yamaha S90 I'm planning on buying) into my Alienware -- does that sound right?) The Digi 002R is a decent interface.It will not compare with having a seperate high end preamp, AD converter though.It is definitely sufficient for home recording, and provides an asio driver to use it within other applications. You may also want to consider other options that exist for home audio. Stand alone digital recorders like the Roland VS series are decent studios in a box that will offer portability, but lack in the expansion options a pc would offer.However some of these boxes are not made well to connect with external equipment.I did a session for a band who had a Roland 2480, an Avalon 737, and decent mics. The only outputs left available to send to external gear were rca jacks, which totally dergaded the sound sent through them. You also have the option of using one of the firewire control surfaces such as the Yamaha 01X which has audio/ midi connections, and also functions as a mixing surface with motorized faders.I prefer to mix with faders, although using automation with the keyboard and mouse is ok once you get used to it. Another option would be an interface like you mentioned above, and using a midi controller such as the Tascam US 2400 to mix with. Here's a few more parameters to keep in mind if you are planning on providing some advice: a. Space is not an issue, or won't be in the future when I buy a house b. Money is not too much of an issue, but it quickly could be depending on what I wish I could buy Anyway, I really appreciate any help you old pros could provide for me. I'm really looking for all feedback, good, bad or indifferent. Many thanks, Mike You can get decent results with many of the audio interfaces on the market. I guess what you need to ask yourself is do I want to spend the extra money to get a totally professional setup, or will the quality I get from these interfaces be sufficient for my needs. For most people it will be fine, unless you want the best, most pristine sound, which will cost much more to accomplish. Randall |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Home Studio Phone Patch | Pro Audio | |||
Anyone know anything about a home studio called "Xytar"? | Pro Audio | |||
FS: Home Recording Studio Package. Nice!! | Marketplace | |||
help me spend $2k on home studio | Pro Audio | |||
Hooking up Home Stereo in Studio | Pro Audio |