"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Please notice these two additional lines from my post that Atkinson
didn't post

;-)

Obviously, I was making a joke.

As you end a large proportion of your posts with the winkey-smiley
emoticon, even when no humor appears to be intended, Mr. Krueger, I
ignore them.

Notice that Atkinson deleted the clear indication that I was making
a joke.

Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

Notice that Atkinson gives no indication that he's making a joke,

I wasn't making a joke, Mr. Krueger. Like Scott Wheeler, I am growing
weary of your flinging out defamatory insults at those with whom you
disagree over audio on a newsgroup that exists to allow people to post
their opions about audio.

so this deception is obviously just another one of his lies about me.

I have posted no lies about you, Mr. Krueger. Not one of the accusations
you have made in this regard is supported by the Google record. What I
_have_ done is correct you when have misstated something about me or about
Stereophile. I am sorry that you regard my having done so is equivalent
to "lies."

snip of grade-school namecalling that Mr. Krueger seems to feel
necessary (Don't worry, Mr. Krueger, the insults are still there
in your orginal posting for all to see and judge both of us
accordingly

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?





tor b

tor b wrote in message :

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?





We want to add something for everybody in the group so you'll understand
why we seem to be retarded. Everybody knows what a killfile or kill
filter is, right? We have something similar that we use when somebody
like that mean Mr. Phillips goes off on Arny. It's an Anti-Arny Smear
filter. What that means is we can pretend nobody answered our last post,
even if they did, because when they answered it, it made Arny look bad.
So we can keep demanding the same "proof" over and over no matter how
many times somebody gives it to us. We also pretend we never saw the
post where Arny admitted he has those sexy thoughts about boys like us.
Did we mention we're almost 10 years old now? Our voice is starting to
change. Arny says we'll be in the "sausage club" soon, whatever that
means.

Anyway, if you keep saying those things about Arny, it doesn't matter
what kind of proof there is. Our reaction will always be to say there is
no proof.



Arny is My Kroo-Daddy

From: tor 2 u h
Date: 8/21/2003 3:36 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


tor b wrote in message :

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?





We want to add something for everybody in the group so you'll understand
why we seem to be retarded. Everybody knows what a killfile or kill
filter is, right? We have something similar that we use when somebody
like that mean Mr. Phillips goes off on Arny. It's an Anti-Arny Smear
filter. What that means is we can pretend nobody answered our last post,
even if they did, because when they answered it, it made Arny look bad.
So we can keep demanding the same "proof" over and over no matter how
many times somebody gives it to us. We also pretend we never saw the
post where Arny admitted he has those sexy thoughts about boys like us.
Did we mention we're almost 10 years old now? Our voice is starting to
change. Arny says we'll be in the "sausage club" soon, whatever that
means.

Anyway, if you keep saying those things about Arny, it doesn't matter
what kind of proof there is. Our reaction will always be to say there is
no proof.



Arny is My Kroo-Daddy

Working for the wife's RE firm these days, are you? "Dedicated to service, fun
to work with"?




tor b

"tor b" wrote in message
...
From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you
could
provide a Google reference?

Right. I guess that makes Atkinson a co-libeler. Letsee, Atkinson has deep
pockets and New York isn't nearly as far from Detroit as it is from Los
Angeles...

Arny said:

"tor b" wrote in message
...
From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you
could
provide a Google reference?

Right. I guess that makes Atkinson a co-libeler. Letsee, Atkinson has deep
pockets and New York isn't nearly as far from Detroit as it is from Los
Angeles...

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ar...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&r num=1

Boon

Richard Malesweski said:

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ar...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&r num=1

Boon

From: (Marc Phillips)
Date: 8/21/2003 4:08 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Richard, er, Doug, uh..Arny said:

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ar...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net& rnum=1

You keep posting the same broken link over and over, you fat, bumbling bozo.
Post a working link or give a Google message ID.




tor b

Richard Malesweski said:

You keep posting the same broken link over and over, you fat, bumbling bozo.
Post a working link or give a Google message ID.

An Internet geek like yourself should know how to get around Outlook Express.

Boon

From: (Marc "bozo" Phillips)
Date: 8/21/2003 6:47 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Richard Krueger/Doug Malesweski/ Arny Haugen said:

You keep posting the same broken link over and over, you fat, bumbling bozo.
Post a working link or give a Google message ID.

An Internet geek like yourself should know how to get around Outlook Express.

Too much of a fat, bumbling bozo to post a working link or message ID, eh?
Have it your way, Porky. It's your propaganda, if you want to make it
inaccessible, I'm not going to argue with you. ;-)






tor b

Richard Malesweski said:



You keep posting the same broken link over and over, you fat, bumbling
bozo.
Post a working link or give a Google message ID.

An Internet geek like yourself should know how to get around Outlook
Express.

Too much of a fat, bumbling bozo to post a working link or message ID, eh?
Have it your way, Porky. It's your propaganda, if you want to make it
inaccessible, I'm not going to argue with you. ;-)

The problem is that you're being dishonest. You know what's in the link.
You've seen it many times.

You've also done the same thing, posting unusable links. In fact, there's a new
website dedicated to reducing Google URLs to usable URLs through OE. George
has used it already.

I'd use it, but frankly, anyone who knows how to use a computer can pull up the
link. That's why Arny has yet to complain about this like you do. Personally,
I'm not an Internet geek, and I don't really care about formatting posts. I do
like them to be readable, so that's why I snip headers and such (you suck at
this, too).

But since you want Arny's name sullied further, here it is:

From: "Arny Krüger"
Subject: Which member of "The Resistance" takes credit for these?
Date: 1999/02/26
Message-ID: #1/1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: news.flash.net 920027206 208.194.218.222 (Fri, 26 Feb 1999 05:06:46
CDT)
Organization: FlashNet Communications, http://www.flash.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 05:06:46 CDT
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion


"The Resistance" - Rothman, Sandman, Bergman, Middius, Briggs, et al would
like you to think they are paragons of truth and justice. We know that they
revel in binary posts that harass people they don't like. It appears that at
least one of their number has gone way off the deep end:

Here is some private email I received last night:

-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:35 PM
Subject: Hello daddy


Hello daddy,

Thank you for killing me. You ****ed me so hard Jesus was very happy with my
arrival. I bet the other daddies didn't let their children suck there dick's
like you sucked mine, daddy. I'm glad I'm dead now.

I've sent you a picture to remind me of you.

(attached jpg - fellatio in progress)

-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:37 PM


Thank you for killing me daddy

(attached jpg fellatio "completed" with results on cheeks)

----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:39 PM


You made me come hard, daddy. I'm in heaven now, but you can suck my dick in
your dreams and your prayers.

(attached jpg fellatio "completed" with results on chin and mouth)

-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:42 PM


Does this bring back good memories, daddy?

(attached jpg picture, nude male with erection being urinated on by nude
male)

-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 10:25 PM
Subject: my wavs


hello daddy,

thank you for murdering me and sodomizing my dead body. please analyse my wav
files daddy.

(attached 494K .wav file, basically low level hum - failed recording attempt?)


-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 10:28 PM
Subject: daddy ****s nate


hello daddy,

thank you for killing me.

(attached 494K .wav file, basically low level hum - failed recording attempt?)

----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 10:31 PM
Subject: sexy daddy


can i **** mommy again while you suck my balls daddy

(attached 494K .wav file, basically low level hum - failed recording attempt?)

-----Original Message-----
From:
To:
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 10:34 PM


what did it feel like to grope me in my coffin, daddy?

(attached 494K .wav file, basically low level hum - failed recording attempt?)

Now, here is the question - does this have anything do to with their other
attempts to slander me - are they all equally "true"?

---end post---

Arny made this all up out of the blue. There were no e-mails sent to him. You
know this. You still support him.

Get it, pervert?

Boon