Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello there,
I was reading a lot here before, cause I plan to improve and/or extend my studio. I have several questions, today I start with my maybe most critical one. Right now, I have a Behringer MX8000 and run 16 direct outs to two Terratec EWS 88 MT for D/A into my computer. For mixdown, I run them out separately again and mix in the analog domain. I know, this gives a bad signal channel because of the double D/A and double A/D conversion, including double coloring by the Behringer. What I got until now was not the best sound. Maybe I should mix completely in the digital domain... (studio pictures and songs I recorded see the link below this mail.) But somehow I like the human touch of analog mixing in front of the console, especially when I work with bands. But put that aside, here's my actual question: Now I got this dbx 386 mic pre amp that has digital out and I thought I could leave out the console and go straight into the Terratecs. Both units use RCA s/pdif connectors, should be no problem. I have read that the dbx needs to be wordclock master or one has jitter problems - is it true? If I would make it the master, does it mean it has to be turned on when booting the computer? what about playback, since there is no mic pre needed and I would like to switch off the tubes. As I also have a laptop, I thought the best for future expansion plans would be to invest into mobile equipment, so I could use it both for live recording and studio, using USB or Firewire interfaces. Terratec put out the new Phase88s, but now they use optical connectors...are these units an option anyway (bad envy24 D/A)? And what could I do about the possible RCA/Optical problem? Thanks for any suggestions on whats probably best in my situation. -- Nudge // PCS Records Studio Leipzig http://studio.lieber-media.de |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes, these are egg crates. This room serves as a rehearsal room, too. One guy we know, he works in a super-market, so we got tons of egg crates, and we have still so many over. In another room not pictured on the website, there is carpet on every wall hanging on wooden lats leaving about 1 inch to the wall. This gives more attenuation. Yes, I should do something about it! :-) But this is another big, big question and I don't know if I will have the power to face it... S.D. Curlee wrote: Nudge wrote in : http://studio.lieber-media.de Are those egg boxes on your walls? -- Nudge // PCS Records Studio Leipzig http://studio.lieber-media.de |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes, these are egg crates. This room serves as a rehearsal room, too. One guy we know, he works in a super-market, so we got tons of egg crates, and we have still so many over. In another room not pictured on the website, there is carpet on every wall hanging on wooden lats leaving about 1 inch to the wall. This gives more attenuation. Yes, I should do something about it! :-) But this is another big, big question and I don't know if I will have the power to face it... S.D. Curlee wrote: Nudge wrote in : http://studio.lieber-media.de Are those egg boxes on your walls? -- Nudge // PCS Records Studio Leipzig http://studio.lieber-media.de |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the lecture, Mike. :-)
I got your point. Well, at least I know that my budget doesn't allow me to solve my problems buying more and more gear anyway. I started the studio because I wanted to record my band. We have so far released 2 CDs and 1 LP and several tracks on samplers, and lately I had recorded these tracks. I felt its time to switch from outside studio to our own when I had made my experiences (that means mistakes, of course). :-) In the beginning I focused on drum recording, that seemed to me the most critical point. So I got me a lot of cheap gear. I wish I had been a solo guitar player and had bought one good microphone, but I ended up with a lot of bad ones. Of course, over the years, my equipment as well as my understanding improved. With my console and the terratecs I can now record the whole band "live" and my AT4033 sounds quite OK. From now on, I want to focus on quality instead of quantity. Lately I made some drum recordings with only four or even 2 mics and I liked the natural sound. I can describe my sound as very flat and uninteresting. I bought a $40 behringer tube preamp and even the difference between this unit and my console (my voice on the AT4033) clearly states this is sad but true. This little thing impressed me. I'm sorry guys! I can imagine some of you will rotfl but it is at least for me the best preamp I got until now. OK, next week I will be back in germany and I will test my new dbx. I hope it will impress me again. About the sync: One terratec controls the other. That's a simple setup. I don't worry about the setup even with the dbx, but I don't want to have the jitter. Maybe it will work even as wordclock slave, then I don't have to switch the master everytime recording with the pre. And it feels good to know that buying new gear with optical connectors will not be a problem. Thank you. I will sure get back on your help, I have tons of questions... ;-) Kind regards Nudge Mike Rivers wrote: Well, you have to use SOMETHING. A/D and D/A converters and cosoles aren't inherently evil, but there are better and worse ones. I don't know what your problem is other than that you have budget priced equipment and you feel that you should improve it, but as we tell people here over and over and over, few people who have questions about problems with their sound that they can't answer (or at least analyze and experess in technical or musical terms) themselves won't solve their problems by buying more gear. That's the lecture. Now let's see what you have in mind. What I got until now was not the best sound. Maybe I should mix completely in the digital domain... (studio pictures and songs I recorded see the link below this mail.) But somehow I like the human touch of analog mixing in front of the console, especially when I work with bands. This makes a whole lot of sense. And I suspect that your recording chain isn't all that bad. Now I got this dbx 386 mic pre amp that has digital out and I thought I could leave out the console and go straight into the Terratecs. Both units use RCA s/pdif connectors, should be no problem. I have read that the dbx needs to be wordclock master or one has jitter problems - is it true? Well, once you have more than two digital devices in a system, you need to worry about data clock synchronization. Actually you have to worry about it even when connecting two devices, but that's usually pretty easy. You're probably doing something now (though perhaps not consciously) to synchronize the clocks in your two Terratec interfaces. At least you should. If you have them synchronized, and can set one up so that it receives its word clock from the incoming S/PDIF device, the dbx could be the master, synchronize the clock of the interface to which it's connected, and the second interface could synchronize to that (perhaps internally). If I would make it the master, does it mean it has to be turned on when booting the computer? what about playback, since there is no mic pre needed and I would like to switch off the tubes. If your system is set up so that it's the clock source, then it has to be on. Perhaps not when booting the computer, but to record or play back. But once your tracks are recorded, you could then switch things in your system setup so that one Terratec uses its internal word clock and the other one syncs to it. As I also have a laptop, I thought the best for future expansion plans would be to invest into mobile equipment, so I could use it both for live recording and studio, using USB or Firewire interfaces. Terratec put out the new Phase88s, but now they use optical connectors...are these units an option anyway (bad envy24 D/A)? And what could I do about the possible RCA/Optical problem? There are a number of companies that make coax/optical S/PDIF adapters, for, as I recall, as little as about $30. No problem. -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- Nudge // PCS Records Studio Leipzig http://studio.lieber-media.de |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the lecture, Mike. :-)
I got your point. Well, at least I know that my budget doesn't allow me to solve my problems buying more and more gear anyway. I started the studio because I wanted to record my band. We have so far released 2 CDs and 1 LP and several tracks on samplers, and lately I had recorded these tracks. I felt its time to switch from outside studio to our own when I had made my experiences (that means mistakes, of course). :-) In the beginning I focused on drum recording, that seemed to me the most critical point. So I got me a lot of cheap gear. I wish I had been a solo guitar player and had bought one good microphone, but I ended up with a lot of bad ones. Of course, over the years, my equipment as well as my understanding improved. With my console and the terratecs I can now record the whole band "live" and my AT4033 sounds quite OK. From now on, I want to focus on quality instead of quantity. Lately I made some drum recordings with only four or even 2 mics and I liked the natural sound. I can describe my sound as very flat and uninteresting. I bought a $40 behringer tube preamp and even the difference between this unit and my console (my voice on the AT4033) clearly states this is sad but true. This little thing impressed me. I'm sorry guys! I can imagine some of you will rotfl but it is at least for me the best preamp I got until now. OK, next week I will be back in germany and I will test my new dbx. I hope it will impress me again. About the sync: One terratec controls the other. That's a simple setup. I don't worry about the setup even with the dbx, but I don't want to have the jitter. Maybe it will work even as wordclock slave, then I don't have to switch the master everytime recording with the pre. And it feels good to know that buying new gear with optical connectors will not be a problem. Thank you. I will sure get back on your help, I have tons of questions... ;-) Kind regards Nudge Mike Rivers wrote: Well, you have to use SOMETHING. A/D and D/A converters and cosoles aren't inherently evil, but there are better and worse ones. I don't know what your problem is other than that you have budget priced equipment and you feel that you should improve it, but as we tell people here over and over and over, few people who have questions about problems with their sound that they can't answer (or at least analyze and experess in technical or musical terms) themselves won't solve their problems by buying more gear. That's the lecture. Now let's see what you have in mind. What I got until now was not the best sound. Maybe I should mix completely in the digital domain... (studio pictures and songs I recorded see the link below this mail.) But somehow I like the human touch of analog mixing in front of the console, especially when I work with bands. This makes a whole lot of sense. And I suspect that your recording chain isn't all that bad. Now I got this dbx 386 mic pre amp that has digital out and I thought I could leave out the console and go straight into the Terratecs. Both units use RCA s/pdif connectors, should be no problem. I have read that the dbx needs to be wordclock master or one has jitter problems - is it true? Well, once you have more than two digital devices in a system, you need to worry about data clock synchronization. Actually you have to worry about it even when connecting two devices, but that's usually pretty easy. You're probably doing something now (though perhaps not consciously) to synchronize the clocks in your two Terratec interfaces. At least you should. If you have them synchronized, and can set one up so that it receives its word clock from the incoming S/PDIF device, the dbx could be the master, synchronize the clock of the interface to which it's connected, and the second interface could synchronize to that (perhaps internally). If I would make it the master, does it mean it has to be turned on when booting the computer? what about playback, since there is no mic pre needed and I would like to switch off the tubes. If your system is set up so that it's the clock source, then it has to be on. Perhaps not when booting the computer, but to record or play back. But once your tracks are recorded, you could then switch things in your system setup so that one Terratec uses its internal word clock and the other one syncs to it. As I also have a laptop, I thought the best for future expansion plans would be to invest into mobile equipment, so I could use it both for live recording and studio, using USB or Firewire interfaces. Terratec put out the new Phase88s, but now they use optical connectors...are these units an option anyway (bad envy24 D/A)? And what could I do about the possible RCA/Optical problem? There are a number of companies that make coax/optical S/PDIF adapters, for, as I recall, as little as about $30. No problem. -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- Nudge // PCS Records Studio Leipzig http://studio.lieber-media.de |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can describe my sound as very flat and uninteresting. I bought a $40
behringer tube preamp and even the difference between this unit and my console (my voice on the AT4033) clearly states this is sad but true. This little thing impressed me. I'm sorry guys! I can imagine some of you will rotfl but it is at least for me the best preamp I got until now. OK, next week I will be back in germany and I will test my new dbx. I hope it will impress me again. Cheap "tube preamps" are generally op-amp preamps (like typical mixer preamps) and the token tube gain stage with a "starved plate", meaning a critical power supply element for the tube is well below the appropriate voltage. The ART and Behringer ones operate at 25V, where 150V is generally considered bare minimum. The DBX 386 has a dual-servo class A solid state preamp like higher-end preamps, and the tube circuit is a proper tube gain stage with its own power supply and 200V across the plates. It will definitely impress you. Still, the problem with the DBX silver series is that they use electrolytic capacitors where metal film would sound significantly better. So something like an FMR RNP or Presonus MP20 offer a cleaner sound in the same price range, but the tube stage and A/D converter make the 386 a very good value since there's no inexpensive way to get a converter of that caliber. About the sync: One terratec controls the other. That's a simple setup. I don't worry about the setup even with the dbx, but I don't want to have the jitter. Maybe it will work even as wordclock slave, then I don't have to switch the master everytime recording with the pre. And it feels good to know that buying new gear with optical connectors will not be a problem. Thank you. There's two ways to deal with sync: - connect the 386 to the master interface and set the master to sync to S/PDIF (the 386 becomes master for the whole system) - connect master and 386 via wordclock (master interface remains master clock) I recommend connecting all three units via workclock, it's just more trustworthy. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Sugarite wrote: The DBX 386 has a dual-servo class A solid state preamp like higher-end preamps, and the tube circuit is a proper tube gain stage with its own power supply and 200V across the plates. It will definitely impress you. Still, the problem with the DBX silver series is that they use electrolytic capacitors where metal film would sound significantly better. So something like an FMR RNP or Presonus MP20 offer a cleaner sound in the same price range, but the tube stage and A/D converter make the 386 a very good value since there's no inexpensive way to get a converter of that caliber. The FMR RNP is indeed the next one that is on my list. After reading a lot, I found that they might be a good team, one for the clean (FMR) and one for the tubey sound. The dbx was of course charming with its converters. I'm really looking forward to check the tape-saturation feature. Another question: If I would go crazy about the unit and would buy more of them, how could I connect to get the digital signal out of them since the S/PDIF is just a 2-channel dig-out and I have just two terratecs with one S/PDIF i/o each? About the sync: One terratec controls the other. That's a simple setup. [..] There's two ways to deal with sync: - connect the 386 to the master interface and set the master to sync to S/PDIF (the 386 becomes master for the whole system) - connect master and 386 via wordclock (master interface remains master clock) I recommend connecting all three units via workclock, it's just more trustworthy. The terratecs have no wordclock i/o AFAIK. would it still be more trustworthy if that means to install an extra wordclock i/o card? Maybe that would be best fitting my situation as I would like to turn off the dbx's tubes when not in use. Sincerely, Nudge -- Nudge // PCS Records Studio Leipzig http://studio.lieber-media.de |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
QUESTION: I Need Help With S/PDIF Issue!! | Pro Audio | |||
QUESTION: I Need Help With S/PDIF Problem | Pro Audio | |||
QUESTION: I Need Help With S/PDIF Problem | Pro Audio | |||
Can a S/PDIF RCA cable be used for regular audio when S/PDIF is not supported? | Pro Audio | |||
How test whether S/PDIF is working? | Audio Opinions |