In article writes:

: If you run the tape, how far in do you first notice that it's out of synch?

It's proportional. So in 2 hours it's off by .155 of a sec. In 1 hour it's off
by .0775 of a sec.... Etc...

Do you notice that it's .0775 seconds out of sync? Do you have to look
at a time scale on the computer to know that it's out of sync or is
there some aural-visual cue that tells you that?

Frankly, I think that if you can see that it's 0.0775 seconds out of
sync, you've got a good imagination. What we're trying to get at is
whether you're seeking an exotic solution for a problem that isn't a
problem in practice.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers - )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Mike Rivers wrote:
: Do you notice that it's .0775 seconds out of sync? Do you have to look
: at a time scale on the computer to know that it's out of sync or is
: there some aural-visual cue that tells you that?


Believe it or not I do notice if I look carefully. I don't notice .03 of a sec.
But .06 is somewhat noticeable.

--Leonid

"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1098130242k@trad...

In article writes:

: If you run the tape, how far in do you first notice that it's out of
synch?

It's proportional. So in 2 hours it's off by .155 of a sec. In 1 hour
it's off
by .0775 of a sec.... Etc...

Do you notice that it's .0775 seconds out of sync? Do you have to look
at a time scale on the computer to know that it's out of sync or is
there some aural-visual cue that tells you that?

Frankly, I think that if you can see that it's 0.0775 seconds out of
sync, you've got a good imagination. What we're trying to get at is
whether you're seeking an exotic solution for a problem that isn't a
problem in practice.

Mr. Makarovsky has been flogging this question now in at
least a couple of newsgroups that I read. Frankly, it has taken
on the tone of a troll. He has ignored at least a dozen suggestions
for the most likely methods of fixing the issue (assuming that it
even exists). if he wants to tweak the length of the sound track
by .002% maybe we should just let him learn for himself.

Richard Crowley wrote:
: Mr. Makarovsky has been flogging this question now in at
: least a couple of newsgroups that I read. Frankly, it has taken
: on the tone of a troll. He has ignored at least a dozen suggestions
: for the most likely methods of fixing the issue (assuming that it
: even exists). if he wants to tweak the length of the sound track
: by .002% maybe we should just let him learn for himself.


Mr. Crowley, what went on in your head
Mr. Crowley, did you talk with the dead - Ozzy 1981...

Anyway, I have no time to troll the newsgroups. I posted it to this and
to rec.video.desktop. If you think it's a troll, just ignore the thread.
FYI, I have previously synched audio and video successfully when audio was
longer, but never done it when audio was shorter. Have a nice day.

--Leonid