Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Larsen wrote:
The danish ReVox importer made worse damage to my A77 in 1974 when fitting a 15 ips capstan shaft than what you see on these pictures, unfortunately it was 1999 before I understood just what it was that was wrong with the transport and why its 15 kHz stability was poor .... capstan not at 90 degrees to the tape transport plane .... :-( I hope you sent them a letter of complaint 15 years after the fact. The motor kit comes with a bag of shim washers and you're supposed to shim the motor straight specifically to prevent this. Sounds like somebody was not reading the manual. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 13:01:33 +0200, Peter Larsen
wrote: --------8--------------- The danish ReVox importer made worse damage to my A77 in 1974 when fitting a 15 ips capstan shaft than what you see on these pictures, unfortunately it was 1999 before I understood just what it was that was wrong with the transport and why its 15 kHz stability was poor .... capstan not at 90 degrees to the tape transport plane .... :-( Kind regards Peter Larsen -- For a (very) so-la-la reproduction of a 15 ips tape, I have a coressponding capstan which I can change on my Revox B77 Dolby. But, the tape transport is quite disturbed, the pressure at the capstan seems increased, yes the capstan is not at 90 deg., and the tape is not touching that righthand tape guide (that one with synthetic ruby washers). The HighSpeed Revox A and B77 models, PR99 etc. had their entire capstan motors mounted tilted in comparison to the 3 1/4 -- 7 1/2 models. The bolt holes at the mounting plate are offest a little. If this isn't bothering, the playback electronics still made for the tape speed of 7 1/2 is... And I'd never record with such a capstan mounted to this machine The result would be quite poor for an Revox ![]() Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 13:01:33 +0200, Peter Larsen
wrote: --------8--------------- The danish ReVox importer made worse damage to my A77 in 1974 when fitting a 15 ips capstan shaft than what you see on these pictures, unfortunately it was 1999 before I understood just what it was that was wrong with the transport and why its 15 kHz stability was poor .... capstan not at 90 degrees to the tape transport plane .... :-( Kind regards Peter Larsen -- For a (very) so-la-la reproduction of a 15 ips tape, I have a coressponding capstan which I can change on my Revox B77 Dolby. But, the tape transport is quite disturbed, the pressure at the capstan seems increased, yes the capstan is not at 90 deg., and the tape is not touching that righthand tape guide (that one with synthetic ruby washers). The HighSpeed Revox A and B77 models, PR99 etc. had their entire capstan motors mounted tilted in comparison to the 3 1/4 -- 7 1/2 models. The bolt holes at the mounting plate are offest a little. If this isn't bothering, the playback electronics still made for the tape speed of 7 1/2 is... And I'd never record with such a capstan mounted to this machine The result would be quite poor for an Revox ![]() Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edi Zubovic wrote:
washers). The HighSpeed Revox A and B77 models, PR99 etc. had their entire capstan motors mounted tilted in comparison to the 3 1/4 -- 7 1/2 models. The tilt is sideways, i.e. in the longitudinal direction of the tape. I discovered it because a tape that had gotten a wee bit too much silicone oil in cleaning traveled sideways. The guy who drilled the new hole for the larger capstan must have done it freehand. And he knew ... I wondered then why the rubber roller arm had been obviously bent and replaced it with a new one, thinking no more of it. I discussed it with some people back then, and nobody came up with the idea that the rubber roller arm might have been bent so as to get the roller parallel with the tilted capstan. The bolt holes at the mounting plate are offest a little. If this isn't bothering, the playback electronics still made for the tape speed of 7 1/2 is... Not anymore, not since 1977, the so called Radio & Television modifications (x) have all been implemented and playback electronics have been properly matched to the actual heads. (x) swedish magazine that had a series of articles about how to fix all that ails a ReVox A77 ex works. And I'd never record with such a capstan mounted to this machine Nor would I. But the machine was - and is - not a bad machine, but it is a baaad machine to play marginal backcoated tapes on. The result would be quite poor for an Revox ![]() Hmm ... yes, I had abandoned any thought of making another analog tape recording by the time I found the problem, the ampex problem hit me real hard - if only I had used more Fuji tapes ..... they sounded better, but I was worried they would not last. Eventually they do run in to problems, just like the 368 the appear to be a clone of, but way less than ampex, and in fact also less than Agfa ... at least guesstimated on the tapes I own. I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp ..... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edi Zubovic wrote:
washers). The HighSpeed Revox A and B77 models, PR99 etc. had their entire capstan motors mounted tilted in comparison to the 3 1/4 -- 7 1/2 models. The tilt is sideways, i.e. in the longitudinal direction of the tape. I discovered it because a tape that had gotten a wee bit too much silicone oil in cleaning traveled sideways. The guy who drilled the new hole for the larger capstan must have done it freehand. And he knew ... I wondered then why the rubber roller arm had been obviously bent and replaced it with a new one, thinking no more of it. I discussed it with some people back then, and nobody came up with the idea that the rubber roller arm might have been bent so as to get the roller parallel with the tilted capstan. The bolt holes at the mounting plate are offest a little. If this isn't bothering, the playback electronics still made for the tape speed of 7 1/2 is... Not anymore, not since 1977, the so called Radio & Television modifications (x) have all been implemented and playback electronics have been properly matched to the actual heads. (x) swedish magazine that had a series of articles about how to fix all that ails a ReVox A77 ex works. And I'd never record with such a capstan mounted to this machine Nor would I. But the machine was - and is - not a bad machine, but it is a baaad machine to play marginal backcoated tapes on. The result would be quite poor for an Revox ![]() Hmm ... yes, I had abandoned any thought of making another analog tape recording by the time I found the problem, the ampex problem hit me real hard - if only I had used more Fuji tapes ..... they sounded better, but I was worried they would not last. Eventually they do run in to problems, just like the 368 the appear to be a clone of, but way less than ampex, and in fact also less than Agfa ... at least guesstimated on the tapes I own. I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp ..... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Peter Larsen wrote: The danish ReVox importer made worse damage to my A77 in 1974 when fitting a 15 ips capstan shaft than what you see on these pictures, unfortunately it was 1999 before I understood just what it was that was wrong with the transport and why its 15 kHz stability was poor .... capstan not at 90 degrees to the tape transport plane .... :-( I hope you sent them a letter of complaint 15 years after the fact. The motor kit comes with a bag of shim washers and you're supposed to shim the motor straight specifically to prevent this. Sounds like somebody was not reading the manual. Somebody was indeed very incompetent. I tried looking the importer up, they appear to be out of business. Reminds me ... there are still tapes that need digitizing. --scott Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Peter Larsen wrote: The danish ReVox importer made worse damage to my A77 in 1974 when fitting a 15 ips capstan shaft than what you see on these pictures, unfortunately it was 1999 before I understood just what it was that was wrong with the transport and why its 15 kHz stability was poor .... capstan not at 90 degrees to the tape transport plane .... :-( I hope you sent them a letter of complaint 15 years after the fact. The motor kit comes with a bag of shim washers and you're supposed to shim the motor straight specifically to prevent this. Sounds like somebody was not reading the manual. Somebody was indeed very incompetent. I tried looking the importer up, they appear to be out of business. Reminds me ... there are still tapes that need digitizing. --scott Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:32:25 +0200, Peter Larsen
wrote: --------------8---------------------- Not anymore, not since 1977, the so called Radio & Television modifications (x) have all been implemented and playback electronics have been properly matched to the actual heads. (x) swedish magazine that had a series of articles about how to fix all that ails a ReVox A77 ex works. Oh, so then ![]() And I'd never record with such a capstan mounted to this machine Nor would I. But the machine was - and is - not a bad machine, but it is a baaad machine to play marginal backcoated tapes on. The result would be quite poor for an Revox ![]() Hmm ... yes, I had abandoned any thought of making another analog tape recording by the time I found the problem, the ampex problem hit me real hard - if only I had used more Fuji tapes ..... they sounded better, but I was worried they would not last. Eventually they do run in to problems, just like the 368 the appear to be a clone of, but way less than ampex, and in fact also less than Agfa ... at least guesstimated on the tapes I own.- - I'll try to find some more of BASF remnants -- namely LGR 50 MK1 pancakes. I still have some 5 of them fresh in nylon bags. They're 30 cm but go fine with Revox and this broadcast tape has indeed been a cake literally; excellent and very forgiving about levels, it soft saturates prior to clipping. -- It goes fine with a Revox and it doesn't feed itself with heads like broadcast Agfas used to do... but Ampex (no Quantegy yet; old stock) 407, which are still obtainable to me here, are also quite fair with Revox. I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp .... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. If such a machine is to be powered up after decades, it is best done with an autotransformer I think. I had a bit of luck when I tried to start the Revox after a really long time. Its transformer has been shortcircuited for a while until the power capacitors formed... not a pretty picture (and smell). Everything went fine at the end though... but in your case, when the safety relay responded, I think there must have been a difference in earth potential and this is something asking for 1:1 transformers or similar isolation to be 100% sure... Revox are I think nulled; they have only two-prong power plugs and no other ground. Kind regards Peter Larsen Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:32:25 +0200, Peter Larsen
wrote: --------------8---------------------- Not anymore, not since 1977, the so called Radio & Television modifications (x) have all been implemented and playback electronics have been properly matched to the actual heads. (x) swedish magazine that had a series of articles about how to fix all that ails a ReVox A77 ex works. Oh, so then ![]() And I'd never record with such a capstan mounted to this machine Nor would I. But the machine was - and is - not a bad machine, but it is a baaad machine to play marginal backcoated tapes on. The result would be quite poor for an Revox ![]() Hmm ... yes, I had abandoned any thought of making another analog tape recording by the time I found the problem, the ampex problem hit me real hard - if only I had used more Fuji tapes ..... they sounded better, but I was worried they would not last. Eventually they do run in to problems, just like the 368 the appear to be a clone of, but way less than ampex, and in fact also less than Agfa ... at least guesstimated on the tapes I own.- - I'll try to find some more of BASF remnants -- namely LGR 50 MK1 pancakes. I still have some 5 of them fresh in nylon bags. They're 30 cm but go fine with Revox and this broadcast tape has indeed been a cake literally; excellent and very forgiving about levels, it soft saturates prior to clipping. -- It goes fine with a Revox and it doesn't feed itself with heads like broadcast Agfas used to do... but Ampex (no Quantegy yet; old stock) 407, which are still obtainable to me here, are also quite fair with Revox. I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp .... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. If such a machine is to be powered up after decades, it is best done with an autotransformer I think. I had a bit of luck when I tried to start the Revox after a really long time. Its transformer has been shortcircuited for a while until the power capacitors formed... not a pretty picture (and smell). Everything went fine at the end though... but in your case, when the safety relay responded, I think there must have been a difference in earth potential and this is something asking for 1:1 transformers or similar isolation to be 100% sure... Revox are I think nulled; they have only two-prong power plugs and no other ground. Kind regards Peter Larsen Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edi Zubovic wrote:
[ lotsa great stuff omitted] I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp ... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. If such a machine is to be powered up after decades, it is best done with an autotransformer I think. Such a contraption is inching its way into my wishlist. I had a bit of luck when I tried to start the Revox after a really long time. Unused items should occasionally be left powered up for an extented period of time, i.e. multiple days. Its transformer has been shortcircuited for a while until the power capacitors formed... not a pretty picture (and smell). Everything went fine at the end though... but in your case, when the safety relay responded, Leak to ground relay .... checks the diff between outgoing amperage and return. I think there must have been a difference in earth potential and this is something asking for 1:1 transformers I have a pair of those, but they are sitting in a plastic box with one side's winding in series between left and right, with a source resistance in the 1 to 2 kOhm range they form an excellent VLF mono combiner and they have occasionally done wonders to problematic recordings back in the analog age. or similar isolation to be 100% sure... Revox are I think nulled; they have only two-prong power plugs and no other ground. Arne E. Jensens hypothesis was that what ails it is leak current in a coupling cap in the signal path .... in which case perhaps it really is only about leaving it powered up for a week instead of only a day. It is a hybrid btw. - it has been a langue lab machine and has since had the valve playback electronics replaced, probably with a board that I know was designed by someone who replaced all signal electronics in their A700's, 553x is socketed .... As for the grounding ... we run two pronged here in Denmark, but grounding is an unavoidable property of an antenna system that is common to all apartments in a building. Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edi Zubovic wrote:
[ lotsa great stuff omitted] I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp ... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. If such a machine is to be powered up after decades, it is best done with an autotransformer I think. Such a contraption is inching its way into my wishlist. I had a bit of luck when I tried to start the Revox after a really long time. Unused items should occasionally be left powered up for an extented period of time, i.e. multiple days. Its transformer has been shortcircuited for a while until the power capacitors formed... not a pretty picture (and smell). Everything went fine at the end though... but in your case, when the safety relay responded, Leak to ground relay .... checks the diff between outgoing amperage and return. I think there must have been a difference in earth potential and this is something asking for 1:1 transformers I have a pair of those, but they are sitting in a plastic box with one side's winding in series between left and right, with a source resistance in the 1 to 2 kOhm range they form an excellent VLF mono combiner and they have occasionally done wonders to problematic recordings back in the analog age. or similar isolation to be 100% sure... Revox are I think nulled; they have only two-prong power plugs and no other ground. Arne E. Jensens hypothesis was that what ails it is leak current in a coupling cap in the signal path .... in which case perhaps it really is only about leaving it powered up for a week instead of only a day. It is a hybrid btw. - it has been a langue lab machine and has since had the valve playback electronics replaced, probably with a board that I know was designed by someone who replaced all signal electronics in their A700's, 553x is socketed .... As for the grounding ... we run two pronged here in Denmark, but grounding is an unavoidable property of an antenna system that is common to all apartments in a building. Edi Zubovic, Crikvenica, Croatia Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Larsen wrote:
Edi Zubovic wrote: [ lotsa great stuff omitted] I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp ... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. If such a machine is to be powered up after decades, it is best done with an autotransformer I think. Such a contraption is inching its way into my wishlist. It is worth having. In the meantime, a lamp board with a number of 60W bulbs in parallel with switches will allow you to provide a voltage drop to an appliance and allow you to bring up up slowly over the course of a few hourse. My personal feeling about cap reforming is that if capacitors have deformed in storage, they should really be replaced anyway and bringing the gear up slowly just helps you avoid replacing something that should be replaced. But I realize this is a religious issue. All of the A77 machines I have used had some amount of ground leakage, and I don't honestly know why. But I would look at the primary of the power transformer and look for filtering there that might be leaking, or for leakage through the transformer. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Larsen wrote:
Edi Zubovic wrote: [ lotsa great stuff omitted] I got me a G36 as a supplementary machine a couple of years ago, but the mains power safety relay cut out when I connected it to grounded preamp ... I wonder if all it needs is to be left powered up for the caps to reform ... but I don't feel well about leaving a known imperfect mains powered contraption powered up. If such a machine is to be powered up after decades, it is best done with an autotransformer I think. Such a contraption is inching its way into my wishlist. It is worth having. In the meantime, a lamp board with a number of 60W bulbs in parallel with switches will allow you to provide a voltage drop to an appliance and allow you to bring up up slowly over the course of a few hourse. My personal feeling about cap reforming is that if capacitors have deformed in storage, they should really be replaced anyway and bringing the gear up slowly just helps you avoid replacing something that should be replaced. But I realize this is a religious issue. All of the A77 machines I have used had some amount of ground leakage, and I don't honestly know why. But I would look at the primary of the power transformer and look for filtering there that might be leaking, or for leakage through the transformer. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
If such a machine is to be powered up after decades, it is best done with an autotransformer I think. Such a contraption is inching its way into my wishlist. It is worth having. In the meantime, a lamp board with a number of 60W bulbs in parallel with switches .... Hmmm .... we run 230 volts over here, I think I'll look into getting the trafo - it is simpler, thanks. Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Scully & Otari heads - 2 days remaining! | Marketplace | |||
FA: NEW! OTARI 1" 8-TRACK HEADS | Marketplace | |||
Powerful Argument in Favor of Agnosticism and Athetism | Audio Opinions | |||
Stealing is wrong, but so are Hypocrites. | Pro Audio |