Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #48   Report Post  
reddred
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Max Arwood" wrote in message


Have you seen the new Layla G3?


Looks very interesting on paper!

http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php

I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4"
ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the
same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing,
just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved.

Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these
things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a 1394
audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy
chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable.

jb




  #49   Report Post  
reddred
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Max Arwood" wrote in message


Have you seen the new Layla G3?


Looks very interesting on paper!

http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php

I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4"
ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the
same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing,
just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved.

Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these
things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a 1394
audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy
chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable.

jb




  #50   Report Post  
Kurt Albershardt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Jon J. Yeager" wrote in message


The last soundcard evaluated there is dated 4 years ago.


This would be a false claim.


Still no reports on RME cards after all these years?




  #51   Report Post  
Kurt Albershardt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Jon J. Yeager" wrote in message


The last soundcard evaluated there is dated 4 years ago.


This would be a false claim.


Still no reports on RME cards after all these years?


  #52   Report Post  
Eric Deibler
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What about the Roland UA-1000 or the Presonus Firepod?
eric

reddred wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Max Arwood" wrote in message
om


Have you seen the new Layla G3?


Looks very interesting on paper!

http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php


I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4"
ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the
same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing,
just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved.

Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these
things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a 1394
audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy
chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable.

jb





  #53   Report Post  
Mike Rivers
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In article writes:

people are really adverse to fresh installs of windows and I
pretty much look at it as maintenance. It's been years since I've had the
same install on one of my own machines for more than six months. Windows in
particular degenerates as time passes.


Trust, mainly. I know that it's supposed to be possible to "reinstall
Windows" without changing anything else, but I don't want to try it
unless it's the last resort. I don't want it to fail and to have to
re-install all of my software, and then re-configure it for the
familiar paths and user interface preferences. I don't even remember
everything I have installed, there have been successive updates that
I'd have to find and perform.

Another thing is that while ever copy of Windows that I have here is a
legitimate, OEM-licensed version, all the copies all "restoration"
disks that, when you install from them, bring the computer back to the
original factory configuration. I'm not sure if you can do anything
but a complete installation. I haven't played with it. One of these
days I'm going to put together a fresh computer from parts, try
running one of those restoration disks on it, and see if it says "Go
to hell, this ain't a Dell!" Maybe if it doesn't, I'll have more
confidence in "reinstalling Windows" but until then, I don't want to
mess around with working computers. And you don't always learn the
right things by fixing a broken computer.


It would be better if Windows didn't "degenerate" as time passes.
There's no reason for this to happen on its own, it's a function of
installing other software (or at least it SHOULD be, if it occurs at
all). I have three computers here, one with Win98SE, one with Win2000,
and one with WinXP Home. So far I've not encountered any problems that
have tempted me to do a re-installation.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
  #55   Report Post  
Laurence Payne
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 6 Oct 2004 09:17:08 -0400, (Mike Rivers) wrote:

Trust, mainly. I know that it's supposed to be possible to "reinstall
Windows" without changing anything else, but I don't want to try it
unless it's the last resort. I don't want it to fail and to have to
re-install all of my software, and then re-configure it for the
familiar paths and user interface preferences. I don't even remember
everything I have installed, there have been successive updates that
I'd have to find and perform.


If you get problems, that isn't what you want. You want a fresh
install onto a cleanly-formatted partition.


Another thing is that while ever copy of Windows that I have here is a
legitimate, OEM-licensed version, all the copies all "restoration"
disks that, when you install from them, bring the computer back to the
original factory configuration. I'm not sure if you can do anything
but a complete installation. I haven't played with it. One of these
days I'm going to put together a fresh computer from parts, try
running one of those restoration disks on it, and see if it says "Go
to hell, this ain't a Dell!" Maybe if it doesn't, I'll have more
confidence in "reinstalling Windows" but until then, I don't want to
mess around with working computers. And you don't always learn the
right things by fixing a broken computer.


If you have one of these, it's a disk image of a Windows setup as
installed on that particular hardware. If you're lucky, it takes you
to a point in Windows installation just before "detecting hardware"
and although any necessary drivers for that machine are included, you
can provide others. This should work on other machines. I've seen
IBM machines that restore in this way.

More likely, it's an image of a finished installation, including
installed software. This MAY work on other hardware, but you can't
really complain if it doesn't.


It would be better if Windows didn't "degenerate" as time passes.
There's no reason for this to happen on its own, it's a function of
installing other software (or at least it SHOULD be, if it occurs at
all). I have three computers here, one with Win98SE, one with Win2000,
and one with WinXP Home. So far I've not encountered any problems that
have tempted me to do a re-installation.


Excellent! Either you're very lucky, or your computers aren't music
production tools. If they were, you'd probably have taken much more
interest in specifying and maintaining them :-)


CubaseFAQ
www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm
"Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect


  #56   Report Post  
Nick
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
And I do feel sorry for anyone who is forced to program on Windows, but
it probably beats working for Christian radio....


Up until about March of 2000, it was a fantastic day job/career. Now it's
not.

--Nick


  #57   Report Post  
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jon J. Yeager" wrote in message

Sorry, I clicked on the first link on top of the soundcard section
(full report) which hasn't been updated since 3/22/2000 according to
the page itself.

Not sure how I was supposed to get to these newer pages of yours, but
thanks for pointing them out.


http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/compare/index.htm


  #58   Report Post  
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kevin D. Kissell" wrote in
message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Jon J. Yeager" wrote in message

Sorry, I clicked on the first link on top of the soundcard section
(full report) which hasn't been updated since 3/22/2000 according to
the page itself.

Not sure how I was supposed to get to these newer pages of yours,
but thanks for pointing them out.


http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/compare/index.htm


That's a pretty old table, though. Most of the cards on it aren't
even on the market any more.


That means that people can compare the card they now may have, to what they
want to upgrade to.


  #59   Report Post  
Kevin D. Kissell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ...
"Jon J. Yeager" wrote in message

Sorry, I clicked on the first link on top of the soundcard section
(full report) which hasn't been updated since 3/22/2000 according to
the page itself.

Not sure how I was supposed to get to these newer pages of yours, but
thanks for pointing them out.


http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/compare/index.htm


That's a pretty old table, though. Most of the cards on it aren't
even on the market any more.


  #60   Report Post  
Ryan Mitchley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You wrote on 03 Oct 2004 21:07:48 GMT:

?? I really can't decide between the three companies.
??
F Yugo---Daiwoo---Porsche911Turbo
F Michael Fuller / Fulltone Musical Products Inc. /
F http://www.fulltone.com

Erm, more like BMW M3 SMG, Subaru Impreza STi, Porsche 911 Turbo.

But we wouldn't want to promote silly comparisons that are meaningless at
best at elitist at worst, right?

Ryan




  #61   Report Post  
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Ryan Mitchley wrote:
You wrote on 03 Oct 2004 21:07:48 GMT:

?? I really can't decide between the three companies.
??
F Yugo---Daiwoo---Porsche911Turbo
F Michael Fuller / Fulltone Musical Products Inc. /
F http://www.fulltone.com

Erm, more like BMW M3 SMG, Subaru Impreza STi, Porsche 911 Turbo.

But we wouldn't want to promote silly comparisons that are meaningless at
best at elitist at worst, right?


No, I don't think you get up to the M3 and 911 range until you start
talking about external stuff like Prism or Lavry. This is more of the
Yugo vs. Toyota debate.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #62   Report Post  
turing test
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have the Edirol/Roland UA-1000. For me, it works well and, since all the
IO that is on the front is replicated on the back, you can use a snake with
it.

The only drawback I have found is that the sample rate is a knob on the
front and can't be controlled with software. Additionally, changing the
sample rate with the knob requires a reboot of the unit (!?!?)

turing test


"Eric Deibler" wrote in message
...
What about the Roland UA-1000 or the Presonus Firepod?
eric

reddred wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Max Arwood" wrote in message
. com


Have you seen the new Layla G3?

Looks very interesting on paper!

http://www.echoaudio.com/Products/PCI/Layla3G/index.php


I'm not thrilled with the current trend of replacing two of the rear 1/4"
ins with front mounted xlr pre's. The m-audio firewire interfaces do the
same thing. It doesn't make it impossible to plug a snake into the thing,
just sloppy and weird, especially when patchbays are involved.

Doesn't anybody have other gear that they need to plug in, or are these
things still aimed at people who are starting fresh? All I want from a
1394
audio card are eight ins and outs on 1/4" jacks and the ability to daisy
chain the things. Simple, universal, and unavailable.

jb







  #63   Report Post  
Eric Deibler
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How does it perform in SONAR?
eric

turing test wrote:
I have the Edirol/Roland UA-1000. For me, it works well and, since all the
IO that is on the front is replicated on the back, you can use a snake with
it.

The only drawback I have found is that the sample rate is a knob on the
front and can't be controlled with software. Additionally, changing the
sample rate with the knob requires a reboot of the unit (!?!?)

turing test



  #64   Report Post  
turing test
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I use it in Sonar, Live, and other audio programs with no problems at all.
I have not tried to record all 8 inputs at once, but I have played back
through 8 different outputs with no issues.
They provide ASIO drivers so you can get the latency quite low.

turing test


"Eric Deibler" wrote in message
...
How does it perform in SONAR?
eric

turing test wrote:
I have the Edirol/Roland UA-1000. For me, it works well and, since all
the IO that is on the front is replicated on the back, you can use a
snake with it.

The only drawback I have found is that the sample rate is a knob on the
front and can't be controlled with software. Additionally, changing the
sample rate with the knob requires a reboot of the unit (!?!?)

turing test





  #65   Report Post  
ap
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ...
..
That's also the approximate order of technical quality from high to lower.


Based on what? Drivers, features, build quality.... Would you say
there is a difference in sound quality? If so, is that based on
subjective evaluation or specs?


  #66   Report Post  
Mike Rivers
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In article writes:

Trust, mainly. I know that it's supposed to be possible to "reinstall
Windows" without changing anything else


If you get problems, that isn't what you want. You want a fresh
install onto a cleanly-formatted partition.


That would require re-installing all of my applications. They're not
broken so I shouldn't have to re-install them.

I suppose that if I was really diligent (how many of you are there?) I
should install ALL applications on a different partition than Windows
so I could bang on Windows all I wanted and once it's running, all the
applications will come up as they were. But that's assuming that
things that characterize the applications aren't stored on the Windows
partition - like in the Registry, or in the /system directory. There
may be a way of getting around that (can the Registry be on a
different partition than the rest of Windows)

In any case, this is more than I want to learn about the inner
workings of computers.

I have three computers here, one with Win98SE, one with Win2000,
and one with WinXP Home. So far I've not encountered any problems that
have tempted me to do a re-installation.


Excellent! Either you're very lucky, or your computers aren't music
production tools. If they were, you'd probably have taken much more
interest in specifying and maintaining them :-)


One is exclusively for music - the Win98 one. But I don't load it down
with gadgets. I use one program to edit stereo files, and another
program to write CDs. I have a copy of Word on there to take notes,
and Excel to keep track of expenses during session, but it's not on
the Internet and I don't install things on it that don't need to be on
it. The other two computers are more general purpose, though I have
the same audio applications installed on them and use them
occasionally, the desktop (win2000) hardly serious because I use the
internal sound card that came with the computer.

The laptop (WinXP) has a decent Digigram sound card and I consider
that to be my "backup" audio computer, and the one I use when I have
something to test for a review. I can carry that into the studio, hook
up real audio hardware top it, and not take a chance messing up the
working studio computer. WinXP is a little better about cleanly
uninstalling things than earlier versions so I've been reasonably
successful with keeping that one fairly clean. But it does have a
bunch of stuff installed on it that I've downloaded and use
occaisonally so I try to keep a CD of downloaded stuff reasonably
current in case I have to install it somewhere else (or again on the
same computer).


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
  #67   Report Post  
TonyP
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kurt Albershardt" wrote in message
...
Still no reports on RME cards after all these years?


Send him one and I bet he'll test it.
Better yet, send it to me and I will do a more thorough test for you :-)

TonyP.


  #68   Report Post  
Laurence Payne
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:07:04 GMT, "Nick"
wrote:

And I do feel sorry for anyone who is forced to program on Windows, but
it probably beats working for Christian radio....


Up until about March of 2000, it was a fantastic day job/career. Now it's
not.


Were they ****ed off because Armageddon, or whatever they call it,
didn't arrive on cue for the Millennium?

CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm
"Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect
  #70   Report Post  
Tony
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FWIW, I find it variously interesting or amusing when I hear people
(including friends and others I respect) making comments like...

"sound card ABCD sounds a lot better than WXYZ - I had a WXYZ, but
over the weekend I uninstalled it and installed an ABCD, and the
difference was amazing - more detailed, warmer, ... endless mindless
blather, etc"

Of course most of the observed effect is...
- listening to WXYZ when tired at the end of a session
- the expectation of improvement (new cars go faster)
- listening to ABCD when refreshed at the beginning of a new session
- more subtle things - eg, a friend recently replaced a Hoontech
system with a Layla G3, and pronounced the Layla sounded a lot better,
and a lot louder (higher level outputs); of course louder generally
does sound better.

On 6 Oct 2004 16:55:51 -0700, (ap) wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ...
.
That's also the approximate order of technical quality from high to lower.


Based on what? Drivers, features, build quality.... Would you say
there is a difference in sound quality? If so, is that based on
subjective evaluation or specs?


Tony (remove the "_" to reply by email)


  #71   Report Post  
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"TonyP" wrote in message

"Kurt Albershardt" wrote in message
...
Still no reports on RME cards after all these years?


Send him one and I bet he'll test it.


Indeed.

Better yet, send it to me and I will do a more thorough test for you
:-)


Are you sure about that?


  #72   Report Post  
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"ap" wrote in message
om
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
... .


That's also the approximate order of technical quality from high to
lower.


Based on what?


The categories shows.

Drivers, features, build quality....


Obviously, all the drivers worked pretty well, and none of the cards fell
apart in typical use.

Would you say there is a difference in sound quality?


On a list that covers the range shown at

http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/compare/index.htm

???

#@ll yes, there's a difference in sound quality between the card at the top
of the list, and the one at the bottom. A huge one.

If so, is that based on subjective evaluation or specs?


Both. At the top of the list, the cards can only be reliably differentiated
by technical performance. At the bottom of the list, if you can't hear the
differences, you don't belong in the audio business. Seriously. The game
starts shifting above the approximate upper 1/3 of the list.

Detailed listening test studies of several of the cards are provided at

http://www.pcabx.com/product/soundcard/index.htm , and linked out of the
relevant technical test reports.


  #74   Report Post  
Nick
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:07:04 GMT, "Nick"
wrote:

And I do feel sorry for anyone who is forced to program on Windows, but
it probably beats working for Christian radio....


Up until about March of 2000, it was a fantastic day job/career. Now it's
not.


Were they ****ed off because Armageddon, or whatever they call it,
didn't arrive on cue for the Millennium?


The full answer is complex and I don't even know all of it.

A lot of companies did break the bank fixing all the Y2K bugs (which were
real BTW). I do think there was some managerial backlash over that.
Whatever the reason, starting around the time of the NASDAQ crash, it became
harder and harder to find enough work. And then things *really* got bad
after the 9/11 attacks. Competition from programmers in India and elsewhere
is also part of it, but not the whole story.

Major new IT projects are typically expensive and risky. I think a lot of
executives just aren't willing to take those kinds of risks in the current
economic situation. In any case, once lucrative IT contracts are much
shorter, they pay far less per hour, and they're harder to come by than any
time I've ever seen since I got out of graduate school in 1988.

--Nick



  #75   Report Post  
Lorin David Schultz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Laurence Payne" wrote:

As you only use a few programs, re-installing would hardly be onerous.



It's not reinstalling programs that's the hassle -- it's:

1. finding, downloading and reinstalling all the updates and patches,
and
2. reconfiguring all the preference settings, screen layouts and menu
formats that finally became useful, comfortable and co-operative with
everything else on the machine after months of screwing around.

I figured I'd get around the problem by buying Norton Ghost and creating
a clone of my drive every time I made a "successful" change. That way I
could truly "go back" if I messed something up or had a drive failure.
No joy. My laptop has no floppy drive. I finally broke down and bought
an external one for WAY too much money, only to discover that the
machine obviously can't boot from a USB device. @#$&*!!!

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)




  #76   Report Post  
Laurence Payne
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:11:12 GMT, "Nick"
wrote:

And I do feel sorry for anyone who is forced to program on Windows, but
it probably beats working for Christian radio....

Up until about March of 2000, it was a fantastic day job/career. Now it's
not.


Were they ****ed off because Armageddon, or whatever they call it,
didn't arrive on cue for the Millennium?


The full answer is complex and I don't even know all of it.

A lot of companies did break the bank fixing all the Y2K bugs..


I meant Christian radio, actually :-)


CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm
"Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect
  #77   Report Post  
Nick
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
A lot of companies did break the bank fixing all the Y2K bugs..


I meant Christian radio, actually :-)


Oh.

Well, I guess if you were PLANNING to be part of the rapture, you might find
yourself a bit cash short now, still being alive in the world and all. ;-)

--Nick


  #78   Report Post  
reddred
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nick" wrote in message
et...
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:07:04 GMT, "Nick"
wrote:

And I do feel sorry for anyone who is forced to program on Windows,

but
it probably beats working for Christian radio....

Up until about March of 2000, it was a fantastic day job/career. Now

it's
not.


Were they ****ed off because Armageddon, or whatever they call it,
didn't arrive on cue for the Millennium?


The full answer is complex and I don't even know all of it.

A lot of companies did break the bank fixing all the Y2K bugs (which were
real BTW). I do think there was some managerial backlash over that.
Whatever the reason, starting around the time of the NASDAQ crash, it

became
harder and harder to find enough work. And then things *really* got bad
after the 9/11 attacks. Competition from programmers in India and

elsewhere
is also part of it, but not the whole story.

Major new IT projects are typically expensive and risky. I think a lot of
executives just aren't willing to take those kinds of risks in the current
economic situation. In any case, once lucrative IT contracts are much
shorter, they pay far less per hour, and they're harder to come by than

any
time I've ever seen since I got out of graduate school in 1988.


Yeah. I'm writing a book. It's more fun at this point anyway.

jb




  #80   Report Post  
ap
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah, I've been to your site and found it to be a great help to a
certain level. But when you get to the subtle differences at the top
of the list, I can't see anything on your site that clearly shows any
difference between the Lynx and the rest at the top- which includes
the delta 1010, and it's probably fair to guess the new Layla would
make it as well. The delta 1010 is tested with Rightmark but Lynx
isn't, so it's difficult to understand any minute differences without
someone holding your hand- "see how this curve goes up 2 points here,
well THIS curve goes up 3!"



From: Tony )


FWIW, I find it variously interesting or amusing when I hear people
(including friends and others I respect) making comments like...

"sound card ABCD sounds a lot better than WXYZ - I had a WXYZ, but
over the weekend I uninstalled it and installed an ABCD, and the
difference was amazing - more detailed, warmer, ... endless mindless
blather, etc"

Of course most of the observed effect is...
- listening to WXYZ when tired at the end of a session
- the expectation of improvement (new cars go faster)
- listening to ABCD when refreshed at the beginning of a new session
- more subtle things - eg, a friend recently replaced a Hoontech
system with a Layla G3, and pronounced the Layla sounded a lot

better,
and a lot louder (higher level outputs); of course louder generally
does sound better.



That pretty much sums up my feelings. This board seems to have a
healthy skepticism of the audiophile crowd, but when it comes to
comparing "pro-sumer" soundcards and high-end converters, it sounds
very similar to people who hear the difference after painting speaker
wire with "audiophile grade laquer"- or was it enamel?

Wouldn't it be great if all the popular soundcards and converters were
truly put head-to-head in controlled double blind listening tests and
super-high-tech-gee-wiz tests above and beyond the usual THD, FR, etc.
It seems like some company out there would be capable of pulling this
off, and it seems so obvious, and would benefit them greatly if their
claims of superiority could be proven true. I suspect they can't prove
shiznit and know it.

Until then, I view most comparisons as audiophile balogna. I don't
know where the "perfect enough for humans" point is, but I suspect the
sound from all three of these cards is indistinguishable from anything
else out there. What features do you need(motu), and how much do you
value impressing clients(protools, even 001 will do- too bad mackie or
peavey don't make a soundcard, they would like, rule, dude.)
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! Peter Larsen Pro Audio 125 July 9th 08 06:16 PM
OT Political Blind Joni Pro Audio 337 September 25th 04 03:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"