Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey,
My Yamaha 8424 CDRW went up in smoke the other day, along with my P4CPU (ouch) so now I'm looking for a CDRW to replace it. Unfortunately Yamaha is out of the CDRW business, so I'm starting from scratch. The Yamaha drive was superior in quality as compared to the Philips and Teac drives I have, as well as other generic brands I'd tried & AB tested. It seems that even when burning at slowest speeds (x1), the optical accuracy and/or some other aspect of CDRW are critical for producing audiophile quality. Specifically, the Yamaha was the only drive I'd used (including DVDRWs) that could translate really great stereo imaging and could render stereo reverberant fields as good as on the original wave files or CD. The kind of transparency and ability to render stereo image is not something I've ever been able to correlate with manuf. specs (at least those provided) so test listening is usually in order. My old Sony PCM was capable of that kind of performance in conjunction with a really good video format and my old Sony CD player that I paid about $350 for back in the early 80's was too. I've heard that Marantz CD players have that kind of quality and there are no doubt lots of folks who make less common audiphile gear that would qualify. But a CDRW? I even had a Teac stand alone CD burner about 6 years ago and it simply couldn't match the audio quality of the Yamaha 8424 for burning CDs and frankly I'd rather stay away from stand alone burners for a host of other reasons. Anyone out there with a critical ear who's noticed knows of a suitable CDRW for audiophile quality burning? I'd appreciate your input. :-) Skler Austin-T |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"CD Quality" MP3 | General | |||
Napster, Rhapsody, etc. - Audio quality good enough? | General | |||
Help! Looking for a quality system with alarm/sleep timer capabilities. | General | |||
Audio amplifier design trivial? | Audio Opinions |