Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a young son and a busy job. I want to convert about 150
cassettes of my old radio shows, live tapes and other things onto cd-r. The problem is that I took one cassette last night, tried to follow all the directions in the software and blew about 3 hours trying to get it to work right- it never did. So I ask ya, before I spend another 3 hours doing it "right" is there a shortcut, possibly consumer, possibly pro device that will convert cassettes to CDR en masse? I have the time to adjust all the live tapes, but I don't have the time to convert about 50 copies of my radio show from the 80s, you know? That would be 2 hours work every day for 50 days! My dream device has to run on its own while I walk away. thanks for any info, Don |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I have a young son and a busy job. I want to convert about 150 cassettes of my old radio shows, live tapes and other things onto cd-r. The problem is that I took one cassette last night, tried to follow all the directions in the software and blew about 3 hours trying to get it to work right- it never did. So I ask ya, before I spend another 3 hours doing it "right" is there a shortcut, possibly consumer, possibly pro device that will convert cassettes to CDR en masse? I have the time to adjust all the live tapes, but I don't have the time to convert about 50 copies of my radio show from the 80s, you know? That would be 2 hours work every day for 50 days! My dream device has to run on its own while I walk away. thanks for any info, Don It's going to take that long no matter how you do it, but there is an easier way with athe HHB 850 BurnIt. Set the machine to analog sychro mode and it will stop burning wnen the cassette stops. You may need to fiddle with the auto tracking levels a bit, but it will allow you to turn on the machine and then let it run by itself. At least you don't have to baby-sit it. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
D wrote:
I have a young son and a busy job. I want to convert about 150 cassettes of my old radio shows, live tapes and other things onto cd-r. The problem is that I took one cassette last night, tried to follow all the directions in the software and blew about 3 hours trying to get it to work right- it never did. So I ask ya, before I spend another 3 hours doing it "right" is there a shortcut, possibly consumer, possibly pro device that will convert cassettes to CDR en masse? I have the time to adjust all the live tapes, but I don't have the time to convert about 50 copies of my radio show from the 80s, you know? That would be 2 hours work every day for 50 days! I can't suggest a magic device that will solve the problem, but I can suggest a more streamlined approach. I would get some real audio editing software (Adobe Audition or something) and a 24-bit audio card. With the 24-bit card, you can be pretty careless about levels (as long as you err on the side of too quiet!!) because you are taking much more accurate samples than a CD can reproduce. Once you have the data in the computer, you can adjust the levels automatically (i.e. "normalize") using the software without any real loss of quality. That should take care of one of the more annoying aspects of converting cassettes to digital. Once you've got that going, all you've got to do is start the software recording, then start the cassette tape. Then walk away for 60 minutes or whatever length the program is. Watch some TV, eat dinner, play with the kid, whatever. Once the recording is done, just come back and edit the recording. You can normalize the levels, then cut off the extra crud at the end, maybe replace gaps (including the auto-reverse time) in the program with silence, etc. If the programs are all similar and you get good at it, you might be able to do the editing in, say, 10 minutes per tape. It's just a guess, but your total time might then be reduced to something like 20 or 30 minutes a tape. If you make a routine of it, you could have them all done in several months. Just start the recording before dinner, come back after dinner and do the edits, and then start the CD-R burning, and then worry about the next one the next day. Or just hire someone to do it... - Logan |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Logan Shaw wrote:
I can't suggest a magic device that will solve the problem, but I can suggest a more streamlined approach. I would get some real audio editing software (Adobe Audition or something) and a 24-bit audio card. The simplest way to get casette tape to CD's is a stand alone recorder, record level needs to be set once only and then it runs unattended for 45 minutes at a time. With the 24-bit card .... Yees. And it ties up the computer for the duration of the transfer. Good idea, but solves more than what is asked for. The suggestion of using a stand alone recorder has the additional advantage of ensuring an unrestored backup version for later restoration, there will be better software tomorrow for quite some time yet. You don't seem to mention Auditions capability of batch mode processing? - it and say a Midiman Audiophile is certainly a capable combination and yes, operator time pr. segment can be fairly short. But it takes time to use software, and it certainly takes time to learn restoration, simplest sometimes is best. Or just hire someone to do it... Great idea, at least the restoration side of it. It may or may not be relevant for the transfer, depending on the quality of the tapes and the deck and just how good it has to be. Sometimes goodenough is just that, one just has to know when. - Logan Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
D wrote:
I have a young son and a busy job. I want to convert about 150 cassettes of my old radio shows, live tapes and other things onto cd-r. I think you should go with Richard Kuschel's suggested approach. The problem is that I took one cassette last night, tried to follow all the directions in the software ERR, undefined variable "the software". Look at what Magix has to offer, not yet tested, I have and use other software. and blew about 3 hours trying to get it to work right- it never did. It takes time to learn to operate any gadget, audio software included. So I ask ya, before I spend another 3 hours doing it "right" is there a shortcut, possibly consumer, possibly pro device that will convert cassettes to CDR en masse? Cassette deck to stand alone CD recorder strongly recommended. I have the time to adjust all the live tapes, but I don't have the time to convert about 50 copies of my radio show from the 80s, you know? That would be 2 hours work every day for 50 days! My dream device has to run on its own while I walk away. You can always look into processing it later if required, get it to another media format while the tapedeck will play them. Don Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Larsen wrote:
Logan Shaw wrote: I can't suggest a magic device that will solve the problem, but I can suggest a more streamlined approach. I would get some real audio editing software (Adobe Audition or something) and a 24-bit audio card. The simplest way to get casette tape to CD's is a stand alone recorder, record level needs to be set once only and then it runs unattended for 45 minutes at a time. I guess I'm just too anal-retentive, personally, to leave well enough alone. I'd be playing large portions of the cassette trying to figure out what the hottest level is, and then trying to set the CD recorder to the optimal level for each individual tape so that I neither go too high nor too low. So, personally, with a 24-bit card, I'd feel much more at ease because I could just record it 10 or 20 dB too low and let the software take care of choosing the right level. That's not the only reasonable way to do it, of course. - Logan |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Logan Shaw wrote:
The simplest way to get casette tape to CD's is a stand alone recorder, record level needs to be set once only and then it runs unattended for 45 minutes at a time. I guess I'm just too anal-retentive, personally, to leave well enough alone. I'd be playing large portions of the cassette trying to figure out what the hottest level is, ... [snip] It is irrelevant, the hottest level on analog tape is tape saturation and it can occur at random everywhere on a casette. You don't want to clip it and make it worse. Average level may vary wildly between casettes or it may not, but it doesn't matter. and then trying to set the CD recorder to the optimal level for each individual tape so that I neither go too high nor too low. You will not go too low by the method suggested above. There is a simple reason: you copy from - shall I be kind - 60 dB dynamic range (50 is more real world like it) to 90 dB dynamic range. You can miss the barn door by 40 dB and still be at least within the same county, and probably within the same farm yard. So, personally, with a 24-bit card, I'd feel much more at ease because I could just record it 10 or 20 dB too low Don't do that, it will quite probably sound better to use the uppermost bit. Determine the largest possible output from the casette deck and adjust so that it is at say -1 to -3 dB dB full scale and leave it like that. You want to keep that level setting constant because doing that increases your options for later batch processing, not keeping the transfer level constant voids some of the options for later batch processing. and let the software take care of choosing the right level. Software is utterly incompetent in that regard. That's not the only reasonable way to do it, of course. Being lazy is sometimes constructive. It is a large enough pile of work to do as it is, there is no need to make it complicated. Make it simple and keep it simple, so that you do not have to remember too much. Having done it all in a standard way makes it much easier to get back to it if interrupted. - Logan Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Logan Shaw wrote:
The simplest way to get casette tape to CD's is a stand alone recorder, record level needs to be set once only and then it runs unattended for 45 minutes at a time. I guess I'm just too anal-retentive, personally, to leave well enough alone. I'd be playing large portions of the cassette trying to figure out what the hottest level is, ... [snip] It is irrelevant, the hottest level on analog tape is tape saturation and it can occur at random everywhere on a casette. You don't want to clip it and make it worse. Average level may vary wildly between casettes or it may not, but it doesn't matter. and then trying to set the CD recorder to the optimal level for each individual tape so that I neither go too high nor too low. You will not go too low by the method suggested above. There is a simple reason: you copy from - shall I be kind - 60 dB dynamic range (50 is more real world like it) to 90 dB dynamic range. You can miss the barn door by 40 dB and still be at least within the same county, and probably within the same farm yard. So, personally, with a 24-bit card, I'd feel much more at ease because I could just record it 10 or 20 dB too low Don't do that, it will quite probably sound better to use the uppermost bit. Determine the largest possible output from the casette deck and adjust so that it is at say -1 to -3 dB dB full scale and leave it like that. You want to keep that level setting constant because doing that increases your options for later batch processing, not keeping the transfer level constant voids some of the options for later batch processing. and let the software take care of choosing the right level. Software is utterly incompetent in that regard. That's not the only reasonable way to do it, of course. Being lazy is sometimes constructive. It is a large enough pile of work to do as it is, there is no need to make it complicated. Make it simple and keep it simple, so that you do not have to remember too much. Having done it all in a standard way makes it much easier to get back to it if interrupted. - Logan Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Personally I like CoolEdit (wich I believe is called Adobe Audition or something like that nowadays) for recording, and Nero for burning. And I like "CD Wave Editor" for splitting wav files to tracks. The version 1.5 of Adobe Audition (former CoolEdit Pro 2.1) has CD burning integrated. No need for a special "CD Wave Editor" for splitting wav files to tracks." The most simple method is probably one of those hifi style CD recorders that you connect directly to your hifi system. Works kinda like a cassette deck but records on CDs instead. There's no opportunity for editing or manual track separation, Sure there is. Track change can be initiated by pressing a button (on a remote control) or automatically when the signal drops below a certain level for more than 4 seconds. At least the low cost consumer CD recorders have these features. The downside is, consumer CD recorders need special blanks. Norbert |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Personally I like CoolEdit (wich I believe is called Adobe Audition or something like that nowadays) for recording, and Nero for burning. And I like "CD Wave Editor" for splitting wav files to tracks. The version 1.5 of Adobe Audition (former CoolEdit Pro 2.1) has CD burning integrated. No need for a special "CD Wave Editor" for splitting wav files to tracks." The most simple method is probably one of those hifi style CD recorders that you connect directly to your hifi system. Works kinda like a cassette deck but records on CDs instead. There's no opportunity for editing or manual track separation, Sure there is. Track change can be initiated by pressing a button (on a remote control) or automatically when the signal drops below a certain level for more than 4 seconds. At least the low cost consumer CD recorders have these features. The downside is, consumer CD recorders need special blanks. Norbert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cassette Adaptor-- Do they degrade with time? | General | |||
Are modern recordings so bad that they would sound the same if recorded on a cassette? | Audio Opinions | |||
Portable stereo cassette tape recorder. | Pro Audio | |||
can portable cassette recorder record on Type II tapes? | General | |||
Using a cheap old cassette recorder as a preamp of sorts? | Pro Audio |