Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC), "Toby Green"
wrote: Just been given the task of transferring some 1930's shellac recordings , date on the records are 3/4/37 , firstly which is the best deck to use , on the records they have " Use only Trailing Needles " , I under stand that modern 78 decks have a universal stylus !! Next these have been recorded off the radio so there is a lot of radio interference , been using cool edit , sound forge , DC , but not found the right filter, HELP. Oh yes, these are NOT shellacs. They are acetates. Processing them like shellac will destroy the surface. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are modern recordings so bad that they would sound the same if recorded on a cassette? | Audio Opinions | |||
"DSD recordings good. PCM recordings bad." - Dr. Diamond | High End Audio | |||
"DSD recordings good. PCM recordings bad." - Dr. Diamond | High End Audio | |||
Why all the bad recordings | High End Audio | |||
Why don't classical piano recordings sound as good as pop recordings? | High End Audio |