Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:43:25 +0000 (UTC), "Toby Green"
wrote:

Just been given the task of transferring some 1930's shellac recordings ,
date on the records are 3/4/37 , firstly which is the best deck to use , on
the records they have " Use only Trailing Needles " , I under stand that
modern 78 decks have a universal stylus !! Next these have been recorded off
the radio so there is a lot of radio interference , been using cool edit ,
sound forge , DC , but not found the right filter, HELP.


Oh yes, these are NOT shellacs. They are acetates. Processing them like
shellac will destroy the surface.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are modern recordings so bad that they would sound the same if recorded on a cassette? Arny Krueger Audio Opinions 85 May 7th 04 06:08 PM
"DSD recordings good. PCM recordings bad." - Dr. Diamond langvid High End Audio 1 February 9th 04 02:23 AM
"DSD recordings good. PCM recordings bad." - Dr. Diamond Farrell8882 High End Audio 116 February 8th 04 06:20 PM
Why all the bad recordings watch king High End Audio 3 February 6th 04 07:04 PM
Why don't classical piano recordings sound as good as pop recordings? Brian Patterson High End Audio 18 January 9th 04 04:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"