On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:49:47 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

Is that the 5033 number?

You tell me.

That's the only Bruce Richman Phd. I can find.

s******

This is starting to get kinda fun.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:49:47 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

Probably caller ID. If you tried to call me, I wouldn't answer either.

How would you know it was me?

Have someone explain cller ID to you sometime.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

If the little abbreviation at the end of his street address is to be
believed, yes.

Also, do you know what the Yellow Pages are? Do you know what makes
them different than the White pages?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
.
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Tell that to Mike.

Since nobody ever answers that phone number listed for the office
building, I was hoping to find a home number. I have had the ofc. number
for months and tried calling it, but as I said, nobody ever answers. It
rings several times and then a message says "The party is not answering,
we're sorry but your call will now be disconnected." This happens no
matter when I try to call, and that has only been during normal business
hours or during daylight hours on weekends.



Look, YOU IDIOT! By your own words, you have proved
that you have been lying all along. You said, just earlier this day,
that you could find no listing for him.



In Miami. The one I called is in N. Miami. I asked about Miami because he
made reference to it in his CV.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Mr. Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
news On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

If the little abbreviation at the end of his street address is to be
believed, yes.

Also, do you know what the Yellow Pages are? Do you know what makes
them different than the White pages?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
.
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Tell that to Mike.

Since nobody ever answers that phone number listed for the office
building, I was hoping to find a home number. I have had the ofc.
number
for months and tried calling it, but as I said, nobody ever answers. It
rings several times and then a message says "The party is not answering,
we're sorry but your call will now be disconnected." This happens no
matter when I try to call, and that has only been during normal business
hours or during daylight hours on weekends.



Look, YOU IDIOT! By your own words, you have proved
that you have been lying all along. You said, just earlier this day,
that you could find no listing for him.




Nothing this habitual liar says should be taken seriously. In fact, it
would
probably more accurate to believe the *opposite* of what he says on any
given
subject. This sociopathic hypocrite has also claimed that he "doesn't
lie", he
just "has opinions".

ROFLMAO !!!!


Bruce J. Richman


Glad to see you don't jump to conclusions and you're always so reasonable.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" emitted :

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925

Thanks Art.. ;-)


If he wren't acting like such an asshole.....
anyway, it took less than a minute to find.
I just wanted to give him an object lesson in regard
to his stalking behavior.

Who belongs to the 909 number?

I've never made any effort to conceal my phone number. You could have
gotten it from 411.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name and
number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
3...
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Is that the 5033 number? How far is N. Miami from Miami? Why doesn't
anybody ever answer?

Admission of stalking behavior, noted.

It's not stalking, I'm just trying to find out who it belongs to.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
.. .
"Clyde Slick" emitted :

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925

Thanks Art.. ;-)


If he wren't acting like such an asshole.....
anyway, it took less than a minute to find.
I just wanted to give him an object lesson in regard
to his stalking behavior.




I'm enjoying this immensely . This despicable piece of **** has done a very
convincing job of illustrating perfectly just what a hypocritical, lying sack
of **** he is. His delusional rantings and ravings, along with his obsessive
stalking behavior give us all very compelling evidence of just how mentally ill
this twisted imbecile really is. He and Krueger deserve each other. LOT's
!!!!



Bruce J. Richman

Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:49:47 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

Is that the 5033 number?

You tell me.

That's the only Bruce Richman Phd. I can find.

s******

This is starting to get kinda fun.


At the risk of sounding insensitive, I've got to admit that certain types of
bizarre behavior found among the mentally ill can be kind of funny at times.



Bruce J. Richman

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
news On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

If the little abbreviation at the end of his street address is to be
believed, yes.

Also, do you know what the Yellow Pages are? Do you know what makes
them different than the White pages?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
.
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Tell that to Mike.

Since nobody ever answers that phone number listed for the office
building, I was hoping to find a home number. I have had the ofc.
number for months and tried calling it, but as I said, nobody ever
answers. It rings several times and then a message says "The party is
not answering, we're sorry but your call will now be disconnected."
This happens no matter when I try to call, and that has only been during
normal business hours or during daylight hours on weekends.



Look, YOU IDIOT! By your own words, you have proved
that you have been lying all along. You said, just earlier this day,
that you could find no listing for him.



In Miami. The one I called is in N. Miami. I asked about Miami because
he made reference to it in his CV.


have you recovered from yesterday's meltdown?
The one where you revealed yourself to be a liar
and internet stalker.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" emitted :

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925

Thanks Art.. ;-)


If he wren't acting like such an asshole.....
anyway, it took less than a minute to find.
I just wanted to give him an object lesson in regard
to his stalking behavior.

Who belongs to the 909 number?

I've never made any effort to conceal my phone number. You could have
gotten it from 411.



Don't worry, I won't be calling you. I am not a stalker.
For the record, I have sent you emails before, as I added you
to my joke distribution list. But sent nothing related to RAO, and
sent nothing to insult you.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name and
number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
3...
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Is that the 5033 number? How far is N. Miami from Miami? Why doesn't
anybody ever answer?

Admission of stalking behavior, noted.

It's not stalking, I'm just trying to find out who it belongs to.


Duh...Mikey, it belongs to Bruce J. Richman.

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:13:30 -0500, "Clyde Slick"
wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name and
number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
3...
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Is that the 5033 number? How far is N. Miami from Miami? Why doesn't
anybody ever answer?

Admission of stalking behavior, noted.

It's not stalking, I'm just trying to find out who it belongs to.


Duh...Mikey, it belongs to Bruce J. Richman.

You forgot the PhD, which is actually in the Yellow Pages listing.

dave weil said:

Jeez man, can't you contain yourself a little bit? Are you *that* lazy
that you must post 700 lines for THIS much content?:

"I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it
proves
you and he are the same person".

And that's not even talking about the butchering of the line length
that occurs in that one sentence.

Get a grip, man.

Agent has an option to skip the download of posts larger than a
certain amount of lines, to be set by the user.

Mine is set to 200 lines max. What a relief!

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Richony Maleswoban said:

Why? Does your semen act to clean his teeth?

what's the 'matter,' tony???? arny's _isn't_ doing the job for "you" anymore
and you're _shopping_ for a replacement??? tony??? Tony??? tony????

bOOn?

Dave Weil wrote:


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?




I think proven liar and stalker McKelvy realizes that his 7 year libel campaign
has been an abject failure, convincing nobody but himself and Krueger of
anything. All it's done is make them look even more foolish and guilty, as
well as motivate all reasonable people to question the validity of anything
they have to say. After all, an individual that would knowingly lie and
fabricate one bizarre statement after another about a person they've never even
met is clearly sociopathic and/or delusional.



Bruce J. Richman

tonyiard lobloweski said:

Subject: Question for Mike McKelvey
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 12/20/2004 9:06 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"Azmacgowan" emitted :

Subject: Question for Mike McKelvey
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 12/20/2004 7:16 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"Bruce J. Richman" emitted :

Usually when somebody presents in an emergency room ranting and
raving about "vinyl bigots", "sockpuppets" and reciting meaningless
phrases
like "asked and answered", the next step is pretty obvious.

Would it involve a blunt nose hammer?


S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
-----------------------------------
It's Grim up north..




You are obviously free to edit + post what you will, whilst your
posting account remains active. However this limpit-like behaviour
does suggest that you wish to be repeatedly struck about the face with
a blunt nose hammer or similar implement in order that you be detached
from my person, figuratively speaking of course.

Is that a threat, you piece of ****?

pull the _trigger_, tony!!! "pull" the 'trigger'!!! you're _not_ going to
'let' him _talk_ to "you" like that are you??? tony?? tony?????

boON

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
news On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your
name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

If the little abbreviation at the end of his street address is to be
believed, yes.

Also, do you know what the Yellow Pages are? Do you know what makes
them different than the White pages?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
.
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Tell that to Mike.

Since nobody ever answers that phone number listed for the office
building, I was hoping to find a home number. I have had the ofc.
number for months and tried calling it, but as I said, nobody ever
answers. It rings several times and then a message says "The party is
not answering, we're sorry but your call will now be disconnected."
This happens no matter when I try to call, and that has only been
during normal business hours or during daylight hours on weekends.



Look, YOU IDIOT! By your own words, you have proved
that you have been lying all along. You said, just earlier this day,
that you could find no listing for him.



In Miami. The one I called is in N. Miami. I asked about Miami because
he made reference to it in his CV.


have you recovered from yesterday's meltdown?
The one where you revealed yourself to be a liar
and internet stalker.

What meltdown? I didn't lie. I didn't stalk.

I guess that means you're the one doing the lying.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" emitted :

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925

Thanks Art.. ;-)


If he wren't acting like such an asshole.....
anyway, it took less than a minute to find.
I just wanted to give him an object lesson in regard
to his stalking behavior.

Who belongs to the 909 number?

I've never made any effort to conceal my phone number. You could have
gotten it from 411.



Don't worry, I won't be calling you. I am not a stalker.

If placing 3 calls is your idea of stalking, I'd say your definition is much
different than mine. Trying to ascertain if someone is who they say they
are hardly qualifies as stalking anyway.

For the record, I have sent you emails before, as I added you
to my joke distribution list. But sent nothing related to RAO, and
sent nothing to insult you.
Nor have I sent anything insulting in return. I did send you an e-mail
regarding a political subject that was being discussed on RAO, but there
were no insults. I don't usually insult people who don't insult me.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:21:49 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

How would you know it was me?


Because the caller id number might
have shown

(805) 499 - 9022, or
(909) 592 - 1925


If I were calling from home it wouldn't showed since it's normally
blocked
to keep down telephone solicitors.

Well, there are plenty of people who don't answer blocked phone calls,
reasoning that if someone is concealing their name (which usually is
what's displayed anyway), they aren't someone worth answering. I
suspect that it's especially true for someone who is operating a
"professional/referral" type business like a consulting psychologist.
After all, they probably feel even more strongly about telephone
solicitors, most of whom block their IDs.

BTW, you should get on the national "do not call" list. I did and my
solicitations went from about 10-20 a day to maybe three or four a
week at most.

Frankly, I think this obsession is turning from a source of amusement
to something a bit scary. Obviously, the fact that he is precisely
listed in the Yellow Pages isn't good enough for you. Now you must
CALL the guy? It's already been done, remember?




I think proven liar and stalker McKelvy realizes that his 7 year libel
campaign
has been an abject failure,

INsofar as they are figmaents of your imagination, yes.

convincing nobody but himself and Krueger of
anything.

The only thing I've been trying to convince myself of is you being who you
say you are.

All it's done is make them look even more foolish and guilty, as
well as motivate all reasonable people to question the validity of
anything
they have to say.

Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

After all, an individual that would knowingly lie and
fabricate one bizarre statement after another about a person they've never
even
met is clearly sociopathic and/or delusional.



Then why do you keep doing it?

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
: "Ruud Broens" emitted :
:
: : Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly
reasonable.
:
: Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
: thugs ..
: one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
: Rudy
:
: One of the thugs in the bar might "accidently" spill your pint*. He is
: looking for a fight... cruising for a bruising. He may be seen
: wandering from one end of the bar to the other, by the end of the
: night face down in the gutter.. ;-)
:
: *Recreational audio opinion.
:
:
: S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
: -----------------------------------
: It's Grim up north..

It's Pim on the NG - Poetry in motion
Rudy

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy


My perspective is that there are basically two groups of people that haunt
this place.

The first one is the one that accepts that there are laws of physics and
that audio must conform to them and that there are no magic rocks, wires, or
clarifiers. There are no major sonic differences between amps, preamps, or
CD players so long as they are Solid State and competently designed to give
flat Frequency Response.

There are ways to discover subtle differences between such devices and that
involves the use of a Double Blind comparison.

There is the other group that espouse the idea that if somebody heard it, it
must be real, even if it conflicts with the laws of physics, as in the case
of things like Shakti Stones.

Those who have pointed out that some of the ideas that people have about
audio don't match reality are offended by having these things pointed out to
them. In response they have decided that it is OK for them to use any lie
any tactic no matter how repulsive or demeaning to try and make them either
go away or lose credibility.

They claim that the first group is anti-choice.
They claim the first groups says that everything sounds the same.

This has been going on for at least 10 years that I know of, most of the
really nasty stuff is directed at Arny Krueger, but it could be anybody who
thinks that a DBT is a way to find audible differences.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
news :
: "Ruud Broens" wrote in message
: ...
:
: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
: ink.net...
: :
: : Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly
reasonable.
:
: Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
: thugs ..
: one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
: Rudy
:
:
: My perspective is that there are basically two groups of people that
haunt
: this place.
:
: The first one is the one that accepts that there are laws of physics
and
: that audio must conform to them and that there are no magic rocks,
wires, or
: clarifiers. There are no major sonic differences between amps,
preamps, or
: CD players so long as they are Solid State and competently designed to
give
: flat Frequency Response.
~~
Insofar as physics being the mother of all sciences (philosophy =
granny)
solid physics based observations leading to theories or the postulation
of laws
will have to answer in it's turn to the requirements set by philosophy..
that means, any addition or modification of theory cannot be logically
incoherent with the body of knowledge at the time - or there's
somethin' wrong

the problem is, the very basis is *observation*
which is not the same as *measurement*

(left corner at the back of the bar: discussing this a bit more is
intrestin)
~~:
: There are ways to discover subtle differences between such devices and
that
: involves the use of a Double Blind comparison.
:
: There is the other group that espouse the idea that if somebody heard
it, it
: must be real, even if it conflicts with the laws of physics, as in the
case
: of things like Shakti Stones.
:
: Those who have pointed out that some of the ideas that people have
about
: audio don't match reality are offended by having these things pointed
out to
: them. In response they have decided that it is OK for them to use any
lie
: any tactic no matter how repulsive or demeaning to try and make them
either
: go away or lose credibility.
:
: They claim that the first group is anti-choice.
: They claim the first groups says that everything sounds the same.
:
: This has been going on for at least 10 years that I know of, most of
the
: really nasty stuff is directed at Arny Krueger, but it could be
anybody who
: thinks that a DBT is a way to find audible differences.
:
~~
stranger @ the bar
had just one drink so far

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
news On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your
name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

If the little abbreviation at the end of his street address is to be
believed, yes.

Also, do you know what the Yellow Pages are? Do you know what makes
them different than the White pages?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
.
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Tell that to Mike.

Since nobody ever answers that phone number listed for the office
building, I was hoping to find a home number. I have had the ofc.
number for months and tried calling it, but as I said, nobody ever
answers. It rings several times and then a message says "The party is
not answering, we're sorry but your call will now be disconnected."
This happens no matter when I try to call, and that has only been
during normal business hours or during daylight hours on weekends.



Look, YOU IDIOT! By your own words, you have proved
that you have been lying all along. You said, just earlier this day,
that you could find no listing for him.



In Miami. The one I called is in N. Miami. I asked about Miami because
he made reference to it in his CV.


have you recovered from yesterday's meltdown?
The one where you revealed yourself to be a liar
and internet stalker.

What meltdown? I didn't lie. I didn't stalk.

I guess that means you're the one doing the lying.


Complete inability to comprehend reality noted.
Complete lack of self awareness noted

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy



At one end of the bar, all the patrons think that all Scotch
tastes the same. At the other end of the bar, some think that some
Scotches taste better than others. Which end are you at?

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
:
: "Ruud Broens" wrote in message
: ...
:
: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
: ink.net...
: :
: : Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly
reasonable.
:
: Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
: thugs ..
: one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
: Rudy
:
:
:
: At one end of the bar, all the patrons think that all Scotch
: tastes the same. At the other end of the bar, some think that some
: Scotches taste better than others. Which end are you at?
:
I'm a man of faith.
I doubly-blindly trust my own cognitive abilities
to absolutely tell me what I like best :-)
c u next time in the bar,
Rudy

"Michael McKelvy" said:

My perspective is that there are basically two groups of people that haunt
this place.

Actually, there are 3 groups.

#1.:
The first one is the one that accepts that there are laws of physics and
that audio must conform to them and that there are no magic rocks, wires, or
clarifiers.

#2.:
There is the other group that espouse the idea that if somebody heard it, it
must be real, even if it conflicts with the laws of physics, as in the case
of things like Shakti Stones.

#3.:
And then there's me.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
...
: "Michael McKelvy" said:
:
: My perspective is that there are basically two groups of people that
haunt
: this place.
:
: Actually, there are 3 groups.
:
: #1.:
: The first one is the one that accepts that there are laws of physics
and
: that audio must conform to them and that there are no magic rocks,
wires, or
: clarifiers.
:
: #2.:
: There is the other group that espouse the idea that if somebody heard
it, it
: must be real, even if it conflicts with the laws of physics, as in
the case
: of things like Shakti Stones.
:
: #3.:
: And then there's me.
:
: --
: Sander de Waal
: " SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

:-))))
R.

Ruud Broens a écrit :
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..

Like in the other bars guys here are wasting time.
Long flame wars instead of long drinks, it's safer for the liver but not
for the brain.

one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh

Martini ? It's in the other room, with the ladies. )

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
...


#3.:
And then there's me.


Real drunks drink alone.
Try AA, that would either be Alcoholics Anonymous
http://www.alcoholics-anonymous.org/
or Audio Advisor http://www.audioadvisor.com/

"Clyde Slick" said:

#3.:
And then there's me.

Real drunks drink alone.

Wouldn't know about that.
Drunks bore me [hic]

Now, had you said "potheads "............ ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Clyde Slick wrote:



"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
news On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your
name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

If the little abbreviation at the end of his street address is to be
believed, yes.

Also, do you know what the Yellow Pages are? Do you know what makes
them different than the White pages?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
.
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Tell that to Mike.

Since nobody ever answers that phone number listed for the office
building, I was hoping to find a home number. I have had the ofc.
number for months and tried calling it, but as I said, nobody ever
answers. It rings several times and then a message says "The party is
not answering, we're sorry but your call will now be disconnected."
This happens no matter when I try to call, and that has only been
during normal business hours or during daylight hours on weekends.



Look, YOU IDIOT! By your own words, you have proved
that you have been lying all along. You said, just earlier this day,
that you could find no listing for him.



In Miami. The one I called is in N. Miami. I asked about Miami because
he made reference to it in his CV.


have you recovered from yesterday's meltdown?
The one where you revealed yourself to be a liar
and internet stalker.

What meltdown? I didn't lie. I didn't stalk.

I guess that means you're the one doing the lying.


Complete inability to comprehend reality noted.
Complete lack of self awareness noted



Reasonable conclusions to be drawn from McKelvy's behavior noted.

Continuation of delusional beliefs by McKelvy noted./

Predictable continuation of lying by McKelvy noted.



Bruce J. Richman

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
. ..

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...
:
: Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly reasonable.

Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
thugs ..
one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
Rudy



At one end of the bar, all the patrons think that all Scotch
tastes the same. At the other end of the bar, some think that some
Scotches taste better than others. Which end are you at?




Also, at one end of the bar are people that respect and welcome the choices of
others to disagree with their personal preferences. At the other end of the
bar are a few people that regularly insult and ridicule those that have certain
preferences and hypocritially call them "bigots".and "tweako-freakos".







Bruce J. Richman

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
: Ruud Broens a écrit :
: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
: ink.net...
: :
: : Reasonable people? The usual gang of RAO thugs are hardly
reasonable.
:
: Kinda new in this bar. Can you define or list the usual gang of RAO
: thugs ..
:
: Like in the other bars guys here are wasting time.
: Long flame wars instead of long drinks, it's safer for the liver but
not
: for the brain.
:
: one likes to know on what end of the bar to sip the martini's, eh
:
: Martini ? It's in the other room, with the ladies. )

Sure that's not a lion's tale ? Then, let's have it man,
show me that door, pronto :-)
ballroom blitz
R.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Sander deWaal said:
Actually, there are 3 groups.

#1.: simpleton's regurgitation of Kroopaganda 1

#2.: simpleton's regurgitation of Kroopaganda 2

#3.:
And then there's me.

Aren't you a Normal? ;-)

Some Normals tinker and fuss with their systems. There are also the
Kroopologists and other 'borgs, who are deathly afraid of real science and
motivated by a petty class-warfare agenda.




That's really just a construct of your mind George.