Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.



I am a great believer in expectation effects.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.

Thanks Richman for admitting that such opinions that will be granted by your
clique will be determined soley by your prejudices. Pretty follows your
approaches to audio.

"Arny Krueger" said:

Thanks Richman for admitting that such opinions that will be granted by your
clique will be determined soley by your prejudices.

In English?

Pretty follows your
approaches to audio.

Who is Pretty?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" said:

Thanks Richman for admitting that such opinions that will be granted
by your clique will be determined soley by your prejudices.

In English?

Pretty well follows your approaches to audio.

Who is Pretty?

Whoever you think is pretty, I guess.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.



It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.

Thanks Richman for admitting that such opinions that will be granted by
your
clique will be determined soley by your prejudices. Pretty follows your
approaches to audio.




Thanks, Krueger, for demonstrating your reading comprehension problems,
since
the questions have to do with McKelvy's opinions and not mine nor those of
any
other posters.

Thanks for demostrating you don't understand what "public" forum means.

Thanks, also for once again also engaging in deceptive editing
by omitting the reference to McKelvy clearly made by Art in his oriiginal
response to McKelvy. Thanks also for demonstrating your ongoing paranoia
about
conspiracy theories among people who disagree with your agenda-driven
prejudices.


Thanks for demonstrating that well known Richman professionalism and
decorum, we've all come to know so well.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.

It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.

*never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between
audio-related posts by Richman.

"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
...
"Arny Krueger" said:

Thanks Richman for admitting that such opinions that will be granted by
your
clique will be determined soley by your prejudices.

In English?

Pretty follows your
approaches to audio.

Who is Pretty?



Annika

"Arny Krueger" said:

*never* is a big word,

Something like "intercarrierfrequency" is a big word.
"Never" isn't.

No won-der you have rea-ding com-pre-hen-sion pro-blems.

;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

"Clyde Slick" said:

Thanks Richman for admitting that such opinions that will be granted by
your
clique will be determined soley by your prejudices.

In English?

Pretty follows your
approaches to audio.

Who is Pretty?

Annika

Brett follows Richman's approaches to audio?

Whodathunk!

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.

It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.

*never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between
audio-related posts by Richman.

Unless he's talking about vinyl and it's playback hardware, there's nothing
very constructive happening with the Doctor.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.

Michael McKelvy wrote:



"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.

Thanks Richman for admitting that such opinions that will be granted by
your
clique will be determined soley by your prejudices. Pretty follows your
approaches to audio.




Thanks, Krueger, for demonstrating your reading comprehension problems,
since
the questions have to do with McKelvy's opinions and not mine nor those of
any
other posters.

Thanks for demostrating you don't understand what "public" forum means.


Thanks for demonstrating that you're too stupid to ujnderstand a simple
question directed to you rather than to the public.
Thanks for trying to distort Sackman's question to fall in line with your
lapdog tendency to always support Krueger.



Thanks, also for once again also engaging in deceptive editing
by omitting the reference to McKelvy clearly made by Art in his oriiginal
response to McKelvy. Thanks also for demonstrating your ongoing paranoia
about
conspiracy theories among people who disagree with your agenda-driven
prejudices.


Thanks for demonstrating that well known Richman professionalism and
decorum, we've all come to know so well.


Thanks for lying as we've anll come to expect from you. Your stupidity can
always be depended on as almost all RAO posters know and ridicule. Also,
thanks for proving that you're so deluded that you can't tell the difference
between a person'pl place of employment and a chat group. Thanks also for
predictably prolving that you're Krueger's puppet - as if we didn't already
know that.



Bruce J. Richman

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.



It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.



Prove it, asshole. LOL!!!

It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do
with me.

Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for
chornic dishonesty.


Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?



Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we can
all expect - dishonest behavior.

(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response.

(2) The title of your thread and the questoni were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.

(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest answers.



Bruce J. Richman

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.

Arny Krueger must be given credit for making one of his
recordings available. I shall listen to it with interest. For
comparison, Mr, McKelvy, you can download MP3s of my most recent
choral recordings at
http://www.cantusonline.org/Store/CJ1Track.htm by clicking on
the song titles with the loudspeaker symbol next to them.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to be in his 70s
or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of his
bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done is cut on
people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist when
you were just being spit out into this world like a wet pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head handed to
you by your betters. Especially since you've been proven to also be a
liar.

On 19 Dec 2004 05:48:54 -0800, "John Atkinson"
wrote:


Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.

Arny Krueger must be given credit for making one of his
recordings available. I shall listen to it with interest. For
comparison, Mr, McKelvy, you can download MP3s of my most recent
choral recordings at
http://www.cantusonline.org/Store/CJ1Track.htm by clicking on
the song titles with the loudspeaker symbol next to them.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

Apparently, you can hear papers rustle and chairs squeaking.

Heck, I can hear that on a Ron Sexsmith song, but the music is
actually listenable. And that particular Ron Sexsmith album was
recorded in analog, so I don't know what the big deal is.

From: "John Atkinson"
Date: 12/19/2004 5:48 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: .com


Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.

Arny Krueger must be given credit for making one of his
recordings available. I shall listen to it with interest. For
comparison, Mr, McKelvy, you can download MP3s of my most recent
choral recordings at
http://www.cantusonline.org/Store/CJ1Track.htm by clicking on
the song titles with the loudspeaker symbol next to them.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile


LOL

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording.

No Brucie, I was simply pointing out that if youi post something on a public
forum, it's likely that other people will respond.


He and Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.


Thanks for proving how desparate you are, that you take simple factual
statements and opinions and convince yourself tghey are lies.




God, you're dull.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?
When you find Mr. McKelvey you should ask him.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?



Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we
can
all expect - dishonest behavior.

(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response.


Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the
death of Julian Hirsch.

(2) The title of your thread and the questoni

Is that Italian?

were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation
for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.

I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording, I've
not listened to it.

(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest
answers.

And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian
Hirsch thread get no answer at all.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
hlink.net
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.

It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.

*never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between
audio-related posts by Richman.




Whateve the delay (and in this case, less then 24 hours), a much sorter
delay
than a personal attack by Krueger against either myself or one of the many
other people he routinely smears.



I guess if you have a life outside of RAO it can get in the way of
responding.

Since you seem to have very little life outside of RAO, perhaps you can tell
me why you have consistently ignored the question about why you made an
unprovoked personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread?
What city do you live in?
Do you have a practice?
In what city?

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.



It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.



Prove it, asshole. LOL!!!

You give evidence every day.

It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having
to do
with me.


It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of
what an asshole you are.

Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation
for
chornic dishonesty.


Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?
When you find Mr. McKelvey you should ask him.


Sorry to confuse you, I meant to ask "Duh..Mikey".

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
arthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?



Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we
can
all expect - dishonest behavior.

(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger,
his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in
and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response.


Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the
death of Julian Hirsch.

(2) The title of your thread and the questoni

Is that Italian?

were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation
for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.

I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording,
I've not listened to it.

(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest
answers.

And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian
Hirsch thread get no answer at all.

Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to be in his 70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of his
bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done is cut on
people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist when
you were just being spit out into this world like a wet pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head handed to
you by your betters. Especially since you've been proven to also be a
liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog, McKelvy, for mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



Bruce J. Richman

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
arthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.




I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording,
I've not listened to it.


Well, go ahead and listen to it, and
respond with your opinions about the
recording, the performance, and Arny's
taste in "musik".

Mikey McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording.

No Brucie, I was simply pointing out that if youi post something on a public
forum, it's likely that other people will respond.


Well Mkey, apparently you didn't notice that the thread had your name in it and
was a question directed at you. Just because you parrot and slavisihly imitate
Arnie's responses, that doesn't mean that others take your place.


He and Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.


Thanks for proving how desparate you are, that you take simple factual
statements and opinions and convince yourself tghey are lies.




God, you're dull.




Thanks for proving once again how predictably stupid and dishonest you can be.
Your lies become larger and mroe frequent with every passing day. You really
are quite out of touch with reality.



Bruce J. Richman

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?
When you find Mr. McKelvey you should ask him.




How juvenile and pathetic you are - copying your puppetmaster Krueger's use of
grasping at typographical errors because of nothing else to say.



Bruce J. Richman

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?
When you find Mr. McKelvey you should ask him.

Inability to recognize a spelling error in a name that you have seen
repeatedly for years, noted.

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
arthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?



Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we
can
all expect - dishonest behavior.

(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response.


Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the
death of Julian Hirsch.



A blatant lie.


(2) The title of your thread and the questoni

Is that Italian?


Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to respond
honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile
typographical error citing noted.



were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation
for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.

I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording, I've
not listened to it.


You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather then answer
the question and stick to the facts. Of course, your mindless and slavish need
to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us.



(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest
answers.

And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian
Hirsch thread get no answer at all.



Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies, the question was equally
dishonest and not worthy of response.

Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least asked for
an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you have
repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman?

I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like to see
this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is clearly against
the law.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Mikey McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording.

No Brucie, I was simply pointing out that if youi post something on a
public
forum, it's likely that other people will respond.


Well Mkey, apparently you didn't notice that the thread had your name in
it and
was a question directed at you.

Apparent to whom? Of course I noticed it, that's why I responded to it as
soon as I read it.

Just because you parrot and slavisihly imitate
Arnie's responses, that doesn't mean that others take your place.

But it was posted on a public forum and therefore anybody who wished too
could respond.


He and Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.


Thanks for proving how desparate you are, that you take simple factual
statements and opinions and convince yourself tghey are lies.




God, you're dull.




Thanks for proving once again how predictably stupid and dishonest you can
be.

In Richamn worl, truth equals lies, opinions equal lies. Pointin out lies
equals predictability.

Your lies become larger and mroe frequent with every passing day. You
really
are quite out of touch with reality.


Thus speaks the long winded asshole with no known address who makes
unprovoked personal attacks during memorial threads.

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
thlink.net
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.

It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.

*never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between
audio-related posts by Richman.




Whateve the delay (and in this case, less then 24 hours), a much sorter
delay
than a personal attack by Krueger against either myself or one of the many
other people he routinely smears.



I guess if you have a life outside of RAO it can get in the way of
responding.

Since you seem to have very little life outside of RAO, perhaps you can tell
me why you have consistently ignored the question about why you made an
unprovoked personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread?

Asked and answered in another post. Since you don't have the ability to tell
the truth or recognize factual evidence, there is no need to respond to any
questions you raise. When you don't agree with the results, you simply lie and
call the person giving them a "liar".

Your dedication to trashing political parties and Krueger's many enemies on RAO
indicates that RAO is your main occupation. In fact, AFAIK, you've never
mentioned being engaged in any type of employment. Is that because you subsist
solely on disability checks from the government?

What city do you live in?
Do you have a practice?
In what city?



Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is
impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or
stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in
Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the
public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime.

Since information has been provided over a 7 year period about my activities
which you have consistently either ignored or characterized as lies, why should
anybody believe you have any interest in the truth?

Here's another question. Are you going to take up Scott Wheeler on his offer
to be you re. my identity with 10 to 1 odds? I notice he didn't specify dollar
amounts so the bet could be for as little or as much as you want, I presume.



Bruce J. Richman

Michael McKelvy lied:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?



LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are
predetermined.



It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO.



Prove it, asshole. LOL!!!

You give evidence every day.


Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted.


It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having
to do
with me.


It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of
what an asshole you are.


It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another
person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc.




Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation
for
chornic dishonesty.


Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is.



Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger
believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody
thinks they are just "opinions" (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable
identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass).


Bruce J. Richman

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
arthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?
When you find Mr. McKelvey you should ask him.


Sorry to confuse you, I meant to ask "Duh..Mikey".



Expect a reasonable delay in responding. He needs to check with his
ventriloquist in Detroit.


Bruce J. Richman