"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


IOW, my opinion is that you sneak inot the morgue
and **** dead bodies, not all of them female.
It's not a lie of course, just my opinion.

Art, what a picture of positive character and good mental health!

I wouldn't even want a pet gerbil to grow up like you. ;-(

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 12/20/2004 5:29 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


I thought that the accents, dynamics, choppiness, and
regimentation produced just a God awful result.

So when are you going to post something of yours, Art?


We all do different things Arny.

Yep Art we all do different things. You are content to sit in front
of your computer typing inaninities. I've got some music to make and
then enjoy listening to.

This from the guy with over 100,000 Usenet posts.

Well, that took me 8 years to do!

Besides, maybe I'm just a highly productive guy. For example in the past 3
years I've also done about 100 live recording sessions. I've also pulled
well over 150 live sound gigs.

LOL we know what you do Arny. It aint makin music.

Delusions of omniscience noted.

Sour grapes noted.

Scott's lost lawsuit noted.

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
.atl.earthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest
fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He
and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual
lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?



Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and -
as
we
can
all expect - dishonest behavior.

(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller,
Krueger,
his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked
in
and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational
response.


Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about
the
death of Julian Hirsch.



A blatant lie.


(2) The title of your thread and the questoni

Is that Italian?


Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to
respond
honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile
typographical error citing noted.



were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's
reputation
for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.

I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording,
I've
not listened to it.


You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather
then
answer
the question and stick to the facts.

I did? Oh dear me, I might start becoming like you.

Of course, your mindless and slavish need
to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us.

I think all you have to do to ingratiate yourself to Arny is accept that
the
laws of physics are still intact.

(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest
answers.


Liewise yourself.

And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the
Julian
Hirsch thread get no answer at all.



Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies,

The premise was why did you make a personal attack on Arny in the Julian
Hirsch thread. You did so, now explain why.

the question was equally
dishonest and not worthy of response.

IOW you got caught and don't want to admit to the fact that it was tacky
and
pointless.


Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least
asked
for
an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you
have
repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr.
Richman?

Because the most likely scenario is that Dr. Richman is a harmless gnat.

I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like
to
see
this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is
clearly
against
the law.

If I'm doiing you such an injustice why have you not taken steps to get
me
charged with something, or is denigrationg an asshole on USENET not a
crime?

Where do you live, where's your practice?










Well, other than seeing his reponse to my post, I haven't bothered to
read
it.
As usual, I can safely assume it contained a series of lies and juvenile
insults. Therefore, rather than waste my time and that of other RAO
readers,
I' re reproducing a response written in April, 2004 in response to
McKelvy's
bull**** about my background. Note that it directly refutrs just about
all of
his idiotic attempts to continue his lies and libel campaign.


In response to proven libeler and pathological liar McKelvy's continued
repetition of false claims, coupled with a laughable "demand" that I
produce
evidence that he has a lengthy history of lying and libeling me on RAO,
I
decided to call this cretin's pathetic attempts to dodge responsibility
for his
despicable behavior with the following response.

A couple of observations, should be added re. my post of April 9, 2004,
which
is reproduced below:

1. In the first example of libel by McKelvy which I cite, he initiated
libel
thread with the title "Richman's ethical lapses". It is worth noting
that
he
does not and CAN NOT list any. So obviously, his sole purpose was to
libel and
defame another person. I chose to ignore this piece of unprovoked
garbage
which he initiated. As did every other RAO poster.

2. As of the time of this writing, 4:00 PM EST on 4/10/04, the proven
liar and
libeler Mckelvy has failed to respond directly to the post reproduced
below.
It is obvious that his latest bluff/bull**** has been called and he's
been
exposed for what most on RAO already have known him to be for a long
time - a
hatemongering, bitter, delusional liar and character assassin whose
primary
purpose in posting on RAO is to smear others with whatever lies,
libelous
false
claims and libelous labels of other people his diseased, delusional
"mind"
(such as it is in its primitive state) can regurgitate.

3. Proven liar and libeler McKelvy has been challenged to submit his
delusional
"complaints" about my professional and ethical behavior (about which he
has
admitted he knows nothing - one of the few true things he has ever said)
to the
appropriate licensing board in my state. Of course, he has failed to do
so,
most likely because he knows that he's full of it, and will be sued by
me
after
he does so.

4. I could have provided many more examples of McKelvy's compulsive lies
and
libels against me, but felt that for now, 2 would be sufficient.
Pending
the
results of Mr. Wheeler's case, and in consultation with my attornies, I
may
elect to pursue legal action against him and use a quite impressive and
lengthy
file of false, libelous claims he has made against me as evidence. No
doubt,
he will "help" by continuing to provide further evidence that can be
used
against him.

5. I apologize for the lengfh of this post in advance, but in
consideration of
McKelvy's obvious compulsive, pathological responses which almost always
consist of further lies and libelous false statements about me, this
response
is IMHO, quite appropriate.

6. This response will be the one used in the future to deal with
McKelvy's
subsequent sociopathic, delusional, false, and libelous personal attacks
against me.
-----------------------------------------------------------


Mike McKelvy continues to avoid providing proof of his slander:

From: (Bruce J. Richman)

Mike McKelvy wrote:


From: (Bruce J. Richman)


deletion of further lies in which McKelvy tries to avoid
responsibility
for
lengthy history of lying and committing slander re. my credentials,
training
and professional activities.

This despicable scumbag, after first admitting he knows nothing about
my
credentials, training and professional activities, then laughingly
trying
to
claim his slanderous bull**** was merely opinions, and now attempting
to
deny
all responsibility for his ridiculous lies ? insults the intelligence
of
all
RAO readers.

His requests for "proof" ? like all his imbecilic grunts and mutterings
concerning me ? are a joke. As is his very RAO existence.

While he continue to deny slandering me, and requesting proof, his
credibility
remains zero (except perhaps, in the eyes of his hero, Krueger).

His false claims re. my professional background are a matter of Google
record,
and virtually all RAO readers at all familiar with this sociopath's
imbecilic
bull**** re. my background know this to be the case.

Since he's been purveying lies about me, he needs to present the proof
for
all
his nonsense, or stick his head further up the orifice in which it's
obviously
been inserted for so long.




Bruce J. Richman



repetitive bull**** similar to that pruveyed over a 6 year period by
this
pathological liar and proven slanderer deleted

For this pathological liar, all false claims about another person's
training,
credentials, professional experience, etc. ? are only "opinions" ? a
piece
of
bull**** nobody other than this lying cretin believes.

Here's just one example of his slander:



http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...thbp0ffk2j625%

40corp.supernews.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMcKelvy%2Band%2Blicensing%2
Bboard%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26t ab%3Dwg

Note that this was an attack thread started by McKelvy, in which this
fool,
reproduces the Ethical Code followed by psychologists.

Note the slanderous title of the post.

Note also the question, this proven slanderer asks in the last line
after
quoting the Ethical code.

Needless to say, this pathological liar has no evidence that I have ever
committed any ethics violations, and in fact his use of the title of
this
thread, to which nobody responded, constitutes slander.

I have directly challenged this despicable cretin and proven liar to
submit any

complaints he has to the Florida State Licensing Board. He has refused
to
do
so, because he knows he's been lying about me for 6 years.

This fool, in a conversation with Scott Wheeler commiitted another
blatant
lie:


"The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be
obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons."

The reference for this is

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...igk0458h89%40c
orp.supernews.com

Now, no doubt, proven liar and slanderer McKelvy will claim he's just
voiced an
opinion, but defamation and libel of a licensed psychologist, whose
identity is

acknowledged and has been proven on RAO to the satisfaction of virtually
all
conscious lifeforms with the exception of McKelvy and Krueger, is *not*
an
opinion.

His lies are a matter of public record, and these 2 examples are just a
few of
many that could be easily obtained from the Google record.

He has also deliberately ignored the following evidence presented on
Google:

"The University of Texas at Austin, has long had one of the most highly
regarded
doctoral programs in Clinical Psychology in the United States (top 10
ranking). Since I had the good fortune to have a very good record in my
Master's propgram at Clinical Psychology at Boston College,l and perhaps
becauise I hit the 99th %ile on the Graduate Record Examination (Verbal
Portion) and the 99th %ile examination on the Psychology Acvhievement
section,
I had the rather odd experience of being actively recruited by schools
to
which
I applied. (I had always thought this just happened to jocks, but I was
wrong). One unforgettable day, I got a call from the head of the
Clinical
Psychology program at the University of Texas, a Dr. James Bieri, who
basically
said "We've seen your application, we'd like you to come here, and we're
prepared to make you a nice offfer". That nice offer, which I accepted,
turned
out to be a NIMH (National Institutes of Mental Health) Traineeship in
Clinical
Psychology, for an unlimited period of time, with no strings attached
other
than that I meet the academic requirements of the program (maintain a B
average).. It took care of all my expenses (tuition, room & board,
books,
etc.) and gave me s small stipend to live on as well. Some of my
classmates
congratulated me on my good fortune (many of them had to accept teaching
assistantships to help pay their bills, while all I had to do was hit
the
books). The program turned out to be a real meatgrinder (as one of my
classmates put it). It made my undergraduate program at an elite "small
Ivy
League school" (Bowdoin College) and my M.A. program seem like
kindergarten.
Almost everybody in my entering class of about 20 had either a Phi
Beta Kappa key, was published and or came from Ivy League schools or
places
like U. of Chicago, Stanford or Berkeley. Of the 20 who started the
program,
only 5 of us survived and got our doctorates. It took not only a high
degree
of intelligence and perserverance, but also a large ability to deal with
the
stress of knowing that you were in a program with a very high attrition
rate
and some professors, who frankly, until you got to the 2nd year and had
"paid
your dues", didn't give a damn if you survived or not. I'll never
forgot
one
of my Statistics professors who used to get up in front of the class and
say
"Even if you don't make it through graduate school, you can still be a
good
citizen""

and the following:

"I was accepted for an Internship in Clnical
Psycnology at Massachusetts General Hospital, which I accepted and
completed"

and the followiong:

"After obtaining my doctorate, I was
also accepted for postdoctoral training at Temple Medical School,
Department of
Psychiary, Institute for Behavior Therapy, in Philadelphia. I enjoyed
my
time
there had learned a lot under the supervision of the late Dr. Joseph
Wolpe, a
world famous psychiatrist who is considered to be one of the founders of
Cognitive?Behavioral Therapy, the predominant type of therapy now
practiced by
most psychologists and psychiatrists (aside from pharmacotherapy). "

The above quotes are from a post written in response to Howard Ferstler,
another well known zealot, pathological liar, and purveyor of libel on
RAO
(not
surprisingly, frequently defended by Krueger, McKelvy's role model).

The complete post (and thread) can be referened at:


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0203225629.076

19.00000418%40mb?mg.aol.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DFerstler%2Band%2BRichman%2B

and%2BUniversity%2Bof%2BTexas%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%2 6ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26ta
b%3Dwg

So McKelvy's slandeous claims about quacks, frauds, and fakes are
nothing
more
than the delusional, sociopathic rantings and repetitions of a proven
liar
and
libeler.

No doubt he will claim that this is all made up, but the only thing made
up are
his nonsensical departures from reality which pollute RAO whenever he
continues
to libel me and others.

One further fact, which I may or may not be able to prove since it
happened a
long time ago, and I don't know if the radio station keeps records. And
I
challenge the cretin and liar, McKelvy, to disprove it ? LOL! :

In about 1976 or 1977, I was employed as the "Psychology Director" of a
private
Cardiac Rehabilitation Center based in Miami, Florida. The center ran a
30?day, interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients who were either
at
high risk for cardiac disease or had already undergone such procedures
as
cardiac bypass surgery. My main responsibility was to direct the
behavioral
component of this intensive program (which also involved dieticians,
exercise
physiologists, cardiologists, and RNs). Areas such as stress management,

smoking cessation, behavioral approaches to obesity, etc. were among the
targets that I had to address. One of my other responsibilities was, in
conjunction with the medical director, to promote the program through
various
media appearances in both TV and radio. Two interviews in particular
stand out
in my mind. The first came in the wee hours of the morning in New York
City on
a nationally syndicated program ? "The Long John Nebel Show" (New
Yorkers
old
enough may remember this). The second occurred in my home base on the
79th
Street Causeway in Miami Beach at a radio station where Miami's best
known
talk
show host (at the time) was carrying forth ? I spent 2 hours being
interviewed
very incisively on the main topic which was "Stress and Heart Disease".
I
remember coming away from that interview thinking that the interviewer
was
very
sharp and well prepared to really grill me. The name of the radio
station
(and
I'm relying on long ago recall was, I believe either WKAT or WIOD). The
name
of the host ? Larry King.

Shortly thereafter, Larry left Miami and the rest is history.

I challenge the proven liar, and libeler, McKelvy to dispute any of
these
facts
with any factual evidence he cares to fabricate from the diseased empty
spaces
composing his deluded cranium.

No doubt he will choose to delete most of this post instead.

LOL!!!

(I apologize for appearing to be bragging about past or present
accomplishments, but since this despicable, loudmouthed, unbelievably
stupid,
delusional, libeler and liar decided to completely embarass himself once
again,
it was just too tempting to not assist him in making a fool of himself
and
exposing his sociopathic behavior once again).

Nothing more needs to be said about his lies, so when he responds with
more
bull****, I will respond with a standard, previously used, canned
response
that
perfectly describes this moron's basic character, motivations, and
irrational
behaviors.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
(FL PY 2543)



Thanks for once again demonstrating you can't tell the difference between
opinions and lies.





I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above.

Ooops, you've run out of ammunition again. That opinions are lies bull****
is getting weaker by the minute.

You can always tell when Bruce is getting frustrated, the frequency of his
typo's increases.




I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...


IOW, you'll; continue to deny that a 7 year history of libel and false
statements is contained in the Google record.

IOW, I'll continue to express my opinion of you and any other thing I feel
like. Plus I'll continue to let you look ridiculous for responding.


IOW, my opinion is that you sneak inot the morgue
and **** dead bodies, not all of them female.
It's not a lie of course, just my opinion.



It's quite a hoot to see McKelvy, in his well-iknown idiotic and mendacious
approach to the human race, trying to sell his transparent lies about his 7
year history of libel and false statements about others. The fact that he's
mentally ill and extremely stupid does not justify his attempts to insult the
intelligence of all rational individuals that can easily tell the difference
between a blatant lie and an opinion.

I think Art's opinion about Mikey's necrophilia is much more truthful and well
within the realm of possibility. It's my opinion that the person posing as
Michael McKelvy is really an inmate at a Southern California mental institution
with access to a computer as part of his recreational therapy program. That
would explain the fact that he has no known address, occupation, or ability to
separate facts from fiction.



Bruce J. Richman

Arny Krueger wrote:



"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording?

Yes.

Is that your idea of music?

It is music, it's just not the kind I like. Are you now attacking
preference again?

Mike, do you think that RAO's preference police in the form of Bruce Richman
is going to criticize Art for his obvious preference-trashing?

LOL!


Since there was no preference trashing taking place, Krueger's delusional
observations have about as much credibility as McKelvy's delusional nonsense
about lies and opinions.

LOL !!!!



Bruce J. Richman

Scott Wheeler wrote:


From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 12/20/2004 5:29 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


I thought that the accents, dynamics, choppiness, and regimentation
produced just a God awful result.

So when are you going to post something of yours, Art?


We all do different things Arny.

Yep Art we all do different things. You are content to sit in front of your
computer typing inaninities. I've got some music to make and then enjoy
listening to.


This from the guy with over 100,000 Usenet posts. LOL we know what you do
Arny.
It aint makin music.



Don't be too sure. In the paranoid, hatemongering "career" involved in
Krueger's character assassination campaigns, endless personal attacks on others
are "music to his ears".




Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

It's my opinion that the person posing as
Michael McKelvy is really an inmate at a Southern California mental
institution
with access to a computer as part of his recreational therapy program.

But how would you explain his love of Hong Kong?

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...


IOW, you'll; continue to deny that a 7 year history of libel and false
statements is contained in the Google record.

IOW, I'll continue to express my opinion of you and any other thing I
feel
like. Plus I'll continue to let you look ridiculous for responding.


IOW, my opinion is that you sneak inot the morgue
and **** dead bodies, not all of them female.
It's not a lie of course, just my opinion.



It's quite a hoot to see McKelvy, in his well-iknown idiotic and
mendacious
approach to the human race, trying to sell his transparent lies about his
7
year history of libel and false statements about others. The fact that
he's
mentally ill and extremely stupid does not justify his attempts to insult
the
intelligence of all rational individuals that can easily tell the
difference
between a blatant lie and an opinion.

I think Art's opinion about Mikey's necrophilia is much more truthful and
well
within the realm of possibility.

Compared to what? The notion that you behave like a ****?

It's my opinion that the person posing as
Michael McKelvy is really an inmate at a Southern California mental
institution
with access to a computer as part of his recreational therapy program.

And you're entitled to it. It does me as much harm as my saying you are an
asshole does to you.

That
would explain the fact that he has no known address, occupation, or
ability to
separate facts from fiction.



Then how did one of the former RAO regulars manage to visit me to audition
speakers?

How was Zip able to return the speakers I sent him?

What would explain the fact that you won't tell what city you live in and
where your practice is located?

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
s.atl.earthlink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?

No, I haven't listened to the recording.


Give it a try.
Please.



He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest
fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording.
He
and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual
lie
marathons.



What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?



Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and -
as
we
can
all expect - dishonest behavior.

(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller,
Krueger,
his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM)
kicked
in
and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational
response.


Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about
the
death of Julian Hirsch.



A blatant lie.


(2) The title of your thread and the questoni

Is that Italian?


Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to
respond
honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile
typographical error citing noted.



were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's
reputation
for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.

I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a
recording,
I've
not listened to it.


You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather
then
answer
the question and stick to the facts.

I did? Oh dear me, I might start becoming like you.

Of course, your mindless and slavish need
to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us.

I think all you have to do to ingratiate yourself to Arny is accept
that
the
laws of physics are still intact.

(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest
answers.


Liewise yourself.

And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the
Julian
Hirsch thread get no answer at all.



Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies,

The premise was why did you make a personal attack on Arny in the
Julian
Hirsch thread. You did so, now explain why.

the question was equally
dishonest and not worthy of response.

IOW you got caught and don't want to admit to the fact that it was
tacky
and
pointless.


Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least
asked
for
an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person
you
have
repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr.
Richman?

Because the most likely scenario is that Dr. Richman is a harmless
gnat.

I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would
like
to
see
this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is
clearly
against
the law.

If I'm doiing you such an injustice why have you not taken steps to
get
me
charged with something, or is denigrationg an asshole on USENET not a
crime?

Where do you live, where's your practice?










Well, other than seeing his reponse to my post, I haven't bothered to
read
it.
As usual, I can safely assume it contained a series of lies and
juvenile
insults. Therefore, rather than waste my time and that of other RAO
readers,
I' re reproducing a response written in April, 2004 in response to
McKelvy's
bull**** about my background. Note that it directly refutrs just
about
all of
his idiotic attempts to continue his lies and libel campaign.


In response to proven libeler and pathological liar McKelvy's
continued
repetition of false claims, coupled with a laughable "demand" that I
produce
evidence that he has a lengthy history of lying and libeling me on
RAO,
I
decided to call this cretin's pathetic attempts to dodge
responsibility
for his
despicable behavior with the following response.

A couple of observations, should be added re. my post of April 9,
2004,
which
is reproduced below:

1. In the first example of libel by McKelvy which I cite, he
initiated
libel
thread with the title "Richman's ethical lapses". It is worth noting
that
he
does not and CAN NOT list any. So obviously, his sole purpose was to
libel and
defame another person. I chose to ignore this piece of unprovoked
garbage
which he initiated. As did every other RAO poster.

2. As of the time of this writing, 4:00 PM EST on 4/10/04, the proven
liar and
libeler Mckelvy has failed to respond directly to the post reproduced
below.
It is obvious that his latest bluff/bull**** has been called and he's
been
exposed for what most on RAO already have known him to be for a long
time - a
hatemongering, bitter, delusional liar and character assassin whose
primary
purpose in posting on RAO is to smear others with whatever lies,
libelous
false
claims and libelous labels of other people his diseased, delusional
"mind"
(such as it is in its primitive state) can regurgitate.

3. Proven liar and libeler McKelvy has been challenged to submit his
delusional
"complaints" about my professional and ethical behavior (about which
he
has
admitted he knows nothing - one of the few true things he has ever
said)
to the
appropriate licensing board in my state. Of course, he has failed to
do
so,
most likely because he knows that he's full of it, and will be sued by
me
after
he does so.

4. I could have provided many more examples of McKelvy's compulsive
lies
and
libels against me, but felt that for now, 2 would be sufficient.
Pending
the
results of Mr. Wheeler's case, and in consultation with my attornies,
I
may
elect to pursue legal action against him and use a quite impressive
and
lengthy
file of false, libelous claims he has made against me as evidence. No
doubt,
he will "help" by continuing to provide further evidence that can be
used
against him.

5. I apologize for the lengfh of this post in advance, but in
consideration of
McKelvy's obvious compulsive, pathological responses which almost
always
consist of further lies and libelous false statements about me, this
response
is IMHO, quite appropriate.

6. This response will be the one used in the future to deal with
McKelvy's
subsequent sociopathic, delusional, false, and libelous personal
attacks
against me.
-----------------------------------------------------------


Mike McKelvy continues to avoid providing proof of his slander:

From: (Bruce J. Richman)

Mike McKelvy wrote:


From: (Bruce J. Richman)


deletion of further lies in which McKelvy tries to avoid
responsibility
for
lengthy history of lying and committing slander re. my credentials,
training
and professional activities.

This despicable scumbag, after first admitting he knows nothing about
my
credentials, training and professional activities, then laughingly
trying
to
claim his slanderous bull**** was merely opinions, and now attempting
to
deny
all responsibility for his ridiculous lies ? insults the
intelligence
of
all
RAO readers.

His requests for "proof" ? like all his imbecilic grunts and
mutterings
concerning me ? are a joke. As is his very RAO existence.

While he continue to deny slandering me, and requesting proof, his
credibility
remains zero (except perhaps, in the eyes of his hero, Krueger).

His false claims re. my professional background are a matter of
Google
record,
and virtually all RAO readers at all familiar with this sociopath's
imbecilic
bull**** re. my background know this to be the case.

Since he's been purveying lies about me, he needs to present the
proof
for
all
his nonsense, or stick his head further up the orifice in which it's
obviously
been inserted for so long.




Bruce J. Richman



repetitive bull**** similar to that pruveyed over a 6 year period by
this
pathological liar and proven slanderer deleted

For this pathological liar, all false claims about another person's
training,
credentials, professional experience, etc. ? are only "opinions" ? a
piece
of
bull**** nobody other than this lying cretin believes.

Here's just one example of his slander:



http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...thbp0ffk2j625%

40corp.supernews.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMcKelvy%2Band%2Blicensing%2
Bboard%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26t ab%3Dwg

Note that this was an attack thread started by McKelvy, in which this
fool,
reproduces the Ethical Code followed by psychologists.

Note the slanderous title of the post.

Note also the question, this proven slanderer asks in the last line
after
quoting the Ethical code.

Needless to say, this pathological liar has no evidence that I have
ever
committed any ethics violations, and in fact his use of the title of
this
thread, to which nobody responded, constitutes slander.

I have directly challenged this despicable cretin and proven liar to
submit any

complaints he has to the Florida State Licensing Board. He has
refused
to
do
so, because he knows he's been lying about me for 6 years.

This fool, in a conversation with Scott Wheeler commiitted another
blatant
lie:


"The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be
obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons."

The reference for this is

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...igk0458h89%40c
orp.supernews.com

Now, no doubt, proven liar and slanderer McKelvy will claim he's just
voiced an
opinion, but defamation and libel of a licensed psychologist, whose
identity is

acknowledged and has been proven on RAO to the satisfaction of
virtually
all
conscious lifeforms with the exception of McKelvy and Krueger, is
*not*
an
opinion.

His lies are a matter of public record, and these 2 examples are just
a
few of
many that could be easily obtained from the Google record.

He has also deliberately ignored the following evidence presented on
Google:

"The University of Texas at Austin, has long had one of the most
highly
regarded
doctoral programs in Clinical Psychology in the United States (top 10
ranking). Since I had the good fortune to have a very good record in
my
Master's propgram at Clinical Psychology at Boston College,l and
perhaps
becauise I hit the 99th %ile on the Graduate Record Examination
(Verbal
Portion) and the 99th %ile examination on the Psychology Acvhievement
section,
I had the rather odd experience of being actively recruited by schools
to
which
I applied. (I had always thought this just happened to jocks, but I
was
wrong). One unforgettable day, I got a call from the head of the
Clinical
Psychology program at the University of Texas, a Dr. James Bieri, who
basically
said "We've seen your application, we'd like you to come here, and
we're
prepared to make you a nice offfer". That nice offer, which I
accepted,
turned
out to be a NIMH (National Institutes of Mental Health) Traineeship in
Clinical
Psychology, for an unlimited period of time, with no strings attached
other
than that I meet the academic requirements of the program (maintain a
B
average).. It took care of all my expenses (tuition, room & board,
books,
etc.) and gave me s small stipend to live on as well. Some of my
classmates
congratulated me on my good fortune (many of them had to accept
teaching
assistantships to help pay their bills, while all I had to do was hit
the
books). The program turned out to be a real meatgrinder (as one of my
classmates put it). It made my undergraduate program at an elite
"small
Ivy
League school" (Bowdoin College) and my M.A. program seem like
kindergarten.
Almost everybody in my entering class of about 20 had either a Phi
Beta Kappa key, was published and or came from Ivy League schools or
places
like U. of Chicago, Stanford or Berkeley. Of the 20 who started the
program,
only 5 of us survived and got our doctorates. It took not only a high
degree
of intelligence and perserverance, but also a large ability to deal
with
the
stress of knowing that you were in a program with a very high
attrition
rate
and some professors, who frankly, until you got to the 2nd year and
had
"paid
your dues", didn't give a damn if you survived or not. I'll never
forgot
one
of my Statistics professors who used to get up in front of the class
and
say
"Even if you don't make it through graduate school, you can still be a
good
citizen""

and the following:

"I was accepted for an Internship in Clnical
Psycnology at Massachusetts General Hospital, which I accepted and
completed"

and the followiong:

"After obtaining my doctorate, I was
also accepted for postdoctoral training at Temple Medical School,
Department of
Psychiary, Institute for Behavior Therapy, in Philadelphia. I enjoyed
my
time
there had learned a lot under the supervision of the late Dr. Joseph
Wolpe, a
world famous psychiatrist who is considered to be one of the founders
of
Cognitive?Behavioral Therapy, the predominant type of therapy now
practiced by
most psychologists and psychiatrists (aside from pharmacotherapy). "

The above quotes are from a post written in response to Howard
Ferstler,
another well known zealot, pathological liar, and purveyor of libel on
RAO
(not
surprisingly, frequently defended by Krueger, McKelvy's role model).

The complete post (and thread) can be referened at:


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0203225629.076

19.00000418%40mb?mg.aol.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DFerstler%2Band%2BRichman%2B

and%2BUniversity%2Bof%2BTexas%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D% 26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26ta
b%3Dwg

So McKelvy's slandeous claims about quacks, frauds, and fakes are
nothing
more
than the delusional, sociopathic rantings and repetitions of a proven
liar
and
libeler.

No doubt he will claim that this is all made up, but the only thing
made
up are
his nonsensical departures from reality which pollute RAO whenever he
continues
to libel me and others.

One further fact, which I may or may not be able to prove since it
happened a
long time ago, and I don't know if the radio station keeps records.
And
I
challenge the cretin and liar, McKelvy, to disprove it ? LOL! :

In about 1976 or 1977, I was employed as the "Psychology Director" of
a
private
Cardiac Rehabilitation Center based in Miami, Florida. The center ran
a
30?day, interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients who were
either
at
high risk for cardiac disease or had already undergone such procedures
as
cardiac bypass surgery. My main responsibility was to direct the
behavioral
component of this intensive program (which also involved dieticians,
exercise
physiologists, cardiologists, and RNs). Areas such as stress
management,

smoking cessation, behavioral approaches to obesity, etc. were among
the
targets that I had to address. One of my other responsibilities was,
in
conjunction with the medical director, to promote the program through
various
media appearances in both TV and radio. Two interviews in particular
stand out
in my mind. The first came in the wee hours of the morning in New
York
City on
a nationally syndicated program ? "The Long John Nebel Show" (New
Yorkers
old
enough may remember this). The second occurred in my home base on
the
79th
Street Causeway in Miami Beach at a radio station where Miami's best
known
talk
show host (at the time) was carrying forth ? I spent 2 hours being
interviewed
very incisively on the main topic which was "Stress and Heart
Disease".
I
remember coming away from that interview thinking that the interviewer
was
very
sharp and well prepared to really grill me. The name of the radio
station
(and
I'm relying on long ago recall was, I believe either WKAT or WIOD).
The
name
of the host ? Larry King.

Shortly thereafter, Larry left Miami and the rest is history.

I challenge the proven liar, and libeler, McKelvy to dispute any of
these
facts
with any factual evidence he cares to fabricate from the diseased
empty
spaces
composing his deluded cranium.

No doubt he will choose to delete most of this post instead.

LOL!!!

(I apologize for appearing to be bragging about past or present
accomplishments, but since this despicable, loudmouthed, unbelievably
stupid,
delusional, libeler and liar decided to completely embarass himself
once
again,
it was just too tempting to not assist him in making a fool of himself
and
exposing his sociopathic behavior once again).

Nothing more needs to be said about his lies, so when he responds with
more
bull****, I will respond with a standard, previously used, canned
response
that
perfectly describes this moron's basic character, motivations, and
irrational
behaviors.

Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
(FL PY 2543)



Thanks for once again demonstrating you can't tell the difference
between
opinions and lies.

I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it proves
you and he are the same person.



I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above.

Ooops, you've run out of ammunition again. That opinions are lies
bull****
is getting weaker by the minute.

You can always tell when Bruce is getting frustrated, the frequency of his
typo's increases.




I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above.
There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each
daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially
as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply
continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this
post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite
closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food.
In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his
head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The
"food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that
others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Schizoid Man wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

It's my opinion that the person posing as
Michael McKelvy is really an inmate at a Southern California mental
institution
with access to a computer as part of his recreational therapy program.

But how would you explain his love of Hong Kong?



There are a couple of possibilities I can think of by way of explanation:

(1) He thinks Pinocchio lives in Hong Kong, and he's always been iinterested
in meeting other lying puppets.

(2) He's extremely delusional and thinks he's *in* Hong Kong.

(3) One of the hospital staff told him that the "suit" he was wearing - the
one with all the straps and buckles and unusual sleeves - was a fine Hong King
tailored men's suit.

(4) His "love" of Hong Kong is just his "opinion", and we all know what Mikey's
"opinions" really are.

(5) All of the above.





Bruce J. Richman

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording?

Yes.

What did you think of
the material?

Not the sort of thng in my collection.

What did you think of the performance?
Sounds like a good recording of an amateur choir.

Is that your idea of music?

It is music, it's just not the kind I like. Are you now attacking
preference again?


No, just offering my opinion. Seems you can't tell the difference.
I am not calling the performance bad by invoking objective
measurements of it. I am saying it is bad because the performance
irritates me rather than inspires me. Gospel music is supposed
to be inspirational.
An opinion you get to have.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording?

Yes.

Is that your idea of music?

It is music, it's just not the kind I like. Are you now attacking
preference again?

Mike, do you think that RAO's preference police in the form of Bruce
Richman is going to criticize Art for his obvious preference-trashing?

LOL!

He's much to busy not reading what I write. :-(

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:



"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
hlink.net

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording?

Yes.

Is that your idea of music?

It is music, it's just not the kind I like. Are you now attacking
preference again?

Mike, do you think that RAO's preference police in the form of Bruce
Richman
is going to criticize Art for his obvious preference-trashing?

LOL!


Since there was no preference trashing taking place, Krueger's delusional
observations have about as much credibility as McKelvy's delusional
nonsense
about lies and opinions.

LOL !!!!



In your opinion.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:40:56 GMT, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

Jeez man, can't you contain yourself a little bit? Are you *that* lazy
that you must post 700 lines for THIS much content?:

"I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it
proves
you and he are the same person".

And that's not even talking about the butchering of the line length
that occurs in that one sentence.

Get a grip, man.

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...


IOW, you'll; continue to deny that a 7 year history of libel and false
statements is contained in the Google record.

IOW, I'll continue to express my opinion of you and any other thing I
feel
like. Plus I'll continue to let you look ridiculous for responding.


IOW, my opinion is that you sneak inot the morgue
and **** dead bodies, not all of them female.
It's not a lie of course, just my opinion.



It's quite a hoot to see McKelvy, in his well-iknown idiotic and
mendacious
approach to the human race, trying to sell his transparent lies about his
7
year history of libel and false statements about others. The fact that
he's
mentally ill and extremely stupid does not justify his attempts to insult
the
intelligence of all rational individuals that can easily tell the
difference
between a blatant lie and an opinion.

I think Art's opinion about Mikey's necrophilia is much more truthful and
well
within the realm of possibility.

Compared to what? The notion that you behave like a ****?

It's my opinion that the person posing as
Michael McKelvy is really an inmate at a Southern California mental
institution
with access to a computer as part of his recreational therapy program.

And you're entitled to it. It does me as much harm as my saying you are an
asshole does to you.

That
would explain the fact that he has no known address, occupation, or
ability to
separate facts from fiction.



Then how did one of the former RAO regulars manage to visit me to audition
speakers?

How was Zip able to return the speakers I sent him?

What would explain the fact that you won't tell what city you live in and
where your practice is located?





Bruce J. Richman

Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:40:56 GMT, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

Jeez man, can't you contain yourself a little bit? Are you *that* lazy
that you must post 700 lines for THIS much content?:

"I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it
proves
you and he are the same person".

And that's not even talking about the butchering of the line length
that occurs in that one sentence.

That imbecilic asshole is so agitated and out of control that he actually
*agreed* with me when he said "I just see how it proves that you and he are the
same person". Either that, or his caretakers at the institution where he lives,
decided to give him the large economy size anti-psychotic injection.

Get a grip, man.



He did, in public. That's another reason he was hospitalized.





Bruce J. Richman

George M. Middius wrote:


S888Wheel said to Turdborg:

Arny's ****ty behavior noted. Good thing you don't get out much. You'd
probably
be sent to the hosiptal more often if you did. While I think you were
wronged
when some one put you in the hospital and I place full blame on your
attacker,
I am not surprised that it happened.

I'm inclined to place full blame on the doctor who treated him and the
doctor who failed to recommend he be evaluated for involuntary commitment.



Given the presenting symptoms, such an oversight would constitute medical
malpractice. Usually when somebody presents in an emergency room ranting and
raving about "vinyl bigots", "sockpuppets" and reciting meaningless phrases
like "asked and answered", the next step is pretty obvious.



Bruce J. Richman

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:40:56 GMT, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

Jeez man, can't you contain yourself a little bit? Are you *that* lazy
that you must post 700 lines for THIS much content?:

"I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it
proves
you and he are the same person".

And that's not even talking about the butchering of the line length
that occurs in that one sentence.

Get a grip, man.

And your comments on Bruce including so much quoted text every time he posts
is where?

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
George M. Middius wrote:


S888Wheel said to Turdborg:

Arny's ****ty behavior noted. Good thing you don't get out much. You'd
probably
be sent to the hosiptal more often if you did. While I think you were
wronged
when some one put you in the hospital and I place full blame on your
attacker,
I am not surprised that it happened.

I'm inclined to place full blame on the doctor who treated him and the
doctor who failed to recommend he be evaluated for involuntary commitment.



Given the presenting symptoms, such an oversight would constitute medical
malpractice. Usually when somebody presents in an emergency room ranting
and
raving about "vinyl bigots", "sockpuppets" and reciting meaningless
phrases
like "asked and answered", the next step is pretty obvious.




How do they handle it when you present with your rant about "Opinions Are
Lies, opinions are lies?"

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to be in his
70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of his
bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done is cut on
people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist when
you were just being spit out into this world like a wet pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head handed to
you by your betters. Especially since you've been proven to also be a
liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate
scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog, McKelvy, for
mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



So Bruce, are you located in Miami still? Is that where you practice?
Are you part of a mental health group? Are you on staff somewhere?
Are you employed as a psychologist anywhere in the United States?

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:38:21 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:40:56 GMT, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

Jeez man, can't you contain yourself a little bit? Are you *that* lazy
that you must post 700 lines for THIS much content?:

"I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it
proves
you and he are the same person".

And that's not even talking about the butchering of the line length
that occurs in that one sentence.

Get a grip, man.

And your comments on Bruce including so much quoted text every time he posts
is where?

Same holds true for him as well, although I don't think I've seen such
egregiousness like this debacle of yours.

But as my mom used to say, "If your friend jumped off a building,
would you follow"? You should worry about yourself, my friend.

Of course, some people don't like me splitting up my replies either.
Of course, there's no massive scrolling and massive caret buildup
either.

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name and
number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to be in his
70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of his
bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done is cut on
people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist when
you were just being spit out into this world like a wet pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head handed to
you by your betters. Especially since you've been proven to also be a
liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate
scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog, McKelvy, for
mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



So Bruce, are you located in Miami still? Is that where you practice?
Are you part of a mental health group? Are you on staff somewhere?
Are you employed as a psychologist anywhere in the United States?


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is that?

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name and
number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
3...
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:00:31 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is that?

Because you can't figure out Yellow.com maybe?

Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:38:21 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:40:56 GMT, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

Jeez man, can't you contain yourself a little bit? Are you *that* lazy
that you must post 700 lines for THIS much content?:

"I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it
proves
you and he are the same person".

And that's not even talking about the butchering of the line length
that occurs in that one sentence.

Get a grip, man.

And your comments on Bruce including so much quoted text every time he posts

is where?

Same holds true for him as well, although I don't think I've seen such
egregiousness like this debacle of yours.


The imbecilic hatitual liar, McKelvy, is dedicated to trying and spread more
lies in support of his hero and role model, Krueger. This is nothing new for
this lying fool. He's been wasting bandwidth with his personal insults on RAO
for many years.


But as my mom used to say, "If your friend jumped off a building,
would you follow"? You should worry about yourself, my friend.

Of course, some people don't like me splitting up my replies either.
Of course, there's no massive scrolling and massive caret buildup
either.





Bruce J. Richman

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
George M. Middius wrote:


S888Wheel said to Turdborg:

Arny's ****ty behavior noted. Good thing you don't get out much. You'd
probably
be sent to the hosiptal more often if you did. While I think you were
wronged
when some one put you in the hospital and I place full blame on your
attacker,
I am not surprised that it happened.

I'm inclined to place full blame on the doctor who treated him and the
doctor who failed to recommend he be evaluated for involuntary commitment.



Given the presenting symptoms, such an oversight would constitute medical
malpractice. Usually when somebody presents in an emergency room ranting
and
raving about "vinyl bigots", "sockpuppets" and reciting meaningless
phrases
like "asked and answered", the next step is pretty obvious.




How do they handle it when you present with your rant about "Opinions Are
Lies, opinions are lies?"




I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to be in his
70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of his
bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done is cut on
people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist when
you were just being spit out into this world like a wet pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head handed to
you by your betters. Especially since you've been proven to also be a
liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate
scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog, McKelvy, for
mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



So Bruce, are you located in Miami still? Is that where you practice?
Are you part of a mental health group? Are you on staff somewhere?
Are you employed as a psychologist anywhere in the United States?




I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman

Michael McKelvy wrote:


Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to be in his
70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of his
bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done is cut on
people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist when
you were just being spit out into this world like a wet pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head handed to
you by your betters. Especially since you've been proven to also be a
liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate
scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog, McKelvy, for
mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



So Bruce, are you located in Miami still? Is that where you practice?
Are you part of a mental health group? Are you on staff somewhere?
Are you employed as a psychologist anywhere in the United States?


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is that?



I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman

Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:00:31 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is that?

Because you can't figure out Yellow.com maybe?



McKelvy's "data searches" include the invention of emails from "good
authorities", followed by passing on ridiculous hearsay. That's his idea of
"evidence". But of course, those were just "opinions".

LOL !!!



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Michael McKelvy wrote:


Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to
be in his 70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of
his bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done
is cut on people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they
say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist
when you were just being spit out into this world like a wet
pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head
handed to you by your betters. Especially since you've been
proven to also be a liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate
scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog,
McKelvy, for mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



So Bruce, are you located in Miami still? Is that where you
practice? Are you part of a mental health group? Are you on staff
somewhere? Are you employed as a psychologist anywhere in the
United States?


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is
that?

Note the specific questions above, and the disjointed ramblings below.

I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above.
There is no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously,
with each daily addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and
ravings ? essentially as meaningless as the ones he's posted on the
previous day ? he simply continues to provide additional evidence of
his desperation, his psychotic thought processes, and of course, his
hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to
this post as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin
corresponds quite closely to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically
presses a bar to get some food. In this case, the "bar"
(metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head telling him
to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs
that others are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:24:02 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is
that?

Note the specific questions above,

Were *you* able to find the listings in both of the above references,
Mr. Krueger?

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Michael McKelvy wrote:


Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to
be in his 70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of
his bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done
is cut on people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they
say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist
when you were just being spit out into this world like a wet
pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head
handed to you by your betters. Especially since you've been
proven to also be a liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate
scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog,
McKelvy, for mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



So Bruce, are you located in Miami still? Is that where you
practice? Are you part of a mental health group? Are you on staff
somewhere? Are you employed as a psychologist anywhere in the
United States?


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is
that?

Note the specific questions above, and the disjointed ramblings below.

I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above.
There is no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously,
with each daily addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and
ravings ? essentially as meaningless as the ones he's posted on the
previous day ? he simply continues to provide additional evidence of
his desperation, his psychotic thought processes, and of course, his
hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to
this post as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin
corresponds quite closely to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically
presses a bar to get some food. In this case, the "bar"
(metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head telling him
to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs
that others are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Bruce J. Richman










Note the troll above and delusional misrepresentation of what I've written by
Krueger. As usual, one pathological liar washing the hands of another.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
..
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:24:02 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is
that?

Note the specific questions above,

Were *you* able to find the listings in both of the above references,
Mr. Krueger?



Krueger has a 7 year history of lies and distortions about myself and many
others he's labeled as "sockpuppets" and other paranoid fabrications of his
diseased mind. Avoidance of reality is a way of life for him, since it would
interfere with his primary function on RAO.



Bruce J. Richman

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:33:21 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Dave Weil wrote:

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:55:06 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

If you live in Miami and practice in or near there why is your name
and number not listed?

At least not listed in Yellow.com

As a business?

If the little abbreviation at the end of his street address is to be
believed, yes.

Also, do you know what the Yellow Pages are? Do you know what makes
them different than the White pages?

You must have learned your search techniques from Arnold Krueger.

I got this listing from Yellow.com:

Richman Bruce J PhD
.
North Miami Beach, FL ...

Address deleted manually by me because this is RAO, after all.

Ironic given that finding the home address is so simple.

Tell that to Mike.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:00:31 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is that?

Because you can't figure out Yellow.com maybe?


I searched for the name Bruce J. Richman, B.J. Richman, Bruce J. Richman
PhD, and under the psychologist heading. I also used AT&T 411. Niether had
a listing.


McKelvy's "data searches" include the invention of emails
from "good
authorities",

No they don't.

followed by passing on ridiculous hearsay.

Possibly, but that's no different than your prof of who you are.

That's his idea of
"evidence". But of course, those were just "opinions".

LOL !!!

It appears t be your idea as well since you've posted nothing that comfirms
you are who you say you are.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:11:06 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


Sat Mike did you see Ludo's account of his career? He's got to be in
his
70s

or higher, which explains oh so much about his posts. For all of his
bleating about medical research, it looks like all he's done is cut on
people. You can't teach an old dog new tricks, they say!

Said Mr. Been There Done That.

You just got beat at your game. Apparently, he was a scientist when
you were just being spit out into this world like a wet pumpkin seed.

Now quit crying and realize that you keep getting your head handed to
you by your betters. Especially since you've been proven to also be a
liar.




Krueger's had his head handed to him so many times by legitimate
scientists
that the only clonsolation he has is to turn to his lapdog, McKelvy, for
mutual
lie sharing and mindless statements about their many enemies.



So Bruce, are you located in Miami still? Is that where you practice?
Are you part of a mental health group? Are you on staff somewhere?
Are you employed as a psychologist anywhere in the United States?




I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above.
There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each
daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially
as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply
continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this
post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite
closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food.
In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his
head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The
"food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that
others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"




Notice that specific, reasonable questions are called psychotic rantings and
ravings.

Bruce does his online version of sticking his fingers in his ears and
yelling, lalalalalalalalalalaalalalala.

"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:38:21 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:40:56 GMT, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

Jeez man, can't you contain yourself a little bit? Are you *that* lazy
that you must post 700 lines for THIS much content?:

"I don't dispute that B.J. Richman did those things, I just see how it
proves
you and he are the same person".

And that's not even talking about the butchering of the line length
that occurs in that one sentence.

Get a grip, man.

And your comments on Bruce including so much quoted text every time he
posts
is where?

Same holds true for him as well, although I don't think I've seen such
egregiousness like this debacle of yours.

But as my mom used to say, "If your friend jumped off a building,
would you follow"? You should worry about yourself, my friend.

It's simply to prevent him from claiming I edited some crucial piece of info
as he hasd done in the past.

Of course, some people don't like me splitting up my replies either.
Of course, there's no massive scrolling and massive caret buildup
either.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:19:46 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:00:31 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


Yellow.com and AT&T can't seem to find you listed in Miami. Why is that?

Because you can't figure out Yellow.com maybe?


I searched for the name Bruce J. Richman, B.J. Richman, Bruce J. Richman
PhD, and under the psychologist heading. I also used AT&T 411. Niether had
a listing.

That's funny, because, using the search term Bruce Richman, I got the
proper listing on *both* sites (at least the "listing" page on
www.att.com).

McKelvy's "data searches" include the invention of emails
from "good
authorities",

No they don't.

followed by passing on ridiculous hearsay.

Possibly, but that's no different than your prof of who you are.

That's his idea of
"evidence". But of course, those were just "opinions".

LOL !!!

It appears t be your idea as well since you've posted nothing that comfirms
you are who you say you are.