| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message nk.net... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message nk.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that Mike McKelvey can't understand? When you find Mr. McKelvey you should ask him. Inability to recognize a spelling error in a name that you have seen repeatedly for years, noted. Unwillingness of Mikey to address the issue noted. Mikey's petty excuse noted. Mikey's deficient personality integration noted. Mikey's lack of maturity noted |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message k.net... Thus speaks the long winded asshole with no known address who makes unprovoked personal attacks during memorial threads. Hey, hypocrite, why don't you post your address before asking that of others? |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Mikey McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message arthlink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? No, I haven't listened to the recording. Give it a try. Please. He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception and pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication was that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. No Brucie, I was simply pointing out that if youi post something on a public forum, it's likely that other people will respond. Well Mkey, apparently you didn't notice that the thread had your name in it and was a question directed at you. Apparent to whom? Of course I noticed it, that's why I responded to it as soon as I read it. Just because you parrot and slavisihly imitate Arnie's responses, that doesn't mean that others take your place. But it was posted on a public forum and therefore anybody who wished too could respond. The title "Question for Mike McKelvy" appears to be pretty specific and obviously *not* directed at others. We all know that Krueger speaks for you and viice versa, but no other individual - at least not one that's sane - would want to be associated with your statements about anything. He and Krueger are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie marathons. Thanks for proving how desparate you are, that you take simple factual statements and opinions and convince yourself tghey are lies. God, you're dull. Thanks for proving once again how predictably stupid and dishonest you can be. In Richamn worl, truth equals lies, opinions equal lies. Pointin out lies equals predictability. Can anybody read this gibberish, or even understand it? Your lies become larger and mroe frequent with every passing day. You really are quite out of touch with reality. Thus speaks the long winded asshole with no known address who makes unprovoked personal attacks during memorial threads. The above insane sentence comes from a delusional, lying sack of ****, that hss polluted RAO fror many years with his endless posts which almost always go on until he gets the "last word". This useless psychopath doesn't even have the brains to look up an address in the telephone book. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clyde Slick wrote:
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message nk.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that Mike McKelvey can't understand? When you find Mr. McKelvey you should ask him. Inability to recognize a spelling error in a name that you have seen repeatedly for years, noted. Unwillingness of Mikey to address the issue noted. Mikey's petty excuse noted. Mikey's deficient personality integration noted. Mikey's lack of maturity noted Mr. Slicks's accurate evaluation of Mikey noted. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
George M. Middius wrote:
Clyde Slick said: Mikey's lack of maturity noted If you're going to club Mikey like that, the least you can do is send him a new box of Kleenex. Can dummies cry? Or does his ventriloquist in Detroit do the weeping? Bruce J. Richman |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
George M. Middius wrote:
Clyde Slick said: Thus speaks the long winded asshole with no known address who makes Hey, hypocrite, why don't you post your address before asking that of others? Mikey doesn't know the name of the institution where he's kept. Life was easier when he was in the Army. His response to questions about his living stats was "Section 8". Is there a city in California called Zyprexa or Risperdol? Those were 2 of his last responses to questions from his handlers. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message rthlink.net "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. *never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between audio-related posts by Richman. Whateve the delay (and in this case, less then 24 hours), a much sorter delay than a personal attack by Krueger against either myself or one of the many other people he routinely smears. I guess if you have a life outside of RAO it can get in the way of responding. Since you seem to have very little life outside of RAO, perhaps you can tell me why you have consistently ignored the question about why you made an unprovoked personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread? Asked and answered in another post. I must have missed it, refresh my memory. Since you don't have the ability to tell the truth or recognize factual evidence, there is no need to respond to any questions you raise. Thank you for adimitting you can't answer them. When you don't agree with the results, you simply lie and call the person giving them a "liar". Why are you repeating this lie? Your dedication to trashing political parties and Krueger's many enemies on RAO indicates that RAO is your main occupation. Being offended by assholes like you? In fact, AFAIK, you've never mentioned being engaged in any type of employment. Is that because you subsist solely on disability checks from the government? It's because the less personal information given on RAO the less likely it can be used in some unintended way. What city do you live in? Do you have a practice? In what city? Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Why do refuse to answer the questions that could put it all to rest? Since information has been provided over a 7 year period about my activities which you have consistently either ignored or characterized as lies, why should anybody believe you have any interest in the truth? Bruce J. Richman Where do you live? Where's your practice, assuming you have one? |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message arthlink.net "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. *never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between audio-related posts by Richman. Whateve the delay (and in this case, less then 24 hours), a much sorter delay than a personal attack by Krueger against either myself or one of the many other people he routinely smears. I guess if you have a life outside of RAO it can get in the way of responding. Since you seem to have very little life outside of RAO, perhaps you can tell me why you have consistently ignored the question about why you made an unprovoked personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread? Asked and answered in another post. I must have missed it, refresh my memory. Thanks for admitting you have short-term memory problems and are too lazy to read posts written the same day. Since you don't have the ability to tell the truth or recognize factual evidence, there is no need to respond to any questions you raise. Thank you for adimitting you can't answer them. Thanks for admitting you can't read English and have memory problems. When you don't agree with the results, you simply lie and call the person giving them a "liar". Why are you repeating this lie? Why do you keep lying about your regular behavior? (e.g. political threads, claiming numerous other posters that have either talked to me or met me are not credible - all lies). Your dedication to trashing political parties and Krueger's many enemies on RAO indicates that RAO is your main occupation. Being offended by assholes like you? Your main occupation is exhibiting your mental illness on RAO and lying about almost everything connected with numerous other posters. In fact, AFAIK, you've never mentioned being engaged in any type of employment. Is that because you subsist solely on disability checks from the government? It's because the less personal information given on RAO the less likely it can be used in some unintended way. Thanks for failing to dispel the hypothesis advanced above and ducking the questions, while hypocritically expecting others that you've smeared and libeled to give you information you've already ignored. What city do you live in? Do you have a practice? In what city? Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Why do refuse to answer the questions that could put it all to rest? It's only an imaginary fabrication and question for you and Krueger. Why have you engaged in a 7 year campaign of libel and character assassination with no proof to support your idiotic lies? Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Since information has been provided over a 7 year period about my activities which you have consistently either ignored or characterized as lies, why should anybody believe you have any interest in the truth? Bruce J. Richman Where do you live? Where's your practice, assuming you have one? Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy ranted:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. They rely on factual information - a behavior you've never endorsed. Unlike you, they don't call lies "opinions", deliberately ignore factual evidence and enqage in smear campaigns based on 7 years of bull****. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. More than you ever will, ****head. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
dave weil wrote: Apparently, you can hear papers rustle and chairs squeaking. Yes you can. I downloaded Arny Krueger's recording and took a listen to it. While the choir is definitely amateur, in both the good and bad senses connoted by that word, I must say that there is a refreshing "live," unprocessed quality to the sound. Heck, I can hear that on a Ron Sexsmith song, but the music is actually listenable. And that particular Ron Sexsmith album was recorded in analog, so I don't know what the big deal is. Only, I think, that the recording is "honest," without having the life sucked out of it by over-zealous editing. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Atkinson" wrote in message
oups.com dave weil wrote: Apparently, you can hear papers rustle and chairs squeaking. Yes you can. I downloaded Arny Krueger's recording and took a listen to it. While the choir is definitely amateur, in both the good and bad senses connoted by that word, Sure the choir is amateur. In the real world they are actually doctors, lawyers, plumbers, auto workers, salesmen, housewives etc. They've been practicing a lot more lately, and are now good enough that I was willing to post a recording of them singing. Music is about fun, right? Here's a challenge - guess the size of the group. However, no chairs were present, and the choir wasn't seated. They were standing in the midst a really robust set solid oak pews that are firmly bolted to a concrete floor in a church balcony. I must say that there is a refreshing "live," unprocessed quality to the sound. Thank you. However, I will make no claims about the recording being unprocessed. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message . earthlink.net "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. *never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between audio-related posts by Richman. Whateve the delay (and in this case, less then 24 hours), a much sorter delay than a personal attack by Krueger against either myself or one of the many other people he routinely smears. I guess if you have a life outside of RAO it can get in the way of responding. Since you seem to have very little life outside of RAO, perhaps you can tell me why you have consistently ignored the question about why you made an unprovoked personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread? Asked and answered in another post. I must have missed it, refresh my memory. Thanks for admitting you have short-term memory problems and are too lazy to read posts written the same day. Thanks for admitting you don't understand that people have lives away from usenet and don't always go on line everyday. Since you don't have the ability to tell the truth or recognize factual evidence, there is no need to respond to any questions you raise. IOW you said no such thing. Thank you for adimitting you can't answer them. Thanks for admitting you can't read English and have memory problems. When you don't agree with the results, you simply lie and call the person giving them a "liar". Why are you repeating this lie? Why do you keep lying about your regular behavior? (e.g. political threads, claiming numerous other posters that have either talked to me or met me are not credible - all lies). Because that is my opinion. Your dedication to trashing political parties and Krueger's many enemies While you never thrash anybody, or tell lies about political parties. on RAO indicates that RAO is your main occupation. Being offended by assholes like you? Your main occupation is exhibiting your mental illness on RAO and lying about almost everything connected with numerous other posters. How very professional. In fact, AFAIK, you've never mentioned being engaged in any type of employment. Is that because you subsist solely on disability checks from the government? Is the fact that you won't disclose where your practice is located indicate that have never had one? It's because the less personal information given on RAO the less likely it can be used in some unintended way. Thanks for failing to dispel the hypothesis advanced above and ducking the questions, while hypocritically expecting others that you've smeared and libeled to give you information you've already ignored. I'm merely foloowing your example. What city do you live in? Do you have a practice? In what city? Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Why do refuse to answer the questions that could put it all to rest? It's only an imaginary fabrication and question for you and Krueger. Why have you engaged in a 7 year campaign of libel and character assassination with no proof to support your idiotic lies? I'll let you know if it ever happens. In the meantime I'll continue to express my opinions. Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Asked and answered. Since information has been provided over a 7 year period about my activities which you have consistently either ignored or characterized as lies, why I haven't ignored them. Give me some actual verifiable proof that you are who you say you are. Second hand reports and hearsay don't cut it. should anybody believe you have any interest in the truth? Bruce J. Richman Where do you live? Where's your practice, assuming you have one? |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy ranted: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. What is your occupation, where do you practice? Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. They rely on factual information - a behavior you've never endorsed. I endorse it whole heartedly, when will you? Unlike you, they don't call lies "opinions", deliberately ignore factual evidence and enqage in smear campaigns based on 7 years of bull****. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. More than you ever will, ****head. Not possible asshole. |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message . earthlink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? No, I haven't listened to the recording. Give it a try. Please. He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception and pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication was that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and Krueger are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie marathons. What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that Mike McKelvey can't understand? Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we can all expect - dishonest behavior. (1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response. Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the death of Julian Hirsch. A blatant lie. (2) The title of your thread and the questoni Is that Italian? Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to respond honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile typographical error citing noted. were both clearly stated. Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation for blatant disregard for the facts in a post. I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording, I've not listened to it. You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather then answer the question and stick to the facts. I did? Oh dear me, I might start becoming like you. Of course, your mindless and slavish need to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us. I think all you have to do to ingratiate yourself to Arny is accept that the laws of physics are still intact. (3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest answers. Liewise yourself. And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread get no answer at all. Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies, The premise was why did you make a personal attack on Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. You did so, now explain why. the question was equally dishonest and not worthy of response. IOW you got caught and don't want to admit to the fact that it was tacky and pointless. Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least asked for an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you have repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman? Because the most likely scenario is that Dr. Richman is a harmless gnat. I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like to see this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is clearly against the law. If I'm doiing you such an injustice why have you not taken steps to get me charged with something, or is denigrationg an asshole on USENET not a crime? Where do you live, where's your practice? |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message .earthlink.net "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. *never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between audio-related posts by Richman. Whateve the delay (and in this case, less then 24 hours), a much sorter delay than a personal attack by Krueger against either myself or one of the many other people he routinely smears. I guess if you have a life outside of RAO it can get in the way of responding. Since you seem to have very little life outside of RAO, perhaps you can tell me why you have consistently ignored the question about why you made an unprovoked personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread? Asked and answered in another post. I must have missed it, refresh my memory. Thanks for admitting you have short-term memory problems and are too lazy to read posts written the same day. Thanks for admitting you don't understand that people have lives away from usenet and don't always go on line everyday. Thanks for again demonstrating that you can't tell the truth about other people. Delusions based on mind-readinj attempts noted. Since you don't have the ability to tell the truth or recognize factual evidence, there is no need to respond to any questions you raise. IOW you said no such thing. Non sequitur noted. Thank you for adimitting you can't answer them. Thanks for admitting you can't read English and have memory problems. When you don't agree with the results, you simply lie and call the person giving them a "liar". Why are you repeating this lie? Why do you keep lying about your regular behavior? (e.g. political threads, claiming numerous other posters that have either talked to me or met me are not credible - all lies). Because that is my opinion. Lies are not the same as opinions, and no matter how many times you try and repeat this nonsense, nobody but you and Krueger will believe it. Your dedication to trashing political parties and Krueger's many enemies While you never thrash anybody, or tell lies about political parties. Provide evidence that I've lied about political parties. I doni't generally go for thrashing, but if you do, consult your physician and get anti-convulsive medication. Or move to the midwest, and get involved in threshing. That way you can be closer to your idol. on RAO indicates that RAO is your main occupation. Being offended by assholes like you? Your main occupation is exhibiting your mental illness on RAO and lying about almost everything connected with numerous other posters. How very professional. Much more professional than knowingly committing libel and promoting obvious falsehoods about another person for over 7 years. My professional opinion is based on your extremely abnormal online behavior and delusional statements based on a fixed belief system not grounded in reality. Many others on RAO have come to similar conclusions about both your habitual, chronic lying and your disturbed mental status as reflected in your online behavior. In fact, AFAIK, you've never mentioned being engaged in any type of employment. Is that because you subsist solely on disability checks from the government? Is the fact that you won't disclose where your practice is located indicate that have never had one? Is the lie perpetuated above based on the fact that you're insane? Why haven't you complained to the legal authorities abouit the impersonator you have claimed is posing as a psychologist on RAO? Is the reason you haven/t based on fear you'll be sued in civil court for making false claims to the authroities - or is it based on your total lack of evidence to back up your libelous false claims? Why have you refjused to take up Scott Wheeler's bet? Is it because you know you'll be exposed again for the pitiful, delusional liar we all know you to be? Does the rreal reason you hide any and all uinformation about your occupation or educational background have to do with the fact that you've never held a job for very long because of emotional instability and lack of trust from your employers? Or would it be because of your inability to tell the truth about others? Or simply, the fact that your prior history of psychiattic hospitalizations has resulted in your subsusiting on disability pension checks? It's because the less personal information given on RAO the less likely it can be used in some unintended way. Thanks for failing to dispel the hypothesis advanced above and ducking the questions, while hypocritically expecting others that you've smeared and libeled to give you information you've already ignored. I'm merely foloowing your example. Actually, you're lying again. More information has been porovided about my activities over a 7 year period than you'll ever be able to either read of comprehend. You and I have nothing in common whatsoever, other than posting to the same Usenet NG. you What city do you live in? Do you have a practice? In what city? Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Why do refuse to answer the questions that could put it all to rest? It's only an imaginary fabrication and question for you and Krueger. Why have you engaged in a 7 year campaign of libel and character assassination with no proof to support your idiotic lies? I'll let you know if it ever happens. In the meantime I'll continue to express my opinions. IOW, you'll; continue to deny that a 7 year history of libel and false statements is contained in the Google record. IOW, you'll continue to lie about me and others like the sociopathic, habitual liar we all know you to be. Thanks for admitting that you intend to maintain your lack of contact with reality. It's what we have all come to expect from you. Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Are you so lazy and/or stupid that you can't find the address of the appropriate legal authorities in Florida? You've been encouraged to do so, since holding oneself out to the public as a licensed psychologist by somebody not qualified is a crime. Asked and answered. Since information has been provided over a 7 year period about my activities which you have consistently either ignored or characterized as lies, why I haven't ignored them. Give me some actual verifiable proof that you are who you say you are. Second hand reports and hearsay don't cut it. should anybody believe you have any interest in the truth? Bruce J. Richman Where do you live? Where's your practice, assuming you have one? Bruce J. Richman |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Mckelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy ranted: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. What is your occupation, where do you practice? Asked and answered over 7 years ago. When are you going to complain to the legal authorities about the poster impersonating a psychologist on RAO? When are you going to print your false statements in an American print publication? When are you going to take up Scott Wheeler on his gernerous offer to bet you with odds of 10 to 1?. Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. They rely on factual information - a behavior you've never endorsed. I endorse it whole heartedly, when will you? You never have. When will you start telling the truth, ****head? Unlike you, they don't call lies "opinions", deliberately ignore factual evidence and enqage in smear campaigns based on 7 years of bull****. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. More than you ever will, ****head. Not possible asshole. Not possibler for you, psychotic, lying piece of ****. Don't forget to consult with your ventriloquist in Detroit for your next aubhuman , drooling attempt to get the last word, moron Bruce J. Richman |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arny Krueger wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message oups.com I downloaded Arny Krueger's recording and took a listen to it. While the choir is definitely amateur, in both the good and bad senses connoted by that word, Sure the choir is amateur... I didn't mean "amateur" in any perjorative senze, merely that the downside of people such as those you mention doing their best and obviously getting a lot of personal fullfilment from singing is too much in the way of poor intonation and sloppy ensemble. Music is about fun, right? Certainly people should enjoy themselves, but all professional musicians I know are intensely serious about their craft. Amateur musicians and singers have an advantage in that respect. Here's a challenge - guess the size of the group. I have no idea. More than 10, less than 30? I must say that there is a refreshing "live," unprocessed quality to the sound. Thank you. However, I will make no claims about the recording being unprocessed. All I am saying is whatever you did, it worked well in the service of the music. Thank you very much for making this recording available. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message oups.com dave weil wrote: Apparently, you can hear papers rustle and chairs squeaking. Yes you can. I downloaded Arny Krueger's recording and took a listen to it. While the choir is definitely amateur, in both the good and bad senses connoted by that word, Sure the choir is amateur. In the real world they are actually doctors, lawyers, plumbers, auto workers, salesmen, housewives etc. They've been practicing a lot more lately, and are now good enough that I was willing to post a recording of them singing. Music is about fun, right? There was no fun in that performance. It was grotesquely stilted and unmusical. |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message .earthlink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? No, I haven't listened to the recording. Give it a try. Please. He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception and pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication was that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and Krueger are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie marathons. What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that Mike McKelvey can't understand? Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we can all expect - dishonest behavior. (1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response. Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the death of Julian Hirsch. A blatant lie. (2) The title of your thread and the questoni Is that Italian? Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to respond honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile typographical error citing noted. were both clearly stated. Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation for blatant disregard for the facts in a post. I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording, I've not listened to it. You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather then answer the question and stick to the facts. I did? Oh dear me, I might start becoming like you. Of course, your mindless and slavish need to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us. I think all you have to do to ingratiate yourself to Arny is accept that the laws of physics are still intact. (3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest answers. Liewise yourself. And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread get no answer at all. Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies, The premise was why did you make a personal attack on Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. You did so, now explain why. the question was equally dishonest and not worthy of response. IOW you got caught and don't want to admit to the fact that it was tacky and pointless. Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least asked for an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you have repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman? Because the most likely scenario is that Dr. Richman is a harmless gnat. I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like to see this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is clearly against the law. If I'm doiing you such an injustice why have you not taken steps to get me charged with something, or is denigrationg an asshole on USENET not a crime? Where do you live, where's your practice? Well, other than seeing his reponse to my post, I haven't bothered to read it. As usual, I can safely assume it contained a series of lies and juvenile insults. Therefore, rather than waste my time and that of other RAO readers, I' re reproducing a response written in April, 2004 in response to McKelvy's bull**** about my background. Note that it directly refutrs just about all of his idiotic attempts to continue his lies and libel campaign. In response to proven libeler and pathological liar McKelvy's continued repetition of false claims, coupled with a laughable "demand" that I produce evidence that he has a lengthy history of lying and libeling me on RAO, I decided to call this cretin's pathetic attempts to dodge responsibility for his despicable behavior with the following response. A couple of observations, should be added re. my post of April 9, 2004, which is reproduced below: 1. In the first example of libel by McKelvy which I cite, he initiated libel thread with the title "Richman's ethical lapses". It is worth noting that he does not and CAN NOT list any. So obviously, his sole purpose was to libel and defame another person. I chose to ignore this piece of unprovoked garbage which he initiated. As did every other RAO poster. 2. As of the time of this writing, 4:00 PM EST on 4/10/04, the proven liar and libeler Mckelvy has failed to respond directly to the post reproduced below. It is obvious that his latest bluff/bull**** has been called and he's been exposed for what most on RAO already have known him to be for a long time - a hatemongering, bitter, delusional liar and character assassin whose primary purpose in posting on RAO is to smear others with whatever lies, libelous false claims and libelous labels of other people his diseased, delusional "mind" (such as it is in its primitive state) can regurgitate. 3. Proven liar and libeler McKelvy has been challenged to submit his delusional "complaints" about my professional and ethical behavior (about which he has admitted he knows nothing - one of the few true things he has ever said) to the appropriate licensing board in my state. Of course, he has failed to do so, most likely because he knows that he's full of it, and will be sued by me after he does so. 4. I could have provided many more examples of McKelvy's compulsive lies and libels against me, but felt that for now, 2 would be sufficient. Pending the results of Mr. Wheeler's case, and in consultation with my attornies, I may elect to pursue legal action against him and use a quite impressive and lengthy file of false, libelous claims he has made against me as evidence. No doubt, he will "help" by continuing to provide further evidence that can be used against him. 5. I apologize for the lengfh of this post in advance, but in consideration of McKelvy's obvious compulsive, pathological responses which almost always consist of further lies and libelous false statements about me, this response is IMHO, quite appropriate. 6. This response will be the one used in the future to deal with McKelvy's subsequent sociopathic, delusional, false, and libelous personal attacks against me. ----------------------------------------------------------- Mike McKelvy continues to avoid providing proof of his slander: From: (Bruce J. Richman) Mike McKelvy wrote: From: (Bruce J. Richman) deletion of further lies in which McKelvy tries to avoid responsibility for lengthy history of lying and committing slander re. my credentials, training and professional activities. This despicable scumbag, after first admitting he knows nothing about my credentials, training and professional activities, then laughingly trying to claim his slanderous bull**** was merely opinions, and now attempting to deny all responsibility for his ridiculous lies ? insults the intelligence of all RAO readers. His requests for "proof" ? like all his imbecilic grunts and mutterings concerning me ? are a joke. As is his very RAO existence. While he continue to deny slandering me, and requesting proof, his credibility remains zero (except perhaps, in the eyes of his hero, Krueger). His false claims re. my professional background are a matter of Google record, and virtually all RAO readers at all familiar with this sociopath's imbecilic bull**** re. my background know this to be the case. Since he's been purveying lies about me, he needs to present the proof for all his nonsense, or stick his head further up the orifice in which it's obviously been inserted for so long. Bruce J. Richman repetitive bull**** similar to that pruveyed over a 6 year period by this pathological liar and proven slanderer deleted For this pathological liar, all false claims about another person's training, credentials, professional experience, etc. ? are only "opinions" ? a piece of bull**** nobody other than this lying cretin believes. Here's just one example of his slander: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...thbp0ffk2j625% 40corp.supernews.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMcKelvy%2Band%2Blicensing%2 Bboard%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26t ab%3Dwg Note that this was an attack thread started by McKelvy, in which this fool, reproduces the Ethical Code followed by psychologists. Note the slanderous title of the post. Note also the question, this proven slanderer asks in the last line after quoting the Ethical code. Needless to say, this pathological liar has no evidence that I have ever committed any ethics violations, and in fact his use of the title of this thread, to which nobody responded, constitutes slander. I have directly challenged this despicable cretin and proven liar to submit any complaints he has to the Florida State Licensing Board. He has refused to do so, because he knows he's been lying about me for 6 years. This fool, in a conversation with Scott Wheeler commiitted another blatant lie: "The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons." The reference for this is http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...igk0458h89%40c orp.supernews.com Now, no doubt, proven liar and slanderer McKelvy will claim he's just voiced an opinion, but defamation and libel of a licensed psychologist, whose identity is acknowledged and has been proven on RAO to the satisfaction of virtually all conscious lifeforms with the exception of McKelvy and Krueger, is *not* an opinion. His lies are a matter of public record, and these 2 examples are just a few of many that could be easily obtained from the Google record. He has also deliberately ignored the following evidence presented on Google: "The University of Texas at Austin, has long had one of the most highly regarded doctoral programs in Clinical Psychology in the United States (top 10 ranking). Since I had the good fortune to have a very good record in my Master's propgram at Clinical Psychology at Boston College,l and perhaps becauise I hit the 99th %ile on the Graduate Record Examination (Verbal Portion) and the 99th %ile examination on the Psychology Acvhievement section, I had the rather odd experience of being actively recruited by schools to which I applied. (I had always thought this just happened to jocks, but I was wrong). One unforgettable day, I got a call from the head of the Clinical Psychology program at the University of Texas, a Dr. James Bieri, who basically said "We've seen your application, we'd like you to come here, and we're prepared to make you a nice offfer". That nice offer, which I accepted, turned out to be a NIMH (National Institutes of Mental Health) Traineeship in Clinical Psychology, for an unlimited period of time, with no strings attached other than that I meet the academic requirements of the program (maintain a B average).. It took care of all my expenses (tuition, room & board, books, etc.) and gave me s small stipend to live on as well. Some of my classmates congratulated me on my good fortune (many of them had to accept teaching assistantships to help pay their bills, while all I had to do was hit the books). The program turned out to be a real meatgrinder (as one of my classmates put it). It made my undergraduate program at an elite "small Ivy League school" (Bowdoin College) and my M.A. program seem like kindergarten. Almost everybody in my entering class of about 20 had either a Phi Beta Kappa key, was published and or came from Ivy League schools or places like U. of Chicago, Stanford or Berkeley. Of the 20 who started the program, only 5 of us survived and got our doctorates. It took not only a high degree of intelligence and perserverance, but also a large ability to deal with the stress of knowing that you were in a program with a very high attrition rate and some professors, who frankly, until you got to the 2nd year and had "paid your dues", didn't give a damn if you survived or not. I'll never forgot one of my Statistics professors who used to get up in front of the class and say "Even if you don't make it through graduate school, you can still be a good citizen"" and the following: "I was accepted for an Internship in Clnical Psycnology at Massachusetts General Hospital, which I accepted and completed" and the followiong: "After obtaining my doctorate, I was also accepted for postdoctoral training at Temple Medical School, Department of Psychiary, Institute for Behavior Therapy, in Philadelphia. I enjoyed my time there had learned a lot under the supervision of the late Dr. Joseph Wolpe, a world famous psychiatrist who is considered to be one of the founders of Cognitive?Behavioral Therapy, the predominant type of therapy now practiced by most psychologists and psychiatrists (aside from pharmacotherapy). " The above quotes are from a post written in response to Howard Ferstler, another well known zealot, pathological liar, and purveyor of libel on RAO (not surprisingly, frequently defended by Krueger, McKelvy's role model). The complete post (and thread) can be referened at: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0203225629.076 19.00000418%40mb?mg.aol.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DFerstler%2Band%2BRichman%2B and%2BUniversity%2Bof%2BTexas%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26 ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26ta b%3Dwg So McKelvy's slandeous claims about quacks, frauds, and fakes are nothing more than the delusional, sociopathic rantings and repetitions of a proven liar and libeler. No doubt he will claim that this is all made up, but the only thing made up are his nonsensical departures from reality which pollute RAO whenever he continues to libel me and others. One further fact, which I may or may not be able to prove since it happened a long time ago, and I don't know if the radio station keeps records. And I challenge the cretin and liar, McKelvy, to disprove it ? LOL! : In about 1976 or 1977, I was employed as the "Psychology Director" of a private Cardiac Rehabilitation Center based in Miami, Florida. The center ran a 30?day, interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients who were either at high risk for cardiac disease or had already undergone such procedures as cardiac bypass surgery. My main responsibility was to direct the behavioral component of this intensive program (which also involved dieticians, exercise physiologists, cardiologists, and RNs). Areas such as stress management, smoking cessation, behavioral approaches to obesity, etc. were among the targets that I had to address. One of my other responsibilities was, in conjunction with the medical director, to promote the program through various media appearances in both TV and radio. Two interviews in particular stand out in my mind. The first came in the wee hours of the morning in New York City on a nationally syndicated program ? "The Long John Nebel Show" (New Yorkers old enough may remember this). The second occurred in my home base on the 79th Street Causeway in Miami Beach at a radio station where Miami's best known talk show host (at the time) was carrying forth ? I spent 2 hours being interviewed very incisively on the main topic which was "Stress and Heart Disease". I remember coming away from that interview thinking that the interviewer was very sharp and well prepared to really grill me. The name of the radio station (and I'm relying on long ago recall was, I believe either WKAT or WIOD). The name of the host ? Larry King. Shortly thereafter, Larry left Miami and the rest is history. I challenge the proven liar, and libeler, McKelvy to dispute any of these facts with any factual evidence he cares to fabricate from the diseased empty spaces composing his deluded cranium. No doubt he will choose to delete most of this post instead. LOL!!! (I apologize for appearing to be bragging about past or present accomplishments, but since this despicable, loudmouthed, unbelievably stupid, delusional, libeler and liar decided to completely embarass himself once again, it was just too tempting to not assist him in making a fool of himself and exposing his sociopathic behavior once again). Nothing more needs to be said about his lies, so when he responds with more bull****, I will respond with a standard, previously used, canned response that perfectly describes this moron's basic character, motivations, and irrational behaviors. Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist (FL PY 2543) Bruce J. Richman |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message oups.com dave weil wrote: Apparently, you can hear papers rustle and chairs squeaking. Yes you can. I downloaded Arny Krueger's recording and took a listen to it. While the choir is definitely amateur, in both the good and bad senses connoted by that word, Sure the choir is amateur. In the real world they are actually doctors, lawyers, plumbers, auto workers, salesmen, housewives etc. They've been practicing a lot more lately, and are now good enough that I was willing to post a recording of them singing. Music is about fun, right? There was no fun in that performance. It was grotesquely stilted and unmusical. Just a typical church choir. They stayed more or less on pitch and got most of the words out. Of course, the arrangement isn't at all difficult or special. Stephen |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
"MINe 109" wrote in message ... In article , "Clyde Slick" wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message oups.com dave weil wrote: Apparently, you can hear papers rustle and chairs squeaking. Yes you can. I downloaded Arny Krueger's recording and took a listen to it. While the choir is definitely amateur, in both the good and bad senses connoted by that word, Sure the choir is amateur. In the real world they are actually doctors, lawyers, plumbers, auto workers, salesmen, housewives etc. They've been practicing a lot more lately, and are now good enough that I was willing to post a recording of them singing. Music is about fun, right? There was no fun in that performance. It was grotesquely stilted and unmusical. Just a typical church choir. They stayed more or less on pitch and got most of the words out. Of course, the arrangement isn't at all difficult or special. Stephen I thought that the accents, dynamics, choppiness, and regimentation produced just a God awful result. |
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
"MINe 109" wrote in message
Just a typical church choir. They stayed more or less on pitch and got most of the words out. Of course, the arrangement isn't at all difficult or special. So Stephen when are you going to post something of yours? |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
I thought that the accents, dynamics, choppiness, and regimentation produced just a God awful result. So when are you going to post something of yours, Art? |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message I thought that the accents, dynamics, choppiness, and regimentation produced just a God awful result. So when are you going to post something of yours, Art? We all do different things Arny. I don't record, though I have listened to thousands of recordings. My criticisms are of the source that you selected. I didn't say anything about your recording abilities. The resolution on my generic pc audio doesn't lend itself to my forming any opinions about your sound quality. |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: "MINe 109" wrote in message Just a typical church choir. They stayed more or less on pitch and got most of the words out. Of course, the arrangement isn't at all difficult or special. So Stephen when are you going to post something of yours? I don't record my group as such. We do get recorded, but not with anything approaching the fidelity of your work. If I ever do make a serious recording, I'll look into posting. Stephen |
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote: "MINe 109" wrote in message ... In article , "Clyde Slick" wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message oups.com dave weil wrote: Apparently, you can hear papers rustle and chairs squeaking. Yes you can. I downloaded Arny Krueger's recording and took a listen to it. While the choir is definitely amateur, in both the good and bad senses connoted by that word, Sure the choir is amateur. In the real world they are actually doctors, lawyers, plumbers, auto workers, salesmen, housewives etc. They've been practicing a lot more lately, and are now good enough that I was willing to post a recording of them singing. Music is about fun, right? There was no fun in that performance. It was grotesquely stilted and unmusical. Just a typical church choir. They stayed more or less on pitch and got most of the words out. Of course, the arrangement isn't at all difficult or special. I thought that the accents, dynamics, choppiness, and regimentation produced just a God awful result. I fear that most church choirs aren't even as good as that... Stephen |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael Mckelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy ranted: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. What is your occupation, where do you practice? Asked and answered over 7 years ago. When are you going to complain to the legal authorities about the poster impersonating a psychologist on RAO? When are you going to print your false statements in an American print publication? When are you going to take up Scott Wheeler on his gernerous offer to bet you with odds of 10 to 1?. Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. They rely on factual information - a behavior you've never endorsed. I endorse it whole heartedly, when will you? You never have. When will you start telling the truth, ****head? Unlike you, they don't call lies "opinions", deliberately ignore factual evidence and enqage in smear campaigns based on 7 years of bull****. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. More than you ever will, ****head. Not possible asshole. Not possibler for you, psychotic, lying piece of ****. Don't forget to consult with your ventriloquist in Detroit for your next aubhuman , drooling attempt to get the last word, moron Just because you like some guys arm up your ass, don't project your sick fantasies on me. |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Arny Krueger wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message l.earthlink.net "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. *never* is a big word, but we observe extremely long delays between audio-related posts by Richman. Whateve the delay (and in this case, less then 24 hours), a much sorter delay than a personal attack by Krueger against either myself or one of the many other people he routinely smears. I guess if you have a life outside of RAO it can get in the way of responding. Since you seem to have very little life outside of RAO, perhaps you can tell me why you have consistently ignored the question about why you made an unprovoked personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread? Asked and answered in another post. I must have missed it, refresh my memory. Thanks for admitting you have short-term memory problems and are too lazy to read posts written the same day. Thanks for admitting you don't understand that people have lives away from usenet and don't always go on line everyday. Thanks for again demonstrating that you can't tell the truth about other people. Delusions based on mind-readinj attempts noted. Since you don't have the ability to tell the truth or recognize factual evidence, there is no need to respond to any questions you raise. IOW you said no such thing. Non sequitur noted. Thank you for adimitting you can't answer them. Thanks for admitting you can't read English and have memory problems. When you don't agree with the results, you simply lie and call the person giving them a "liar". Why are you repeating this lie? Why do you keep lying about your regular behavior? (e.g. political threads, claiming numerous other posters that have either talked to me or met me are not credible - all lies). Because that is my opinion. Lies are not the same as opinions, and no matter how many times you try and repeat this nonsense, nobody but you and Krueger will believe it. Your dedication to trashing political parties and Krueger's many enemies While you never thrash anybody, or tell lies about political parties. Provide evidence that I've lied about political parties. I doni't generally go for thrashing, but if you do, consult your physician and get anti-convulsive medication. Or move to the midwest, and get involved in threshing. That way you can be closer to your idol. on RAO indicates that RAO is your main occupation. Being offended by assholes like you? Your main occupation is exhibiting your mental illness on RAO and lying about almost everything connected with numerous other posters. How very professional. Much more professional than knowingly committing libel and promoting obvious falsehoods about another person for over 7 years. My professional opinion is based on your extremely abnormal online behavior and delusional statements based on a fixed belief system not grounded in reality. Many others on RAO have come to similar conclusions about both your habitual, chronic lying and your disturbed mental status as reflected in your online behavior. In fact, AFAIK, you've never mentioned being engaged in any type of employment. Is that because you subsist solely on disability checks from the government? Does the fact that you won't disclose where your practice is located indicate that have never had one? Is the lie perpetuated above based on the fact that you're insane? Now you call a question a lie. You really are a scik puppy. Why haven't you complained to the legal authorities abouit the impersonator you have claimed is posing as a psychologist on RAO? Is the reason you haven/t based on fear you'll be sued in civil court for making false claims to the authroities - or is it based on your total lack of evidence to back up your libelous false claims? Why have you refjused to take up Scott Wheeler's bet? Is it because you know you'll be exposed again for the pitiful, delusional liar we all know you to be? Does the rreal reason you hide any and all uinformation about your occupation or educational background have to do with the fact that you've never held a job for very long because of emotional instability and lack of trust from your employers? Or would it be because of your inability to tell the truth about others? Or simply, the fact that your prior history of psychiattic hospitalizations has resulted in your subsusiting on disability pension checks? I don't know, it's all so confusing. Who are you again? :-) It's because the less personal information given on RAO the less likely it can be used in some unintended way. Thanks for failing to dispel the hypothesis advanced above and ducking the questions, while hypocritically expecting others that you've smeared and libeled to give you information you've already ignored. Another name for a hypothesis is opinion. Your entitled to yours. Mine is you're an asshole. I'm merely following your example. Actually, you're lying again. More information has been porovided about my activities over a 7 year period than you'll ever be able to either read of comprehend. Then just share some tiny piece, like where the **** your practice is. You and I have nothing in common whatsoever, other than posting to the same Usenet NG. Also, I know the difference between a lie and an opinion. you What city do you live in? Do you have a practice? In what city? Why do refuse to answer the questions that could put it all to rest? It's only an imaginary fabrication and question for you and Krueger. Why have you engaged in a 7 year campaign of libel and character assassination with no proof to support your idiotic lies? I'll let you know if it ever happens. In the meantime I'll continue to express my opinions. IOW, you'll; continue to deny that a 7 year history of libel and false statements is contained in the Google record. IOW, I'll continue to express my opinion of you and any other thing I feel like. Plus I'll continue to let you look ridiculous for responding. IOW, you'll continue to lie about me and others like the sociopathic, habitual liar we all know you to be. Thanks for admitting that you intend to maintain your lack of contact with reality. It's what we have all come to expect from you. I guess as long as you confuse lies and opinions, you won't be disappointed. Why haven't you pursued your numerous allegations that somebody is impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman on RAO? Why won't you tell everybody where you live and where your practice is? Asked and answered. Where do you live? Where's your practice, assuming you have one? |
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message l.earthlink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? No, I haven't listened to the recording. Give it a try. Please. He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception and pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication was that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and Krueger are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie marathons. What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that Mike McKelvey can't understand? Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we can all expect - dishonest behavior. (1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response. Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the death of Julian Hirsch. A blatant lie. (2) The title of your thread and the questoni Is that Italian? Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to respond honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile typographical error citing noted. were both clearly stated. Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation for blatant disregard for the facts in a post. I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording, I've not listened to it. You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather then answer the question and stick to the facts. I did? Oh dear me, I might start becoming like you. Of course, your mindless and slavish need to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us. I think all you have to do to ingratiate yourself to Arny is accept that the laws of physics are still intact. (3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest answers. Liewise yourself. And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread get no answer at all. Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies, The premise was why did you make a personal attack on Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. You did so, now explain why. the question was equally dishonest and not worthy of response. IOW you got caught and don't want to admit to the fact that it was tacky and pointless. Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least asked for an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you have repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman? Because the most likely scenario is that Dr. Richman is a harmless gnat. I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like to see this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is clearly against the law. If I'm doiing you such an injustice why have you not taken steps to get me charged with something, or is denigrationg an asshole on USENET not a crime? Where do you live, where's your practice? Well, other than seeing his reponse to my post, I haven't bothered to read it. As usual, I can safely assume it contained a series of lies and juvenile insults. Therefore, rather than waste my time and that of other RAO readers, I' re reproducing a response written in April, 2004 in response to McKelvy's bull**** about my background. Note that it directly refutrs just about all of his idiotic attempts to continue his lies and libel campaign. In response to proven libeler and pathological liar McKelvy's continued repetition of false claims, coupled with a laughable "demand" that I produce evidence that he has a lengthy history of lying and libeling me on RAO, I decided to call this cretin's pathetic attempts to dodge responsibility for his despicable behavior with the following response. A couple of observations, should be added re. my post of April 9, 2004, which is reproduced below: 1. In the first example of libel by McKelvy which I cite, he initiated libel thread with the title "Richman's ethical lapses". It is worth noting that he does not and CAN NOT list any. So obviously, his sole purpose was to libel and defame another person. I chose to ignore this piece of unprovoked garbage which he initiated. As did every other RAO poster. 2. As of the time of this writing, 4:00 PM EST on 4/10/04, the proven liar and libeler Mckelvy has failed to respond directly to the post reproduced below. It is obvious that his latest bluff/bull**** has been called and he's been exposed for what most on RAO already have known him to be for a long time - a hatemongering, bitter, delusional liar and character assassin whose primary purpose in posting on RAO is to smear others with whatever lies, libelous false claims and libelous labels of other people his diseased, delusional "mind" (such as it is in its primitive state) can regurgitate. 3. Proven liar and libeler McKelvy has been challenged to submit his delusional "complaints" about my professional and ethical behavior (about which he has admitted he knows nothing - one of the few true things he has ever said) to the appropriate licensing board in my state. Of course, he has failed to do so, most likely because he knows that he's full of it, and will be sued by me after he does so. 4. I could have provided many more examples of McKelvy's compulsive lies and libels against me, but felt that for now, 2 would be sufficient. Pending the results of Mr. Wheeler's case, and in consultation with my attornies, I may elect to pursue legal action against him and use a quite impressive and lengthy file of false, libelous claims he has made against me as evidence. No doubt, he will "help" by continuing to provide further evidence that can be used against him. 5. I apologize for the lengfh of this post in advance, but in consideration of McKelvy's obvious compulsive, pathological responses which almost always consist of further lies and libelous false statements about me, this response is IMHO, quite appropriate. 6. This response will be the one used in the future to deal with McKelvy's subsequent sociopathic, delusional, false, and libelous personal attacks against me. ----------------------------------------------------------- Mike McKelvy continues to avoid providing proof of his slander: From: (Bruce J. Richman) Mike McKelvy wrote: From: (Bruce J. Richman) deletion of further lies in which McKelvy tries to avoid responsibility for lengthy history of lying and committing slander re. my credentials, training and professional activities. This despicable scumbag, after first admitting he knows nothing about my credentials, training and professional activities, then laughingly trying to claim his slanderous bull**** was merely opinions, and now attempting to deny all responsibility for his ridiculous lies ? insults the intelligence of all RAO readers. His requests for "proof" ? like all his imbecilic grunts and mutterings concerning me ? are a joke. As is his very RAO existence. While he continue to deny slandering me, and requesting proof, his credibility remains zero (except perhaps, in the eyes of his hero, Krueger). His false claims re. my professional background are a matter of Google record, and virtually all RAO readers at all familiar with this sociopath's imbecilic bull**** re. my background know this to be the case. Since he's been purveying lies about me, he needs to present the proof for all his nonsense, or stick his head further up the orifice in which it's obviously been inserted for so long. Bruce J. Richman repetitive bull**** similar to that pruveyed over a 6 year period by this pathological liar and proven slanderer deleted For this pathological liar, all false claims about another person's training, credentials, professional experience, etc. ? are only "opinions" ? a piece of bull**** nobody other than this lying cretin believes. Here's just one example of his slander: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...thbp0ffk2j625% 40corp.supernews.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMcKelvy%2Band%2Blicensing%2 Bboard%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26t ab%3Dwg Note that this was an attack thread started by McKelvy, in which this fool, reproduces the Ethical Code followed by psychologists. Note the slanderous title of the post. Note also the question, this proven slanderer asks in the last line after quoting the Ethical code. Needless to say, this pathological liar has no evidence that I have ever committed any ethics violations, and in fact his use of the title of this thread, to which nobody responded, constitutes slander. I have directly challenged this despicable cretin and proven liar to submit any complaints he has to the Florida State Licensing Board. He has refused to do so, because he knows he's been lying about me for 6 years. This fool, in a conversation with Scott Wheeler commiitted another blatant lie: "The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons." The reference for this is http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...igk0458h89%40c orp.supernews.com Now, no doubt, proven liar and slanderer McKelvy will claim he's just voiced an opinion, but defamation and libel of a licensed psychologist, whose identity is acknowledged and has been proven on RAO to the satisfaction of virtually all conscious lifeforms with the exception of McKelvy and Krueger, is *not* an opinion. His lies are a matter of public record, and these 2 examples are just a few of many that could be easily obtained from the Google record. He has also deliberately ignored the following evidence presented on Google: "The University of Texas at Austin, has long had one of the most highly regarded doctoral programs in Clinical Psychology in the United States (top 10 ranking). Since I had the good fortune to have a very good record in my Master's propgram at Clinical Psychology at Boston College,l and perhaps becauise I hit the 99th %ile on the Graduate Record Examination (Verbal Portion) and the 99th %ile examination on the Psychology Acvhievement section, I had the rather odd experience of being actively recruited by schools to which I applied. (I had always thought this just happened to jocks, but I was wrong). One unforgettable day, I got a call from the head of the Clinical Psychology program at the University of Texas, a Dr. James Bieri, who basically said "We've seen your application, we'd like you to come here, and we're prepared to make you a nice offfer". That nice offer, which I accepted, turned out to be a NIMH (National Institutes of Mental Health) Traineeship in Clinical Psychology, for an unlimited period of time, with no strings attached other than that I meet the academic requirements of the program (maintain a B average).. It took care of all my expenses (tuition, room & board, books, etc.) and gave me s small stipend to live on as well. Some of my classmates congratulated me on my good fortune (many of them had to accept teaching assistantships to help pay their bills, while all I had to do was hit the books). The program turned out to be a real meatgrinder (as one of my classmates put it). It made my undergraduate program at an elite "small Ivy League school" (Bowdoin College) and my M.A. program seem like kindergarten. Almost everybody in my entering class of about 20 had either a Phi Beta Kappa key, was published and or came from Ivy League schools or places like U. of Chicago, Stanford or Berkeley. Of the 20 who started the program, only 5 of us survived and got our doctorates. It took not only a high degree of intelligence and perserverance, but also a large ability to deal with the stress of knowing that you were in a program with a very high attrition rate and some professors, who frankly, until you got to the 2nd year and had "paid your dues", didn't give a damn if you survived or not. I'll never forgot one of my Statistics professors who used to get up in front of the class and say "Even if you don't make it through graduate school, you can still be a good citizen"" and the following: "I was accepted for an Internship in Clnical Psycnology at Massachusetts General Hospital, which I accepted and completed" and the followiong: "After obtaining my doctorate, I was also accepted for postdoctoral training at Temple Medical School, Department of Psychiary, Institute for Behavior Therapy, in Philadelphia. I enjoyed my time there had learned a lot under the supervision of the late Dr. Joseph Wolpe, a world famous psychiatrist who is considered to be one of the founders of Cognitive?Behavioral Therapy, the predominant type of therapy now practiced by most psychologists and psychiatrists (aside from pharmacotherapy). " The above quotes are from a post written in response to Howard Ferstler, another well known zealot, pathological liar, and purveyor of libel on RAO (not surprisingly, frequently defended by Krueger, McKelvy's role model). The complete post (and thread) can be referened at: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0203225629.076 19.00000418%40mb?mg.aol.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DFerstler%2Band%2BRichman%2B and%2BUniversity%2Bof%2BTexas%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26 ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26ta b%3Dwg So McKelvy's slandeous claims about quacks, frauds, and fakes are nothing more than the delusional, sociopathic rantings and repetitions of a proven liar and libeler. No doubt he will claim that this is all made up, but the only thing made up are his nonsensical departures from reality which pollute RAO whenever he continues to libel me and others. One further fact, which I may or may not be able to prove since it happened a long time ago, and I don't know if the radio station keeps records. And I challenge the cretin and liar, McKelvy, to disprove it ? LOL! : In about 1976 or 1977, I was employed as the "Psychology Director" of a private Cardiac Rehabilitation Center based in Miami, Florida. The center ran a 30?day, interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients who were either at high risk for cardiac disease or had already undergone such procedures as cardiac bypass surgery. My main responsibility was to direct the behavioral component of this intensive program (which also involved dieticians, exercise physiologists, cardiologists, and RNs). Areas such as stress management, smoking cessation, behavioral approaches to obesity, etc. were among the targets that I had to address. One of my other responsibilities was, in conjunction with the medical director, to promote the program through various media appearances in both TV and radio. Two interviews in particular stand out in my mind. The first came in the wee hours of the morning in New York City on a nationally syndicated program ? "The Long John Nebel Show" (New Yorkers old enough may remember this). The second occurred in my home base on the 79th Street Causeway in Miami Beach at a radio station where Miami's best known talk show host (at the time) was carrying forth ? I spent 2 hours being interviewed very incisively on the main topic which was "Stress and Heart Disease". I remember coming away from that interview thinking that the interviewer was very sharp and well prepared to really grill me. The name of the radio station (and I'm relying on long ago recall was, I believe either WKAT or WIOD). The name of the host ? Larry King. Shortly thereafter, Larry left Miami and the rest is history. I challenge the proven liar, and libeler, McKelvy to dispute any of these facts with any factual evidence he cares to fabricate from the diseased empty spaces composing his deluded cranium. No doubt he will choose to delete most of this post instead. LOL!!! (I apologize for appearing to be bragging about past or present accomplishments, but since this despicable, loudmouthed, unbelievably stupid, delusional, libeler and liar decided to completely embarass himself once again, it was just too tempting to not assist him in making a fool of himself and exposing his sociopathic behavior once again). Nothing more needs to be said about his lies, so when he responds with more bull****, I will respond with a standard, previously used, canned response that perfectly describes this moron's basic character, motivations, and irrational behaviors. Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist (FL PY 2543) Thanks for once again demonstrating you can't tell the difference between opinions and lies. |
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? Yes. What did you think of the material? Not the sort of thng in my collection. What did you think of the performance? Sounds like a good recording of an amateur choir. Is that your idea of music? It is music, it's just not the kind I like. Are you now attacking preference again? |
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
Since McKelvy is out of touch with reality and can only respon r efleively and psychotically to the sight of my name, there is no need to read anything he has to say. Therefore, as I've done in the past, the response to his mindless lies will be as follows: \ "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael Mckelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy ranted: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. What is your occupation, where do you practice? Asked and answered over 7 years ago. When are you going to complain to the legal authorities about the poster impersonating a psychologist on RAO? When are you going to print your false statements in an American print publication? When are you going to take up Scott Wheeler on his gernerous offer to bet you with odds of 10 to 1?. Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. They rely on factual information - a behavior you've never endorsed. I endorse it whole heartedly, when will you? You never have. When will you start telling the truth, ****head? Unlike you, they don't call lies "opinions", deliberately ignore factual evidence and enqage in smear campaigns based on 7 years of bull****. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. More than you ever will, ****head. Not possible asshole. Not possibler for you, psychotic, lying piece of ****. Don't forget to consult with your ventriloquist in Detroit for your next aubhuman , drooling attempt to get the last word, moron Just because you like some guys arm up your ass, don't project your sick fantasies on me. I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially as meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply continues to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought processes, and of course, his hatred. No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food" metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others are getting his "message". State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's "Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO" Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist Bruce J. Richman |
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: Since McKelvy is out of touch with reality and can only respon r efleively and psychotically to the sight of my name, there is no need to read anything he has to say. Therefore, as I've done in the past, the response to his mindless lies will be as follows: \ "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael Mckelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy ranted: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. What is your occupation, where do you practice? Asked and answered over 7 years ago. When are you going to complain to the legal authorities about the poster impersonating a psychologist on RAO? When are you going to print your false statements in an American print publication? When are you going to take up Scott Wheeler on his gernerous offer to bet you with odds of 10 to 1?. Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. They rely on factual information - a behavior you've never endorsed. I endorse it whole heartedly, when will you? You never have. When will you start telling the truth, ****head? Unlike you, they don't call lies "opinions", deliberately ignore factual evidence and enqage in smear campaigns based on 7 years of bull****. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. More than you ever will, ****head. Not possible asshole. Not possibler for you, psychotic, lying piece of ****. Don't forget to consult with your ventriloquist in Detroit for your next aubhuman , drooling attempt to get the last word, moron Just because you like some guys arm up your ass, don't project your sick fantasies on me. I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially as meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply continues to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought processes, and of course, his hatred. No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food" metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others are getting his "message". State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's "Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO" Stay tuned for more evasions and nonsense from Brucie-opinions-are-lies Richman. |
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michaep McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: Since McKelvy is out of touch with reality and can only respon r efleively and psychotically to the sight of my name, there is no need to read anything he has to say. Therefore, as I've done in the past, the response to his mindless lies will be as follows: \ "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael Mckelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy ranted: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy lied: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? LOL !!! These are the kinds of questions for which the answers are predetermined. It's predetermined you will never have a constructive day on RAO. Prove it, asshole. LOL!!! You give evidence every day. Lack of proof noted. OSAF noted. It's predetermined that you'll never tell the truth about anything having to do with me. It's proven that I have never done anything more than give my opinion of what an asshole you are. It's proven that you're a lying scumbag that has deliberately libeled another person by knowingly lying about their identity, occupation, credentials, etc. What is your occupation, where do you practice? Asked and answered over 7 years ago. When are you going to complain to the legal authorities about the poster impersonating a psychologist on RAO? When are you going to print your false statements in an American print publication? When are you going to take up Scott Wheeler on his gernerous offer to bet you with odds of 10 to 1?. Thanks for lying again. We wouldn't want you to damage your reputation for chornic dishonesty. Thank you for demonstrating again you don't know what a lie is. Projecting your own problems on to others noted. Nobody other than Krueger believes your libelous false claims about my professional activies, and nobody thinks they are just "opinions" Now you understand why I don't trust them. They rely on the barest whisp of evidence. They rely on factual information - a behavior you've never endorsed. I endorse it whole heartedly, when will you? You never have. When will you start telling the truth, ****head? Unlike you, they don't call lies "opinions", deliberately ignore factual evidence and enqage in smear campaigns based on 7 years of bull****. (Supportive sockpuppets with no verifiable identities like Torresists don't count, dumbass). Neither do you dickless. More than you ever will, ****head. Not possible asshole. Not possibler for you, psychotic, lying piece of ****. Don't forget to consult with your ventriloquist in Detroit for your next aubhuman , drooling attempt to get the last word, moron Just because you like some guys arm up your ass, don't project your sick fantasies on me. I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings ? essentially as meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day ? he simply continues to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought processes, and of course, his hatred. No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food" metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others are getting his "message". State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's "Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO" Stay tuned for more evasions and nonsense from Brucie-opinions-are-lies Richman. I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought processes, and of course, his hatred. No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food" metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others are getting his "message". State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's "Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO" Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist Bruce J. Richman |
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message . atl.earthlink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of the material? What did you think of the performance? Is that your idea of music? No, I haven't listened to the recording. Give it a try. Please. He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate deception and pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication was that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and Krueger are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie marathons. What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that Mike McKelvey can't understand? Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we can all expect - dishonest behavior. (1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response. Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the death of Julian Hirsch. A blatant lie. (2) The title of your thread and the questoni Is that Italian? Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to respond honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile typographical error citing noted. were both clearly stated. Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation for blatant disregard for the facts in a post. I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording, I've not listened to it. You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather then answer the question and stick to the facts. I did? Oh dear me, I might start becoming like you. Of course, your mindless and slavish need to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us. I think all you have to do to ingratiate yourself to Arny is accept that the laws of physics are still intact. (3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest answers. Liewise yourself. And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian Hirsch thread get no answer at all. Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies, The premise was why did you make a personal attack on Arny in the Julian Hirsch thread. You did so, now explain why. the question was equally dishonest and not worthy of response. IOW you got caught and don't want to admit to the fact that it was tacky and pointless. Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least asked for an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you have repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman? Because the most likely scenario is that Dr. Richman is a harmless gnat. I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like to see this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is clearly against the law. If I'm doiing you such an injustice why have you not taken steps to get me charged with something, or is denigrationg an asshole on USENET not a crime? Where do you live, where's your practice? Well, other than seeing his reponse to my post, I haven't bothered to read it. As usual, I can safely assume it contained a series of lies and juvenile insults. Therefore, rather than waste my time and that of other RAO readers, I' re reproducing a response written in April, 2004 in response to McKelvy's bull**** about my background. Note that it directly refutrs just about all of his idiotic attempts to continue his lies and libel campaign. In response to proven libeler and pathological liar McKelvy's continued repetition of false claims, coupled with a laughable "demand" that I produce evidence that he has a lengthy history of lying and libeling me on RAO, I decided to call this cretin's pathetic attempts to dodge responsibility for his despicable behavior with the following response. A couple of observations, should be added re. my post of April 9, 2004, which is reproduced below: 1. In the first example of libel by McKelvy which I cite, he initiated libel thread with the title "Richman's ethical lapses". It is worth noting that he does not and CAN NOT list any. So obviously, his sole purpose was to libel and defame another person. I chose to ignore this piece of unprovoked garbage which he initiated. As did every other RAO poster. 2. As of the time of this writing, 4:00 PM EST on 4/10/04, the proven liar and libeler Mckelvy has failed to respond directly to the post reproduced below. It is obvious that his latest bluff/bull**** has been called and he's been exposed for what most on RAO already have known him to be for a long time - a hatemongering, bitter, delusional liar and character assassin whose primary purpose in posting on RAO is to smear others with whatever lies, libelous false claims and libelous labels of other people his diseased, delusional "mind" (such as it is in its primitive state) can regurgitate. 3. Proven liar and libeler McKelvy has been challenged to submit his delusional "complaints" about my professional and ethical behavior (about which he has admitted he knows nothing - one of the few true things he has ever said) to the appropriate licensing board in my state. Of course, he has failed to do so, most likely because he knows that he's full of it, and will be sued by me after he does so. 4. I could have provided many more examples of McKelvy's compulsive lies and libels against me, but felt that for now, 2 would be sufficient. Pending the results of Mr. Wheeler's case, and in consultation with my attornies, I may elect to pursue legal action against him and use a quite impressive and lengthy file of false, libelous claims he has made against me as evidence. No doubt, he will "help" by continuing to provide further evidence that can be used against him. 5. I apologize for the lengfh of this post in advance, but in consideration of McKelvy's obvious compulsive, pathological responses which almost always consist of further lies and libelous false statements about me, this response is IMHO, quite appropriate. 6. This response will be the one used in the future to deal with McKelvy's subsequent sociopathic, delusional, false, and libelous personal attacks against me. ----------------------------------------------------------- Mike McKelvy continues to avoid providing proof of his slander: From: (Bruce J. Richman) Mike McKelvy wrote: From: (Bruce J. Richman) deletion of further lies in which McKelvy tries to avoid responsibility for lengthy history of lying and committing slander re. my credentials, training and professional activities. This despicable scumbag, after first admitting he knows nothing about my credentials, training and professional activities, then laughingly trying to claim his slanderous bull**** was merely opinions, and now attempting to deny all responsibility for his ridiculous lies ? insults the intelligence of all RAO readers. His requests for "proof" ? like all his imbecilic grunts and mutterings concerning me ? are a joke. As is his very RAO existence. While he continue to deny slandering me, and requesting proof, his credibility remains zero (except perhaps, in the eyes of his hero, Krueger). His false claims re. my professional background are a matter of Google record, and virtually all RAO readers at all familiar with this sociopath's imbecilic bull**** re. my background know this to be the case. Since he's been purveying lies about me, he needs to present the proof for all his nonsense, or stick his head further up the orifice in which it's obviously been inserted for so long. Bruce J. Richman repetitive bull**** similar to that pruveyed over a 6 year period by this pathological liar and proven slanderer deleted For this pathological liar, all false claims about another person's training, credentials, professional experience, etc. ? are only "opinions" ? a piece of bull**** nobody other than this lying cretin believes. Here's just one example of his slander: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...thbp0ffk2j625% 40corp.supernews.com&rnum=7&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DMcKelvy%2Band%2Blicensing%2 Bboard%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26t ab%3Dwg Note that this was an attack thread started by McKelvy, in which this fool, reproduces the Ethical Code followed by psychologists. Note the slanderous title of the post. Note also the question, this proven slanderer asks in the last line after quoting the Ethical code. Needless to say, this pathological liar has no evidence that I have ever committed any ethics violations, and in fact his use of the title of this thread, to which nobody responded, constitutes slander. I have directly challenged this despicable cretin and proven liar to submit any complaints he has to the Florida State Licensing Board. He has refused to do so, because he knows he's been lying about me for 6 years. This fool, in a conversation with Scott Wheeler commiitted another blatant lie: "The person claiming to be B.J. Richman, a Ph.D is a fake as should be obvious to anybody with more than 2 active neurons." The reference for this is http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...igk0458h89%40c orp.supernews.com Now, no doubt, proven liar and slanderer McKelvy will claim he's just voiced an opinion, but defamation and libel of a licensed psychologist, whose identity is acknowledged and has been proven on RAO to the satisfaction of virtually all conscious lifeforms with the exception of McKelvy and Krueger, is *not* an opinion. His lies are a matter of public record, and these 2 examples are just a few of many that could be easily obtained from the Google record. He has also deliberately ignored the following evidence presented on Google: "The University of Texas at Austin, has long had one of the most highly regarded doctoral programs in Clinical Psychology in the United States (top 10 ranking). Since I had the good fortune to have a very good record in my Master's propgram at Clinical Psychology at Boston College,l and perhaps becauise I hit the 99th %ile on the Graduate Record Examination (Verbal Portion) and the 99th %ile examination on the Psychology Acvhievement section, I had the rather odd experience of being actively recruited by schools to which I applied. (I had always thought this just happened to jocks, but I was wrong). One unforgettable day, I got a call from the head of the Clinical Psychology program at the University of Texas, a Dr. James Bieri, who basically said "We've seen your application, we'd like you to come here, and we're prepared to make you a nice offfer". That nice offer, which I accepted, turned out to be a NIMH (National Institutes of Mental Health) Traineeship in Clinical Psychology, for an unlimited period of time, with no strings attached other than that I meet the academic requirements of the program (maintain a B average).. It took care of all my expenses (tuition, room & board, books, etc.) and gave me s small stipend to live on as well. Some of my classmates congratulated me on my good fortune (many of them had to accept teaching assistantships to help pay their bills, while all I had to do was hit the books). The program turned out to be a real meatgrinder (as one of my classmates put it). It made my undergraduate program at an elite "small Ivy League school" (Bowdoin College) and my M.A. program seem like kindergarten. Almost everybody in my entering class of about 20 had either a Phi Beta Kappa key, was published and or came from Ivy League schools or places like U. of Chicago, Stanford or Berkeley. Of the 20 who started the program, only 5 of us survived and got our doctorates. It took not only a high degree of intelligence and perserverance, but also a large ability to deal with the stress of knowing that you were in a program with a very high attrition rate and some professors, who frankly, until you got to the 2nd year and had "paid your dues", didn't give a damn if you survived or not. I'll never forgot one of my Statistics professors who used to get up in front of the class and say "Even if you don't make it through graduate school, you can still be a good citizen"" and the following: "I was accepted for an Internship in Clnical Psycnology at Massachusetts General Hospital, which I accepted and completed" and the followiong: "After obtaining my doctorate, I was also accepted for postdoctoral training at Temple Medical School, Department of Psychiary, Institute for Behavior Therapy, in Philadelphia. I enjoyed my time there had learned a lot under the supervision of the late Dr. Joseph Wolpe, a world famous psychiatrist who is considered to be one of the founders of Cognitive?Behavioral Therapy, the predominant type of therapy now practiced by most psychologists and psychiatrists (aside from pharmacotherapy). " The above quotes are from a post written in response to Howard Ferstler, another well known zealot, pathological liar, and purveyor of libel on RAO (not surprisingly, frequently defended by Krueger, McKelvy's role model). The complete post (and thread) can be referened at: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0203225629.076 19.00000418%40mb?mg.aol.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DFerstler%2Band%2BRichman%2B and%2BUniversity%2Bof%2BTexas%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26 ie%3DUTF?8%26sa%3DN%26ta b%3Dwg So McKelvy's slandeous claims about quacks, frauds, and fakes are nothing more than the delusional, sociopathic rantings and repetitions of a proven liar and libeler. No doubt he will claim that this is all made up, but the only thing made up are his nonsensical departures from reality which pollute RAO whenever he continues to libel me and others. One further fact, which I may or may not be able to prove since it happened a long time ago, and I don't know if the radio station keeps records. And I challenge the cretin and liar, McKelvy, to disprove it ? LOL! : In about 1976 or 1977, I was employed as the "Psychology Director" of a private Cardiac Rehabilitation Center based in Miami, Florida. The center ran a 30?day, interdisciplinary inpatient program for patients who were either at high risk for cardiac disease or had already undergone such procedures as cardiac bypass surgery. My main responsibility was to direct the behavioral component of this intensive program (which also involved dieticians, exercise physiologists, cardiologists, and RNs). Areas such as stress management, smoking cessation, behavioral approaches to obesity, etc. were among the targets that I had to address. One of my other responsibilities was, in conjunction with the medical director, to promote the program through various media appearances in both TV and radio. Two interviews in particular stand out in my mind. The first came in the wee hours of the morning in New York City on a nationally syndicated program ? "The Long John Nebel Show" (New Yorkers old enough may remember this). The second occurred in my home base on the 79th Street Causeway in Miami Beach at a radio station where Miami's best known talk show host (at the time) was carrying forth ? I spent 2 hours being interviewed very incisively on the main topic which was "Stress and Heart Disease". I remember coming away from that interview thinking that the interviewer was very sharp and well prepared to really grill me. The name of the radio station (and I'm relying on long ago recall was, I believe either WKAT or WIOD). The name of the host ? Larry King. Shortly thereafter, Larry left Miami and the rest is history. I challenge the proven liar, and libeler, McKelvy to dispute any of these facts with any factual evidence he cares to fabricate from the diseased empty spaces composing his deluded cranium. No doubt he will choose to delete most of this post instead. LOL!!! (I apologize for appearing to be bragging about past or present accomplishments, but since this despicable, loudmouthed, unbelievably stupid, delusional, libeler and liar decided to completely embarass himself once again, it was just too tempting to not assist him in making a fool of himself and exposing his sociopathic behavior once again). Nothing more needs to be said about his lies, so when he responds with more bull****, I will respond with a standard, previously used, canned response that perfectly describes this moron's basic character, motivations, and irrational behaviors. Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist (FL PY 2543) Thanks for once again demonstrating you can't tell the difference between opinions and lies. I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. Ooops, you've run out of ammunition again. That opinions are lies bull**** is getting weaker by the minute. You can always tell when Bruce is getting frustrated, the frequency of his typo's increases. |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message k.net... IOW, you'll; continue to deny that a 7 year history of libel and false statements is contained in the Google record. IOW, I'll continue to express my opinion of you and any other thing I feel like. Plus I'll continue to let you look ridiculous for responding. IOW, my opinion is that you sneak inot the morgue and **** dead bodies, not all of them female. It's not a lie of course, just my opinion. |
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? Yes. What did you think of the material? Not the sort of thng in my collection. What did you think of the performance? Sounds like a good recording of an amateur choir. Is that your idea of music? It is music, it's just not the kind I like. Are you now attacking preference again? No, just offering my opinion. Seems you can't tell the difference. I am not calling the performance bad by invoking objective measurements of it. I am saying it is bad because the performance irritates me rather than inspires me. Gospel music is supposed to be inspirational. |
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message I thought that the accents, dynamics, choppiness, and regimentation produced just a God awful result. So when are you going to post something of yours, Art? We all do different things Arny. Yep Art we all do different things. You are content to sit in front of your computer typing inaninities. I've got some music to make and then enjoy listening to. |
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... Did you listen to Arny's recording? Yes. Is that your idea of music? It is music, it's just not the kind I like. Are you now attacking preference again? Mike, do you think that RAO's preference police in the form of Bruce Richman is going to criticize Art for his obvious preference-trashing? LOL! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| RCA out and Speaker Question in 2004 Ranger Edge Question | Car Audio | |||
| capacitor + parallel wiring question? | Car Audio | |||
| question on Pioneer DEH-P4600MP | Car Audio | |||
| Sub + amp wiring question | Car Audio | |||
| MTX 4200X amp wiring question | Car Audio | |||
Linear Mode
