"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:

so, what do you think of Arny now, after you read my
synopsis of his behaviors regarding his claims that
various posters here have sent him email
containing child porn? And how he still maintains
we sent him child porn, while at the same time
alleging that the very same pictures, while they were being
stored in his hard drive, were NOT child porn, so as to absolve
himself of the criminal act of possesing child porn?
Can you see that his claims are inconsistent and
that one, or all of them, are lies?

Your obsession with following this disputed claim makes you look very
sad.

It's very easy to smear ppl. I'm unimpressed.


Then you must be very unimpressed with Arny.

Is it alright in your book to
knowingly falsely accuse people
of emailing child porn?

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.

The record shows
Arny has made such claims.

Did you send me the porn, Art?

Do you know who did send it to me?

Was it Middius or Marc Phillips, if not you?

The record shows
that concurrently to this, he also
claims that the Michigan State Police has
judged the 'alleged' material top be of adults.

The record shows that approximately three years or more elapsed between
those two events.

How do you reconcile the inherent inconsistency?

Art Sackman is lying again.

Does truth matter to you?

Fear not, it does not matter to Art Sackman.

If so, reconcile your ambivilance towards Arny's behavior
with your passion for truth.

He recognizes that he's see enough low-life activity around here in the past
two days to make just about any egregious behavior on the part of RAO
regulars believable.

Let's consider this post from just yesterday:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnews txt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we see
today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the floors
of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was tethered
upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus attaching his
teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's feet. Your mother,
enchanted by upside-down things (particularly people), decided that
she would mop the floor of his dungeon first and **** him afterwards.
The impassioned upside-down **** created a child. To mother's delight,
the child much preferred being kicked than hugged. It also enjoyed
being taped upside down to the wall, with its pacifier in its arse,
while mommy whipped it with light flex and breast fed its nostrils.


Notice that Dr. Bruce Richman thinks that this is the absolute
truth, and that it is a post from a perfectly sane individual.

Note that David Weil, purported defender of truth, has nothing to
say against this reprehensible act against every poster and lurker at RAO.

Note that Art Sackman thinks that posts like this are very funny.

Sad, very sad!

Paul Dormer wrote:


"Pooh Bear" emitted :

The DIY fraternaty reverse engineered the
Gaincard and now *hundreds* of people worldwide are building Gaincard
clones or modifications thereof, referred to as Gainclones.

I have now read a few reviews of these amps and, for the most part, it
seems reviewers have *transandental* experiences with them.

Comments..?

Since they built them themselves I supect the usual 'I did it so it sounds
great' effect.

Didn't you claim to be an audio equipment designer? Therefore you are
also vulnerable to the 'I did it so it sounds great' effect...


He's made a lot of claims. Most of them are BS. He's also vulnerable to the
"I say it, so it must be true" effect. It's very easy to fool oneself, but
harder to fool the public.


This reminds me of a review of the Linn Majik integrated amp, in which
Linn made a virtue of the IC amp therein, IIRC, it was easier to design
around as it didn't need the expensive component matching of a discrete
amp.

Is there a circuit-designing statistical advantage to ICs?

Nope. In fact the limitations of the devices that can be produced using IC
fabrication techniques normally means that an IC design has to make
comnpromises compared to a fully discrete design.

Not many ppl are tutored in discrete circuit design anymore however, it's a
vanishing 'art' - sorry science.

The device used in the Gainclone is this I understand.

"The LM3875 is a high-performance audio power amplifier capable of
delivering
56W of continuous average power to an 8 load with 0.1% THD+N from 20Hz to
20kHz"

http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM3875.html

The output stage isn't even the complementary type !

Some modern IC amplifiers are *ok* - but I've never seen one that truly
shined. You can do so much more with discrete circuit design.

Have you heard the amplifier in question.


He doesn't feel it necessary to provide credible evidence for what he says.

Besides, he has no verifiable identity. What makes you think he has the
ability to hear anything other than the sound of his own voice?





--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t









Bruce J. Richman

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed emails.



Did you send me the porn, Art?


Absolutely not. I was not participating in RAO
at the time frame in question.

Do you know who did send it to me?


No, nor do I know that it ever was actually sent to you.

Was it Middius or Marc Phillips, if not you?


It wasn't me. I never sent you porn.
I believe that the porn in question never was sent to you at all.
Obviously, I have no knowledge of private emails
that might have been sent to you by Middius, Phillips,
or anyone else in the world.


The record shows that approximately three years or more elapsed between
those two events.


Even after the second event, you have continued
to make those claims.

How do you reconcile the inherent inconsistency?

Art Sackman is lying again.


No, your posting history is doumented.
your previous claims are on the record.


Does truth matter to you?

Fear not, it does not matter to Art Sackman.


I see, you are warning off Graham form telling the truth.
That he nee dnot tell it.

If so, reconcile your ambivilance towards Arny's behavior
with your passion for truth.

He recognizes that he's see enough low-life activity around here in the
past
two days to make just about any egregious behavior on the part of RAO
regulars believable.


Of course, except for you, Sweet Baby Jesus.

Let's consider this post from just yesterday:


I have laid out the truth about you.
I am asking him DIRECTLY ABOUT YOU.
Stop deflecting the issue onto others.
I want him to address your behavior.



Notice that Dr. Bruce Richman thinks that this is the absolute
truth, and that it is a post from a perfectly sane individual.

Note that David Weil, purported defender of truth, has nothing to
say against this reprehensible act against every poster and lurker at
RAO.

Note that Art Sackman thinks that posts like this are very funny.


I said it was satirical. I implied that it was not literally true
when I responded that the actual truth about you was worse than Devil's
satire.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed emails.

Nope, try again.

The alleged proof was full of holes. I debunked them with relevant
references from RFCs.

BTW Art, why not tell us what an RFC is?

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
.. .
"Pooh Bear" emitted :

The DIY fraternaty reverse engineered the
Gaincard and now *hundreds* of people worldwide are building Gaincard
clones or modifications thereof, referred to as Gainclones.

I have now read a few reviews of these amps and, for the most part,
it
seems reviewers have *transandental* experiences with them.

Comments..?

Since they built them themselves I supect the usual 'I did it so it
sounds
great' effect.

Didn't you claim to be an audio equipment designer? Therefore you are
also vulnerable to the 'I did it so it sounds great' effect...

This reminds me of a review of the Linn Majik integrated amp, in which
Linn made a virtue of the IC amp therein, IIRC, it was easier to design
around as it didn't need the expensive component matching of a discrete
amp.

Is there a circuit-designing statistical advantage to ICs?

Nope. In fact the limitations of the devices that can be produced using
IC
fabrication techniques normally means that an IC design has to make
comnpromises compared to a fully discrete design.

Not many ppl are tutored in discrete circuit design anymore however, it's
a
vanishing 'art' - sorry science.

The device used in the Gainclone is this I understand.

"The LM3875 is a high-performance audio power amplifier capable of
delivering
56W of continuous average power to an 8 load with 0.1% THD+N from 20Hz to
20kHz"

http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM3875.html

The output stage isn't even the complementary type !

Some modern IC amplifiers are *ok* - but I've never seen one that truly
shined. You can do so much more with discrete circuit design.

Have you heard the amplifier in question.


Have you forgotten?
He can visualize what it sounds like by merely reading the schematic.










Yesiree !! He hears things and sees things that aren't there at the time.
This sounds very familiar to me. I think I heard the same thing from a patient
yesterday.

With apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan:

"When I was a boy I went to schools
And quickly learned that evidence was for the fools
I learned to lie and prevaricate
And tell everybody that I was first rate"

Chorus:

"He learned to lie and prevaricate
And tell everybody that he was first rate"

"I told everybody I was named Pooh Bear
And most of them just laughed and said they didn't care
They thought I was delusional and made me tear
So I cried and told them that I was an engineer"

CHORUS:

"They thought he was delusional and made him tear
So he cried and told them that he was an engineer"

"When I got a little older I found RAO
But unforunately my voices were quite loud, not low
So I tried to drown them out with a pack of lies
About my audio background and my ego size

CHORUS

"So he tried to drown them out with a pack of lies
About his audio background and his ego size"

"Unfortunately my lunacy was quickly found
To cause some folks to want to have me clinic bound
So I can't tell you my real name, I am just Pooh Bear
And please give me some Haldol if you really care"

CHORUS:

"So he can't tell us his real name, he is just Pooh Bear
And please give him some Haldol if you really care"





Bruce J. Richman

Pooh Bear wrote:

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...


Graham

so, what do you think of Arny now, after you read my
synopsis of his behaviors regarding his claims that
various posters here have sent him email
containing child porn? And how he still maintains
we sent him child porn, while at the same time
alleging that the very same pictures, while they were being
stored in his hard drive, were NOT child porn, so as to absolve
himself of the criminal act of possesing child porn?
Can you see that his claims are inconsistent and
that one, or all of them, are lies?

This was the synopsis I posted several days ago, with a note
in the header requesting that you read it.

I did read it.

I don't understand its relationship to audio matters.


Graham










Sort of like your unprovoked personal attacks against others. You don't
understand those either.

There are a lot of things you don't understand, such as humility, honesty, and
objectivity.

Since Arny chose to introduce the first posts about child pornograhy on RAO,
they unforunately, *became* relevant to the posters in RAO.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Sort of like your unprovoked personal attacks against others. You
don't understand those either.

Richman, I've lost count of your unprovoked attacks on me.

When are you going to stop lying to yourself?

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...


Graham

so, what do you think of Arny now, after you read my
synopsis of his behaviors regarding his claims that
various posters here have sent him email
containing child porn? And how he still maintains
we sent him child porn, while at the same time
alleging that the very same pictures, while they were being
stored in his hard drive, were NOT child porn, so as to absolve
himself of the criminal act of possesing child porn?
Can you see that his claims are inconsistent and
that one, or all of them, are lies?

This was the synopsis I posted several days ago, with a note
in the header requesting that you read it.

I did read it.

I don't understand its relationship to audio matters.


Graham


Graham is going with the the burying his head in the sand option.









He prefers to lower the external S/N ratio so that it won't interfere with his
internal one. He also favors a high THD in his RAO "designs" - total human
distortion.


Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


He also favors a high THD in his
RAO "designs" - total human distortion.

Right down your alley, Bruce.

BYW, why not tell us again why this is a perfectly normal posting:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnewst xt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we see
today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the floors
of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was tethered
upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus attaching his
teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's feet. Your mother,
enchanted by upside-down things (particularly people), decided that
she would mop the floor of his dungeon first and **** him afterwards.
The impassioned upside-down **** created a child. To mother's delight,
the child much preferred being kicked than hugged. It also enjoyed
being taped upside down to the wall, with its pacifier in its arse,
while mommy whipped it with light flex and breast fed its nostrils.

Notice that Dr. Bruce Richman thinks that this is the absolute truth, and is
a post from a perfectly sane individual.

Note that David Weil, purported defender of truth, has nothing to say.

What further indictment of the cowardice of Weil and Richman is needed?

Pooh Bear wrote"


Clyde Slick wrote:

so, what do you think of Arny now, after you read my
synopsis of his behaviors regarding his claims that
various posters here have sent him email
containing child porn? And how he still maintains
we sent him child porn, while at the same time
alleging that the very same pictures, while they were being
stored in his hard drive, were NOT child porn, so as to absolve
himself of the criminal act of possesing child porn?
Can you see that his claims are inconsistent and
that one, or all of them, are lies?

Your obsession with following this disputed claim makes you look very
sad.

It's very easy to smear ppl. I'm unimpressed.


With your own behavior. We agree. It's easy to do and worthless.



Graham










Bruce J. Richman

Subject: What does Graham have to say about Arny?
From: "Clyde Slick"
Date: 8/17/2004 9:52 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: What does Graham have to say about Arny?
From: "Clyde Slick"
Date: 8/17/2004 9:52 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed email

Others??? Do you mean the anonymous "Leon North", the "Internet Expert" sans
credentials? The "Leon North" that made it's first ever Usenet post by posting
on RAO on 9/11/2001?

Even *you* are not _that_ stupid, are you? :-(

"Torresists" wrote in message

Subject: What does Graham have to say about Arny?
From: "Clyde Slick"
Date: 8/17/2004 9:52 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed email

Others??? Do you mean the anonymous "Leon North", the "Internet
Expert" sans credentials? The "Leon North" that made it's first ever
Usenet post by posting on RAO on 9/11/2001?

Even *you* are not _that_ stupid, are you? :-(

Interesting that Dormer is not also going ballistic over Leon North's fake
ID, or should I mention it - the fake ID of Jamie Benchimol?

Paul Dormer wrote:


"Sander deWaal" emitted :

I *must* recreate the magical
expereinces of hearing "On Land" on a toob setup for the first time..
a memory from 10 years ago that still makes me quiver at the thought
of it. That was some Audio Innovations rig, but I couldn't tell you
which.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I don't think recreating such fond
memories isn't possible.

I disagree.. it was the sonics of the tubed amp that got the hairs
standing up on the back of my neck, not some lost-in-time experience.
Just the sound I'm after! Obviously not *exactly* the same sound, but
on the rare occasion I've heard tubed gear since I've been rewarded
with the glorious sonorous effects associated with the equipment, so
I'm sure my expectations will be met..

BTW "On Land" is a fave of mine, no doubt lends itself to valve
reproduction (note) due to all the ambience and microdynamics in the
recording, and this is why, in particular, I'm eager to hear it
toobed-up again..

Audio Innovations: they had some very special gear at that time.
Could have been the "First" or "Second" amplifiers, both triode jobs
with either 2 x 2A3 PP per channel or 2 x 2 x 2A3 PP per channel.
Those things left me speechless when I heard them for the first time.
They were also among the first DHT triode amps to be available here on
the continent at that time AFAIK (1989?)

I occasionally see Audio Innovations equipment for sale in the UK..

So.. may I ask.. how do I traverse this veritable minefield of
topologies and valve types to hone in on what I seek? There are no
dealers in my area who carry a range to demo.. and I ain't got a clue
what you and Devil are going on about half the time. Is it a case of
suck it and see? There are so many differences in opinion about what
is best I haven't got a clue where to start. Left to my own devices
I'd probably just plonk down some cash on something like this for
example..


http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...80&item=571454
8040&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

..but I have no idea whether that's a good starting point. The design
looks familiar to many others... that's about all I can say.

Likewise, if I commissioned you to build me something, at this point
in time I wouldn't have a clue what to ask for..




--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t








Paul, it's obviously none of my business telling you what to do, but have you
considered a pair of classic Quads, which I would imagine can be found in good
condition in the UK, and if not can be rebuilt. Many *still* think that they
have one of the finest midranges ever produced by a loudspeaker.

I'll admit to being old enough to have had an experience like Sander's Dad.
(And for the record, I'm in my early 60's). I owned a pair of classic Quad
ESL-57's, which I bought as demos from a dealer in 1976, along with a dedicated
subwoofer specially designed for them by Miller & Kriesel (M&K). I drove them
with a relatively low powered, not particularly refined Fisher 400 Receiver (~
20 watts/channel as I recall). I owned these for over 15 years. To this day,
the realism of this combination was sometimes hair-raising. No, as you know,
they can't be played at headbanger levels, and yes, they have a narrow sweet
spot, *but* their pluses far outweigh the minuses. Of course, as the Devil
will tell you I'm sure, the 63's are more refined, can play louder, and have
greater extension.

Just my .02 worth. If I happen to find the right pair at the right price, I
just might take the plunge myself, and have them rebuilt if it has not already
been done. And then, God willing, someday maybe have stacked Quads for
greater dynamics and better bass.

One way or another, I'm going to stick with eleectrostatics, and suggest you
give them a try.



Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


If iron knees killed !

You'd be dead?

Knee joint replacment surgery, eh?

Paul Dormer wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" emitted :

It *is* rather surprising, since repeated CAT scans and PET scans show vast
areas of empty space in his skull. Maybe they think that this time they can

remove the.....er.......brown rather malodorous matter that somehow finds
its
way to his mouth.

Is Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease predominant in certain hotspots in
Detroit right about now? It would explain the pockets of air
inhabiting the head area of certain posters, and accompanying aroma of
cheese*..

And let's have their heads on platters too...

I'll have you know that the clamp on my platter does a pretty good job of
removing edge warps. However, it's not powerful enough or heavy enough to
remove the kinds of warps that these people have.

One method of dealing with warps is to beat them out.. ;-)


*swiss


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t








LOL !!! LOT's. !!! If iron knees killed !



Bruce J. Richman

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


If iron knees killed !

You'd be dead?

Knee joint replacment surgery, eh?









Have you moved to Canada?

Eh?



No, I've never had joint replacment surgery.

Have you ever replaced any joints? After flushing them quickly just before a
raid?

Did you get the metal plate in your head after getting hit by the Octopus or
run over by a Zamboni at a hockey game, or did the neurosurgeon misinterpret
what you meant when you told him you wanted more RAM?

Is your reported age of 57:

(a) In Earth Years ?
(b) In Jack Benny Years?
(c) In Heinz Variety Years?
or
(d) In Dyslexic Number Reversal Years?




Bruce J. Richman

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

Some modern IC amplifiers are *ok* - but I've never seen one that truly
shined. You can do so much more with discrete circuit design.

Have you heard the amplifier in question.

I've heard enough IC amplifiers to be aware that most sound pretty similar.

That's you done then.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Sort of like your unprovoked personal attacks against others. You
don't understand those either.

Richman, I've lost count of your unprovoked attacks on me.


If you want to go back to your *first* unprovoked personal attack against me,
consisting of a complaint about email harassment which you sent to me via
private email, then *nothing* according to the way you define"unprovoked" has
been provoked. And no, Krueger, I can't prove it, but you threatened to report
me to my ISP for an unsolicited email you lied and claimed I sent to you.
I've never sent you any unsolicited email.

Sort of like th lies you're making now about people sending you kiddie porn.

Speaking of unprovoked personal attacks, Kruege, what would you call your
recent (within the last few days) generation of an attack thread withi my name
and Dave Weil's name in the title? I'm sure both Dave and I have lost count of
the number of times you've tried to smear people by putting their names in the
title of attack threads started by you.

You somehow came to the illogical conclusion that because I didn't comment one
way or another on Graham's obviously satirical description of your early
childhood upbringing - at least not at the time it was posted and until after
you made your silly personal attack accusations. Wouldn't you call that an
unp;rovoked personal attack? After all, it certainly was NOT based on anything
I said about you, was it?:I



When are you going to stop lying to yourself?



Fortunately, I've never felt the need nor necessity to do so. I've heard more
than enough lies about me from you for over 7 years.


Bruce J. Richman

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed emails.

Nope, try again.

The alleged proof was full of holes. I debunked them with relevant
references from RFCs.


All non relevant, or misinterpreted.

BTW Art, why not tell us what an RFC is?



request for comment

Arny Krueger wrote"


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


He also favors a high THD in his
RAO "designs" - total human distortion.

Right down your alley, Bruce.

BYW, why not tell us again why this is a perfectly normal posting:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnews txt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we see
today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the floors
of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was tethered
upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus attaching his
teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's feet. Your mother,
enchanted by upside-down things (particularly people), decided that
she would mop the floor of his dungeon first and **** him afterwards.
The impassioned upside-down **** created a child. To mother's delight,
the child much preferred being kicked than hugged. It also enjoyed
being taped upside down to the wall, with its pacifier in its arse,
while mommy whipped it with light flex and breast fed its nostrils.

Notice that Dr. Bruce Richman thinks that this is the absolute truth, and is
a post from a perfectly sane individual.

Note that David Weil, purported defender of truth, has nothing to say.

What further indictment of the cowardice of Weil and Richman is needed?











I agree with you, Arny, making fun of pompous frauds like Pooh Bear is right
down my alley, especially after being targeted by him for unprovoked personal
attacks. I'm sure he'll appreciate your support.

As for the post you reproduced, I agree with you, Arny. The post, taken in its
entirety, ie. Graham's (The Devil) commenjts, followed by your totally
illogical and imaginary speculations about what the silence of others means
..........
is a perfectly normal posting for Arny Krueger. It contains (1) an obviously
satirical post from The Devil, (2) paranoid speculations about what a lack of
response to The Dervil's post means when that lack comes from either Dr. Bruce
Richman or Dave Weil, (3) an absence of similar paranoid speculations about the
evil motives of others that didn't comment about The Devil's post - meaning
that it's OK for everybody else to not respond, because they're not busily
plotting against him, (4) Reaching the conclusion that Richman and Weil are
coward, (5) Failing to mention that all the other people that didn't respond to
The Devil's post are also cowards.

What's wrong with this picture?

You're right, Arny - For You, It's a Normal Post. For anybody else,
P-A-R-A-N-O-I-A.

Oh, and just to make you feel better, thanks for not commenting on 7 years of
posts from Ferstler, and McKelvy in which numerous lies and libels have been
written. You must be a coward, too.

Get real, Krueger.



Bruce J. Richman

Clyde Slick wrote:

Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed emails.

Nope, try again.

The alleged proof was full of holes. I debunked them with relevant
references from RFCs.


All non relevant, or misinterpreted.

BTW Art, why not tell us what an RFC is?



request for comment










Or when near Detroit, "Request for Committment".


Bruce J. Richman

From: Pooh Bear
Date: 8/17/2004 7:12 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Clyde Slick wrote:

so, what do you think of Arny now, after you read my
synopsis of his behaviors regarding his claims that
various posters here have sent him email
containing child porn? And how he still maintains
we sent him child porn, while at the same time
alleging that the very same pictures, while they were being
stored in his hard drive, were NOT child porn, so as to absolve
himself of the criminal act of possesing child porn?
Can you see that his claims are inconsistent and
that one, or all of them, are lies?

Your obsession with following this disputed claim makes you look very
sad.

It's very easy to smear ppl. I'm unimpressed.


Graham








What does this post have to do with audio?

"Bruce J. Richman" emitted :


Have you forgotten?
He can visualize what it sounds like by merely reading the schematic.










Yesiree !! He hears things and sees things that aren't there at the time.
This sounds very familiar to me. I think I heard the same thing from a patient
yesterday.

With apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan:

"When I was a boy I went to schools
And quickly learned that evidence was for the fools
I learned to lie and prevaricate
And tell everybody that I was first rate"

Chorus:

"He learned to lie and prevaricate
And tell everybody that he was first rate"

"I told everybody I was named Pooh Bear
And most of them just laughed and said they didn't care
They thought I was delusional and made me tear
So I cried and told them that I was an engineer"

CHORUS:

"They thought he was delusional and made him tear
So he cried and told them that he was an engineer"

"When I got a little older I found RAO
But unforunately my voices were quite loud, not low
So I tried to drown them out with a pack of lies
About my audio background and my ego size

CHORUS

"So he tried to drown them out with a pack of lies
About his audio background and his ego size"

"Unfortunately my lunacy was quickly found
To cause some folks to want to have me clinic bound
So I can't tell you my real name, I am just Pooh Bear
And please give me some Haldol if you really care"

CHORUS:

"So he can't tell us his real name, he is just Pooh Bear
And please give him some Haldol if you really care"

Lovely ;-)

"Pooh Bear".. the name just has this aura of credibility surrounding
it. For intellectual, high end audio designers, I'm sure it's
practically an automatic first place choice for an alternative
identity. Certainly, it's important to have a strong role model...
http://tinyurl.com/6hhlr


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

Here's a review of the Gaincard by Steven R. Rochlin. Note that he
mentions it in the same breath as the Ongaku he used to own..

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazin...9/47review.htm

I'm familiar with Steven Rochlin's use of language.
Forgive me if I'm a bit sceptical about this :-)

For someone to 'wax lyrical' about a bog standard National Semiconducor
power op-amp reinforces my suspicion that there's no shortage of audio
charlatans !

A narrow minded and unscientific attitude, Pooh. You already made it
clear that you haven't heard the amp. Restrain yourself.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

"Arny Krueger" emitted :

"Torresists" wrote in message

Subject: What does Graham have to say about Arny?
From: "Clyde Slick"
Date: 8/17/2004 9:52 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed email

Others??? Do you mean the anonymous "Leon North", the "Internet
Expert" sans credentials? The "Leon North" that made it's first ever
Usenet post by posting on RAO on 9/11/2001?

Even *you* are not _that_ stupid, are you? :-(

Interesting that Dormer is not also going ballistic over Leon North's fake
ID, or should I mention it - the fake ID of Jamie Benchimol?

Why is that interesting? TIA for sharing... ;-)


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

Compare making an IC to baking a cake. It's not actually really that different
conceptually in many ways.

47 Laboratory put the icing (and a cherry) on the cake.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

"Arny Krueger" emitted :

Score! I again blew Art's mind so badly that he just posted my post with no
comments.

Why bother going out!


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

"Arny Krueger" emitted :

Did you send me the porn, Art?

Do you know who did send it to me?

Was it Middius or Marc Phillips, if not you?

Is the Moon made of Cheese?

Was Elvis black?

etc.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message


A narrow minded and unscientific attitude, Pooh.

A simple observation of the obvious.

You already made it clear that you haven't heard the amp.

The facts are clear - it is bog standard National Semiconductor power
op-amp chip in a standard circuit.

Restrain yourself.

Cure yourself!

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

Compare making an IC to baking a cake. It's not actually really that
different conceptually in many ways.

47 Laboratory put the icing (and a cherry) on the cake.

Such as?

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote"


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


He also favors a high THD in his
RAO "designs" - total human distortion.

Right down your alley, Bruce.

BYW, why not tell us again why this is a perfectly normal posting:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnewst xt.nz

Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we
see today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the
floors of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was
tethered upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus
attaching his teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's
feet. Your mother, enchanted by upside-down things (particularly
people), decided that she would mop the floor of his dungeon first
and **** him afterwards. The impassioned upside-down **** created a
child. To mother's delight, the child much preferred being kicked
than hugged. It also enjoyed being taped upside down to the wall,
with its pacifier in its arse, while mommy whipped it with light
flex and breast fed its nostrils.

Notice that Dr. Bruce Richman thinks that this is the absolute
truth, and is a post from a perfectly sane individual.

Note that David Weil, purported defender of truth, has nothing to
say.

What further indictment of the cowardice of Weil and Richman is
needed?

I agree with you, Arny, making fun of pompous frauds like Pooh Bear
is right down my alley, especially after being targeted by him for
unprovoked personal attacks. I'm sure he'll appreciate your support.

As for the post you reproduced, I agree with you, Arny. The post,
taken in its entirety, ie. Graham's (The Devil) commenjts, followed
by your totally illogical and imaginary speculations about what the
silence of others means .........
is a perfectly normal posting for Arny Krueger. It contains (1) an
obviously satirical post from The Devil, (2) paranoid speculations
about what a lack of response to The Dervil's post means when that
lack comes from either Dr. Bruce Richman or Dave Weil, (3) an absence
of similar paranoid speculations about the evil motives of others
that didn't comment about The Devil's post - meaning that it's OK for
everybody else to not respond, because they're not busily plotting
against him, (4) Reaching the conclusion that Richman and Weil are
coward, (5) Failing to mention that all the other people that didn't
respond to The Devil's post are also cowards.

What's wrong with this picture?

You're right, Arny - For You, It's a Normal Post. For anybody else,
P-A-R-A-N-O-I-A.

Oh, and just to make you feel better, thanks for not commenting on 7
years of posts from Ferstler, and McKelvy in which numerous lies and
libels have been written. You must be a coward, too.

Get real, Krueger.

Thanks for sharing Richman, you're a bigger fraud than I could have ever
imagined.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Sort of like your unprovoked personal attacks against others. You
don't understand those either.

Richman, I've lost count of your unprovoked attacks on me.


If you want to go back to your *first* unprovoked personal attack
against me, consisting of a complaint about email harassment which
you sent to me via private email, then *nothing* according to the way
you define"unprovoked" has been provoked. And no, Krueger, I can't
prove it, but you threatened to report me to my ISP for an
unsolicited email you lied and claimed I sent to you. I've never sent
you any unsolicited email.

Prove it.

Sort of like th lies you're making now about people sending you
kiddie porn.

Prove it.

Speaking of unprovoked personal attacks, Kruege, what would you call
your recent (within the last few days) generation of an attack thread
withi my name and Dave Weil's name in the title? I'm sure both Dave
and I have lost count of the number of times you've tried to smear
people by putting their names in the title of attack threads started
by you.

It wasn't an attack thread it was a defense againt the kind of libel that
you promote, Richman.

You somehow came to the illogical conclusion that because I didn't
comment one way or another on Graham's obviously satirical
description of your early childhood upbringing - at least not at the
time it was posted and until after you made your silly personal
attack accusations. Wouldn't you call that an unp;rovoked personal
attack? After all, it certainly was NOT based on anything I said
about you, was it?:I

Fact of the matter Richman, you've offered your justifcation of Devil's
outragious post. It shows how your taste and judgment have gone down the
sewer, and your conscience with it.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Prove that the claim was false at the time it was made.


Others in this group have proved that you manufacured
the false headers regasding those supposed emails.

Nope, try again.

The alleged proof was full of holes. I debunked them with relevant
references from RFCs.


All non relevant, or misinterpreted.

BTW Art, why not tell us what an RFC is?

request for comment

How many cries for help did it take Art, before one of your brighter
associates bailed you out?

Subject: Gaincard / gainclone amps..
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 8/18/2004 2:06 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

Here's a review of the Gaincard by Steven R. Rochlin. Note that he
mentions it in the same breath as the Ongaku he used to own..

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazin...9/47review.htm

I'm familiar with Steven Rochlin's use of language.
Forgive me if I'm a bit sceptical about this :-)

For someone to 'wax lyrical' about a bog standard National Semiconducor
power op-amp reinforces my suspicion that there's no shortage of audio
charlatans !

A narrow minded and unscientific attitude, Pooh. You already made it
clear that you haven't heard the amp. Restrain yourself.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

Subject: Gaincard / gainclone amps..
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 8/17/2004 8:57 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Clyde Slick" emitted :

Have you forgotten?
He can visualize what it sounds like by merely reading the schematic.

That is what I'm alluding to ;-)


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

Subject: Gaincard / gainclone amps..
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 8/17/2004 11:13 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

Some modern IC amplifiers are *ok* - but I've never seen one that truly
shined. You can do so much more with discrete circuit design.

Have you heard the amplifier in question.

I've heard enough IC amplifiers to be aware that most sound pretty similar.

That's you done then.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

Subject: Gaincard / gainclone amps..
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 8/18/2004 2:16 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Pooh Bear" emitted :

Compare making an IC to baking a cake. It's not actually really that
different
conceptually in many ways.

47 Laboratory put the icing (and a cherry) on the cake.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

Subject: What does Graham have to say about Arny?
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 8/18/2004 2:58 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Arny Krueger" emitted :

Did you send me the porn, Art?

Do you know who did send it to me?

Was it Middius or Marc Phillips, if not you?

Is the Moon made of Cheese?

Was Elvis black?

etc.


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

Subject: Gaincard / gainclone amps..
From: Paul Dormer
Date: 8/18/2004 1:53 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"Bruce J. Richman" emitted :


Have you forgotten?
He can visualize what it sounds like by merely reading the schematic.










Yesiree !! He hears things and sees things that aren't there at the time.
This sounds very familiar to me. I think I heard the same thing from a
patient
yesterday.

With apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan:

"When I was a boy I went to schools
And quickly learned that evidence was for the fools
I learned to lie and prevaricate
And tell everybody that I was first rate"

Chorus:

"He learned to lie and prevaricate
And tell everybody that he was first rate"

"I told everybody I was named Pooh Bear
And most of them just laughed and said they didn't care
They thought I was delusional and made me tear
So I cried and told them that I was an engineer"

CHORUS:

"They thought he was delusional and made him tear
So he cried and told them that he was an engineer"

"When I got a little older I found RAO
But unforunately my voices were quite loud, not low
So I tried to drown them out with a pack of lies
About my audio background and my ego size

CHORUS

"So he tried to drown them out with a pack of lies
About his audio background and his ego size"

"Unfortunately my lunacy was quickly found
To cause some folks to want to have me clinic bound
So I can't tell you my real name, I am just Pooh Bear
And please give me some Haldol if you really care"

CHORUS:

"So he can't tell us his real name, he is just Pooh Bear
And please give him some Haldol if you really care"

Lovely ;-)

"Pooh Bear".. the name just has this aura of credibility surrounding
it. For intellectual, high end audio designers, I'm sure it's
practically an automatic first place choice for an alternative
identity. Certainly, it's important to have a strong role model...
http://tinyurl.com/6hhlr


--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t