Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
andrew.zey wrote:
I'm looking for the best video editing software which will have capable audio mixing either built in or integrated in the suite (Like Soundtrack Pro in Final Cut Studio or Adobe Premiere's built-in audio mixing). This is important as the music is tightly synced to the video, so the layout must be done first in the video editor, then exported and polished in the audio mixing software. I must be able to retain clip positions from the video editor. I think you need to call your local Avid rep. Be prepared to write a big check. 1. FCP Doesn't allow convenient sub-frame editing. It can be done, but very awkwardly Just like editing 16mm.... it's no fun. A lot of other systems are nicer, and if need be you can export to Pro Tools or something and then re-import. 2. FCP Limited to AIFF files, as WAV sometimes has serious drifting problems due to mis-identification of SMPTE framerate. Are you sure about that? Neither wav nor AIFF files actually contain any timecode data. As long as everything is at 48 ksamp/sec, everything should be fine. Your timecode stuff is all out of band. 3. FCP & STP have undefined meters (don't specify which algorithm is used). Both ignore peaks which are detected in WaveLab 6 running on PC That's also something you'll find standard throughout the audio industry, uncalibrated and doubtful metering. Get an outboard calibrated meter from RME or Dorrough and trust it. 4. STP Inability to pan submix busses and master mix. 5. STP Inability to nest/group busses (so I only have 1 level of grouping available that would allow panning) 6. STP Inability to copy&paste any effects or automation data 7. STP is counter-intuitive, as it requires at least 1 sub-mix, which cannot be panned! 8. STP each AUX bus has to be mapped to a submix bus 9. All of the FCS only supports AU plugins, not MacVST's. Here is one hint: you can use the workstation as a set of locked dubbers, then use a mixer to do the actual mix in realtime. This gives you the best of both worlds, and it's just like working with film and means you can avoid all the nonsense. Points 4-8 are really a deal-breaker with STP, as it makes it extremely clumsy and awkward to get any serious mixing done. Edit on an editor, mix on a mixer. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pros - Help! What software for audio editing / multitrack mixing? | Pro Audio | |||
editing multitrack drums in cubase SL3/SX3 | Tech | |||
editing multitrack drums in cubase SL3/SX3 | Pro Audio | |||
64bit computing & multitrack recording/editing? | Pro Audio | |||
Need advice on multitrack editing software (PC) | Pro Audio |