Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am thinking of adding my old drive (Seagate 3.2G 5400rpm) to my new
PC which include a Samsung SATA150 80G 7200rpm, but I am having second thoughts: 1) I am concerned about the mismatch of performances between the two drives; after a quick test the Samsung registered about 65MB/s (read/write) while the old Seagate only recorded a mere 7.3MB/s. Should I bother the hassle of installing the 'limping' Seagate alongside the Samsung in order to "improve" overall audio recording performance? 2) The initial idea was to use the Seagate as a "tape reel" and the faster drive for the operating system. It seems that there are conflicting suggestions about this subject...in fact many in this forum suggest exactly the opposite (faster drive for audio). 3) I've also read that the pagefile is better be confined away from the OS drive... I was thinking of doing a small Pagefile partition (512Mb) on the old Seagate and dedicate the rest for audio recording only. Will the pagefile partition sited alongide the audio partition compromise the performance? 4) I am contemplating to implement a SATA Raid system (and ditch the old Seagate altogether) by adding an extra drive (another Samsung) for a Raid(0) setup. My motherboard (a Gigabyte GA-K8VT800pro) has an onboard SATA Raid controller (and also an IDE Raid controller). As the 2 Samsung will help each other in improving read/write performance it seems that they are acting as a single unit therefore a third drive would be ideal to separate the audio recording from the OS? Raid setups are still a new thing to me and any suggestion is welcomed. Thanks, Alex |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hard disk drives for audio use? | Pro Audio | |||
Hard Disk recording of CD's | Audio Opinions | |||
Pro Tools hard disk performance | Pro Audio | |||
stand alone hard disk system vs computer based system | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie Hard Disk Recorder News | Pro Audio |