Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Every time I read a review in Stereophile or any other trade publication,
the test music invariably consists of a bunch of obscure artists and recordings (who here really listens to Rokia Traore Bowmboï?). I usually pick up my CDs more for their musical rather than their sonic content, and I presume that the majority of the listening public does the same. Why then don't these tests involce something a little more generic like U2, Radiohead or Usher since that's what most people are listening to anyway? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"DSD recordings good. PCM recordings bad." - Dr. Diamond | High End Audio | |||
Why all the bad recordings | High End Audio | |||
Comments about Blind Testing | High End Audio | |||
the emperor's clothes | High End Audio | |||
Why don't classical piano recordings sound as good as pop recordings? | High End Audio |