This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which
causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

George M. Middius wrote:



This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which
causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.



You are clearly attemting to libel Joseph, Middius.
You demonstrate in your message that if Joseph was Californian he would
have the same good reasons to sue you than Scott "Redemptor" Wheeler to
sue Arnold Krueger.
I'm afraid that you are really an idiot, sorry.

Lionel wrote:


You are clearly attemting to libel Joseph, Middius.
You demonstrate in your message that if Joseph was Californian he would
have the same good reasons to sue you than Scott "Redemptor" Wheeler to
sue Arnold Krueger.
I'm afraid that you are really an idiot, sorry.


Guess where I live. Los(t) Angeles. Do I care enough to file a claim?
No.

Joseph Oberlander wrote:

Lionel wrote:


You are clearly attemting to libel Joseph, Middius.
You demonstrate in your message that if Joseph was Californian he
would have the same good reasons to sue you than Scott "Redemptor"
Wheeler to sue Arnold Krueger.
I'm afraid that you are really an idiot, sorry.


Guess where I live. Los(t) Angeles. Do I care enough to file a claim?
No.


;-)

"George M. Middius" wrote in message


This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which
causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message



This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which
causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.


So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.


Middius is too stupid he should have eaten his balls better than to post
this.
LOL !

"Lionel" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message



This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there
are no California laws governing the tort of libel.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.


So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius.
Let's hear about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be
shunned or avoided.


Middius is too stupid.

He should have eaten his balls better than to post this.

LOL !

It is just another example of his hypocrisy, as well.

So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.







You have to limmit it to false claims Arny.

You should stop posting here, I predict you a very bad karma.
PS : your wife and children should read the following...

-----------------------------------------------------------------

S888Wheel wrote:

So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.








You have to limmit it to false claims Arny.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :Nate Krueger )
Objet :Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-05 04:58:51 PST

1. Will your bio be in Ferstler's new audio encyclopedia?
2. If not, why?
3. You still have a "record", right?
4. Are you still licking Nousiaine's anus every time he farts and loving it?


BOOOOO!
Nate

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :S888Wheel )
Objet : Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-05 08:32:49 PST

Subject: Questions to Arny Krueger
From: MiNe 109
Date: 6/5/03 6:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

In article ,
dave weil wrote:

On 5 Jun 2003 04:58:50 -0700, (Nate Krueger)
wrote:


delete

Nate

Just a note to say that I'm totally against this sort of thing.

Me, too.

Stephen


It is really disgusting and uncalled for.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :Arny Krueger )
Objet : Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-06 08:19:53 PST

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

So here's how the scam works. One of the scamsters conjures up a
sockpuppet to make a post like this, and then all the conspirators
post how much they are against this sort of thing. This is supposed
to make them look good in the eyes of the general public. Let's not
forget that my son has been dead for years and all those years these
same people basically held their tongues when dozens of posts like
this were made.

It just speaks to the basic hypocrisy of those involved.




No Arny, that isn't how it works. One person crosses the line and the
rest of us express our outrage. That's how it works.

After about 4 years, some of you have actually expressed your outrage.
Wonderful, I'm sure that you are very proud of yourselves. Where was your
outrage for the first 3 years?

You should stop posting here, I predict you a very bad karma.
PS : your wife and children should read the following...



S888Wheel wrote:

So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.








You have to limmit it to false claims Arny.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :Nate Krueger )
Objet :Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-05 04:58:51 PST

1. Will your bio be in Ferstler's new audio encyclopedia?
2. If not, why?
3. You still have a "record", right?
4. Are you still licking Nousiaine's anus every time he farts and loving it?


BOOOOO!
Nate

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :S888Wheel )
Objet : Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-05 08:32:49 PST

Subject: Questions to Arny Krueger
From: MiNe 109
Date: 6/5/03 6:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

In article ,
dave weil wrote:

On 5 Jun 2003 04:58:50 -0700, (Nate Krueger)
wrote:


delete

Nate

Just a note to say that I'm totally against this sort of thing.

Me, too.

Stephen


It is really disgusting and uncalled for.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :Arny Krueger )
Objet : Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-06 08:19:53 PST

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

So here's how the scam works. One of the scamsters conjures up a
sockpuppet to make a post like this, and then all the conspirators
post how much they are against this sort of thing. This is supposed
to make them look good in the eyes of the general public. Let's not
forget that my son has been dead for years and all those years these
same people basically held their tongues when dozens of posts like
this were made.

It just speaks to the basic hypocrisy of those involved.




No Arny, that isn't how it works. One person crosses the line and the
rest of us express our outrage. That's how it works.

After about 4 years, some of you have actually expressed your outrage.
Wonderful, I'm sure that you are very proud of yourselves. Where was your
outrage for the first 3 years?





you really are clueless Lionel. I was simply pointing out a fact that arny
didn't acknowledge in that post.

S888Wheel wrote:
You should stop posting here, I predict you a very bad karma.
PS : your wife and children should read the following...



S888Wheel wrote:


So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.








You have to limmit it to false claims Arny.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :Nate Krueger )
Objet :Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-05 04:58:51 PST

1. Will your bio be in Ferstler's new audio encyclopedia?
2. If not, why?
3. You still have a "record", right?
4. Are you still licking Nousiaine's anus every time he farts and loving it?


BOOOOO!
Nate

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :S888Wheel )
Objet : Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-05 08:32:49 PST


Subject: Questions to Arny Krueger
From: MiNe 109
Date: 6/5/03 6:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

In article ,
dave weil wrote:


On 5 Jun 2003 04:58:50 -0700, (Nate Krueger)
wrote:


delete

Nate

Just a note to say that I'm totally against this sort of thing.

Me, too.

Stephen


It is really disgusting and uncalled for.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

De :Arny Krueger )
Objet : Questions to Arny Krueger

View this article only
Groupes de discussion :rec.audio.opinion
Date :2003-06-06 08:19:53 PST

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


So here's how the scam works. One of the scamsters conjures up a
sockpuppet to make a post like this, and then all the conspirators
post how much they are against this sort of thing. This is supposed
to make them look good in the eyes of the general public. Let's not
forget that my son has been dead for years and all those years these
same people basically held their tongues when dozens of posts like
this were made.

It just speaks to the basic hypocrisy of those involved.




No Arny, that isn't how it works. One person crosses the line and the
rest of us express our outrage. That's how it works.

After about 4 years, some of you have actually expressed your outrage.
Wonderful, I'm sure that you are very proud of yourselves. Where was your
outrage for the first 3 years?






you really are clueless Lionel. I was simply pointing out a fact that arny
didn't acknowledge in that post.

Is the above what you call false claim ?
You should let your wife judge by herself...

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius.
Let's hear about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be
shunned or avoided.

You have to limit it to false claims Arny.

Doooh. There's been plenty of those by Middius unless you actually believe
everything Middius says.

So what's your point?

I said


You have to limit it to false claims Arny.

Arny said


Doooh. There's been plenty of those by Middius unless you actually believe
everything Middius says.

So what's your point?

Your post was incomplete.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

I said


You have to limit it to false claims Arny.

Arny said


Doooh. There's been plenty of those by Middius unless you actually
believe everything Middius says.

So what's your point?

Your post was incomplete.

It's so like to you dissemble, sockpuppet wheel,

The Big Bag Of **** whined:

Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.

Oh, this is rich. So everybody hates you because of me? Damn!

OK, let's get this show on the road. I hereby command all of RAO to
love and adore Arnii Krooger.

[sending out massive thought-control energy waves]


Let me know if this changes everything, IdiotBorg.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message

The Big Bag Of **** whined:

Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius.
Let's hear about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be
shunned or avoided.

Oh, this is rich. So everybody hates you because of me? Damn!

That's not what the law says, Middius.

OK, let's get this show on the road. I hereby command all of RAO to
love and adore Arnii Krooger.

That's not what the law says, Middius.

[sending out massive thought-control energy waves]

Let me know if this changes everything, IdiotBorg.

That's not what the law says, Middius.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message



This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which
causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.


So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius. Let's hear
about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be shunned or avoided.


But Arny, if you're the "Master Baiter", don't you have all of that
coming anyway?

"trotsky" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message



This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there
are no California laws governing the tort of libel.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.


So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius.
Let's hear about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be
shunned or avoided.

But Arny, if you're the "Master Baiter", don't you have all of that
coming anyway?

Frankly, when it comes to proving real financial damages Singh, you've got a
much better case against RAO than just about anybody else that I know. Of
course you appear to be laboring under the delusion that your speaker
business is still alive.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"trotsky" wrote in message


Arny Krueger wrote:

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
om



This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there
are no California laws governing the tort of libel.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.


So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius.
Let's hear about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be
shunned or avoided.


But Arny, if you're the "Master Baiter", don't you have all of that
coming anyway?


Frankly, when it comes to proving real financial damages Singh, you've got a
much better case against RAO than just about anybody else that I know. Of
course you appear to be laboring under the delusion that your speaker
business is still alive.


What's that got to do with the question I asked, cuckoo bird?

trotsky wrote:


Arny Krueger wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message


Arny Krueger wrote:

"George M. Middius" wrote in message




This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there
are no California laws governing the tort of libel.



* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.



So let's talk about your activities on RAO since 1997, Middius.
Let's hear about how you are totally innocent of exposing me to
hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which causing me to be
shunned or avoided.



But Arny, if you're the "Master Baiter", don't you have all of that
coming anyway?



Frankly, when it comes to proving real financial damages Singh, you've
got a
much better case against RAO than just about anybody else that I know. Of
course you appear to be laboring under the delusion that your speaker
business is still alive.



What's that got to do with the question I asked, cuckoo bird?

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which
causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.





What a difference knowledge makes.

S888Wheel wrote:

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which
causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure
him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.




What a difference knowledge makes.


Knowledge ? LOL !
Just Google skill...

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

What a difference knowledge makes.

Ah, you think you have unique knowlege sockpuppet wheel? All you've shown is
that you have the same knowlege as every little child who knows how to "run
to mommy crying" when the going gets too tough.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"S888Wheel" wrote in message

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

What a difference knowledge makes.

Ah, you think you have unique knowlege sockpuppet wheel? All you've shown
is
that you have the same knowlege as every little child who knows how to
"run
to mommy crying" when the going gets too tough.



Monmy judge gonna slap you down!!!




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"S888Wheel" wrote in message

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

What a difference knowledge makes.

Ah, you think you have unique knowlege sockpuppet wheel? All you've
shown
is
that you have the same knowlege as every little child who knows how
to
"run
to mommy crying" when the going gets too tough.



Monmy judge gonna slap you down!!!

Momma judge gonna say: My already-crowded court calendar is going to fill up
faster than the gas tank of a moped if I let every idiot with money to waste
get satisfaction by filing a complaint here every time he gets insulted on
Usenet.

Arny Krueger wrote:



Momma judge gonna say: My already-crowded court calendar is going to fill up
faster than the gas tank of a moped if I let every idiot with money to waste
get satisfaction by filing a complaint here every time he gets insulted on
Usenet.

ie:
Token lunch money award and a rubber stamp. The first time. Repeat filings
get ignored or a token $1 award. Arny pays a token sum and laughs as the
filing fee was more than the award.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"S888Wheel" wrote in message

California Civil Code § 45 - Libel

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing,
picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which
exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or
which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency
to injure him in his occupation.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Kroopologism is a disgusting disease.

What a difference knowledge makes.

Ah, you think you have unique knowlege sockpuppet wheel? All you've
shown
is
that you have the same knowlege as every little child who knows how
to
"run
to mommy crying" when the going gets too tough.



Monmy judge gonna slap you down!!!

Momma judge gonna say: My already-crowded court calendar is going to fill
up
faster than the gas tank of a moped if I let every idiot with money to
waste
get satisfaction by filing a complaint here every time he gets insulted on
Usenet.



Mommy judge will hear the case. The entertainmnet value of watching you
perform your debating trade tricks in a live venue is priceless.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Arny said


Ah, you think you have unique knowlege sockpuppet wheel? All you've shown is
that you have the same knowlege as every little child who knows how to "run
to mommy crying" when the going gets too tough.

Unique? No. Beyond your grasp? Yes.

George M. Middius wrote:
This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.


I did not say that. I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to determine
validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his reputation has to be
proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.

"Joseph Oberlander" wrote in message
ink.net

George M. Middius wrote:
This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.

I did not say that.

Of course not. It's the Middius "Big Lie" technique.

I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to
determine validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his
reputation has to be proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the month,
will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that he won't feel
that he totally wasted his money.

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the month,
will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that he won't feel
that he totally wasted his money.


LOL you really are dense. I prefer you don't answer the lawsuit. This is about
the 10th time I have said this in no uncertain terms. You are amazingly stupid.
I have said I think you are not because you are basically a coward who has no
desire to face off with anyone in the real world. But the fact remains that
life is much simpler with a default judgement. I also think you are simply
incapable of answering the lawsuit by yourself. You cannot even find filing
fees and you have yet to show any understanding of the law.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the
month, will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that
he won't feel that he totally wasted his money.


LOL you really are dense. I prefer you don't answer the lawsuit.

That's an amusing change for you, sockpuppet wheel.

This is about the 10th time I have said this in no uncertain terms.

Prove it.

You are amazingly stupid.

You are amazingly vacuous,

I have said I think you are not because you are
basically a coward who has no desire to face off with anyone in the
real world.

A reply to a lawsuit intentionally filed thousands of miles away to put me
at a maximal disadvantage is hardly "facing off". It just shows what a thug
you are, sockpuppet wheel. You hide behind an alias everytime you post. That
says enough about your cowardice for most to see.

But the fact remains that life is much simpler with a
default judgement.

It's simpler for the court.

I also think you are simply incapable of answering
the lawsuit by yourself.

Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a lawyer
and colleted on it, eh?

You cannot even find filing fees and you have yet to show any
understanding of the law.

You're wrong about that, but what is new?

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:35:48 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a lawyer
and colleted on it, eh?

Case number, liar?

--
td

Arny said

I guess one of the big dramatic issues on RAO for the rest of the
month, will be sockpuppet wheel begging me to file an answer so that
he won't feel that he totally wasted his money.


I said


LOL you really are dense. I prefer you don't answer the lawsuit.

Arny said


That's an amusing change for you, sockpuppet wheel.


No. You just don't pay attention.


I said


This is about the 10th time I have said this in no uncertain terms.


Arny said


Prove it.


Why? You think I care what goes on in your screwed up head.

I said




You are amazingly stupid.


Arny said


You are amazingly vacuous,


I know you are but what am I?

I said


I have said I think you are not because you are
basically a coward who has no desire to face off with anyone in the
real world.

Arny said

A reply to a lawsuit intentionally filed thousands of miles away to put me
at a maximal disadvantage is hardly "facing off". It just shows what a thug
you are, sockpuppet wheel.

Go cry to your mommy then. Coward. You were pretty puffed up about running up
my legal fees and putting a lien on my house before I filed. What happened?
Could it be you were full of ****?


Arny said

You hide behind an alias everytime you post. That
says enough about your cowardice for most to see.

Yeah my e mail address is an alias. that shows what an idiot your are.


I said


But the fact remains that life is much simpler with a
default judgement.

Arny said


It's simpler for the court.

And for me.

I said


I also think you are simply incapable of answering
the lawsuit by yourself.

Arny said


Still haven't comprehended the fact that I won a lawsuit against a lawyer
and colleted on it, eh?


I still think you are all talk.

I said


You cannot even find filing fees and you have yet to show any
understanding of the law.


Arny said


You're wrong about that, but what is new?

Bull****. But of course you were never one to let the facts get in the way of
your fantasies.

Joseph Oberlander said:

This is for Obie Wan The Big Moron, who ludicrously claimed there are
no California laws governing the tort of libel.

I did not say that. I *did* say that if it comes to a judge to determine
validity, Wheel has a big problem as damage to his reputation has to be
proven. Otherwise, it's merely an insult.

Let's reinforce the general impression of how ignorant you are. Here's
another of your gems:

Usenet alone is well known for being a massive flame and ****ing
contest comparable to IRC. No judge will consider anything said
in such a forum seriously.

Your exact words, Obie. I've never yet seen you retract any of the
little nuggets of stupidity you plop on Usenet. Of course nobody will
sue you for saying stupid things. But why don't you have any pride in
the way the rest of us see you?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message


But why don't you have any pride in the way the rest of us see you?

If irony killed...

It's a well-known fact that Middius is one of the most-hated individuals
among all the audio groups in Usenet. He gets less and less sympathy on on
RAO because some of his *supporters" are sockpuppets, others are afraid of
him, some are naive, and a few of them are as sociopathic as he is.

George M. Middius wrote:

Let's reinforce the general impression of how ignorant you are. Here's
another of your gems:

Usenet alone is well known for being a massive flame and ****ing
contest comparable to IRC. No judge will consider anything said
in such a forum seriously.

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every single
posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every single
posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.








Oberlander joins Arny in his inability to tell the difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accusation.

S888Wheel wrote:

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every single
posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.









Oberlander joins Arny in his inability to tell the difference between an
opinion and a libelous false accusation.

Do you really need my point of view ?

"S888Wheel" wrote in message

It's a pretty valid comparison. Online forums are widely considered
to be forums of opinion. The phrase "IMO" is implied with every
single posting unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Hence, the proper response on Wheel's part should have been to laugh
and say that Arny was delusional.

Oberlander joins Arny in his inability to tell the difference between
an opinion and a libelous false accusation.

Let's talk about a bozo who reads a post in rec.audio.opinion and says:
That's not an opinion.

LOL!