"John Atkinson" wrote in message
om

Here is what appears to be a straightforward exchange between Marc
Phillips and Arny Krueger:

Except of course the exchange isn't as Atkinson recounts it. He had to
remove critical lines of text in order to perpertrate this, his most recent
lie.

Begin (mis)quoted text:

------------------------------------------------------
In message
Marc Phillips ) wrote:
Arny said:
Noting that Phillips does not seem to have any problems with child
pornography, other than making false police reports about people he
hates...

Then I would have problems with child pornography...
------------------------------------------------------

Here is how that same message was subsequently quoted by Arny Krueger:

Begin quoted text:
------------------------------------------------------
In message
Arny Krueger ) wrote:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
Arny said:
Noting that Phillips does not seem to have any problems with child
pornography, other than making false police reports about people he
hates...

I have problems getting as much child pornography as I need.

Thanks for sharing, Marc!

Please notice these two additional lines from my post that Atkinson didn't
post


;-)

Obviously, I was making a joke.

------------------------------------------------------

Again:

1) Marc Phillips' original statement: "Then I would have problems with
child pornography."

2) As rewritten by Arny Krueger: "I have problems getting as much
child pornography as I need."

Notice that Atkinson deleted the clear indication that I was making a joke.

Notice that Atkinson gives no indication that he's making a joke, so this
deception is obviously just another one of his lies about me.

Unless the Krueger posting is a forgery, to those like Mike McKelvy,
who feel that Arny Krueger is not to blame for the high level of
flames on r.a.o., how is this childish behavior on AK's part
excusable?

Yes, it is really childish of Atkinson to delete text in order to turn a
clearly-indicated joke into some kind of a serious-looking affair.

Just curious.

No, Atkinson has been just caught lying, again.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

i.e., a professional liar.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Please notice these two additional lines from my post that Atkinson
didn't post

;-)

Obviously, I was making a joke.

As you end a large proportion of your posts with the winkey-smiley
emoticon, even when no humor appears to be intended, Mr. Krueger, I
ignore them.

Notice that Atkinson deleted the clear indication that I was making
a joke.

Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

Notice that Atkinson gives no indication that he's making a joke,

I wasn't making a joke, Mr. Krueger. Like Scott Wheeler, I am growing
weary of your flinging out defamatory insults at those with whom you
disagree over audio on a newsgroup that exists to allow people to post
their opions about audio.

so this deception is obviously just another one of his lies about me.

I have posted no lies about you, Mr. Krueger. Not one of the accusations
you have made in this regard is supported by the Google record. What I
_have_ done is correct you when have misstated something about me or about
Stereophile. I am sorry that you regard my having done so is equivalent
to "lies."

snip of grade-school namecalling that Mr. Krueger seems to feel
necessary (Don't worry, Mr. Krueger, the insults are still there
in your orginal posting for all to see and judge both of us
accordingly

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?





tor b

tor b wrote in message :

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?





We want to add something for everybody in the group so you'll understand
why we seem to be retarded. Everybody knows what a killfile or kill
filter is, right? We have something similar that we use when somebody
like that mean Mr. Phillips goes off on Arny. It's an Anti-Arny Smear
filter. What that means is we can pretend nobody answered our last post,
even if they did, because when they answered it, it made Arny look bad.
So we can keep demanding the same "proof" over and over no matter how
many times somebody gives it to us. We also pretend we never saw the
post where Arny admitted he has those sexy thoughts about boys like us.
Did we mention we're almost 10 years old now? Our voice is starting to
change. Arny says we'll be in the "sausage club" soon, whatever that
means.

Anyway, if you keep saying those things about Arny, it doesn't matter
what kind of proof there is. Our reaction will always be to say there is
no proof.



Arny is My Kroo-Daddy

From: tor 2 u h
Date: 8/21/2003 3:36 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


tor b wrote in message :

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?





We want to add something for everybody in the group so you'll understand
why we seem to be retarded. Everybody knows what a killfile or kill
filter is, right? We have something similar that we use when somebody
like that mean Mr. Phillips goes off on Arny. It's an Anti-Arny Smear
filter. What that means is we can pretend nobody answered our last post,
even if they did, because when they answered it, it made Arny look bad.
So we can keep demanding the same "proof" over and over no matter how
many times somebody gives it to us. We also pretend we never saw the
post where Arny admitted he has those sexy thoughts about boys like us.
Did we mention we're almost 10 years old now? Our voice is starting to
change. Arny says we'll be in the "sausage club" soon, whatever that
means.

Anyway, if you keep saying those things about Arny, it doesn't matter
what kind of proof there is. Our reaction will always be to say there is
no proof.



Arny is My Kroo-Daddy

Working for the wife's RE firm these days, are you? "Dedicated to service, fun
to work with"?




tor b

"tor b" wrote in message
...
From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you
could
provide a Google reference?

Right. I guess that makes Atkinson a co-libeler. Letsee, Atkinson has deep
pockets and New York isn't nearly as far from Detroit as it is from Los
Angeles...

Arny said:

"tor b" wrote in message
...
From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you
could
provide a Google reference?

Right. I guess that makes Atkinson a co-libeler. Letsee, Atkinson has deep
pockets and New York isn't nearly as far from Detroit as it is from Los
Angeles...

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ar...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&r num=1

Boon

Richard Malesweski said:

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ar...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&r num=1

Boon

From: (Marc Phillips)
Date: 8/21/2003 4:08 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Richard, er, Doug, uh..Arny said:

From: (John Atkinson)
Date: 8/21/2003 1:16 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:




Even with the winkey-smiley emoticon reinstated, Mr. Krueger, I fail
to see what is funny about accusing someone else of pederasty, of
having a need for child pornography. Perhaps, as you have said, I
am humor-impaired in this regard.

I didn't notice your objection when Mr. Phillips made the unproven
allegation
that Mr. Krueger was a child pornographer. Did I miss it? Perhaps you could
provide a Google reference?

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Ar...&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net& rnum=1

You keep posting the same broken link over and over, you fat, bumbling bozo.
Post a working link or give a Google message ID.




tor b

Richard Malesweski said:

You keep posting the same broken link over and over, you fat, bumbling bozo.
Post a working link or give a Google message ID.

An Internet geek like yourself should know how to get around Outlook Express.

Boon