Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() When it comes to putting food on our tables, we've all become aware that our system uses too much fossil fuel. So retailers and restauranteurs are looking for suppliers closer to home. Now my question: Which has a bigger carbon footprint, a pound of beef or a pound of fish? |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 7, 5:23*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
When it comes to putting food on our tables, we've all become aware that our system uses too much fossil fuel. So retailers and restauranteurs are looking for suppliers closer to home. Now my question: Which has a bigger carbon footprint, a pound of beef or a pound of fish? Answer: Your not gonna tell me what to eat. Your just like Atkinson who lacks the integrity not to obfuscate the issue with doubletalk. He should start doing DBTs on amps and preamps because thats the best place for 'em to start. He shows his utter lack of integrity and exposes the corruption that runs like a stray mongrel through a back alley over at S'puke. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question for Scottie Witlessmongrel | Audio Opinions | |||
The question Scottie Witlessmongrel is afraid to answer | Audio Opinions | |||
The question Scottie Witlessmongrel is afraid to answer | Audio Opinions | |||
Morality question for Scottie Witlessmongrel | Audio Opinions | |||
Audio Question for Scottie Witlessmongrel | Audio Opinions |