[George M. Middius]

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

Lol!

[Clyde Slick]

On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.


LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!





wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.

Now go back to your "Hooked on Phonics" studies. You're done here.;-)

[Clyde Slick]

On 9 Oct, 02:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.


nope.
you are making false inferences again.
now you sound like Arns applying his debaqting trade skills.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 8, 9:09 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 9 Oct, 02:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.

nope.
you are making false inferences again.
now you sound like Arns applying his debaqting trade skills.

On a related topic, Clyde, what do we attribute your recent rabid
defense of 2pid to? Are you sick of him claiming to want 'discussion'
and then bungling things up or not answering questions too?

BTW, Clyde, and then there were three. I forgot about nob.

[Clyde Slick]

On 9 Oct, 06:27, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:09 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On 9 Oct, 02:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.

nope.
you are making false inferences again.
now you sound like Arns applying his debaqting trade skills.

On a related topic, Clyde, what do we attribute your recent rabid
defense of 2pid to? Are you sick of him claiming to want 'discussion'
and then bungling things up or not answering questions too?

BTW, Clyde, and then there were three. I forgot about nob.

i haven't said a word about Scott.
There you go again!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 1:26 am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 9 Oct, 06:27, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!





wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:09 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 02:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.

nope.
you are making false inferences again.
now you sound like Arns applying his debaqting trade skills.

On a related topic, Clyde, what do we attribute your recent rabid
defense of 2pid to? Are you sick of him claiming to want 'discussion'
and then bungling things up or not answering questions too?

BTW, Clyde, and then there were three. I forgot about nob.

i haven't said a word about Scott.
There you go again!

Not really. It's inferred.

[Clyde Slick]

On 9 Oct, 08:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:26 am, Clyde Slick wrote:



On 9 Oct, 06:27, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:09 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 02:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.

nope.
you are making false inferences again.
now you sound like Arns applying his debaqting trade skills.

On a related topic, Clyde, what do we attribute your recent rabid
defense of 2pid to? Are you sick of him claiming to want 'discussion'
and then bungling things up or not answering questions too?

BTW, Clyde, and then there were three. I forgot about nob.

i haven't said a word about Scott.
There you go again!

Not really. It's inferred.

falsely, as usual for you.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 1:34 am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 9 Oct, 08:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!





wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:26 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 06:27, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:09 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 02:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.

nope.
you are making false inferences again.
now you sound like Arns applying his debaqting trade skills.

On a related topic, Clyde, what do we attribute your recent rabid
defense of 2pid to? Are you sick of him claiming to want 'discussion'
and then bungling things up or not answering questions too?

BTW, Clyde, and then there were three. I forgot about nob.

i haven't said a word about Scott.
There you go again!

Not really. It's inferred.

falsely, as usual for you.

Lol!

OK, Clyde, what exactly is it that you want to discuss? You seemed
rather upset that I didn't have firm views pro or con on why some
people choose not to go on Fox News. We could talk about why BO is an
idiot, even if you assume the 'sarcasm' defense is valid. We can talk
about why whether or not the surge in Iraq is effective is irrelevant,
and why. We can talk about why 2pid is an imbecile.

I have firm views on those topics.

If you want to go toe-to-toe, well, bring it on.

Lol!

[Clyde Slick]

On 9 Oct, 10:03, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:34 am, Clyde Slick wrote:



On 9 Oct, 08:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:26 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 06:27, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:09 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 02:30, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:25 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 00:46, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:40 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 8, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote:

Scooter, how would you describe your own stereo?

A. really kewl-looking
B. more like a toy than a pile of crap
C. a big, shiny badge of courageousness
D. better than yours, ass-face!
E. just fine considering your age and esthetic quotient

D (much) & just fine E...and it sounds good too.

Good call, George.

It's obvious now that 2pid looks to audio to make up for his lack of
size where it matters most for men. That's probably why he keeps his
OT posts going as well: it makes him feel manlier and braver than he
actually is.

LOL!!!
you sound just like old Arns!!!!

You mean good old Arns bragging about how good his system is? That was
not me.

nope.
you are making false inferences again.
now you sound like Arns applying his debaqting trade skills.

On a related topic, Clyde, what do we attribute your recent rabid
defense of 2pid to? Are you sick of him claiming to want 'discussion'
and then bungling things up or not answering questions too?

BTW, Clyde, and then there were three. I forgot about nob.

i haven't said a word about Scott.
There you go again!

Not really. It's inferred.

falsely, as usual for you.

Lol!

OK, Clyde, what exactly is it that you want to discuss?

There is no discussion with you.
Just like Arny, you employ deceitful
debating trade tactics.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 4:33 am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 9 Oct, 10:03, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:

Not really. It's inferred.

falsely, as usual for you.

Lol!

OK, Clyde, what exactly is it that you want to discuss?

There is no discussion with you.

If you consider 'discussion' to mean "not pointing out stupidity,"
then I suppose you're right.

Just like Arny, you employ deceitful
debating trade tactics.

And, just like 2pid, you say dumb things. So we're exactly alike.

Why, if this is all as bad as you say, you should be happy. People
will see my faulty logic and will come to the conservative side in
droves. There will be another Reformation. Church memberships will
bulge. America will soon again be the strong moral leader it once was.
You know, that America in the distant past that conservatives yearn
for, the one that J.Edgar Hoover so effectively helped maintain.

You do, however, bring up a very interesting topic for 'discussion':
would you rather be insane but smart, or would you rather be
(possibly) sane, but so stupid nobody can tell for sure?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 3:17 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 9, 5:47 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 9, 4:33 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 10:03, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
Not really. It's inferred.

falsely, as usual for you.

Lol!

OK, Clyde, what exactly is it that you want to discuss?

Admission of deceit noted.....but they're so common as to
hardly be worthy of note.



There is no discussion with you.

If you consider 'discussion' to mean "not pointing out stupidity,"
then I suppose you're right.

I think discussion above the 3rd grade level requires
a more mature approach....something you and George never mastered.



Just like Arny, you employ deceitful
debating trade tactics.

And, just like 2pid, you say dumb things. So we're exactly alike.

Lol..... fools casting aspersions know not what they say.

That wasn't nice, 2pid. Now you've insulted Clyde, your only friend
here.

Lol... Fools have trouble with their native tongue, 2pid. I'd suggest
slowing down and trying to read the words before you respond,
especially given your well-known comprehension issues..

But thank you anyway for admitting that you say dumb things.

Ssshhead...you're simply not worth the time to sort out your
twisted and often self-incriminating ramblings while enduring
your pathetic ego supporting insults.

Lol!

How can you get one hyphen right, and entirely miss the other one? Is
that due to the randomness in your 'brain' or to your ego-supporting
stupidity?

Your self-perception module is not functioning...again.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 3:17 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 9, 5:47 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 9, 4:33 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 10:03, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
Not really. It's inferred.

falsely, as usual for you.

Lol!

OK, Clyde, what exactly is it that you want to discuss?

Admission of deceit noted.....but they're so common as to
hardly be worthy of note.

Where have I deceived you, 2pid? I have called you "stupid." You have
proven yourself to be beyond stupid. If anything, I am guilty of
understatement.

There is no discussion with you.

If you consider 'discussion' to mean "not pointing out stupidity,"
then I suppose you're right.

I think discussion above the 3rd grade level requires
a more mature approach....something you and George never mastered.

I think intrelligence requires processing information at above a
child's level, 2pid. So where does that leave us? And how do we
reconcile this with what you post in your OT drivel?

[Clyde Slick]

On 9 Oct, 14:47, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:



And, just like 2pid, you say dumb things. So we're exactly alike.

Why, if this is all as bad as you say, you should be happy. People
will see my faulty logic and will come to the conservative side in
droves.

you just said a dumb thing

There will be another Reformation. Church memberships will
bulge.

you just said another dumb thing

America will soon again be the strong moral leader it once was.
You know, that America in the distant past that conservatives yearn
for, the one that J.Edgar Hoover so effectively helped maintain.


you just said another dumb thing

say something smart, so we can have a basis for a rational discussion.


You do, however, bring up a very interesting topic for 'discussion':
would you rather be insane but smart, or would you rather be
(possibly) sane, but so stupid nobody can tell for sure?

I can't help you solve your problematical life.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 6:58 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 9, 3:29 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!





wrote:
On Oct 9, 3:17 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Oct 9, 5:47 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Oct 9, 4:33 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Oct, 10:03, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
Not really. It's inferred.

falsely, as usual for you.

Lol!

OK, Clyde, what exactly is it that you want to discuss?

Admission of deceit noted.....but they're so common as to
hardly be worthy of note.

There is no discussion with you.

If you consider 'discussion' to mean "not pointing out stupidity,"
then I suppose you're right.

I think discussion above the 3rd grade level requires
a more mature approach....something you and George never mastered.

Just like Arny, you employ deceitful
debating trade tactics.

And, just like 2pid, you say dumb things. So we're exactly alike.

Lol..... fools casting aspersions know not what they say.

That wasn't nice, 2pid. Now you've insulted Clyde, your only friend
here.

Wrong again.....and he's astute enough to easily see what parts are
wrong.

Really? You mean he's too dumb to see what it means? Lol!

You obviously are not.

I tend to look under the surface, 2pid. Try it sometime.

Lol!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 9, 6:55 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Oct 9, 4:04 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:

I am guilty of
understatement.

Says the buffoon with two replies/post.

Gee, 2pid, the other option is to do what you do: reply without
snipping the unimportant parts (you usually snip pertinent things,
mostly, if you bother to trim at all).

That's how you end up with your 1,000-line dishevelled OT messes.
Perhaps that's preferable to you and accurately reflects the jumble in
your 'mind'.