Thread: New vs Vintage
View Single Post
  #114   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Scott[_6_] Scott[_6_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 642
Default New vs Vintage

On Apr 2, 1:35=A0pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message



Not at all. Again it's not about people doing experiments
it's about misrepresenting real science.


Who does that?


Since you asked, I think you do.


Weekend
scientists don't get a special pass that allows them to
bypass the rigors of accepted scientific methodologies.


Who does that?


*does* what? I didn't say anybody *does* anything in the above quote.


Do all the experiments you want just don't pretend it is
something the actual scientific community considers to be
real science.


=A0Remember that ABX and its procedures were fully described in a
peer-reviewed paper that was printed in the JAES.


Yep. I have it. Remember when I asked for any peer reviewed papers
with results of such tests that show amplifiers sound the same? The
AESJ clearly shows that they would publish such papers should thet
stand up to scrutiny by having published the paper you are referencing
above which cites the need for such tests in audio.