Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 1:35=A0pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message Not at all. Again it's not about people doing experiments it's about misrepresenting real science. Who does that? Since you asked, I think you do. Weekend scientists don't get a special pass that allows them to bypass the rigors of accepted scientific methodologies. Who does that? *does* what? I didn't say anybody *does* anything in the above quote. Do all the experiments you want just don't pretend it is something the actual scientific community considers to be real science. =A0Remember that ABX and its procedures were fully described in a peer-reviewed paper that was printed in the JAES. Yep. I have it. Remember when I asked for any peer reviewed papers with results of such tests that show amplifiers sound the same? The AESJ clearly shows that they would publish such papers should thet stand up to scrutiny by having published the paper you are referencing above which cites the need for such tests in audio. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Semi OT - vintage amplifier for vintage system? | Vacuum Tubes |