AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - How many people have Mr. Krueger, et al 'converted'?

wrote in message
oups.com...

Fella ranted:

wrote:
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:

I'm just curious. I just did a search of r.a.o. going back at least
eight years. Thousands and thousands of 'objectivist' posts by Mr.
Krueger, nob, and others.

Have these thousands of posts, representing hundreds and thousands of
man hours, been to any effect?

Has anyone ever actually changed their mind on how they think about
audio based on what they've read here?

Just curious...

I did. I used to read Arny back way back in the day, when I was just a
wee little lurker. I was a hard-boiled extremist objectivist. Even more
than Arny is. ABX was my religion, and I practiced it every day. You
couldn't convince me that ANYTHING sounded ANY different from ANYTHING
else in audio. Even loudspeakers all sounded the same, where I was
concerned. But after taking in a gutfull of Arny Krueger, he sickened
me so much, that I renounced the religion of objectivism, and smashed
my ABX comparator box with a mallet.

I even tore down my picture of sexy Dave Carlstrom, and today, as most
people know me, I'm an alternative audio guru. I always maintain an
even number of cd's in my collection, I cross out the bar codes in my
cd cases with a "specially treated" $150 red marker, and I park my car
in the same place and the same direction every day. All to ensure good
sound from my home audio. And I'm happy to report, the sound I'm
getting off my hifi kit has NEVER been better in all my days. So thank
you, Arny Krueger!

Troll BE GONE!

This post is almost proof that this is some borg posing as an extreme
audio subjectivist crackpot. The message to be derived from the text
above: If you abandon the objectivist abxism religion you become a
pitiful silly subjectivist crackpot troll with a $200 green marker stuck
up your butt.

Nice kook rant. So... are you going to ever back up any of your
********, or simply remain the ignorant twit that you so clearly are?

I vote for the second one.