"Arny Krueger" wrote

Your suggestion was investigated by L.
Greenhill, Stereo Review, Aug. 1983,p.51.

To do this I would
need to forget about the advances in computer
modeling not available in 1983, advances in
material science, manufacturing techniques,
improvement in overall equipment standards
and the volumes of cable reviews written in
audio magazines.

The inclusion of the last item sets the pace
for the rest of your comment, Powell.
Something about the blind leading the blind.

Mmmm... Greenhill, Stereo Review that was a
magazine review, no?


I’m sorry, I don’t think that I could dumb-down
that far, Arny.

Right, Powell. For you to understand how cables
really work would take a lot of development in the
opposite directiong.

Let me sum up your understanding of wire
technology then.

Metallurgy = Metallurgy
Dielectrics = Dielectrics
Geometry = Geometry
Connectors = Connectors
------------------------------
Therefore Wire = Wire