On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:58:03 +0100, Lionel
wrote:


Or the fact that I talk about how "lean" the speaker is throughout
most of the review. I went back and looked for the phrase "bloom in
the midrange" and didn't see it. Perhaps you could provide the quote
in context. I searched for it and the only example of that phrase was
someone telling me that they didn't expect me to write a phrase like
that. Perhaps your memory is faulty.

In fact, when attempting to explain to Paul Dormer what I meant by
lean (hey, there's a third!) I said "When the sound is lean (jangly
top end and punchy low end)...". Note the FR emphasis points. Sounds
to me that I intuitively recognized this hole (surely you don't claim
that there is NO midrange possible with this configuration) that
you're discussing. But perhaps you could show this damming phrase that
you quote in context.

LOL, there's a hole of 2 khz Dave in one of frequency range where the
music have most of information.
Your review is like your general RAO writings blur, hollow and undefine
full of way to escape in case of attack.

A serious audio lover and good audio reviewer would have written first
"this speakers have a redhibitory hole in the high-midrange..."

So you say. That's YOUR opinion. I think I described the traits of the
speaker, and I certainly didn't use the phrase "midrange bloat" or
make ANY such representations of anything close to that.

My conclusion is that you have hearing problem. Your audio comments on
RAO have zero value.
You are deaf Dave, deal with it.

So, you were lying with the comment about "bloated midrange".

BTW, you seem to be saying that this speaker cannot EVEN reproduce 2
khz.

Actually it sounds to me like I was confirming EXACTLY what you were
quoting about the speaker combination. That sort of "hole", as you
put it, would cause a speaker to be very lean.

Poor little Lionel...that chip keeps getting bigger and bigger and
bigger...and now you've come down to lying about what people have
written. SHAME ON YOU!