MINe 109 wrote:
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:


The experience itself paints a pretty nasty picture of
Atkinson. It has acceptance of weak proof painted all
over
it.

Or a "road to Damascas" moment akin to the one that led
to
Stereophile to begin with.

Why don't you tell us about that "Road To Damascas"
moment
that led to the creation of Stereophile to begin with.

Somehow JGH got the idea to do a subjective review
magazine.

Could you be more vague Stephen? Why not just admit that you
didn't know what you were talking about?

There is a well-known story behind the creation of
Stereophile. You might do well to find out what it is.

He cunningly anticipated the debate by publishing the
story in
1989.

http://www.stereophile.com/features/113/

...only about 9 years after it happened and during one
of
the first big consumer-level pushes for ABX.

Who cares how long it took?

Clearly, nobody who has suspended disbelief in
Sterephile's
weirdness...

Was it too soon or too late?

Could you be more vague Stephen?

JGH and Stereophile were open to ABX and
more-or-less accepted its premises at face value.

Good job of obfuscating the point that Atkinson who is
Sterephile's editor, was not open to ABX and only
compares
it to a bogus standard.

If it doesn't work, what's it good for?

Good question. Stereophile doesn't work, so what is it good
for?

Do you harbor a grudge, blaming Stereophile for somehow
preventing
mass consumer acceptance of an ABX product?

Given the consumer acceptance of PCABX, why would I care?

Would that you were so easily satisfied with other things.

Apparently even my low standards are way too high for you,
Stephen.