"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message

"Powell" wrote in message
...


I wouldn't sweat-it, Arny. You haven't been served,
right? Unless he can show real damages his action
is frivolous. Scott probably hasn't spent a dime on
legal. Let his spend a grand on legal discovery
(he has no money)... any need to cave-in is
ridiculous. If served, consider a counter law suite
and collection of legal expenses. Knowing of
course that both of you are uncollectible .

A simple response could have ended the whole ordeal.

So now you're a legal expert?

So, you are now saying that a response to the suit would not
have resulted in a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.

It doesn't take an expert to see what an utter idiot you are.

When you find an expert sockpuppet Yustabe, be sure to post on this topic
again.

If you had filed a written response, you may have gotten
a dismissal.

My position is that no response to the suit will result in its dismissal.

The only cost would be the fee. You could have written it yourself.

Thanks for contradicting sockpuppet wheel when he recently claimed that
there would be no fee. Of course, he's previously contradicted himself on
this issue, as well. Your clique is obviously coming unglued and so are its
individual members.

If this were a serious issue, there would be at least two separate
responses. One is a motion to quash on the grounds of personal jurisdiction.
The other would be an answer to the claims along with a clarification of the
information that the filer would ordinarily include, but that this filer
fraudulently left out. Little things like the name of the newsgroup and name
of the entity that was purportedly libeled.