Arny....

[Clyde Slick]

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will be better in the
morning.
Good night.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
> be better in the morning.
> Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will be better in the
> morning.

But be sure to lock all your doors and windows.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>> Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>> be better in the morning.
>> Good night.
>
> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
> tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
> they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.
>

No, I was talking about your wild acusations against about a dozen people.
Even if you did get it it was the act of one person, and yet you wildly
accused a number of people, even years after the purported event happened.
I was one of the people you recently accused. I wasn't even around here back
when
your son died and when you made the original accusations.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Pooh Bear]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
> > Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
> > be better in the morning.
> > Good night.
>
> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
> tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
> they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them. If you don't reply to
their post, they don't have the ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so
on ad nauseam....

You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
it with your dignity intact.

Graham

[Forwarder]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>>Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>>be better in the morning.
>>Good night.
>
>
> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
> tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..

Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy
wishes you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...

Just for the record. I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would
ever dream of being your apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the
ultr dumb mickey though.

[dave weil]

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:13:13 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

>> Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>> be better in the morning.
>> Good night.
>
>This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
>tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
>they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

Who's playing the victim now?

Poor little Arnold.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:13:55 +0000, Pooh Bear
> wrote:

>
>
>Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>> > Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>> > be better in the morning.
>> > Good night.
>>
>> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
>> tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
>> they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.
>
>Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them. If you don't reply to
>their post, they don't have the ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so
>on ad nauseam....
>
>You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
>it with your dignity intact.
>
>Graham

You're joking, right?

Haven't you been paying attention?

You should look out because you're dangerously close to being shunned
by Arnold.

Oh wait, maybe you're smarter than I gave you credit for...

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said to Poopie B'ar:

> >You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
> >it with your dignity intact.

> You should look out because you're dangerously close to being shunned
> by Arnold.

> Oh wait, maybe you're smarter than I gave you credit for...

No, you had it right the first time. Poopie is on record as saying the
Krooborg "makes sense" to him.

[Jenn]

Pooh Bear wrote:
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> > "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> >
> > > Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
> > > be better in the morning.
> > > Good night.
> >
> > This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
> > tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
> > they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.
>
> Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them. If you don't reply to
> their post, they don't have the ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so
> on ad nauseam....

Just to be clear: I haven't "targeted" Army with any "****".
>
> You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
> it with your dignity intact.
>
> Graham

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
oups.com
> Pooh Bear wrote:
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>>>> be better in the morning.
>>>> Good night.
>>>
>>> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he
>>> fed Jenn and Scott tat old story about the
>>> pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so they
>>> could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt
>>> and attack me.
>>
>> Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them.
>> If you don't reply to their post, they don't have the
>> ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so on ad
>> nauseam....

> Just to be clear: I haven't "targeted" Army with any
> "****".

You're pure as the driven snow, Jenn. Just a victim...

[Bret Ludwig]

Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself. You know there are a lot of
hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff. Why don't
you just get a different hobby?

[Arny Krueger]

"Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
oups.com...

> Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.

When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.

> You know there are a lot of
> hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff.

Well Bret, you're right about that. If it wasn't for a few audio numskulls
who cover up their lack of interest in audio by substituting personal
attacks, RAO could be a pretty good place.

> Why don't you just get a different hobby?

Wow, that's a practical suggestion! NOT!!!!

[George M. Middius]

Bertie said:

> Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself. You know there are a lot of
> hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff. Why don't
> you just get a different hobby?

This is not a "hobby" for Mr. ****. The poor Beast imagines that he has a
"Usenet career" in which he plies "the debating trade". On several
occasions, he has accused various Real Audio Guys of attempting to disrupt
his "business", which he has indicated encompasses his snot-bombing of
Usenet as well as those atrocious web sites where he posts his sick
"prayers" and other bits of 'borgma.

Not a hobby. Not at all.

"Forwarder" > wrote in message
...
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>>Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>>>be better in the morning.
>>>Good night.
>>
>>
>> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and
>> Scott tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..
>
> Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy wishes
> you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...
>
> Just for the record. I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would ever
> dream of being your apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the ultr
> dumb mickey though.

That you have the capacity to wonder anything is a near miracle.

[Bret Ludwig]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>
> > Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.
>
> When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
> speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.
>
> > You know there are a lot of
> > hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff.
>
> Well Bret, you're right about that. If it wasn't for a few audio numskulls
> who cover up their lack of interest in audio by substituting personal
> attacks, RAO could be a pretty good place.
>
> > Why don't you just get a different hobby?
>
> Wow, that's a practical suggestion! NOT!!!!

[Bret Ludwig]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>
> > Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.
>
> When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
> speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.

AFAIK she has not been the target of this kind of vitriol, both
because she isn't a thorn in the ass of everyone else, and also because
she's a RG (unlike Margaret).

ABX is a dead horse in the context of hobby audio. It probably has a
use if you are a corporation trying to shave build costs and make
things as crappy as possible with the least amount of obvious flaw in
the sound. We are taking the opposite approach-doing everything as well
as possible and building without concession to upfront cost. It gives
us emotional satisfaction. That's all.

[Jenn]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> oups.com
> > Pooh Bear wrote:
> >> Arny Krueger wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> >>>
> >>>> Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
> >>>> be better in the morning.
> >>>> Good night.
> >>>
> >>> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he
> >>> fed Jenn and Scott tat old story about the
> >>> pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so they
> >>> could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt
> >>> and attack me.
> >>
> >> Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them.
> >> If you don't reply to their post, they don't have the
> >> ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so on ad
> >> nauseam....
>
> > Just to be clear: I haven't "targeted" Army with any
> > "****".
>
> You're pure as the driven snow, Jenn. Just a victim...

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

[Bret Ludwig]

George M. Middius wrote:

<<snip>>

>
> This is not a "hobby" for Mr. ****. The poor Beast imagines that he has a
> "Usenet career" in which he plies "the debating trade". On several
> occasions, he has accused various Real Audio Guys of attempting to disrupt
> his "business", which he has indicated encompasses his snot-bombing of
> Usenet as well as those atrocious web sites where he posts his sick
> "prayers" and other bits of 'borgma.


It's a poor paying career! Even selling single ended triodes pays a
lot better. How nutty.

[EddieM]

> Forwarder wrote
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>> "Clyde Slick wrote
>
>
>
>
>>>Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>>>be better in the morning.
>>>Good night.
>>
>>
>> This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
>> tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..
>
> Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy wishes
> you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...
>
> Just for the record.


Right. This newsgroup is all about the convoluted thoughts bubbling
inside Arnii's head rolling down his finger tips starting at the break of day.

As it happen, it is occasionally lick up and then unwittingly regurgitated
by the ultra dumb Mickey mcmikey the chicken choker to other party.



> I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would ever dream of being your
> apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the ultr dumb mickey though.

[Forwarder]

Bret Ludwig wrote:

> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>>"Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>
>>
>>>Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.
>>
>>When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
>>speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.
>
>
> AFAIK she has not been the target of this kind of vitriol, both
> because she isn't a thorn in the ass of everyone else, and also because
> she's a RG (unlike Margaret).
>
> ABX is a dead horse in the context of hobby audio. It probably has a
> use if you are a corporation trying to shave build costs and make
> things as crappy as possible with the least amount of obvious flaw in
> the sound.

WELL said.

[Forwarder]

wrote:

> "Forwarder" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Arny Krueger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

>>>
>>>
>>>>Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
>>>>be better in the morning.
>>>>Good night.
>>>
>>>
>>>This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and
>>>Scott tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..
>>
>>Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy wishes
>>you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...
>>
>>Just for the record. I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would ever
>>dream of being your apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the ultr
>>dumb mickey though.
>
>
> That you have the capacity to wonder anything is a near miracle.
>
>

That would be "..the capacity to wonder *about* anything is.."

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
ups.com...


> No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique, you
intentially "target" people.

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>
>
> > No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>
> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique, you
> intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/
>
> I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone so
> angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?
>
> I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
> things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
> support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> ups.com...

>> > No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

>> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
>> you
>> intentially "target" people.

> Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
> that's the ticket. :-/

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you never
targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting people.

>> I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone
>> so
>> angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

> To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?

I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
because of it.

>> I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
>> things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
>> support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

<no comment from Jenn - perhaps it flew over her head?>

[dave weil]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:34:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>
>"Jenn" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
>
>> No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>
>Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique, you
>intentially "target" people.
>
>I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone so
>angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.
>
>I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
>things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
>support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

<snicker>

One has to wonder whether Arnold actually *believes* this tripe...

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>
>
>> No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>
> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
> you intentially "target" people.
>

where did she say that?



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >,
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>> ups.com...
>
>>> > No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>
>>> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
>>> you
>>> intentially "target" people.
>
>> Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
>> that's the ticket. :-/
>
> It's really simple logic, Jenn.
>
> Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
> risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
> never targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would
> have no meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't
> targeted me has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been
> targeting people.
>

That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
>
>
>>> > No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>
>>> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
>>> you
>>> intentially "target" people.
>
>> Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
>> that's the ticket. :-/
>
> It's really simple logic, Jenn.
>
> Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
> risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
> never targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would
> have no meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't
> targeted me has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been
> targeting people.
>

Arny, I haven't killed you.
Going by your logic, therefore I must have killed somone else



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> >> No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

> > Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
> > you intentially "target" people.

> where did she say that?

Arnii is listening to his Special Voices again. That seems to be the theme
for his entire vendetta against Jenn.

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> Arny, I haven't killed you.
> Going by your logic, therefore I must have killed somone else

What does Kroologic tell us about Mikey and Arnii's poop?

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> ups.com...
>
> >> > No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>
> >> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
> >> you
> >> intentially "target" people.
>
> > Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
> > that's the ticket. :-/
>
> It's really simple logic, Jenn.
>
> Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me.

Correct.

> I'm going to take big
> risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you never
> targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
> meaning.

LOL. That's one of the most illogical statements that I've ever read.
Truly. According to the above, the way to my sentence have meaning
would be to add to it as follows: "I simply haven't 'targeted' you, nor
have I targeted anyone else." Are you going to stand by that?

> Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
> has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting people.

LOL. No, that's not logical at all. BTW, as it happens, I HAVE
targeted someone in a NG before. It was in an argument over a racial
issue.
>
> >> I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone
> >> so
> >> angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.
>
> > To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?
>
> I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
> confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
> Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
> experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
> because of it.

OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
information out of me. Are you happy? (By the way, the "changes to my
personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
in Usenet groups. OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)

Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.
>
> >> I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
> >> things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
> >> support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.
>
> <no comment from Jenn - perhaps it flew over her head?>

Nope, I was too busy shaking my head to respond.

[dizzy]

Clyde Slick wrote:

>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>
>> It's really simple logic, Jenn.
>>
>> Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
>> risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
>> never targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would
>> have no meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't
>> targeted me has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been
>> targeting people.
>
>That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"

I agree. Arny's wrong.

[Harry Lavo]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >,
>> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> >> ups.com...
>>

>snip, illrelevant to following<

>
> Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
> that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
> A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
> out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
> argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
> at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
> now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
> Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
> you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.
>>

Jenn, I never felt your response to a known internet correspondent appearing
at night at your door was paranoid. I saw it as prudent. Given what you
just outlined above, I'd say it probably scared the crap out of you, and
your reaction was totally understandable, even admirably restrained. I
probably would have called the police, were I in your shoes.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Harry Lavo" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > In article >,
> >> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> >> ups.com...
> >>
>
> >snip, illrelevant to following<
>
> >
> > Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
> > that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
> > A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
> > out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
> > argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
> > at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
> > now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
> > Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
> > you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.
> >>
>
> Jenn, I never felt your response to a known internet correspondent appearing
> at night at your door was paranoid. I saw it as prudent.

Thanks, I agree.

> Given what you
> just outlined above, I'd say it probably scared the crap out of you, and
> your reaction was totally understandable, even admirably restrained. I
> probably would have called the police, were I in your shoes.

A. I probably should have.
B. You'd look funny in my shoes :-)

[George M. Middius]

dippyborg said:

> >That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"

> I agree. Arny's wrong.

That's quite an adventure in euphemizing, dippy. It must have cost you
dearly to acknowledge, even for a moment, that your spiritual leader has
feet of feces.

[dizzy]

George M. Middius <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
wrote:

>dippyborg said:
>
>> >That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"
>
>> I agree. Arny's wrong.
>
>That's quite an adventure in euphemizing, dippy. It must have cost you
>dearly to acknowledge, even for a moment, that your spiritual leader has
>feet of feces.

You're dumb.

[Clyde Slick]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >,
>> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> >> ups.com...
>>
>> >> > No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>>
>> >> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his
>> >> clique,
>> >> you
>> >> intentially "target" people.
>>
>> > Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
>> > that's the ticket. :-/
>>
>> It's really simple logic, Jenn.
>>
>> Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me.
>
> Correct.
>
>> I'm going to take big
>> risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
>> never
>> targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
>> meaning.
>
> LOL. That's one of the most illogical statements that I've ever read.
> Truly. According to the above, the way to my sentence have meaning
> would be to add to it as follows: "I simply haven't 'targeted' you, nor
> have I targeted anyone else." Are you going to stand by that?
>
>> Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
>> has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting
>> people.
>
> LOL. No, that's not logical at all. BTW, as it happens, I HAVE
> targeted someone in a NG before. It was in an argument over a racial
> issue.
>>
>> >> I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get
>> >> someone
>> >> so
>> >> angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.
>>
>> > To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?
>>
>> I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
>> confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
>> Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
>> experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
>> because of it.
>
> OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
> information out of me. Are you happy? (By the way, the "changes to my
> personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
> in Usenet groups. OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
> that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)
>
> Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
> that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
> A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
> out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
> argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
> at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
> now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
> Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
> you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.
>>

There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
yourself.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Clyde Slick" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > In article >,
> >> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> >> ups.com...
> >>
> >> >> > No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.
> >>
> >> >> Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his
> >> >> clique,
> >> >> you
> >> >> intentially "target" people.
> >>
> >> > Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
> >> > that's the ticket. :-/
> >>
> >> It's really simple logic, Jenn.
> >>
> >> Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >> I'm going to take big
> >> risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
> >> never
> >> targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
> >> meaning.
> >
> > LOL. That's one of the most illogical statements that I've ever read.
> > Truly. According to the above, the way to my sentence have meaning
> > would be to add to it as follows: "I simply haven't 'targeted' you, nor
> > have I targeted anyone else." Are you going to stand by that?
> >
> >> Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
> >> has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting
> >> people.
> >
> > LOL. No, that's not logical at all. BTW, as it happens, I HAVE
> > targeted someone in a NG before. It was in an argument over a racial
> > issue.
> >>
> >> >> I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get
> >> >> someone
> >> >> so
> >> >> angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.
> >>
> >> > To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?
> >>
> >> I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
> >> confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
> >> Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
> >> experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
> >> because of it.
> >
> > OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
> > information out of me. Are you happy? (By the way, the "changes to my
> > personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
> > in Usenet groups. OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
> > that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)
> >
> > Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
> > that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
> > A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
> > out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
> > argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
> > at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
> > now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
> > Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
> > you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.
> >>
>
> There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
> yourself.

I know.

[ScottW]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
>> yourself.
>
> I know.

Arny's harmless if words on usenet can't hurt you. Now some of the other
sicko's around here.. I'm not so sure :).

ScottW

[Jenn]

In article <qwWDf.81017$0G.18894@dukeread10>,
"ScottW" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> >> There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
> >> yourself.
> >
> > I know.
>
> Arny's harmless if words on usenet can't hurt you. Now some of the other
> sicko's around here.. I'm not so sure :).
>
> ScottW

You're probably right.

[Clyde Slick]

"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:qwWDf.81017$0G.18894@dukeread10...
>
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
>>>
>>> There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
>>> yourself.
>>
>> I know.
>
> Arny's harmless if words on usenet can't hurt you. Now some of the other
> sicko's around here.. I'm not so sure :).
>

Actually, the only one I know to have taken this
outside of Usenet was Scott Wheeler.
Arny and JA did have their public debate on an audio topic,
but personal issues were put aside.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>> I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
>> confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
>> Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
>> experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
>> because of it.

> OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
> information out of me.

No, you misunderstand my goals. More likely, you are imposing your goals on
me.

>Are you happy?

A little less, all things given. Of course I've already read your entire
post.

>(By the way, the "changes to my
> personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
> in Usenet groups.

All things given, I see no relationship between the regrettable event that
you will shortly describe and your futile attempts at partial anonymity.

> OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
> that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)

I see no rationale for that, even given the regrettable story below.

> Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
> that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
> A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
> out of her.

I'm very sorry for your loss, Jenn. Trust me, this is not the kind of
information that I'm trying to get out of you.

> So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
> argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
> at my door at night unannounced.

That's not a complete sentence, but I presume that the rest of it is that
such an unexpected visit would be extraordinary frightening for you. I can
see that.

> Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy now?

I'm somewhat less happy than when I began reading this post. Of course your
loss makes me unhappy for you, Jenn.

> Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?

That was a choice you got to make, Jenn. Your good fortune is that Middius
and Sackman who have a long track record for doing such things, will
probably not try to regularly spin this situation to your disadvantage for
6 or more years.

> Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case?

Seems to be an unecessary detail.

> What will make you happy now, Arny?

How about your sister not being dead?

>I'm here to serve your wishes.

I don't think so.

>> >> I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
>> >> things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will
>> >> help
>> >> support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

>> <no comment from Jenn - perhaps it flew over her head?>

> Nope, I was too busy shaking my head to respond.

Well, then Jenn you're not actually here to serve my wishes, right?

Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
> >> confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
> >> Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
> >> experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
> >> because of it.
>
> > OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
> > information out of me.
>
> No, you misunderstand my goals. More likely, you are imposing your goals on
> me.
>
> >Are you happy?
>
> A little less, all things given. Of course I've already read your entire
> post.
>
> >(By the way, the "changes to my
> > personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
> > in Usenet groups.
>
> All things given, I see no relationship between the regrettable event that
> you will shortly describe and your futile attempts at partial anonymity.

I understand that.
>
> > OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
> > that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)
>
> I see no rationale for that, even given the regrettable story below.
>
> > Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
> > that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
> > A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
> > out of her.
>
> I'm very sorry for your loss, Jenn. Trust me, this is not the kind of
> information that I'm trying to get out of you.

You never know a person's life story when you are posting to them, do
you?
>
> > So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
> > argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
> > at my door at night unannounced.
>
> That's not a complete sentence, but I presume that the rest of it is that
> such an unexpected visit would be extraordinary frightening for you. I can
> see that.
>
> > Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy now?
>
> I'm somewhat less happy than when I began reading this post. Of course your
> loss makes me unhappy for you, Jenn.
>
> > Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
>
> That was a choice you got to make, Jenn.

Yes, it was. I told you in order to try to finally get you off of the
story of the guy coming to my door.

> Your good fortune is that Middius
> and Sackman who have a long track record for doing such things, will
> probably not try to regularly spin this situation to your disadvantage for
> 6 or more years.
>
> > Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case?
>
> Seems to be an unecessary detail.
>
> > What will make you happy now, Arny?
>
> How about your sister not being dead?
>
> >I'm here to serve your wishes.
>
> I don't think so.

You're right; that was just sarcasm.
>
> >> >> I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
> >> >> things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will
> >> >> help
> >> >> support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.
>
> >> <no comment from Jenn - perhaps it flew over her head?>
>
> > Nope, I was too busy shaking my head to respond.
>
> Well, then Jenn you're not actually here to serve my wishes, right?
>
> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.

Why do you offer it now and not the other night?

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> Actually, the only one I know to have taken this
> outside of Usenet was Scott Wheeler.

Other than Cwazy Bwian, you mean.

[Fella]

Arny Krueger wrote:

>>>"Jenn" > wrote in message

>>>> I simply haven't "targeted" you.
>
>
> Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
> has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting people.
>

WHOA!! Now I see the light!

..................*Kroologic*..................... ......


Now I know *exactly* what it's all about. Though understanding it is one
thing, to try to put it into words, one must re-wire the brain.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >,
>> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>> >> I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
>> >> confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your
>> >> behavior.
>> >> Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
>> >> experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
>> >> because of it.
>>
>> > OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
>> > information out of me.
>>
>> No, you misunderstand my goals. More likely, you are imposing your goals
>> on
>> me.
>>
>> >Are you happy?
>>
>> A little less, all things given. Of course I've already read your entire
>> post.
>>
>> >(By the way, the "changes to my
>> > personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
>> > in Usenet groups.
>>
>> All things given, I see no relationship between the regrettable event
>> that
>> you will shortly describe and your futile attempts at partial anonymity.
>
> I understand that.
>>
>> > OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
>> > that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)
>>
>> I see no rationale for that, even given the regrettable story below.
>>
>> > Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
>> > that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
>> > A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
>> > out of her.
>>
>> I'm very sorry for your loss, Jenn. Trust me, this is not the kind of
>> information that I'm trying to get out of you.
>
> You never know a person's life story when you are posting to them, do
> you?
>>
>> > So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
>> > argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
>> > at my door at night unannounced.
>>
>> That's not a complete sentence, but I presume that the rest of it is that
>> such an unexpected visit would be extraordinary frightening for you. I
>> can
>> see that.
>>
>> > Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy now?
>>
>> I'm somewhat less happy than when I began reading this post. Of course
>> your
>> loss makes me unhappy for you, Jenn.
>>
>> > Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
>>
>> That was a choice you got to make, Jenn.
>
> Yes, it was. I told you in order to try to finally get you off of the
> story of the guy coming to my door.
>
>> Your good fortune is that Middius
>> and Sackman who have a long track record for doing such things, will
>> probably not try to regularly spin this situation to your disadvantage
>> for
>> 6 or more years.
>>
>> > Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case?
>>
>> Seems to be an unecessary detail.
>>
>> > What will make you happy now, Arny?
>>
>> How about your sister not being dead?
>>
>> >I'm here to serve your wishes.
>>
>> I don't think so.
>
> You're right; that was just sarcasm.
>>
>> >> >> I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say
>> >> >> dumb
>> >> >> things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I
>> >> >> will
>> >> >> help
>> >> >> support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.
>>
>> >> <no comment from Jenn - perhaps it flew over her head?>
>>
>> > Nope, I was too busy shaking my head to respond.
>>
>> Well, then Jenn you're not actually here to serve my wishes, right?
>>
>> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.
>
> Why do you offer it now and not the other night?

I had no perceptions at all of your sister's death until just now. The post
that I just responded to represents itself as your first revelation of this
matter.

[Clyde Slick]

"George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net> wrote
in message ...
>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> Actually, the only one I know to have taken this
>> outside of Usenet was Scott Wheeler.
>
> Other than Cwazy Bwian, you mean.
>


that's right



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "George M. Middius" <cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net>
> wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>> Clyde Slick said:
>>
>>> Actually, the only one I know to have taken this
>>> outside of Usenet was Scott Wheeler.

>> Other than Cwazy Bwian, you mean.

> that's right

You forgot Robert Morien and a guy who posts on AAPLS who posts under the
handle "Phildo".

Then there is Marc Phillips who went on for months here about how he stalked
my house and reported me to my local police department as a pedophile.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:


> >> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.
> >
> > Why do you offer it now and not the other night?
>
> I had no perceptions at all of your sister's death until just now. The post
> that I just responded to represents itself as your first revelation of this
> matter.

From

> Arny, I'm going to say this once: I lost a close sibling
> when she was 40 and I was 28. I know from up close what
> that does to a parent. My parents were never the same.
> Burying a child is just about the worst thing that can
> happen to a person, IMO. I know. So I would NEVER take
> advantage of such a thing. I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT.
> Please take a breath and calm down.

>>Yeah sure Jenn. You've been flogging the child porno thing for a day
now.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>> >> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.
>> >
>> > Why do you offer it now and not the other night?

>> I had no perceptions at all of your sister's death until just now. The
>> post
>> that I just responded to represents itself as your first revelation of
>> this
>> matter.

> From

>> Arny, I'm going to say this once: I lost a close sibling
>> when she was 40 and I was 28. I know from up close what
>> that does to a parent. My parents were never the same.
>> Burying a child is just about the worst thing that can
>> happen to a person, IMO. I know. So I would NEVER take
>> advantage of such a thing. I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT.
>> Please take a breath and calm down.

Obviously, the intentional setup.

Flag on the play.

"Just goes to show that Jenn will manipulate her sister's death for debating
trade points"?

That's what Middius and Art have said about me for the past 7 years.

Think about it, Jenn.

[Jenn]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> >> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.
> >> >
> >> > Why do you offer it now and not the other night?
>
> >> I had no perceptions at all of your sister's death until just now. The
> >> post
> >> that I just responded to represents itself as your first revelation of
> >> this
> >> matter.
>
> > From
>
> >> Arny, I'm going to say this once: I lost a close sibling
> >> when she was 40 and I was 28. I know from up close what
> >> that does to a parent. My parents were never the same.
> >> Burying a child is just about the worst thing that can
> >> happen to a person, IMO. I know. So I would NEVER take
> >> advantage of such a thing. I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT.
> >> Please take a breath and calm down.
>
> Obviously, the intentional setup.

No, Arny; not everything in the world is a setup. What is obvious to
you is simply not true.
>
> Flag on the play.
>
> "Just goes to show that Jenn will manipulate her sister's death for debating
> trade points"?
>
> That's what Middius and Art have said about me for the past 7 years.
>
> Think about it, Jenn.

I don't don't bring it up out of context, Arny. Here's the "setup"
since you have to "see" one: You accused me of not being sincere in my
statement that I didn't know anything about Nate. Then you said that
you hadn't heard about my sister up until last night's post. Do the
words "goose" and "gander" mean anything to you, Arny? Not a "setup",
just facts.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >,
>> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> >> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.
>> >> >
>> >> > Why do you offer it now and not the other night?
>>
>> >> I had no perceptions at all of your sister's death until just now. The
>> >> post
>> >> that I just responded to represents itself as your first revelation of
>> >> this
>> >> matter.
>>
>> > From
>> >
>>
>> >> Arny, I'm going to say this once: I lost a close sibling
>> >> when she was 40 and I was 28. I know from up close what
>> >> that does to a parent. My parents were never the same.
>> >> Burying a child is just about the worst thing that can
>> >> happen to a person, IMO. I know. So I would NEVER take
>> >> advantage of such a thing. I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT.
>> >> Please take a breath and calm down.
>>
>> Obviously, the intentional setup.
>
> No, Arny; not everything in the world is a setup. What is obvious to
> you is simply not true.
>>
>> Flag on the play.
>>
>> "Just goes to show that Jenn will manipulate her sister's death for
>> debating
>> trade points"?
>>
>> That's what Middius and Art have said about me for the past 7 years.

>> Think about it, Jenn.

<Jenn won't give an answer>

> I don't don't bring it up out of context, Arny.

So what?

You've just shown how scheming and manipulative you are, Jenn. You've also
clearly done what I've been criticized of for most of a decade - use the
death of a loved one to make a critical point.

> Here's the "setup" since you have to "see" one:

I don't *have* to see one - its as obvious as a dog turd on a sidewalk.

> You accused me of not being sincere in my
> statement that I didn't know anything about Nate.

Given how much has been posted here about Nate Jenn, you'd have to be blind
not to see it.

> Then you said that
> you hadn't heard about my sister up until last night's post. Do the
> words "goose" and "gander" mean anything to you, Arny? Not a "setup",
> just facts.

Yes Jenn I underestimated how low you'd stoop to make a critical point.

I also now see how you will try to inflate an isolated incident you
fabricated to defend yourself.

You and Stephen are quite a pair. ;-)

[Jenn]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > In article >,
> >> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Why do you offer it now and not the other night?
> >>
> >> >> I had no perceptions at all of your sister's death until just now. The
> >> >> post
> >> >> that I just responded to represents itself as your first revelation of
> >> >> this
> >> >> matter.
> >>
> >> > From
> >> >
> >>
> >> >> Arny, I'm going to say this once: I lost a close sibling
> >> >> when she was 40 and I was 28. I know from up close what
> >> >> that does to a parent. My parents were never the same.
> >> >> Burying a child is just about the worst thing that can
> >> >> happen to a person, IMO. I know. So I would NEVER take
> >> >> advantage of such a thing. I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT.
> >> >> Please take a breath and calm down.
> >>
> >> Obviously, the intentional setup.
> >
> > No, Arny; not everything in the world is a setup. What is obvious to
> > you is simply not true.
> >>
> >> Flag on the play.
> >>
> >> "Just goes to show that Jenn will manipulate her sister's death for
> >> debating
> >> trade points"?
> >>
> >> That's what Middius and Art have said about me for the past 7 years.
>
> >> Think about it, Jenn.
>
> <Jenn won't give an answer>

Not worthy of an answer. I've never accused you of using your son's
death for debating points, have I?

>
> > I don't don't bring it up out of context, Arny.
>
> So what?

So, that's the entire point.

>
> You've just shown how scheming and manipulative you are, Jenn. <snip>

Great, we need go no further then, Arny. You're "targeting me". Write
to yourself; I won't be writing to you anymore. Everyone here is
trying to get you to see that you need help; it's up to you now to seek
it out.

[George M. Middius]

Jenn said to The Big ****:

> Everyone here is trying to get you to see that you need help;

I'm not. I'm sure Krooger can initiate an expeditious departure from his
mortal existence without any help.

> it's up to you now to seek it out.

Anybody want to bet on that happening? ;-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> ...
>> In article >,
>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> >> Nevertheless, please accept my regrets for your loss.
>>> >
>>> > Why do you offer it now and not the other night?
>
>>> I had no perceptions at all of your sister's death until just now. The
>>> post
>>> that I just responded to represents itself as your first revelation of
>>> this
>>> matter.
>
>> From
>
>>> Arny, I'm going to say this once: I lost a close sibling
>>> when she was 40 and I was 28. I know from up close what
>>> that does to a parent. My parents were never the same.
>>> Burying a child is just about the worst thing that can
>>> happen to a person, IMO. I know. So I would NEVER take
>>> advantage of such a thing. I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT.
>>> Please take a breath and calm down.
>
> Obviously, the intentional setup.
>
> Flag on the play.
>
> "Just goes to show that Jenn will manipulate her sister's death for
> debating trade points"?
>
> That's what Middius and Art have said about me for the past 7 years.
>
> Think about it, Jenn.

maybe it was piling on. She'a already beating you 73-0



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> >
> Given how much has been posted here about Nate Jenn, you'd have to be
> blind not to see it.
>
or, maybe, not here for the past 5 years.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

[paul packer]

On 1 Feb 2006 09:01:19 -0800, "Jenn" > wrote:


>> You've just shown how scheming and manipulative you are, Jenn. <snip>
>
>Great, we need go no further then, Arny. You're "targeting me". Write
>to yourself; I won't be writing to you anymore.

Great. Now if you can convince John Atkinson to take the same sensible
attitude much pain and suffering will have been avoided.

[EddieM]

> paul packer wrote
>> Jenn wrote:
>>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>
>
>>> You've just shown how scheming and manipulative you are,
>>> Jenn. <snip>
>>
>>Great, we need go no further then, Arny. You're "targeting me".
>> Write to yourself; I won't be writing to you anymore.
>
> Great. Now if you can convince John Atkinson to take the same
> sensible attitude much pain and suffering will have been avoided.



!!