Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will be better in the
morning.
Good night.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

Clyde Slick said:

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will be better in the
morning.

But be sure to lock all your doors and windows.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.


No, I was talking about your wild acusations against about a dozen people.
Even if you did get it it was the act of one person, and yet you wildly
accused a number of people, even years after the purported event happened.
I was one of the people you recently accused. I wasn't even around here back
when
your son died and when you made the original accusations.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them. If you don't reply to
their post, they don't have the ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so
on ad nauseam....

You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
it with your dignity intact.

Graham

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.


This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..

Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy
wishes you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...

Just for the record. I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would
ever dream of being your apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the
ultr dumb mickey though.

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:13:13 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

Who's playing the victim now?

Poor little Arnold.

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:13:55 +0000, Pooh Bear
wrote:



Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them. If you don't reply to
their post, they don't have the ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so
on ad nauseam....

You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
it with your dignity intact.

Graham

You're joking, right?

Haven't you been paying attention?

You should look out because you're dangerously close to being shunned
by Arnold.

Oh wait, maybe you're smarter than I gave you credit for...

dave weil said to Poopie B'ar:

You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
it with your dignity intact.

You should look out because you're dangerously close to being shunned
by Arnold.

Oh wait, maybe you're smarter than I gave you credit for...

No, you had it right the first time. Poopie is on record as saying the
Krooborg "makes sense" to him.

Pooh Bear wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so
they could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt and attack me.

Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them. If you don't reply to
their post, they don't have the ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so
on ad nauseam....

Just to be clear: I haven't "targeted" Army with any "****".

You're a Christian so please, please turn the other cheek and walk away from
it with your dignity intact.

Graham

"Jenn" wrote in message
oups.com
Pooh Bear wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he
fed Jenn and Scott tat old story about the
pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so they
could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt
and attack me.

Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them.
If you don't reply to their post, they don't have the
ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so on ad
nauseam....

Just to be clear: I haven't "targeted" Army with any
"****".

You're pure as the driven snow, Jenn. Just a victim...

Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself. You know there are a lot of
hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff. Why don't
you just get a different hobby?

"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...

Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.

When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.

You know there are a lot of
hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff.

Well Bret, you're right about that. If it wasn't for a few audio numskulls
who cover up their lack of interest in audio by substituting personal
attacks, RAO could be a pretty good place.

Why don't you just get a different hobby?

Wow, that's a practical suggestion! NOT!!!!

Bertie said:

Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself. You know there are a lot of
hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff. Why don't
you just get a different hobby?

This is not a "hobby" for Mr. ****. The poor Beast imagines that he has a
"Usenet career" in which he plies "the debating trade". On several
occasions, he has accused various Real Audio Guys of attempting to disrupt
his "business", which he has indicated encompasses his snot-bombing of
Usenet as well as those atrocious web sites where he posts his sick
"prayers" and other bits of 'borgma.

Not a hobby. Not at all.

"Forwarder" wrote in message
news
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.


This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and
Scott tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..

Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy wishes
you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...

Just for the record. I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would ever
dream of being your apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the ultr
dumb mickey though.

That you have the capacity to wonder anything is a near miracle.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...

Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.

When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.

You know there are a lot of
hardcore nuts here and you persist with this undesired stuff.

Well Bret, you're right about that. If it wasn't for a few audio numskulls
who cover up their lack of interest in audio by substituting personal
attacks, RAO could be a pretty good place.

Why don't you just get a different hobby?

Wow, that's a practical suggestion! NOT!!!!

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...

Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.

When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.

AFAIK she has not been the target of this kind of vitriol, both
because she isn't a thorn in the ass of everyone else, and also because
she's a RG (unlike Margaret).

ABX is a dead horse in the context of hobby audio. It probably has a
use if you are a corporation trying to shave build costs and make
things as crappy as possible with the least amount of obvious flaw in
the sound. We are taking the opposite approach-doing everything as well
as possible and building without concession to upfront cost. It gives
us emotional satisfaction. That's all.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
oups.com
Pooh Bear wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.

This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he
fed Jenn and Scott tat old story about the
pornographic email that targeted my dead son, so they
could bat it around for a few days and use it to hurt
and attack me.

Very seriously..... the best advice is to ignore them.
If you don't reply to their post, they don't have the
ammo to post more **** targeted at you and so on ad
nauseam....

Just to be clear: I haven't "targeted" Army with any
"****".

You're pure as the driven snow, Jenn. Just a victim...

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

George M. Middius wrote:

snip


This is not a "hobby" for Mr. ****. The poor Beast imagines that he has a
"Usenet career" in which he plies "the debating trade". On several
occasions, he has accused various Real Audio Guys of attempting to disrupt
his "business", which he has indicated encompasses his snot-bombing of
Usenet as well as those atrocious web sites where he posts his sick
"prayers" and other bits of 'borgma.


It's a poor paying career! Even selling single ended triodes pays a
lot better. How nutty.

Forwarder wrote
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Clyde Slick wrote




Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.


This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and Scott
tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..

Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy wishes
you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...

Just for the record.


Right. This newsgroup is all about the convoluted thoughts bubbling
inside Arnii's head rolling down his finger tips starting at the break of day.

As it happen, it is occasionally lick up and then unwittingly regurgitated
by the ultra dumb Mickey mcmikey the chicken choker to other party.



I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would ever dream of being your
apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the ultr dumb mickey though.

Bret Ludwig wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
groups.com...


Arny you bring a lot of this on yourself.

When you have the guts to say the same thing to Jenn, we'll know that you
speak the truth, not some lie that salves your wounded ego. Bret.


AFAIK she has not been the target of this kind of vitriol, both
because she isn't a thorn in the ass of everyone else, and also because
she's a RG (unlike Margaret).

ABX is a dead horse in the context of hobby audio. It probably has a
use if you are a corporation trying to shave build costs and make
things as crappy as possible with the least amount of obvious flaw in
the sound.

WELL said.

wrote:

"Forwarder" wrote in message
news
Arny Krueger wrote:


"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
om


Arny, try to get a good nights sleep. Maybe things will
be better in the morning.
Good night.


This is Art's vain attempt to cover up the fact that he fed Jenn and
Scott tat old story about the pornographic email that targeted my ..

Ok so *YOU*!!! have dragged the issue to also this thread. The guy wishes
you good night, etc, and *YOU* answer with ...

Just for the record. I just wonder how anyone in his right mind would ever
dream of being your apologist, let alone supporter. Excluding the ultr
dumb mickey though.


That you have the capacity to wonder anything is a near miracle.



That would be "..the capacity to wonder *about* anything is.."

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...


No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique, you
intentially "target" people.

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...


No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique, you
intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?

I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
you
intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you never
targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting people.

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone
so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?

I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
because of it.

I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

no comment from Jenn - perhaps it flew over her head?

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:34:29 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


"Jenn" wrote in message
oups.com...


No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique, you
intentially "target" people.

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

snicker

One has to wonder whether Arnold actually *believes* this tripe...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...


No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
you intentially "target" people.


where did she say that?



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
you
intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
never targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would
have no meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't
targeted me has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been
targeting people.


That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news


No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
you
intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
never targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would
have no meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't
targeted me has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been
targeting people.


Arny, I haven't killed you.
Going by your logic, therefore I must have killed somone else



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Clyde Slick said:

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
you intentially "target" people.

where did she say that?

Arnii is listening to his Special Voices again. That seems to be the theme
for his entire vendetta against Jenn.

Clyde Slick said:

Arny, I haven't killed you.
Going by your logic, therefore I must have killed somone else

What does Kroologic tell us about Mikey and Arnii's poop?

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his clique,
you
intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me.

Correct.

I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you never
targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
meaning.

LOL. That's one of the most illogical statements that I've ever read.
Truly. According to the above, the way to my sentence have meaning
would be to add to it as follows: "I simply haven't 'targeted' you, nor
have I targeted anyone else." Are you going to stand by that?

Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting people.

LOL. No, that's not logical at all. BTW, as it happens, I HAVE
targeted someone in a NG before. It was in an argument over a racial
issue.

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get someone
so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?

I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
because of it.

OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
information out of me. Are you happy? (By the way, the "changes to my
personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
in Usenet groups. OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)

Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.

I just read posts and deal with those situations where people say dumb
things. If they clean up their act, and it makes sense to do, I will help
support their position. Otherwise, I just let them post in peace.

no comment from Jenn - perhaps it flew over her head?

Nope, I was too busy shaking my head to respond.

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me. I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
never targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would
have no meaning. Since I presume that your statement that you haven't
targeted me has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been
targeting people.

That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"

I agree. Arny's wrong.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...


snip, illrelevant to following


Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.


Jenn, I never felt your response to a known internet correspondent appearing
at night at your door was paranoid. I saw it as prudent. Given what you
just outlined above, I'd say it probably scared the crap out of you, and
your reaction was totally understandable, even admirably restrained. I
probably would have called the police, were I in your shoes.

In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...


snip, illrelevant to following


Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.


Jenn, I never felt your response to a known internet correspondent appearing
at night at your door was paranoid. I saw it as prudent.

Thanks, I agree.

Given what you
just outlined above, I'd say it probably scared the crap out of you, and
your reaction was totally understandable, even admirably restrained. I
probably would have called the police, were I in your shoes.

A. I probably should have.
B. You'd look funny in my shoes :-)

dippyborg said:

That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"

I agree. Arny's wrong.

That's quite an adventure in euphemizing, dippy. It must have cost you
dearly to acknowledge, even for a moment, that your spiritual leader has
feet of feces.

George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

dippyborg said:

That's what we here on RAO call "Kroologic"

I agree. Arny's wrong.

That's quite an adventure in euphemizing, dippy. It must have cost you
dearly to acknowledge, even for a moment, that your spiritual leader has
feet of feces.

You're dumb.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his
clique,
you
intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me.

Correct.

I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
never
targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
meaning.

LOL. That's one of the most illogical statements that I've ever read.
Truly. According to the above, the way to my sentence have meaning
would be to add to it as follows: "I simply haven't 'targeted' you, nor
have I targeted anyone else." Are you going to stand by that?

Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting
people.

LOL. No, that's not logical at all. BTW, as it happens, I HAVE
targeted someone in a NG before. It was in an argument over a racial
issue.

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get
someone
so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?

I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
because of it.

OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
information out of me. Are you happy? (By the way, the "changes to my
personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
in Usenet groups. OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)

Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.


There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
yourself.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

In article ,
"Clyde Slick" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
ups.com...

No, I am neither. I simply haven't "targeted" you.

Thanks Jenn for admitting that like Middius and the rest of his
clique,
you
intentially "target" people.

Huh? Yeah...right...I admitted above that I target people...sure,
that's the ticket. :-/

It's really simple logic, Jenn.

Jenn, you clearly said that you hadn't targeted me.

Correct.

I'm going to take big
risk here and presume that what you write actually has meaning. If you
never
targeted anybody, then saying that you are not targeting me would have no
meaning.

LOL. That's one of the most illogical statements that I've ever read.
Truly. According to the above, the way to my sentence have meaning
would be to add to it as follows: "I simply haven't 'targeted' you, nor
have I targeted anyone else." Are you going to stand by that?

Since I presume that your statement that you haven't targeted me
has meaning, it is logical to conclude that you have been targeting
people.

LOL. No, that's not logical at all. BTW, as it happens, I HAVE
targeted someone in a NG before. It was in an argument over a racial
issue.

I can see where this kind of behavior on your part Jenn could get
someone
so
angry that they try to deal with you in the real world.

To what kind of behavior do you refer, Arny?

I'm going to take another risk Jenn and presume that the person who
confronted you at home was less than totally pleased with your behavior.
Otherwise there would be no reason for you to be so traumatized by the
experience that you felt obliged to make changes to your personal life
because of it.

OK, Arny, after much trying, you are going to get some personal
information out of me. Are you happy? (By the way, the "changes to my
personal life to which you refer is ONE change: not using my last name
in Usenet groups. OooooooHHHH!! Such major changes in my personal life
that they warrant you bringing it up over and over!)

Now, as to that personal information. Do you remember that I told you
that my sister died when she was 40 and I was 28? Here's how she died:
A man walked into her front door and raped her and then beat the life
out of her. So gee wiz, pardon me if a man with whom I'd had an
argument online and who had threatened me drives 100 miles and shows up
at my door at night unannounced. Call me picky, I guess. Are you happy
now? Isn't it neat to bring this into a group about a freaking hobby?
Do you want the crime report number of my sister's case? What will make
you happy now, Arny? I'm here to serve your wishes.


There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
yourself.

I know.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...

There will be a day you'll be sorry that you told him anything.about
yourself.

I know.

Arny's harmless if words on usenet can't hurt you. Now some of the other
sicko's around here.. I'm not so sure .

ScottW