ABBEDD RIAA
January 24th 06, 08:20 PM
John Smith > wrote in
:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:40:23 -0500, ansermetniac
> > wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:36:36 -0800, Seeing Citrus
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:29:07 -0500, ansermetniac
> Pleasantly Postulated:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:28:51 -0800, Seeing Citrus
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:13:37 -0500, ansermetniac
> Pleasantly Postulated:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I keep waiting for him to explain how one can *remaster* a mixed
>>>>>>CD. Without access to the individual tracks laid down on the
>>>>>>master tapes it does seem more than a little fruitless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Seeing Citrus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>______
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On every Steve Hoffman remaster it states either
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1) Transfered from the origingal 2 track stereo un eqd master
>>>>>>2) Transsfered from the original full track momno un eqd master
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hoffman does NOT use the multitracks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The only difference between my source and Hoffman's, is mine has
>>>>>>been ****ed with by a dial twiddling phoney whose disiciples do
>>>>>>not know he is a phoney
>>>>>
>>>>>So you twiddle the dials even more and proclaim for all to see,
>>>>>just what complete loon you are.
>>>
>>>Note: no response.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Granted, I may do better if I had Hoffman's source , but I am
>>>>>>still able to undo his bass boost and sizzling highs and present
>>>>>>something musical.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Audiphools be damned
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Abbedd
>>>>>
>>>>>In other words exactly what I can do with the EQ on my stereo to
>>>>>any CD.
>>>
>>>Note: No response.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Pathetic, unbelievably pathetic, that you imagine you are doing
>>>>>anything approaching *special* or even *competent*.
>>>>
>>>>Typical answer when one is outed.
>>>>
>>>>Seeing Citrus is a proven Phoney. One down, how many more to go?
>>>
>>>Note: avoidance of all points directly addressed.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Abbedd
>>>
>>>Note: Subject line *giggle*
>>
>>And that is my PROFESSIONAL Opinion
>>
>>Abbedd
>
> ...as a CNC operator.
>
> If he actually got *payed* to re-EQ, he wouldn't have to convince
> himself that he knows what he's doing by posting his unwanted
> "talent".
>
Yes the fat, greasy **** with pubic hair on his head works on a loading
dock. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA.
:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:40:23 -0500, ansermetniac
> > wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:36:36 -0800, Seeing Citrus
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:29:07 -0500, ansermetniac
> Pleasantly Postulated:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:28:51 -0800, Seeing Citrus
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:13:37 -0500, ansermetniac
> Pleasantly Postulated:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I keep waiting for him to explain how one can *remaster* a mixed
>>>>>>CD. Without access to the individual tracks laid down on the
>>>>>>master tapes it does seem more than a little fruitless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Seeing Citrus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>______
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On every Steve Hoffman remaster it states either
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1) Transfered from the origingal 2 track stereo un eqd master
>>>>>>2) Transsfered from the original full track momno un eqd master
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hoffman does NOT use the multitracks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The only difference between my source and Hoffman's, is mine has
>>>>>>been ****ed with by a dial twiddling phoney whose disiciples do
>>>>>>not know he is a phoney
>>>>>
>>>>>So you twiddle the dials even more and proclaim for all to see,
>>>>>just what complete loon you are.
>>>
>>>Note: no response.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Granted, I may do better if I had Hoffman's source , but I am
>>>>>>still able to undo his bass boost and sizzling highs and present
>>>>>>something musical.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Audiphools be damned
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Abbedd
>>>>>
>>>>>In other words exactly what I can do with the EQ on my stereo to
>>>>>any CD.
>>>
>>>Note: No response.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Pathetic, unbelievably pathetic, that you imagine you are doing
>>>>>anything approaching *special* or even *competent*.
>>>>
>>>>Typical answer when one is outed.
>>>>
>>>>Seeing Citrus is a proven Phoney. One down, how many more to go?
>>>
>>>Note: avoidance of all points directly addressed.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Abbedd
>>>
>>>Note: Subject line *giggle*
>>
>>And that is my PROFESSIONAL Opinion
>>
>>Abbedd
>
> ...as a CNC operator.
>
> If he actually got *payed* to re-EQ, he wouldn't have to convince
> himself that he knows what he's doing by posting his unwanted
> "talent".
>
Yes the fat, greasy **** with pubic hair on his head works on a loading
dock. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA.