John Smith wrote in
:

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:40:23 -0500, ansermetniac
wrote:

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:36:36 -0800, Seeing Citrus
wrote:

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:29:07 -0500, ansermetniac
Pleasantly Postulated:

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:28:51 -0800, Seeing Citrus
wrote:

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:13:37 -0500, ansermetniac
Pleasantly Postulated:

I keep waiting for him to explain how one can *remaster* a mixed
CD. Without access to the individual tracks laid down on the
master tapes it does seem more than a little fruitless.

Seeing Citrus

______

On every Steve Hoffman remaster it states either

1) Transfered from the origingal 2 track stereo un eqd master
2) Transsfered from the original full track momno un eqd master


Hoffman does NOT use the multitracks

The only difference between my source and Hoffman's, is mine has
been ****ed with by a dial twiddling phoney whose disiciples do
not know he is a phoney

So you twiddle the dials even more and proclaim for all to see,
just what complete loon you are.

Note: no response.



Granted, I may do better if I had Hoffman's source , but I am
still able to undo his bass boost and sizzling highs and present
something musical.

Audiphools be damned


Abbedd

In other words exactly what I can do with the EQ on my stereo to
any CD.

Note: No response.


Pathetic, unbelievably pathetic, that you imagine you are doing
anything approaching *special* or even *competent*.

Typical answer when one is outed.

Seeing Citrus is a proven Phoney. One down, how many more to go?

Note: avoidance of all points directly addressed.



Abbedd

Note: Subject line *giggle*

And that is my PROFESSIONAL Opinion

Abbedd

...as a CNC operator.

If he actually got *payed* to re-EQ, he wouldn't have to convince
himself that he knows what he's doing by posting his unwanted
"talent".


Yes the fat, greasy **** with pubic hair on his head works on a loading
dock. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA.