Fess up, Gerg

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/

Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

--
td

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
>
> Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?

No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
>
> Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?



When did your gay family members decide to get into the speaker biz?

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
>
> > http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
> >
> > Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?
>
> No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
> Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>
No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.

[trotsky]

Robert Morein wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
>>>
>>>Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?
>>
>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>
>
> No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.


How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
Quentin?

You can crawl back in your rat hole now.

[George M. Middius]

Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.

> >>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
> >>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?

> > No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.

> How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
> Quentin?

Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
Did you try to wing it without research when you were in college?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.
>
>
>>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>>
>
>>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
>>
>
>
>>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
>>Quentin?
>
>
> Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?
>
> FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.


I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?

[George M. Middius]

Greg, how many times have you mistaken the Chicago sewer system for
the Ganges River?

> >>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
> >>Quentin?

> > Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?

Inability to answer noted.


> > FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.

> I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?

For the fourth time, you may not suck my dick.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:56:59 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>When did your gay family members decide to get into the speaker biz?

When all the ******s started growing a pair of testicles.

--
td

P.S. Now we've seen your limited-editon, UK-only 'orchestration', what
will you be listening to in your Ford Focus?

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:56:59 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>When did your gay family members decide to get into the speaker biz?
>
>
> When all the ******s started growing a pair of testicles.


Are you making fun of Middius? Why I laugh?

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Greg, how many times have you mistaken the Chicago sewer system for
> the Ganges River?
>
>
>>>>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
>>>>Quentin?
>>>
>
>>>Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?
>>
>
> Inability to answer noted.
>
>
>
>>>FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
>>
>
>
>>I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?
>
>
> For the fourth time, you may not suck my dick.



Oops, audio related. Kryptonite!

[dave weil]

On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:44:08 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>> Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.
>>
>>
>>>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>>>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>>>
>>
>>>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
>>>
>>
>>
>>>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
>>>Quentin?
>>
>>
>> Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?
>>
>> FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
>
>
>I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?

Greg, why don't you just ask George for a date outright? It will do
you good to come clean with yourself.

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

> Greg, why don't you just ask George for a date outright? It will do
> you good to come clean with yourself.

He knows he can't touch that.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:44:08 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>>>Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>>>>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>>>>
>>>>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
>>>>Quentin?
>>>
>>>
>>>Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?
>>>
>>>FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
>>
>>
>>I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?
>
>
> Greg, why don't you just ask George for a date outright? It will do
> you good to come clean with yourself.


Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
much on useful information.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
>job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
>George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
>getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
>much on useful information.

Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.

I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
speakers.

So, when George turns you down for a date, do you think you'll cry?

[Bruce J. Richman]

Robert Morein wrote:


>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>
>> The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
>>
>> > http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
>> >
>> > Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?
>>
>> No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>> Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>
>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements, they still
beat Gerg's claim that all the public needs to do is trust his "years of audio
experience".
I'd also want to know if these speakers have passed the famous Chicago/Gerg
"limp dick" test for speaker potency.




Bruce J. Richman

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> George M. Middius wrote:
> >
> > Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.
> >
> >
> >>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
> >>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
> >>>
> >
> >>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
> >>
> >
> >
> >>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
> >>Quentin?
> >
> >
> > Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?
> >
> > FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
>
>
> I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?
>
Just the good ones.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
>>job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
>>George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
>>getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
>>much on useful information.
>
>
> Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.
>
> I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
> speakers.


I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.
Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
few random comments too.

[trotsky]

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
> Robert Morein wrote:
>
>
>
>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>>
>>>The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
>>>>
>>>>Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?
>>>
>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>>
>>
>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
> in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
> polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements, they still
> beat Gerg's claim that all the public needs to do is trust his "years of audio
> experience".
> I'd also want to know if these speakers have passed the famous Chicago/Gerg
> "limp dick" test for speaker potency.


Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here that
doesn't think that I'm more capable of recognizing good sound than you?
Show some honesty for a change.

[trotsky]

Michael Mckelvy wrote:
> "trotsky" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>>George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>>>Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>>>>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>>>>
>>>>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
>>>>
>>>
>>>>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
>>>>Quentin?
>>>
>>>
>>>Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?
>>>
>>>FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
>>
>>
>>I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?
>>
>
> Just the good ones.


Mine are very good. I must've spent gobs of cash on research.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On 10 Nov 2003 04:51:21 GMT, (Bruce J. Richman)
wrote:

>There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
>in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
>polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements,

LOL!

--
td

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
>>>job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
>>>George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
>>>getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
>>>much on useful information.
>>
>>
>> Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.
>>
>> I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
>> speakers.
>
>
>I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.

That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.

> Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
>few random comments too.

And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?

<s******>

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here

Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
the closet.

Why do you try alt.scourged.priest?

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2003 04:51:21 GMT, (Bruce J. Richman)
> wrote:
>
>
>>There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of data
>>in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
>>polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements,
>
>
> LOL!


You lie. You've never laughed at a Richman post in your life.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
>>>>job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
>>>>George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
>>>>getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
>>>>much on useful information.
>>>
>>>
>>>Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.
>>>
>>>I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
>>>speakers.
>>
>>
>>I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.
>
>
> That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.



That's all I deal in.


>> Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
>>few random comments too.
>
>
> And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?
>
> <s******>


It cost me a lot more than that.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here
>
>
> Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
> the closet.


dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays. Nashville has a lot of
them, right. Aren't you going to tell us some of your best friends are
gay, or something equally fruity as that? Do you rationalize it as
being a part of the "queer eye for the straight guy" concept?

[Arny Krueger]

"trotsky" > wrote in message


> Unfortunately,
> George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance
> of getting anything useful out of him is slim.

Refresh my memory. When was it that George's comments weren't agenda-driven?

;-)

Methinks you are just a very slow learner, Singh.

> As ever, this group isn't much on useful information.

Ask a honest audio-related question and if I can, I'll give you an honest
answer.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:21:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dave weil wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how bad a
>>>>>job you did when attempting to review my speakers. Unfortunately,
>>>>>George's comments are mostly agenda driven these days, so the chance of
>>>>>getting anything useful out of him is slim. As ever, this group isn't
>>>>>much on useful information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.
>>>>
>>>>I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
>>>>speakers.
>>>
>>>
>>>I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random comments.
>>
>>
>> That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.
>
>
>
>That's all I deal in.

So, you've come out of the closet then?

>>> Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up with a
>>>few random comments too.
>>
>>
>> And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?
>>
>> <s******>
>
>
>It cost me a lot more than that.

I'm sorry if it cost you sales. Maybe if you hadn't interfered and
****ed me off...

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:23:57 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here
>>
>>
>> Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
>> the closet.
>
>
>dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

More than you? I don't think so.

> Nashville has a lot of them, right. Aren't you going to tell us some of your best friends are
>gay, or something equally fruity as that?

One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.

> Do you rationalize it as being a part of the "queer eye for the straight guy" concept?

No, I rationalize it as it being the orientation of one of my close
friends.

[George M. Middius]

Gayipus is envious of dave.

> dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.

I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>
>
>Gayipus is envious of dave.
>
>> dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.
>
>I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.

That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.

(How's *that* for a straight line)?

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

> >Gayipus is envious of dave.
> >
> >> dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.
> >
> >I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.
>
> That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.
>
> (How's *that* for a straight line)?

Very manly.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:23:57 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:32:07 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here
>>>
>>>
>>>Sorry. Maybe you can find a man-filled forum to help you come out of
>>>the closet.
>>
>>
>>dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.
>
>
> More than you? I don't think so.
>
>
>> Nashville has a lot of them, right. Aren't you going to tell us some of your best friends are
>>gay, or something equally fruity as that?
>
>
> One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.


That was a bit predictable.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
> > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Gayipus is envious of dave.
>>
>>
>>>dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.
>>
>>I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.
>
>
> That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.


That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:18:02 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

> One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.
>
>
>That was a bit predictable.

In the real world, many of us straight people have close friends that
are gay, so I guess it would be predictable. In fact, I HOPE that it
would be predictable. Homophobia is so 50s, you know.

You're not going be able to fight your gayness much longer Greg. Might
as well track down that model on your web site now rather than later.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:49 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Gayipus is envious of dave.
>>>
>>>
>>>>dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.
>>>
>>>I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.
>>
>>
>> That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.
>
>
>That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.

It's only *my* motto for *me*. What others do is their business.

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

> You're not going be able to fight your gayness much longer Greg. Might
> as well track down that model on your web site now rather than later.

Now that Gregipus has so little steady income, he might consider
branching out. After all, most hustlers are "straight". Of course,
most of them are good-looking too.....

[Bruce J. Richman]

Greg Singh wrote:


>Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>> Robert Morein wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>>
>>>>The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
>>>>>
>>>>>Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?
>>>>
>>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
>>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
>>>>
>>>
>>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance of
>data
>> in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
>> polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements, they
>still
>> beat Gerg's claim that all the public needs to do is trust his "years of
>audio
>> experience".
>> I'd also want to know if these speakers have passed the famous Chicago/Gerg
>> "limp dick" test for speaker potency.
>
>
>Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here that
>doesn't think that I'm more capable of recognizing good sound than you?
> Show some honesty for a change.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Your credibility is zero, Greg. And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
practically all RAO regulars.


Bruce J. Richman

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:18:02 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.
>>
>>
>>That was a bit predictable.
>
>
> In the real world, many of us straight people have close friends that
> are gay,


Wait, so you're saying that the majority of contributors to
rec.audio.opinion have close friends that are gay? Devil, do you agree
with this?

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:49 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gayipus is envious of dave.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.
>>>>
>>>>I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.
>>>
>>>
>>>That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.
>>
>>
>>That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.
>
>
> It's only *my* motto for *me*. What others do is their business.



Wow, it's like the Spin Doctors just made a comeback.

[trotsky]

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

> Your credibility is zero, Greg.


No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
different levels.


And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
> and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
> arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
> practically all RAO regulars.


My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact. If you care to
refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:27:30 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:18:02 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>One of my best friends *is* gay, yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>That was a bit predictable.
>>
>>
>> In the real world, many of us straight people have close friends that
>> are gay,
>
>
>Wait, so you're saying that the majority of contributors to
>rec.audio.opinion have close friends that are gay?

I'd hope so.

> Devil, do you agree with this?

He probably would.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:28:26 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:49 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dave weil wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:33:27 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Gayipus is envious of dave.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>dave, you suddenly seem preoccupied with gays.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think dave will let you suck his dick either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That's right. My motto? Only one dick per coupling.
>>>
>>>
>>>That's the best slam on Middius' lifestyle yet.
>>
>>
>> It's only *my* motto for *me*. What others do is their business.
>
>
>
>Wow, it's like the Spin Doctors just made a comeback.

Why, are you hot on red-headed,scraggly-bearded singers? Maybe you
could snag Mick Hucknall instead...

[George M. Middius]

Gayipus Dishonestus misses the Truth-Time Trolley.

> > Your credibility is zero, Greg.

> No, that's not true either.

On the contrary, it's so true that Krooger is envious of you.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:39:51 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>
>> Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>
>
>No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
>exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
>on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
>call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
>not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
>different levels.

Yes, it's the pedantic Greg on the loose again...

> And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
>> and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
>> arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
>> practically all RAO regulars.
>
>
>My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact. If you care to
>refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
>is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.

Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
your enemies to buy your product.

[MiNE 109]

In article >, trotsky >
wrote:

> Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>
> > Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>
>
> No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
> exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
> on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
> call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
> not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
> different levels.

You said "no such record". There is such a record, for which I have
posted the catalogue number.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:01:56 GMT, MiNE 109 >
wrote:

>In article >, trotsky >
>wrote:
>
>> Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>>
>> > Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>>
>>
>> No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
>> exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
>> on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
>> call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
>> not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
>> different levels.
>
>You said "no such record". There is such a record, for which I have
>posted the catalogue number.

Way to fight pedantry with pedantry. That should stick in his craw for
a while.

I was going to point out that there *is* a record called Take Five,
since I still call CDs records as well (and it's a fair thing to call
a CD a record actually), but I decided not to play that card.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:59:09 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>
>
>Gayipus Dishonestus misses the Truth-Time Trolley.
>
>> > Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>
>> No, that's not true either.
>
>On the contrary, it's so true that Krooger is envious of you.

Well, Arnold *is* giving him advice these days.

[MiNE 109]

In article >,
dave weil > wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:01:56 GMT, MiNE 109 >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >, trotsky >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Bruce J. Richman wrote:
> >>
> >> > Your credibility is zero, Greg.
> >>
> >>
> >> No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
> >> exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
> >> on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
> >> call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
> >> not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
> >> different levels.
> >
> >You said "no such record". There is such a record, for which I have
> >posted the catalogue number.
>
> Way to fight pedantry with pedantry. That should stick in his craw for
> a while.
>
> I was going to point out that there *is* a record called Take Five,
> since I still call CDs records as well (and it's a fair thing to call
> a CD a record actually), but I decided not to play that card.

Someone snickered at me years ago for calling an lp an 'album'. I doubt
he had a 78 collection!

Stephen

[Bruce J. Richman]

Greg Singh wrote:

>Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>
>> Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>
>
>No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
>exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
>on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
>call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
>not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
>different levels.
>
>

Yourr analysis is wrong. Of course, the fact that you have promoted numerous
li9es about6 me over the years completely destroys your ability to judge my
credibility in an objective fashion. And I'm well aware of teh various
different time signatures used in the selections on the Time Out album, whether
we'are talking about Take Five, or any of the other selection on the album.
The fact that I made a slip of the tongue has nothing to do with my credibility
whatsoever. And only a petty flamer such as yourself would even notice it -
but then again, your sole purpose for being on RAO, as most of us know, is to
try and fight with others. (Many of commented on this before).



> And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
>> and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
>> arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
>> practically all RAO regulars.
>
>
>My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact.

There is no reason that anybody should believe you, since to promote your
products, you resort to the old, tired salesman's ploy of bashing other
products such as Quads, Martin Logans, Dunlavys and probably many others as
well.

If you care to
>refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
>is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.
>
>
>
>


There is no fact that you given to refute, other than your biased opinion -
which is not a fact. You've made no effort whatsoever to provide any evidence
- other than your questionable words - that your speakers are superior to any
others. And when a relatively objective reviewer found even the smallest flaws
(in his iopinion) with your speakers, you immediately resorted to personal
attacks upon him. So why should anybody bother to try and review your
speakers, since you have no tolerance for either suggestions or constructive
criticism?




Bruce J. Richman

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:39:51 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>>
>>
>>No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
>>exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
>>on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
>>call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
>>not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
>>different levels.
>
>
> Yes, it's the pedantic Greg on the loose again...
>
>
>> And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
>>
>>>and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
>>>arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
>>>practically all RAO regulars.
>>
>>
>>My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact. If you care to
>>refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
>>is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.
>
>
> Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
> your enemies to buy your product.


Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>> Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
>> your enemies to buy your product.
>
>
>Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.

I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...

[trotsky]

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
> Greg Singh wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>>
>>
>>No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
>>exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
>>on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
>>call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
>>not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
>>different levels.
>>
>>
>
>
> Yourr analysis is wrong. Of course, the fact that you have promoted numerous
> li9es about6 me over the years completely destroys your ability to judge my
> credibility in an objective fashion. And I'm well aware of teh various
> different time signatures used in the selections on the Time Out album,


Wait, now you're acknowledging that there is a "Time Out" album?


whether
> we'are talking about Take Five, or any of the other selection on the album.
> The fact that I made a slip of the tongue has nothing to do with my credibility
> whatsoever. And only a petty flamer such as yourself would even notice it -
> but then again, your sole purpose for being on RAO, as most of us know, is to
> try and fight with others. (Many of commented on this before).


So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse. We are talking about one of
the most well known jazz recordings ever, of course. Do you also think
that Jethro Tull lived five or six hundred years so he could make
records, too?


>> And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
>>
>>>and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well. Your
>>>arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
>>>practically all RAO regulars.
>>
>>
>>My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact.
>
>
> There is no reason that anybody should believe you,


That statement makes dave weil look like you consider him to be nothing.


since to promote your
> products, you resort to the old, tired salesman's ploy of bashing other
> products such as Quads, Martin Logans, Dunlavys and probably many others as
> well.


I bashed Quads? When was this? I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys. Your
misrepresentation of the facts here is tantamount to lying.


> If you care to
>
>>refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
>>is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> There is no fact that you given to refute, other than your biased opinion -


So dave's opinion is meaningless?


> which is not a fact. You've made no effort whatsoever to provide any evidence
> - other than your questionable words - that your speakers are superior to any
> others. And when a relatively objective reviewer found even the smallest flaws
> (in his iopinion) with your speakers, you immediately resorted to personal
> attacks upon him. So why should anybody bother to try and review your
> speakers, since you have no tolerance for either suggestions or constructive
> criticism?


I'm not sure what you're trying to say here: dave was only capable of
finding the smallest of flaws, and you still say there's no reason to
believe me (or him)?

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>>Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
>>>your enemies to buy your product.
>>
>>
>>Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.
>
>
> I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...


Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
on the internet "friends"? Is that how you know the gay guy?

[Bruce J. Richman]

Greg Singh wrote:


>Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>> Greg Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Bruce J. Richman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Your credibility is zero, Greg.
>>>
>>>
>>>No, that's not true either. I suppose in your alternate universe there
>>>exists a Brubeck LP called "Take Five", right? The only reason to harp
>>>on this is that the whole reason for calling the album "Time Out" is to
>>>call attention to the groups penchant for weird time signatures, so to
>>>not know the actually title eats at your credility on a couple of
>>>different levels.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yourr analysis is wrong. Of course, the fact that you have promoted
>numerous
>> li9es about6 me over the years completely destroys your ability to judge my
>> credibility in an objective fashion. And I'm well aware of teh various
>> different time signatures used in the selections on the Time Out album,
>
>
>Wait, now you're acknowledging that there is a "Time Out" album?
>
>
> whether
>> we'are talking about Take Five, or any of the other selection on the album.
>
>> The fact that I made a slip of the tongue has nothing to do with my
>credibility
>> whatsoever. And only a petty flamer such as yourself would even notice it
>-
>> but then again, your sole purpose for being on RAO, as most of us know, is
>to
>> try and fight with others. (Many of commented on this before).
>
>
>So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.

As usual, you've attempted to lie about me and what I've said. What else is
new?
Of course, it may just be a carryover of your "salesman days" when you probably
tried to twist what people actually said on a regular basis, correct?


We are talking about one of
>the most well known jazz recordings ever, of course. Do you also think
>that Jethro Tull lived five or six hundred years so he could make
>records, too?
>

Do you have any evidence for any of your ridiculous lies about things that I
have said? Or would you rather just continue to exhibit your delusional claims
on RAO?




>
>>> And your dishonesty has been demonstrated over
>>>
>>>>and over again concerning both audio issues and other topics as well.
>Your
>>>>arrogance and silly bragging about your imaginary skills are well known to
>>>>practically all RAO regulars.
>>>
>>>
>>>My speakers are really good, Bruce. That's a fact.
>>
>>
>> There is no reason that anybody should believe you,
>
>
>That statement makes dave weil look like you consider him to be nothing.
>

Once again, you demonstrate your (a) inabiloity to colmprehend English, and (b)
propensity to lie about what others have said. Dave Weil found both positive
and negative things to say about your speakers, a *fact* that you are now
trying to avoid conceding.


>
> since to promote your
>> products, you resort to the old, tired salesman's ploy of bashing other
>> products such as Quads, Martin Logans, Dunlavys and probably many others as
>> well.
>
>
>I bashed Quads? When was this? I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
>and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys. Your
>misrepresentation of the facts here is tantamount to lying.
>

You lost no time in ridiculing Scott's ownership of Quads and implied that your
speakers were superior. You've also claied that your speakers are "really
good" is a fact. It is nothing more than your opinion, on all counts.
Therefore, your attempt to represent cloaims about your speakers that you make
as facts - is clearly an example of self-serving lieing in an effort to sell
your products.



>
>> If you care to
>>
>>>refute that fact, I would suggest you bid on one of my auctions where it
>>>is a lot harder for me to refuse to sell you a pair.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> There is no fact that you given to refute, other than your biased opinion -
>
>
>So dave's opinion is meaningless?
>
>

That would be your projection of your incorrect and false beliefs on to others,
but as with most of your attempts to twist what others have said, you' would
appear to be either again incapable of comprehending what one of your flame
tarrgets has written, or more likely, you're just lieing again.



>> which is not a fact. You've made no effort whatsoever to provide any
>evidence
>> - other than your questionable words - that your speakers are superior to
>any
>> others. And when a relatively objective reviewer found even the smallest
>flaws
>> (in his iopinion) with your speakers, you immediately resorted to personal
>> attacks upon him. So why should anybody bother to try and review your
>> speakers, since you have no tolerance for either suggestions or
>constructive
>> criticism?
>
>
>I'm not sure what you're trying to say here: dave was only capable of
>finding the smallest of flaws, and you still say there's no reason to
>believe me (or him)?
>
>
>

It's indeed unfortunate that you can't understand clearly written sentences
that don't correspond to your self-serving, prejudiced views of your speakers.
Your attempts to misrepresent what I have written tend to corroborate what I've
said earlier about your credibility.



Bruce J. Richman

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:56:48 -0600, dave weil >
wrote:

>> Devil, do you agree with this?
>
>He probably would.

I do. Gerg is hung up about gays because he wants nine inches of veiny
jism justice raining on his fat ass.

--

td

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:56:48 -0600, dave weil >
> wrote:
>
>
>>>Devil, do you agree with this?
>>
>>He probably would.
>
>
> I do. Gerg is hung up about gays because he wants nine inches of veiny
> jism justice raining on his fat ass.


Hey, no fair, you're being unfairly influenced by your family members
and the Royals.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.

Apparently, so does grammar...

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
>and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys.

I'd like to see the scoring sheet.

Did your friend cheat off of your paper?

[dave weil]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:57:45 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
>>>>your enemies to buy your product.
>>>
>>>
>>>Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.
>>
>>
>> I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...
>
>
>Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
>on the internet "friends"?

I actually *have* made quite a few friends through the internet.

> Is that how you know the gay guy?

No. Although I *do* know some gay folks through the internet.

I know *you*, don't I?

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.
>
>
> Apparently, so does grammar...


That's grammatically correct, dave. Maybe your gay internet friend
Middius will help you out on this one.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
>>and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys.
>
>
> I'd like to see the scoring sheet.
>
> Did your friend cheat off of your paper?



Zzzzz.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:57:45 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:58 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Now *that's* an ineresting shilling sales technique. Challenge one of
>>>>>your enemies to buy your product.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Why is Bruce one of my "enemies", dave? I don't even know the guy.
>>>
>>>
>>>I see. Please tell us how you treat your friends...
>>
>>
>>Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
>>on the internet "friends"?
>
>
> I actually *have* made quite a few friends through the internet.


That wasn't what was being discussed, dave. Care to try again?

>
>
>>Is that how you know the gay guy?
>
>
> No. Although I *do* know some gay folks through the internet.
>
> I know *you*, don't I?


I'm less gay that you, dave. I'll tell you what, though, it must be
funny as hell to see you in those Nashville gay bars telling dudes "I'm
with someone."

[dave weil]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:08:21 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.
>>
>>
>> Apparently, so does grammar...
>
>
>That's grammatically correct, dave.

No it's not. "So "facts suck" is basically you are excuse" is
grammatically incorrect.

>Maybe your gay internet friend Middius will help you out on this one.

Well, we'll see, won't we...

[dave weil]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:09:02 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>dave weil wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I haven't liked Martin Logans for years
>>>and was astonished when the Jupiters scored well against Dunlavys.
>>
>>
>> I'd like to see the scoring sheet.
>>
>> Did your friend cheat off of your paper?
>
>
>
>Zzzzz.

SCoRE'RE!

[dave weil]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:11:25 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>>>Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact with
>>>on the internet "friends"?
>>
>>
>> I actually *have* made quite a few friends through the internet.
>
>
>That wasn't what was being discussed, dave. Care to try again?

So, you didn't mean "Oh, are you one of those people that call people
that you interact with on the internet 'friends'?" when you wrote
"Oh, are you one of those people that call people that you interact
with on the internet 'friends'?"

Cool.

>>>Is that how you know the gay guy?
>>
>>
>> No. Although I *do* know some gay folks through the internet.
>>
>> I know *you*, don't I?
>
>
>I'm less gay that you, dave.

Grammar's a bitch, innit?

> I'll tell you what, though, it must be
>funny as hell to see you in those Nashville gay bars telling dudes "I'm
>with someone."

Yes, it would be funny if it ever happened.

[trotsky]

dave weil wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:08:21 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>dave weil wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:53:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>So "facts suck" is basically you're excuse.
>>>
>>>
>>>Apparently, so does grammar...
>>
>>
>>That's grammatically correct, dave.
>
>
> No it's not. "So "facts suck" is basically you are excuse" is
> grammatically incorrect.


Oh, well, you've caught me misspelling a word I guess. Naturally you're
going to ask Bruce Richman how he managed to spell the word "lying" as
"lieing", right?

[dave weil]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:25:27 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>Oh, well, you've caught me misspelling a word I guess. Naturally you're
>going to ask Bruce Richman how he managed to spell the word "lying" as
>"lieing", right?

After hundreds of cases of "misspelling", one would think you'd give
it up.

It's not misspelling - you can't tell when your supposed to use you're
pronouns (mistakes intentional)...

[George M. Middius]

Gregipus Grammaticus tiptoes through the tulips.

> I'm less gay that you, dave.

Is this a grammar lecture or a dick-sucking demo? Take as much time as
you need, etc.

[George M. Middius]

Glans, I said:

> >I'm less gay than you, dave.
>
> LOL!

Now that was funny, wasn't it.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Gregipus Grammaticus tiptoes through the tulips.
>
>
>>I'm less gay that you, dave.
>
>
> Is this a grammar lecture or a dick-sucking demo? Take as much time as
> you need, etc.


Hey, did those wacky scientists ever get around to identifying the gay gene?

[dave weil]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:01 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>
>
>George M. Middius wrote:
>>
>> Gregipus Grammaticus tiptoes through the tulips.
>>
>>
>>>I'm less gay that you, dave.
>>
>>
>> Is this a grammar lecture or a dick-sucking demo? Take as much time as
>> you need, etc.
>
>
>Hey, did those wacky scientists ever get around to identifying the gay gene?

Yes, he's depicted on your web site. He's appropriately enough on your
"Kontact" page, replete with chic white Ethan Allen sofa and a bottle
of "Zinf"...

....hmmmm, I wonder if this web site is just a cleverly coded dating
service...

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

> Yes, he's depicted on your web site. He's appropriately enough on your
> "Kontact" page, replete with chic white Ethan Allen sofa and a bottle
> of "Zinf"...
>
> ...hmmmm, I wonder if this web site is just a cleverly coded dating
> service...

Now that Gregipus has revealed he's exclusively a rough trade
customer, maybe the clues will be subtler. Is there, perhaps, a whip
hiding behind the roses, or a set of cuffs in the shadows in the
"factory"?

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:39:34 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>Hey, no fair, you're being unfairly influenced by your family members
>and the Royals.

'****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
does it?

--
td

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:39:34 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>Hey, no fair, you're being unfairly influenced by your family members
>>and the Royals.
>
>
> '****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
> does it?


No, but it does sound like a particularly good night out with your
mistresses.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:28:22 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>> '****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
>> does it?

>No, but it does sound like a particularly good night out with your
>mistresses.

That's the second time you made me laugh in as many years. Well done.

--
td

[trotsky]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 23:28:22 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>
>>>'****** pile' doesn't have anything to do with your gay fantasies,
>>>does it?
>
>
>>No, but it does sound like a particularly good night out with your
>>mistresses.
>
>
> That's the second time you made me laugh in as many years. Well done.


Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
because he's gay though--right?

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:49:45 GMT, trotsky > wrote:

>Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
>because he's gay though--right?

You make as much sense as Greg.

Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.

--
td

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
> >because he's gay though--right?
>
> You make as much sense as Greg.
>
> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.

I would like my "symapathy" now, please.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:21:43 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>
>> dave weil wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:30:25 GMT, trotsky > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> dave weil wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:32:39 GMT, trotsky >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, dave, I have been meaning to ask George something: how
>>>>>> bad a job you did when attempting to review my speakers.
>>>>>> Unfortunately, George's comments are mostly agenda driven these
>>>>>> days, so the chance of getting anything useful out of him is
>>>>>> slim. As ever, this group isn't much on useful information.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Especially when it comes to comparing your speakers with Dunlavy.
>>>>>
>>>>> I maintain that *my* report was better than *your* review of your
>>>>> speakers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I never reviewed my speakers, but merely provided a few random
>>>> comments.
>>>
>>>
>>> That we were supposed to take as TRVTH.
>>
>>
>>
>> That's all I deal in.
>
> So, you've come out of the closet then?
>
>>>> Sadly, you did review them, and were only capable of coming up
>>>> with a few random comments too.
>>>
>>>
>>> And it only cost you under $50. So what are you bitching about?
>>>
>>> <s******>
>>
>>
>> It cost me a lot more than that.
>
> I'm sorry if it cost you sales. Maybe if you hadn't interfered and
> ****ed me off...


Yup, Weil is really impressed with his own power as a market maker. Brings
out the dominatrix...

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:41:33 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
>> >because he's gay though--right?
>>
>> You make as much sense as Greg.
>>
>> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.
>
>I would like my "symapathy" now, please.

Would you like homeopathic symapathy?

--
td

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> >> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
> >> >because he's gay though--right?
> >>
> >> You make as much sense as Greg.
> >>
> >> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.
> >
> >I would like my "symapathy" now, please.
>
> Would you like homeopathic symapathy?

If you're out of Gay Vegetarian ****** Pile symapathy, it'll have to do.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:06:51 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>> >> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
>> >> >because he's gay though--right?
>> >>
>> >> You make as much sense as Greg.
>> >>
>> >> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.
>> >
>> >I would like my "symapathy" now, please.
>>
>> Would you like homeopathic symapathy?
>
>If you're out of Gay Vegetarian ****** Pile symapathy, it'll have to do.

Just a moment while I call Madisound.

--
td

[dave weil]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:49:35 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>Yup, Weil is really impressed with his own power as a market maker. Brings
>out the dominatrix...

Yep, still having problems with gender identification I see, even
though he got the pronoun correct.

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> >> >> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
> >> >> >because he's gay though--right?
> >> >>
> >> >> You make as much sense as Greg.
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.
> >> >
> >> >I would like my "symapathy" now, please.
> >>
> >> Would you like homeopathic symapathy?
> >
> >If you're out of Gay Vegetarian ****** Pile symapathy, it'll have to do.
>
> Just a moment while I call Madisound.

Oh good, they can give you complete specs.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:22:05 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>> >> >> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
>> >> >> >because he's gay though--right?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You make as much sense as Greg.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.
>> >> >
>> >> >I would like my "symapathy" now, please.
>> >>
>> >> Would you like homeopathic symapathy?
>> >
>> >If you're out of Gay Vegetarian ****** Pile symapathy, it'll have to do.
>>
>> Just a moment while I call Madisound.
>
>Oh good, they can give you complete specs.

Stainless steel ********, a love of Jane Horrocks, dumb as a box o'
rocks, fork sticking zzzz loT's. Do you expect them to be as honest
and forthcoming as I have shown whom you I am? Agree or disagree?

--
td

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> >> >> >> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
> >> >> >> >because he's gay though--right?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You make as much sense as Greg.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I would like my "symapathy" now, please.
> >> >>
> >> >> Would you like homeopathic symapathy?
> >> >
> >> >If you're out of Gay Vegetarian ****** Pile symapathy, it'll have to do.
> >>
> >> Just a moment while I call Madisound.
> >
> >Oh good, they can give you complete specs.
>
> Stainless steel ********, a love of Jane Horrocks, dumb as a box o'
> rocks, fork sticking zzzz loT's. Do you expect them to be as honest
> and forthcoming as I have shown whom you I am? Agree or disagree?


Same old anonymouse ****, right Dev? As usual, I'm right and your
afraid to answer the mother****ing question. You're stereo sucks.
Give my mother****ing regards to your laughingstock of a gay family.
Got anything to say about audio? I wouldn't sell you a pair of my
world class speakers even if you let me blow you. Sorree'ee.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:50:28 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>> >> >> >> >Pity you can't say the same for Middius. He gets the symapathy vote
>> >> >> >> >because he's gay though--right?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> You make as much sense as Greg.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Oh, sorry, I mean Arnii.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I would like my "symapathy" now, please.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Would you like homeopathic symapathy?
>> >> >
>> >> >If you're out of Gay Vegetarian ****** Pile symapathy, it'll have to do.
>> >>
>> >> Just a moment while I call Madisound.
>> >
>> >Oh good, they can give you complete specs.
>>
>> Stainless steel ********, a love of Jane Horrocks, dumb as a box o'
>> rocks, fork sticking zzzz loT's. Do you expect them to be as honest
>> and forthcoming as I have shown whom you I am? Agree or disagree?
>
>
>Same old anonymouse ****, right Dev? As usual, I'm right and your
>afraid to answer the mother****ing question. You're stereo sucks.
>Give my mother****ing regards to your laughingstock of a gay family.
>Got anything to say about audio? I wouldn't sell you a pair of my
>world class speakers even if you let me blow you. Sorree'ee.

You're house of forks is caving in, and you accuse me of being a
laughing stalk? Why I laugh? No one can set up a pair of stilettos the
way I can, and get the best elevatory glam-slut performance from them.
Toe in, toe out, put your cock all about. Teeeheehee. As the Bob Dylan
song goes: You're so vain, you probably think this song is about
chewing. And there were ******s in my coffee, ******s in my coffee and
you're so veiny, you're so veiny, you probably wear a tight cock ring,
your balls in my coffee, balls in my coffee. Have you got anything to
say for yourself at this point?

--
td

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> >Same old anonymouse ****, right Dev? As usual, I'm right and your
> >afraid to answer the mother****ing question. You're stereo sucks.
> >Give my mother****ing regards to your laughingstock of a gay family.
> >Got anything to say about audio? I wouldn't sell you a pair of my
> >world class speakers even if you let me blow you. Sorree'ee.
>
> You're house of forks is caving in, and you accuse me of being a
> laughing stalk? Why I laugh? No one can set up a pair of stilettos the
> way I can, and get the best elevatory glam-slut performance from them.
> Toe in, toe out, put your cock all about. Teeeheehee. As the Bob Dylan
> song goes: You're so vain, you probably think this song is about
> chewing. And there were ******s in my coffee, ******s in my coffee and
> you're so veiny, you're so veiny, you probably wear a tight cock ring,
> your balls in my coffee, balls in my coffee. Have you got anything to
> say for yourself at this point?

Still afraid to answer the question, I see. And still stealing my
intellectual property. Did you or did you not **** Arnii's dead kid?
I'm sure Arnii will back me on this. You're thought processes are
totally ****ed. I'm right as usual. Your done.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:50:08 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>Still afraid to answer the question, I see. And still stealing my
>intellectual property. Did you or did you not **** Arnii's dead kid?
>I'm sure Arnii will back me on this. You're thought processes are
>totally ****ed. I'm right as usual. Your done.

Ah, yes, total meltdown just as I expected. Maybe Dev can chime in at
this point with a few more 'jokes' about Arnii's dead kid ****ing
himself in the face with a baseball bat? Oops, my bad for trying to
get you to say something consequential about audio. Let me know when
you have your test tubes reattached and would like to discuss your
appalling behaviour properly.

--
td

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> >Still afraid to answer the question, I see. And still stealing my
> >intellectual property. Did you or did you not **** Arnii's dead kid?
> >I'm sure Arnii will back me on this. You're thought processes are
> >totally ****ed. I'm right as usual. Your done.
>
> Ah, yes, total meltdown






Still anally connected, as expected. Since when is a melt down
dicktionarily defined likewise as a symapatethically ****** pile?
Got your number, Dev.






just as I expected. Maybe Dev can chime in at
> this point with a few more 'jokes' about Arnii's dead kid ****ing
> himself in the face with a baseball bat?




Excuse me, but where were you when the baseball bat was still in
view? Does your wife know about this? You're tools are bizzarare.








Oops, my bad for trying to
> get you to say something consequential about audio.



Funny thing -- I was just thinking that when you started lying about
it. How's you're audio, anyway? Does it suck as much as you're gay
sons and uncles and pets? Why I laughingstock?



Let me know when
> you have your test tubes reattached and would like to discuss your
> appalling behaviour properly.



Your as much fun as a refinished Chippindale chair, Dev. Do you
think I would let you tag along when my buddies and me are gone to a
major sporting event to hear live music? When I go to Indy, buddy.
Come back when you're unable to hear the question, please. There's a
good dick for me to suck.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:07:43 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>
>
>The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
>
>> >Still afraid to answer the question, I see. And still stealing my
>> >intellectual property. Did you or did you not **** Arnii's dead kid?
>> >I'm sure Arnii will back me on this. You're thought processes are
>> >totally ****ed. I'm right as usual. Your done.
>>
>> Ah, yes, total meltdown
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Still anally connected, as expected. Since when is a melt down
>dicktionarily defined likewise as a symapatethically ****** pile?
>Got your number, Dev.





And this is aproporos of whomse viewpoint? I think
youre'ae;re're'e;s're're's'sa'ree''reee''e''reeeee rre'e''re'rrr
spinning like a table full of dinner at this point, but maybe you
would like to redeem yourself by admitting I have flown correctly and
you are still on the floor like an incomprehensive worm, buddy.

Your. You're. ''''''' Y ,,,,,, O U '''' RE.

your a forkucking idiot. Sorry, but I'm running out of ways to tell
you your as dumb as a bag of carpet.

>
>
>
>
>
>just as I expected. Maybe Dev can chime in at
>> this point with a few more 'jokes' about Arnii's dead kid ****ing
>> himself in the face with a baseball bat?
>
>
>
>
>Excuse me, but where were you when the baseball bat was still in
>view? Does your wife know about this? You're tools are bizzarare.
>
>

''''''Y ou'e 'y


Whatever. Maybe that works at Arny's house, but in keeping with your'e
Yure(re y^reo

MOTHER****ING IDIOT

Gene Roddenberry house of cocks we should laugh our asses off in
disgrace? So'rry good buddy, but I'm not the only one that finds you a
bit gay on this point of effeminance. Quid pro quo, asslovely. If
you're going to be frothconing about my genitalia, very good, and
maybe we can talk about you for a change. Where do you put the
gasoline in your speakers, dickhead? If you have something to bring to
the dinner table, bring it now, you inconsequential MOTH'ER****'ING
SON OF A BITCH. I'M MOTHER****ING SICK of this wishy-washingmachine
with language.

er'''y'''re



>
>
>
>
>
>
>Oops, my bad for trying to
>> get you to say something consequential about audio.
>
>
>
>Funny thing -- I was just thinking that when you started lying about
>it. How's you're audio, anyway? Does it suck as much as you're gay
>sons and uncles and pets? Why I laughingstock?
>




You*re conig you%er

YOUOUOUOURRRR'RE MOTHERFUKING YOIY&UERE&E

coming unglued at the point. Is there anybody that disagrees with me?
As usual, you fail to see which writing the wall is buttered on.

>
>
>Let me know when
>> you have your test tubes reattached and would like to discuss your
>> appalling behaviour properly.
>
>
>
>Your as much fun as a refinished Chippindale chair, Dev. Do you
>think I would let you tag along when my buddies and me are gone to a
>major sporting event to hear live music? When I go to Indy, buddy.
>Come back when you're unable to hear the question, please. There's a
>good dick for me to suck.

Yeah, sure, that makes sense. I'm the ******* for trying to get you to
say something of consequence about audio. I don't know how yo'rue able
to sleep at night with y'r eyes, which are clearly full of swiss
cheese at this point. So'rry.

--
td

[Arny Krueger]

"The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra" > wrote in message
news:r1u4rvouavoijghm7ovd08jks72pu9dajj@rdmzrnewst xt.nz

> I'm the ******* for trying to get you to
> say something of consequence about audio.

Try it once yourself, Booby.

[The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:47:58 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra" > wrote in message
>news:r1u4rvouavoijghm7ovd08jks72pu9dajj@rdmzrnewst xt.nz
>
>> I'm the ******* for trying to get you to
>> say something of consequence about audio.
>
>Try

You don't really get much of anything, do you, idiot?

--
td

[George M. Middius]

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:

> >> I'm the ******* for trying to get you to
> >> say something of consequence about audio.

> >Try

> You don't really get much of anything, do you, idiot?

Arnii thinks saying "Booby" makes him look clever.

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

> The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
>
>>>> I'm the ******* for trying to get you to
>>>> say something of consequence about audio.
>
>>> Try
>
>> You don't really get much of anything, do you, idiot?
>
> Arnii thinks saying "Booby" makes him look clever.

It takes a real nitwit to think that calling oneself "The Stainless Steel
Boob Orchestra" makes them look like anything but a gigantic idiot.

[tor 2 u]

Arny Krueger wrote in message >:

> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>
> > The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
> >
> >>>> I'm the ******* for trying to get you to
> >>>> say something of consequence about audio.
> >
> >>> Try
> >
> >> You don't really get much of anything, do you, idiot?
> >
> > Arnii thinks saying "Booby" makes him look clever.
>
> It takes a real nitwit to think that calling oneself "The Stainless Steel
> Boob Orchestra" makes them look like anything but a gigantic idiot.
>



Does that mean you don't understand why he calls himself that? I am worried
about you Arny. You seem to be getting stupider every day.



If you knew half as much about audio as Arny does, you would be
half as much an ass as Marc "Phillips" is.

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
link.net...
> Michael Mckelvy wrote:
> > "trotsky" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>
> >>George M. Middius wrote:
> >>
> >>>Gregipus Pretendicus steps in it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
> >>>>>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>>How much money do you spend researching screenplays, Bob? How about
> >>>>Quentin?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Boy, are you desperate. Are you hoping to give Bob a BJ?
> >>>
> >>>FYI, little closet queen -- not all screenplays require any research.
> >>
> >>
> >>I see, fag boy. Do all speaker designs?
> >>
> >
> > Just the good ones.
>
>
> Mine are very good. I must've spent gobs of cash on research.
>

To bad nobody will ever know.

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
> Bruce J. Richman wrote:
> > Robert Morein wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> >>>
> >>>The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra said:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>http://www.worldsbestloudspeakers.co.uk/
> >>>>
> >>>>Jupiter Audio moved to Britain?
> >>>
> >>>No, that can't be Greg's enterprise. It doesn't say "World's Best
> >>>Mother****ing Loudspeakers", does it?
> >>>
> >>
> >>No, and it doesn't say "We spent $40 on research" either.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > There's another reason it can't be Singh's. It provides some semblance
of data
> > in the form of frequency response graphs. Even if they were made with
> > polygraph tracings rather than actual speaker response measurements,
they still
> > beat Gerg's claim that all the public needs to do is trust his "years of
audio
> > experience".
> > I'd also want to know if these speakers have passed the famous
Chicago/Gerg
> > "limp dick" test for speaker potency.
>
>
> Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here that
> doesn't think that I'm more capable of recognizing good sound than you?
> Show some honesty for a change.
>
I don't think there's anybody here that thinks you know much of anything
about good sound. If you did you would have used better drivers.

[dave weil]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:25:04 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy"
> wrote:

>> Sorry, Bruce, but do you really think that there's a man here that
>> doesn't think that I'm more capable of recognizing good sound than you?
>> Show some honesty for a change.
>>
>I don't think there's anybody here that thinks you know much of anything
>about good sound. If you did you would have used better drivers.

You keep saying this but you refuse to back up your comments
with...ummmm...facts.