A Question for Arny about the lawsuit

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[George M. Middius]

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

> You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
> However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
> What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

Yes, Arnii, and give us the amount in dollars, not broken-down
amplifiers and outdated sound cards.

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
> > You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
> > However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
> > What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?
>
> Yes, Arnii, and give us the amount in dollars, not broken-down
> amplifiers and outdated sound cards.
>
He'll try to pay off in ABX rentals.

[Lionel]

Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

> You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
> However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
> What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?
>
>

Sockpuppet Yustabe,
You are a son of a bitch and nobody is interested in your ****ing questions.
We all know that you have too much knowledge about pedophilie to be
really honest.
I suspect that you and your friend George M. Middius are 2 pedophiles
and that you use to prostitute young boys and girls... Someone says that
you are specialized in young girls and that Middius is saving pretty
yong boys for him...

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:
>
> > You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
> > However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
> > What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?
> >
> >
>
> Sockpuppet Yustabe,
> You are a son of a bitch and nobody is interested in your ****ing
questions.
> We all know that you have too much knowledge about pedophilie to be
> really honest.
> I suspect that you and your friend George M. Middius are 2 pedophiles
> and that you use to prostitute young boys and girls... Someone says that
> you are specialized in young girls and that Middius is saving pretty
> yong boys for him...
>

I am not that bad.
I lock the girls in the basement but I don't touch them until they turn
"at least" eighteen.
I Yustabe Slim, I did not Yustabe Apimp.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[S888Wheel]

>
>You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
>However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
>What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number. General damages
will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury. They are both
limmited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limmited lawsuit. The judge can also
award my costs on top of everything else.

[Robert Morein]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >
> >You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
> >However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
> >What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?
>
> it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number. General
damages
> will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury. They are both
> limmited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limmited lawsuit. The judge can
also
> award my costs on top of everything else.

What will you do with your winnings?
Pig out on offerings by Jupiter Audio?

[Arny Krueger]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message


>> You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
>> However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
>> What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

> it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number.

I'm sure that sockpuppet wheel wipes his butt with $5,000 checks.

> General
> damages will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury.
> They are both limited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limited
> lawsuit. The judge can also award my costs on top of everything else.

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have female-sounding
first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion. These
persons no doubt were invited by the filer to see the statement for the
purpose of creating the appearance that there was damage to some person's
reputation. Thus, we have evidence that the filer asked female family
members to view sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of
obtaining $5,000.

The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
03E03776.

[Robert Morein]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>
>
> >> You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
> >> However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
> >> What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?
>
> > it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number.
>
> I'm sure that sockpuppet wheel wipes his butt with $5,000 checks.
>
> > General
> > damages will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury.
> > They are both limited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limited
> > lawsuit. The judge can also award my costs on top of everything else.
>
> The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
female-sounding
> first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
> claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
> and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion. These
> persons no doubt were invited by the filer to see the statement for the
> purpose of creating the appearance that there was damage to some person's
> reputation. Thus, we have evidence that the filer asked female family
> members to view sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of
> obtaining $5,000.
>
> The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
> personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
> AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
> available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
> 03E03776.
>
Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
seeing the document.

[Arny Krueger]

"Robert Morein" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>>> You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
>>>> However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
>>>> What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?
>>
>>> it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number.
>>
>> I'm sure that sockpuppet wheel wipes his butt with $5,000 checks.
>>
>>> General
>>> damages will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury.
>>> They are both limited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limited
>>> lawsuit. The judge can also award my costs on top of everything
>>> else.
>>
>> The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
>> female-sounding first names and the same last name as the person who
>> filed. The lawsuit claims that the purportedly damaging statement
>> was seen by those persons, and also states that the statement refers
>> to a sexual perversion. These persons no doubt were invited by the
>> filer to see the statement for the purpose of creating the
>> appearance that there was damage to some person's reputation. Thus,
>> we have evidence that the filer asked female family members to view
>> sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of obtaining
>> $5,000.
>>
>> The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to
>> the personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court
>> record, and AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it
>> should be available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The
>> case number is 03E03776.
>>
> Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
> seeing the document.

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/civilCaseSummary/index.asp?CaseType=Civil

[dave weil]

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:06:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>
>The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
>personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
>AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
>available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
>03E03776.

So, he's gotten you to start spending money.

Cool.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:

> > The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have female-sounding
> > first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
> > claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
> > and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion.

> Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
> seeing the document.

There is nothing stopping Turdy from posting the entire lawsuit
verbatim on this or any other site. A lawsuit is a matter of public
record. Krooger's being cagy and elliptical about the contents of the
suit is bizarre.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:
>
> > > The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
female-sounding
> > > first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The
lawsuit
> > > claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those
persons,
> > > and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion.
>
> > Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
> > seeing the document.
>
> There is nothing stopping Turdy from posting the entire lawsuit
> verbatim on this or any other site. A lawsuit is a matter of public
> record. Krooger's being cagy and elliptical about the contents of the
> suit is bizarre.
>

Arny posted an erroneous reference number for the suit.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[S888Wheel]

>
>What will you do with your winnings?
>Pig out on offerings by Jupiter Audio?
>

I will buy some records and tube gear in honor of Arny and donate the rest to
some sort of abuse center.

[S888Wheel]

>The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have female-sounding
>first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
>claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
>and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion. These
>persons no doubt were invited by the filer to see the statement for the
>purpose of creating the appearance that
>there was damage to some person's
>reputation. Thus, we have evidence that the filer asked female family
>members to view sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of
>obtaining $5,000.

Again Arny fantasizes about my family. His fantasies are obviously rather lurid
and sick and in no way represent reality. Interestingly, he does acknowledge
that he is posting material on Usenet that is not suitable for women and
children even though they have full access to it. I'm sure his family would be
proud of him if they knew. what do you want to bet arny has kept the content of
the libelous post a secret from his family?

Arny said

>
>The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
>personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
>AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
>available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
>03E03776.

You are a fool. you think that a complaint against your libel will hurt my
reputation. Have you shown the complaint to anyone in your family Arny or are
you ashamed of it?

[S888Wheel]

>
>Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
>seeing the document.
>

Just ask me. If Arny is OK with it I'll send you a copy of the complaint.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:06:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to
>> the personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court
>> record, and AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it
>> should be available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The
>> case number is 03E03776.

Correction - I was typing under insufficeint light and the stamp was not
properly inked: 03E08776.

> So, he's gotten you to start spending money.

Nope, not at all.

> Cool.

You've proven your stupidity and bad will again, Weil. Way to go, little
guy!

[Arny Krueger]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message


> You are a fool.

Perhaps, but I don't want to get into a contest with you over who is the
biggest fool. You just might win.

> you think that a complaint against your libel will hurt my reputation.

It already has.

> Have you shown the complaint to anyone in your
> family Arny or are you ashamed of it?

Tell you what sockpuppet Wheel. You tell me about your family and I'll
consider telling you about my family.

[dave weil]

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:00:43 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"dave weil" > wrote in message

>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:06:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to
>>> the personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court
>>> record, and AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it
>>> should be available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The
>>> case number is 03E03776.
>
>Correction - I was typing under insufficeint light and the stamp was not
>properly inked: 03E08776.

IOW - the paper lied to you.

[Bruce J. Richman]

George M. Middius wrote:


>Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:
>
>> > The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
>female-sounding
>> > first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
>> > claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
>> > and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion.
>
>> Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
>> seeing the document.
>
>There is nothing stopping Turdy from posting the entire lawsuit
>verbatim on this or any other site. A lawsuit is a matter of public
>record. Krooger's being cagy and elliptical about the contents of the
>suit is bizarre.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Not only that, but he's also, quite predictably, trying to promote yet another
paranoid conspiracy theory. In this one, he claims, without any proof of
course, that Mr. Wheeler deliberately "invited" his family to view the libelous
comments that Krueger made about him. As usual, no evidence is presented to
support this claim.



Bruce J. Richman

[S888Wheel]

>
>Tell you what sockpuppet Wheel. You tell me about your family and I'll
>consider telling you about my family.

Why do you want to know about my family arny? So you can construct more
detailed fantasies about them to ease the pain of your miserable existance, the
life of a chronic underachiever? I will not feed the mind of a sociopath with
information about my family. I have shown a number of family members my
complaint. they concur that you are a disgusting low life looser. Please tell
us what your family thinks of you should you ever show them what you have said
about me publicly on RAO. Obviously you haven't done so yet. i'm glad you have
some shame for your actions.

[Arny Krueger]

"S888Wheel" > revels in fantasies of pain inflicted on
others in message


>> Tell you what sockpuppet Wheel. You tell me about your family and
>> I'll consider telling you about my family.

> Why do you want to know about my family arny?

In the real world people talk about their families. But what would you know
about that?

>So you can construct
> more detailed fantasies about them to ease the pain of your miserable
> existence, the life of a chronic underachiever?

It very much appears sockpuppet wheel, that you want to construct a reality
in which my family lives in pain by causing financial loss. Is that more or
less morally objectionable than such fantasies that you might fantasize that
I would have?

> I will not feed the mind of a sociopath with information about my family.

In the real world, people who want to publicly revel in the real pain they
cause other people, are often called sociopath. That's you, here now today
sockpuppet wheel.

> I have shown a number of family members my complaint. they concur that
you are a
> disgusting low life looser.

I think that agreement within a family is a good thing. I'd hate for your
family to see you for what you have proven yourself to be, sockpuppet wheel.

>Please tell us what your family thinks of
> you should you ever show them what you have said about me publicly on
> RAO.

Thanks for proving once again that you want to revel in the real pain that
you think you can inflict on my family, sockpuppet wheel.

>Obviously you haven't done so yet.

That would be one of your fantasies, sockpuppet wheel. You're a lot less
dangerous to human life when you stick to fantasies.

> i'm glad you have some shame for your actions.

You've got that wrong. I'm ashamed of your reprehensible actions and
delusional behavior.

[Michael Mckelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
> >Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:
> >
> >> > The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
> >female-sounding
> >> > first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The
lawsuit
> >> > claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those
persons,
> >> > and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion.
> >
> >> Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
> >> seeing the document.
> >
> >There is nothing stopping Turdy from posting the entire lawsuit
> >verbatim on this or any other site. A lawsuit is a matter of public
> >record. Krooger's being cagy and elliptical about the contents of the
> >suit is bizarre.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Not only that, but he's also, quite predictably, trying to promote yet
another
> paranoid conspiracy theory. In this one, he claims, without any proof of
> course, that Mr. Wheeler deliberately "invited" his family to view the
libelous
> comments that Krueger made about him. As usual, no evidence is presented
to
> support this claim.
>
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>
>
As usual, you present nothing to support the claim that you are anythig more
than a beancounter who can't find his ass with both hands.

[Lionel]

S888Wheel wrote:

>>Tell you what sockpuppet Wheel. You tell me about your family and I'll
>>consider telling you about my family.
>
>
> Why do you want to know about my family arny? So you can construct more
> detailed fantasies about them to ease the pain of your miserable existance, the
> life of a chronic underachiever? I will not feed the mind of a sociopath with
> information about my family. I have shown a number of family members my
> complaint. they concur that you are a disgusting low life looser. Please tell
> us what your family thinks of you should you ever show them what you have said
> about me publicly on RAO. Obviously you haven't done so yet. i'm glad you have
> some shame for your actions.

For Mr. Scott Wheeler people who use to spend time on RAO are loosers...
Except people who support his lawsuit. ;-)

[S888Wheel]

Arny said

>
>>> Tell you what sockpuppet Wheel. You tell me about your family and
>>> I'll consider telling you about my family.

I said

>
>> Why do you want to know about my family arny?
>

Arny said

>
>In the real world people talk about their families. But what would you know
>about that?

I note that you cut itno my question and then chose not to answer it. In the
real world Arny, I choose to talk about my family from time to time with
friends and other family. I do not as a rule, talk about them on message boards
Frequented by sociopaths. That seems pretty normal to me.

I said

>
>>So you can construct
>> more detailed fantasies about them to ease the pain of your miserable
>> existence, the life of a chronic underachiever?

Arny said

>
>It very much appears sockpuppet wheel, that you want to construct a reality
>in which my family lives in pain by causing financial loss.

no Arny just you. It is called punishment. you have it comming. I feel sorry
for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry for the family of everyone who
is punished in court. I noticed that you still didn't answer the question
though. could it be beacuse I nailed the answer already? yep.

Arny said

> Is that more or
>less morally objectionable than such fantasies that you might fantasize that
>I would have?

Far less. your fantasies are a sign of gross sociopathic behavior. In most
legitimate lawsuits the family of the defendent suffers. I blame the defendent
for their causing the lawsuit to begin with.

I said

>
>> I will not feed the mind of a sociopath with information about my family.
>

Arny said

>
>In the real world,

As if you can speak of the real world. your real world exists on your computer.
you have a total disconnect with what most people see as the real world.

Arny said

>people who want to publicly revel in the real pain they
>cause other people, are often called sociopath. That's you, here now today
>sockpuppet wheel.

LOL talk about projecting. I suspect I will be able to present a stack of posts
an inch thick by you expressing a desire to see others suffer and a joy upon
seeing it. If you had any connection with the real world the thought of a jury
comprised of normal people, most if not all of whom would have had no exposure
to RAO or Usenet, reading the highlights of your lurid history on RAO while
contemplating punitive damages for libel would be quite unsettling. I wonder
how many people who have followed this lawsuit including yourself have taken a
moment to consider that.

I said

>
>> I have shown a number of family members my complaint. they concur that
>you are a
>> disgusting low life looser.
>

Arny said

>
>I think that agreement within a family is a good thing. I'd hate for your
>family to see you for what you have proven yourself to be, sockpuppet wheel.

They do. They are very proud of me. They continue to be disgusted by you.

I said

>
> >Please tell us what your family thinks of
>> you should you ever show them what you have said about me publicly on
>> RAO.

Arny said

>
>Thanks for proving once again that you want to revel in the real pain that
>you think you can inflict on my family, sockpuppet wheel.
>

You wrote the post. you are the one too ashamed to show them your handy work.
If *you* show them what *you* have done, then*you* would be the source of their
pain. But you missed the point. the point is you are too ashamed to show them
what you have done. That is your own creation. I feel would feel sorrry for
your family if they were to ever see what you do on RAO.

I said



>
>>Obviously you haven't done so yet.

Arny said

>
>That would be one of your fantasies, sockpuppet wheel. You're a lot less
>dangerous to human life when you stick to fantasies.
>

Arny, why didn't you just say that you were rubber and I am glue... At least be
original. You could try saying. "I know you are but what am I?" Arny I am not
fantasizing. I based it on what you said.

I said

>
>> i'm glad you have some shame for your actions.

Arny said

>
>You've got that wrong.

that may be, sociopaths don't feel shame do they. they keep secrets from their
family for more practical reasons.

Arny said

>I'm ashamed of your reprehensible actions and
>delusional behavior.

That's just crazy talk.

[Arny Krueger]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message

>>
>> It very much appears sockpuppet wheel, that you want to construct a
>> reality in which my family lives in pain by causing financial loss.

> no Arny just you.

"Arny made me do it".

> It is called punishment. you have it comming.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to me.

>I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry for the
> family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed that you still
> didn't answer the question though. could it be beacuse I nailed the
> answer already? yep.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.

> Arny said
>
>> Is that more or
>> less morally objectionable than such fantasies that you might
>> fantasize that I would have?

> Far less. your fantasies are a sign of gross sociopathic behavior. In
> most legitimate lawsuits the family of the defendent suffers. I blame
> the defendent for their causing the lawsuit to begin with.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> I said
>
>>
>>> I will not feed the mind of a sociopath with information about my
>>> family.
>
> Arny said

>> In the real world,

> As if you can speak of the real world. your real world exists on your
> computer. you have a total disconnect with what most people see as
> the real world.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> Arny said
>
>> people who want to publicly revel in the real pain they
>> cause other people, are often called sociopath. That's you, here now
>> today sockpuppet wheel.

> LOL talk about projecting.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


>I suspect I will be able to present a
> stack of posts an inch thick by you expressing a desire to see others
> suffer and a joy upon seeing it.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> If you had any connection with the
> real world the thought of a jury comprised of normal people, most if
> not all of whom would have had no exposure to RAO or Usenet, reading
> the highlights of your lurid history on RAO while contemplating
> punitive damages for libel would be quite unsettling. I wonder how
> many people who have followed this lawsuit including yourself have
> taken a moment to consider that.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> I said
>
>>
>>> I have shown a number of family members my complaint. they concur
>>> that
>> you are a
>>> disgusting low life looser.
>>
>
> Arny said
>
>>
>> I think that agreement within a family is a good thing. I'd hate
>> for your family to see you for what you have proven yourself to be,
>> sockpuppet wheel.

> They do. They are very proud of me. They continue to be disgusted by
> you.

Sounds like a family of sociopaths talking to tme.


> I said
>
>>
>>> Please tell us what your family thinks of
>>> you should you ever show them what you have said about me publicly
>>> on RAO.

> Arny said
>
>
>> Thanks for proving once again that you want to revel in the real
>> pain that you think you can inflict on my family, sockpuppet wheel.

> You wrote the post. you are the one too ashamed to show them your
> handy work.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> If *you* show them what *you* have done, then*you* would
> be the source of their pain.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> But you missed the point. the point is
> you are too ashamed to show them what you have done. That is your own
> creation. I feel would feel sorrry for your family if they were to
> ever see what you do on RAO.
>
> I said
>
>
>
>>
>>> Obviously you haven't done so yet.
>
> Arny said
>
>>
>> That would be one of your fantasies, sockpuppet wheel. You're a lot
>> less dangerous to human life when you stick to fantasies.
>
>
> Arny, why didn't you just say that you were rubber and I am glue...
> At least be original. You could try saying. "I know you are but what
> am I?" Arny I am not fantasizing. I based it on what you said.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> I said
>
>>
>>> i'm glad you have some shame for your actions.
>
> Arny said
>
>>
>> You've got that wrong.

> that may be, sociopaths don't feel shame do they.

You just contradicted yourself. Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.


> they keep secrets from their family for more practical reasons.

> Arny said
>
>> I'm ashamed of your reprehensible actions and
>> delusional behavior.
>
> That's just crazy talk.

Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>
> >>
>
> >I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry for the
> > family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed that you still
> > didn't answer the question though. could it be beacuse I nailed the
> > answer already? yep.
>
> Sounds like a sociopath talking to tme.
>

Hello! A sociopath has no conscience, he feels sorry
for nothing.

So, now we are redused to this: whover might criticize you, you
will call a sociopath.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message


> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...

>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>

>>> I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry for
>>> the family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed that you
>>> still didn't answer the question though. could it be beacuse I
>>> nailed the answer already? yep.

>> Sounds like a sociopath talking to me.

> Hello! A sociopath has no conscience, he feels sorry for nothing.

Right, and given that I've said that I feel sorry for some of the things
I've done, you just cut yourself and sockpuppet wheel off at the knees.
Thanks again!

> So, now we are redused to this: whover might criticize you, you
> will call a sociopath.

No, just the ones that are sociopaths, you nitwit!

Please satisfy my curiosity. What sort of job title do they give to nitwits
like you, sockpuppet Yustabe?

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>
>
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> > ...
>
> >> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
> >>
>
> >>> I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry for
> >>> the family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed that you
> >>> still didn't answer the question though. could it be beacuse I
> >>> nailed the answer already? yep.
>
> >> Sounds like a sociopath talking to me.
>
> > Hello! A sociopath has no conscience, he feels sorry for nothing.
>
> Right, and given that I've said that I feel sorry for some of the things
> I've done, you just cut yourself and sockpuppet wheel off at the knees.
> Thanks again!
>

I don't think that you really are sorry for anything.
Saying you are sorry is not being sorry.
To you, it's just another debating trade gimmick.


> > So, now we are redused to this: whover might criticize you, you
> > will call a sociopath.
>
> No, just the ones that are sociopaths, you nitwit!
>

In your mind!

> Please satisfy my curiosity. What sort of job title do they give to
nitwits
> like you, sockpuppet Yustabe?

Something a little more classy than "recipient
of a disability pension'.





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>
>>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>
>>>>> I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry for
>>>>> the family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed that
>>>>> you still didn't answer the question though. could it be beacuse I
>>>>> nailed the answer already? yep.
>>
>>>> Sounds like a sociopath talking to me.
>>
>>> Hello! A sociopath has no conscience, he feels sorry for nothing.
>>
>> Right, and given that I've said that I feel sorry for some of the
>> things I've done, you just cut yourself and sockpuppet wheel off at
>> the knees. Thanks again!
>>
>
> I don't think that you really are sorry for anything.
> Saying you are sorry is not being sorry.
> To you, it's just another debating trade gimmick.
>
>
>>> So, now we are redused to this: whover might criticize you, you
>>> will call a sociopath.
>>
>> No, just the ones that are sociopaths, you nitwit!
>>
>
> In your mind!
>
>> Please satisfy my curiosity. What sort of job title do they give to
nitwits
>> like you, sockpuppet Yustabe?
>
> Something a little more classy than "recipient
> of a disability pension'.

Quit poking fun at Middius and answer the question.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>
> >>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>
> >>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>
> >>>>> I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry for
> >>>>> the family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed that
> >>>>> you still didn't answer the question though. could it be beacuse I
> >>>>> nailed the answer already? yep.
> >>
> >>>> Sounds like a sociopath talking to me.
> >>
> >>> Hello! A sociopath has no conscience, he feels sorry for nothing.
> >>
> >> Right, and given that I've said that I feel sorry for some of the
> >> things I've done, you just cut yourself and sockpuppet wheel off at
> >> the knees. Thanks again!
> >>
> >
> > I don't think that you really are sorry for anything.
> > Saying you are sorry is not being sorry.
> > To you, it's just another debating trade gimmick.
> >
> >
> >>> So, now we are redused to this: whover might criticize you, you
> >>> will call a sociopath.
> >>
> >> No, just the ones that are sociopaths, you nitwit!
> >>
> >
> > In your mind!
> >
> >> Please satisfy my curiosity. What sort of job title do they give to
> nitwits
> >> like you, sockpuppet Yustabe?
> >
> > Something a little more classy than "recipient
> > of a disability pension'.
>
> Quit poking fun at Middius and answer the question.
>
>

Nitwits like me must score "at least" 140 on IQ tests.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>>
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry
>>>>>>> for the family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed
>>>>>>> that you still didn't answer the question though. could it be
>>>>>>> beacuse I nailed the answer already? yep.
>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like a sociopath talking to me.
>>>>
>>>>> Hello! A sociopath has no conscience, he feels sorry for nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Right, and given that I've said that I feel sorry for some of the
>>>> things I've done, you just cut yourself and sockpuppet wheel off at
>>>> the knees. Thanks again!
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think that you really are sorry for anything.
>>> Saying you are sorry is not being sorry.
>>> To you, it's just another debating trade gimmick.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> So, now we are redused to this: whover might criticize you, you
>>>>> will call a sociopath.
>>>>
>>>> No, just the ones that are sociopaths, you nitwit!
>>>>
>>>
>>> In your mind!
>>>
>>>> Please satisfy my curiosity. What sort of job title do they give to
>> nitwits
>>>> like you, sockpuppet Yustabe?
>>>
>>> Something a little more classy than "recipient
>>> of a disability pension'.
>>
>> Quit poking fun at Middius and answer the question.

> Nitwits like me must score "at least" 140 on IQ tests.

Again, an irrelevant comment. I guess you must have found an IQ test that
doesn't test people's ability to determine what is relevant or not. Come to
think of it, this problem has dogged you as long as you posted to RAO. No
known cure, AFAIK.

[S888Wheel]

>
>For Mr. Scott Wheeler people who use to spend time on RAO are loosers...
>Except people who support his lawsuit. ;-)
>

You become more and more like Krueger every day. Now you fantasize about me and
believe it.

[Lionel]

S888Wheel wrote:

>>For Mr. Scott Wheeler people who use to spend time on RAO are loosers...
>>Except people who support his lawsuit. ;-)
>>
>
>
> You become more and more like Krueger every day. Now you fantasize about me and
> believe it.
You are like Trotsky on the other thread...
You have sued Krueger like he has done his web site.
Both you are bragging that you are going to win. Reading you both it
looks like that you are speaking about the achievement of your life.
Like him you are a loser.
Like him your typhoon is just a fart !

Time is on my side... Mr. pianist, time is on my side.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
>
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>> "Sockpuppet Yustabe" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> I feel sorry for any pain it cuases your family. I feel sorry
> >>>>>>> for the family of everyone who is punished in court. I noticed
> >>>>>>> that you still didn't answer the question though. could it be
> >>>>>>> beacuse I nailed the answer already? yep.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Sounds like a sociopath talking to me.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello! A sociopath has no conscience, he feels sorry for nothing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Right, and given that I've said that I feel sorry for some of the
> >>>> things I've done, you just cut yourself and sockpuppet wheel off at
> >>>> the knees. Thanks again!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I don't think that you really are sorry for anything.
> >>> Saying you are sorry is not being sorry.
> >>> To you, it's just another debating trade gimmick.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> So, now we are redused to this: whover might criticize you, you
> >>>>> will call a sociopath.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, just the ones that are sociopaths, you nitwit!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> In your mind!
> >>>
> >>>> Please satisfy my curiosity. What sort of job title do they give to
> >> nitwits
> >>>> like you, sockpuppet Yustabe?
> >>>
> >>> Something a little more classy than "recipient
> >>> of a disability pension'.
> >>
> >> Quit poking fun at Middius and answer the question.
>
> > Nitwits like me must score "at least" 140 on IQ tests.
>
> Again, an irrelevant comment. I guess you must have found an IQ test that
> doesn't test people's ability to determine what is relevant or not. Come
to
> think of it, this problem has dogged you as long as you posted to RAO. No
> known cure, AFAIK.
>

Right, let's get back to your question. It was the equivilent of
"Are you still pimping your wife?"




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[Arny Krueger]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message


> Not only that, but he's also, quite predictably, trying to promote
> yet another paranoid conspiracy theory. In this one, he claims,
> without any proof of course, that Mr. Wheeler deliberately "invited"
> his family to view the libelous comments that Krueger made about him.
> As usual, no evidence is presented to support this claim.

Tell us Richman, do any members of your family other than yourself routinely
read RAO?