You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

Yes, Arnii, and give us the amount in dollars, not broken-down
amplifiers and outdated sound cards.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

Yes, Arnii, and give us the amount in dollars, not broken-down
amplifiers and outdated sound cards.

He'll try to pay off in ABX rentals.

Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?



Sockpuppet Yustabe,
You are a son of a bitch and nobody is interested in your ****ing questions.
We all know that you have too much knowledge about pedophilie to be
really honest.
I suspect that you and your friend George M. Middius are 2 pedophiles
and that you use to prostitute young boys and girls... Someone says that
you are specialized in young girls and that Middius is saving pretty
yong boys for him...

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Sockpuppet Yustabe wrote:

You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?



Sockpuppet Yustabe,
You are a son of a bitch and nobody is interested in your ****ing
questions.
We all know that you have too much knowledge about pedophilie to be
really honest.
I suspect that you and your friend George M. Middius are 2 pedophiles
and that you use to prostitute young boys and girls... Someone says that
you are specialized in young girls and that Middius is saving pretty
yong boys for him...


I am not that bad.
I lock the girls in the basement but I don't touch them until they turn
"at least" eighteen.
I Yustabe Slim, I did not Yustabe Apimp.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number. General damages
will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury. They are both
limmited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limmited lawsuit. The judge can also
award my costs on top of everything else.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message
...

You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number. General
damages
will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury. They are both
limmited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limmited lawsuit. The judge can
also
award my costs on top of everything else.

What will you do with your winnings?
Pig out on offerings by Jupiter Audio?

What will you do with your winnings?
Pig out on offerings by Jupiter Audio?


I will buy some records and tube gear in honor of Arny and donate the rest to
some sort of abuse center.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number.

I'm sure that sockpuppet wheel wipes his butt with $5,000 checks.

General
damages will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury.
They are both limited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limited
lawsuit. The judge can also award my costs on top of everything else.

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have female-sounding
first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion. These
persons no doubt were invited by the filer to see the statement for the
purpose of creating the appearance that there was damage to some person's
reputation. Thus, we have evidence that the filer asked female family
members to view sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of
obtaining $5,000.

The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
03E03776.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"S888Wheel" wrote in message


You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number.

I'm sure that sockpuppet wheel wipes his butt with $5,000 checks.

General
damages will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury.
They are both limited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limited
lawsuit. The judge can also award my costs on top of everything else.

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
female-sounding
first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion. These
persons no doubt were invited by the filer to see the statement for the
purpose of creating the appearance that there was damage to some person's
reputation. Thus, we have evidence that the filer asked female family
members to view sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of
obtaining $5,000.

The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
03E03776.

Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
seeing the document.

"Robert Morein" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"S888Wheel" wrote in message


You have acknowledged that Wheeler has sued you for libel.
However, we don't know that amount for which he has sued.
What is the amount of damages that is claimed in his suit?

it was five thousand dollars but it is a meaningless number.

I'm sure that sockpuppet wheel wipes his butt with $5,000 checks.

General
damages will be decided by the judge. punitive damages go to a jury.
They are both limited to 10, 000 dollars. I filed as a limited
lawsuit. The judge can also award my costs on top of everything
else.

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
female-sounding first names and the same last name as the person who
filed. The lawsuit claims that the purportedly damaging statement
was seen by those persons, and also states that the statement refers
to a sexual perversion. These persons no doubt were invited by the
filer to see the statement for the purpose of creating the
appearance that there was damage to some person's reputation. Thus,
we have evidence that the filer asked female family members to view
sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of obtaining
$5,000.

The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to
the personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court
record, and AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it
should be available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The
case number is 03E03776.

Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
seeing the document.

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/civil...CaseType=Civil

Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have female-sounding
first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion.

Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
seeing the document.

There is nothing stopping Turdy from posting the entire lawsuit
verbatim on this or any other site. A lawsuit is a matter of public
record. Krooger's being cagy and elliptical about the contents of the
suit is bizarre.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
female-sounding
first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The
lawsuit
claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those
persons,
and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion.

Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
seeing the document.

There is nothing stopping Turdy from posting the entire lawsuit
verbatim on this or any other site. A lawsuit is a matter of public
record. Krooger's being cagy and elliptical about the contents of the
suit is bizarre.


Arny posted an erroneous reference number for the suit.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

George M. Middius wrote:


Robert Morein said to ****-for-Brains:

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have
female-sounding
first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion.

Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
seeing the document.

There is nothing stopping Turdy from posting the entire lawsuit
verbatim on this or any other site. A lawsuit is a matter of public
record. Krooger's being cagy and elliptical about the contents of the
suit is bizarre.









Not only that, but he's also, quite predictably, trying to promote yet another
paranoid conspiracy theory. In this one, he claims, without any proof of
course, that Mr. Wheeler deliberately "invited" his family to view the libelous
comments that Krueger made about him. As usual, no evidence is presented to
support this claim.



Bruce J. Richman

Can you provide us with contact info for the court? I am interested in
seeing the document.


Just ask me. If Arny is OK with it I'll send you a copy of the complaint.

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:06:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
03E03776.

So, he's gotten you to start spending money.

Cool.

"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:06:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to
the personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court
record, and AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it
should be available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The
case number is 03E03776.

Correction - I was typing under insufficeint light and the stamp was not
properly inked: 03E08776.

So, he's gotten you to start spending money.

Nope, not at all.

Cool.

You've proven your stupidity and bad will again, Weil. Way to go, little
guy!

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:00:43 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:06:05 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to
the personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court
record, and AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it
should be available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The
case number is 03E03776.

Correction - I was typing under insufficeint light and the stamp was not
properly inked: 03E08776.

IOW - the paper lied to you.

The lawsuit mentions three persons, two of whom seem to have female-sounding
first names and the same last name as the person who filed. The lawsuit
claims that the purportedly damaging statement was seen by those persons,
and also states that the statement refers to a sexual perversion. These
persons no doubt were invited by the filer to see the statement for the
purpose of creating the appearance that
there was damage to some person's
reputation. Thus, we have evidence that the filer asked female family
members to view sexually perverse written materials for the purpose of
obtaining $5,000.

Again Arny fantasizes about my family. His fantasies are obviously rather lurid
and sick and in no way represent reality. Interestingly, he does acknowledge
that he is posting material on Usenet that is not suitable for women and
children even though they have full access to it. I'm sure his family would be
proud of him if they knew. what do you want to bet arny has kept the content of
the libelous post a secret from his family?

Arny said


The text of this filing, if made public could be highly damaging to the
personal reputation of the person who filed it. It is a court record, and
AFAIK has not been suppressed by the court. Therefore it should be
available to any interested parties for a nominal fee. The case number is
03E03776.

You are a fool. you think that a complaint against your libel will hurt my
reputation. Have you shown the complaint to anyone in your family Arny or are
you ashamed of it?

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


You are a fool.

Perhaps, but I don't want to get into a contest with you over who is the
biggest fool. You just might win.

you think that a complaint against your libel will hurt my reputation.

It already has.

Have you shown the complaint to anyone in your
family Arny or are you ashamed of it?

Tell you what sockpuppet Wheel. You tell me about your family and I'll
consider telling you about my family.

Tell you what sockpuppet Wheel. You tell me about your family and I'll
consider telling you about my family.

Why do you want to know about my family arny? So you can construct more
detailed fantasies about them to ease the pain of your miserable existance, the
life of a chronic underachiever? I will not feed the mind of a sociopath with
information about my family. I have shown a number of family members my
complaint. they concur that you are a disgusting low life looser. Please tell
us what your family thinks of you should you ever show them what you have said
about me publicly on RAO. Obviously you haven't done so yet. i'm glad you have
some shame for your actions.