View Full Version : Arny's ABX device proven defective!
Robert Morein
October 10th 05, 04:39 AM
From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
"A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages can
be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to the
reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field of
the relay coil."
When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a frequency of
between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of the
tongues.
"However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely significant
on very low-level signal switching circuits."
Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire of
unscientific thought and sloppy design.
IN FULL:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
The choice of an electromechanical relay to be included in a low-level
signal circuit can be a crucial factor in determining the levels of
electrical noise within an application.
In basic terms, the electromechanical relay is a comparatively simple
component and when included in an application, it is somewhat governed by
its inherent operating characteristics.
When small DC or AC voltages are switched with electromechanical relays,
noise can be generated, causing possible corruption of the signals to be
switched due to heating and material effects.
Specific constructional techniques during the circuit design, along with a
careful selection of materials by manufacturers, can be employed in order
for such noise generation to be significantly lowered, if not completely
eliminated.
Electrical noise levels occur because of the unavoidability of transition
points between materials along the paths travelled by the signal.
The transition points are always a compromise between the practicalities of
the relay design, compared against an ideal electrical characteristic.
This is due to manufacturing requirements that dictate that the metal
connections are routed into the interior of the relay via sealed or moulded
glass entry points moulded into the metal casing.
To prevent mechanical stress between the glass insulation and the PIN
passing through it when the temperature changes, the coefficients of thermal
expansion of the two materials must be matched.
Unfortunately, this results in the use of contact materials that produce
noise voltages if heated.
The effective temperature differences largely depend on temperature
distribution within the relay and thereby on the relay construction and the
geometry of the connections.
Moreover, the manufacturers' datasheets only very rarely give information on
the thermo electromotive force of relays.
Bret Ludwig
October 10th 05, 05:02 AM
Robert Morein wrote:
> From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>
> "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages can
> be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to the
> reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field of
> the relay coil."
> When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a frequency of
> between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of the
> tongues.
>
> "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely significant
> on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>
> Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire of
> unscientific thought and sloppy design.
Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box anyway.
Robert Morein
October 10th 05, 05:10 AM
"Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Robert Morein wrote:
> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >
> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages
can
> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to
the
> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic
field of
> > the relay coil."
> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
frequency of
> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of
the
> > tongues.
> >
> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
significant
> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >
> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire
of
> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>
>
> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box anyway.
>
Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push it. Arny
should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
ScottW
October 10th 05, 06:28 AM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>
> "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages
> can
> be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to
> the
> reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field
> of
> the relay coil."
> When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a frequency
> of
> between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of
> the
> tongues.
>
> "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> significant
> on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>
> Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire of
> unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>
> IN FULL:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------------
> The choice of an electromechanical relay to be included in a low-level
> signal circuit can be a crucial factor in determining the levels of
> electrical noise within an application.
>
> In basic terms, the electromechanical relay is a comparatively simple
> component and when included in an application, it is somewhat governed by
> its inherent operating characteristics.
>
> When small DC or AC voltages are switched with electromechanical relays,
> noise can be generated, causing possible corruption of the signals to be
> switched due to heating and material effects.
>
> Specific constructional techniques during the circuit design, along with a
> careful selection of materials by manufacturers, can be employed in order
> for such noise generation to be significantly lowered, if not completely
> eliminated.
>
> Electrical noise levels occur because of the unavoidability of transition
> points between materials along the paths travelled by the signal.
>
> The transition points are always a compromise between the practicalities
> of
> the relay design, compared against an ideal electrical characteristic.
>
> This is due to manufacturing requirements that dictate that the metal
> connections are routed into the interior of the relay via sealed or
> moulded
> glass entry points moulded into the metal casing.
>
> To prevent mechanical stress between the glass insulation and the PIN
> passing through it when the temperature changes, the coefficients of
> thermal
> expansion of the two materials must be matched.
>
> Unfortunately, this results in the use of contact materials that produce
> noise voltages if heated.
>
> The effective temperature differences largely depend on temperature
> distribution within the relay and thereby on the relay construction and
> the
> geometry of the connections.
>
> Moreover, the manufacturers' datasheets only very rarely give information
> on
> the thermo electromotive force of relays.
Robert,
Do you have a clue as to what these guys mean when then mean "small signal"
?
Solar flares probably disrupt their measurements... do you have a problem
with solar flares adversely affecting your hi-fi?
When Middius farts... you may be experiencing power ripple for days.
George...try to contain yourself as Robert is contemplating his hi-fi
performance,
and don't even think about lighting one off again...poor Robert will be
toast. His relays will oscillate indefinitely.
ScottW
October 10th 05, 07:48 AM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>
> "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages
> can
> be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to
> the
> reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field
> of
> the relay coil."
> When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a frequency
> of
> between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of
> the
> tongues.
>
> "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> significant
> on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>
> Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire of
> unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>
> IN FULL:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------------
> The choice of an electromechanical relay to be included in a low-level
> signal circuit can be a crucial factor in determining the levels of
> electrical noise within an application.
>
> In basic terms, the electromechanical relay is a comparatively simple
> component and when included in an application, it is somewhat governed by
> its inherent operating characteristics.
>
> When small DC or AC voltages are switched with electromechanical relays,
> noise can be generated, causing possible corruption of the signals to be
> switched due to heating and material effects.
>
> Specific constructional techniques during the circuit design, along with a
> careful selection of materials by manufacturers, can be employed in order
> for such noise generation to be significantly lowered, if not completely
> eliminated.
>
> Electrical noise levels occur because of the unavoidability of transition
> points between materials along the paths travelled by the signal.
>
> The transition points are always a compromise between the practicalities
> of
> the relay design, compared against an ideal electrical characteristic.
>
> This is due to manufacturing requirements that dictate that the metal
> connections are routed into the interior of the relay via sealed or
> moulded
> glass entry points moulded into the metal casing.
>
> To prevent mechanical stress between the glass insulation and the PIN
> passing through it when the temperature changes, the coefficients of
> thermal
> expansion of the two materials must be matched.
>
> Unfortunately, this results in the use of contact materials that produce
> noise voltages if heated.
>
> The effective temperature differences largely depend on temperature
> distribution within the relay and thereby on the relay construction and
> the
> geometry of the connections.
>
> Moreover, the manufacturers' datasheets only very rarely give information
> on
> the thermo electromotive force of relays.
>
>
Now all you have to do is prove that this relay has an audible effect.
Do that and you actually score a point. Fail to do that and it's just more
piossing and whining, as usual.
Robert Morein
October 10th 05, 07:49 AM
"ScottW" > wrote in message
news:IZm2f.3104$jw6.966@lakeread02...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >
> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages
> > can
> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to
> > the
> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic
field
> > of
> > the relay coil."
> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
frequency
> > of
> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of
> > the
> > tongues.
> >
> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> > significant
> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >
> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire
of
> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
> >
> > IN FULL:
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > The choice of an electromechanical relay to be included in a low-level
> > signal circuit can be a crucial factor in determining the levels of
> > electrical noise within an application.
> >
> > In basic terms, the electromechanical relay is a comparatively simple
> > component and when included in an application, it is somewhat governed
by
> > its inherent operating characteristics.
> >
> > When small DC or AC voltages are switched with electromechanical relays,
> > noise can be generated, causing possible corruption of the signals to be
> > switched due to heating and material effects.
> >
> > Specific constructional techniques during the circuit design, along with
a
> > careful selection of materials by manufacturers, can be employed in
order
> > for such noise generation to be significantly lowered, if not completely
> > eliminated.
> >
> > Electrical noise levels occur because of the unavoidability of
transition
> > points between materials along the paths travelled by the signal.
> >
> > The transition points are always a compromise between the practicalities
> > of
> > the relay design, compared against an ideal electrical characteristic.
> >
> > This is due to manufacturing requirements that dictate that the metal
> > connections are routed into the interior of the relay via sealed or
> > moulded
> > glass entry points moulded into the metal casing.
> >
> > To prevent mechanical stress between the glass insulation and the PIN
> > passing through it when the temperature changes, the coefficients of
> > thermal
> > expansion of the two materials must be matched.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this results in the use of contact materials that produce
> > noise voltages if heated.
> >
> > The effective temperature differences largely depend on temperature
> > distribution within the relay and thereby on the relay construction and
> > the
> > geometry of the connections.
> >
> > Moreover, the manufacturers' datasheets only very rarely give
information
> > on
> > the thermo electromotive force of relays.
>
> Robert,
> Do you have a clue as to what these guys mean when then mean "small
signal"
Yes, Scott, I do.
October 10th 05, 07:49 AM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>>
>> Robert Morein wrote:
>> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>> >
>> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
>> > voltages
> can
>> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to
> the
>> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic
> field of
>> > the relay coil."
>> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
> frequency of
>> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of
> the
>> > tongues.
>> >
>> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> significant
>> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>> >
>> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire
> of
>> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box anyway.
>>
> Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push it. Arny
> should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
>
>
And you should have spent yours in school instead of court, fighting a
losing battle.
Robert Morein
October 10th 05, 08:45 AM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> > oups.com...
> >>
> >> Robert Morein wrote:
> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >> >
> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
> >> > voltages
> > can
> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according
to
> > the
> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic
> > field of
> >> > the relay coil."
> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
> > frequency of
> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency
of
> > the
> >> > tongues.
> >> >
> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> > significant
> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >> >
> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
quagmire
> > of
> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box anyway.
> >>
> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push it. Arny
> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
> >
> >
What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college, and the
like?
Robert Morein
October 10th 05, 11:58 AM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
[snip]
> >
> Now all you have to do is prove that this relay has an audible effect.
> Do that and you actually score a point. Fail to do that and it's just
more
> piossing and whining, as usual.
>
No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the flow of
audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
Arny Krueger
October 10th 05, 04:28 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>
> "A further noise variable that can specifically affect
> small AC voltages can be observed with reed contacts and
> with relays constructed according to the reed principle -
> designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field
> of the relay coil."
> When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
> with a frequency of between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to
> the inherent resonant frequency of the tongues.
>
> "However a typical level for standard contacts can be
> extremely significant on very low-level signal switching
> circuits."
> Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in
> the quagmire of unscientific thought and sloppy design.
The unscientific thought here would be assuming that if
something could happen (which is all the article says) it
did happen and adversely affected the performance of the
equipment.
The article says:
"A further noise variable that can..."
"However a typical level for standard contacts can..."
And it also says that:
"When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
with a frequency of between 2 and 3kHz..."
The potential logical problem with the word "can" is
illustated by the following true statement:
"At almost any time a car's tire can spontaneously deflate
rapidly ("Blown tire") and throw the car out of control."
This is of course a true statement. However tires don't blow
and cars don't out of control every time we drive them.
These days blown tires are rare.
Just because something can happen, doesn't mean that it
always happens.
So, as usual Robert Morien is using bad logic to attack the
ABX RM-2 Compartor which I partially designed. His bad logic
involves trating an article about things that can happen, as
if it describes something that always happen.s
Why the indicated problem did not impact the ABX RM-2
comparator is hinted at in the article Robvert citted. That
article says:
"When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
with a frequency of between 2 and 3kHz..."
In response to one of Robert's earlier attacks, I pointed
out that in accordance with Clark's JAES article about the
ABX comparator (which Robert should be familiar with) each
switch-over involved a complex sequence of contact openings
and closings.
Had Robert actually done his homework and become familiar
with the AES ABX article he would know the details of those
contact openings and closings. It trurns out that the last
step of the complex series of relay contact openings and
closing was in fact a set of contacts opening. Therefore,
problems with contacts closing were obviated by the fact
that thoughout the witchover operation there was always one
critical set of relay contacts that had been closed for
quite some time, that shorted out any and all signals
whether internal or external, and that opened, not closed
during the last step in the operation.
October 10th 05, 07:33 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
>> > oups.com...
>> >>
>> >> Robert Morein wrote:
>> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>> >> >
>> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
>> >> > voltages
>> > can
>> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according
> to
>> > the
>> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic
>> > field of
>> >> > the relay coil."
>> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
>> > frequency of
>> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency
> of
>> > the
>> >> > tongues.
>> >> >
>> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
>> > significant
>> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>> >> >
>> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
> quagmire
>> > of
>> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box anyway.
>> >>
>> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push it.
>> > Arny
>> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
>> >
>> >
> What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college, and
> the
> like?
>
>
Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh about your
incompetence?
Robert Morein
October 10th 05, 09:24 PM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> >> > oups.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
> >> >> > voltages
> >> > can
> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
according
> > to
> >> > the
> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
magnetic
> >> > field of
> >> >> > the relay coil."
> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
> >> > frequency of
> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
frequency
> > of
> >> > the
> >> >> > tongues.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> >> > significant
> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
> > quagmire
> >> > of
> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box anyway.
> >> >>
> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push it.
> >> > Arny
> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
> >> >
> >> >
> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college, and
> > the
> > like?
> >
> >
> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh about your
> incompetence?
>
I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
October 10th 05, 09:43 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
> [snip]
>> >
>> Now all you have to do is prove that this relay has an audible effect.
>> Do that and you actually score a point. Fail to do that and it's just
> more
>> ****ing and whining, as usual.
>>
> No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the flow
> of
> audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
>
That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted by
those in the field of audio research.
You are the one making the claim that the device is masking something or
somehow defective, you have the burden of proving that is so.
Clyde Slick
October 10th 05, 10:20 PM
"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>
>> From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>>
>> "A further noise variable that can specifically affect
>> small AC voltages can be observed with reed contacts and
>> with relays constructed according to the reed principle -
>> designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field
>> of the relay coil."
>> When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
>> with a frequency of between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to
>> the inherent resonant frequency of the tongues.
>>
>> "However a typical level for standard contacts can be
>> extremely significant on very low-level signal switching
>> circuits."
>
>> Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in
>> the quagmire of unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>
> The unscientific thought here would be assuming that if something could
> happen (which is all the article says) it did happen and adversely
> affected the performance of the equipment.
>
> The article says:
>
> "A further noise variable that can..."
>
> "However a typical level for standard contacts can..."
>
> And it also says that:
>
> "When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a frequency
> of between 2 and 3kHz..."
>
> The potential logical problem with the word "can" is illustated by the
> following true statement:
>
> "At almost any time a car's tire can spontaneously deflate rapidly ("Blown
> tire") and throw the car out of control."
>
> This is of course a true statement. However tires don't blow and cars
> don't out of control every time we drive them. These days blown tires are
> rare.
>
> Just because something can happen, doesn't mean that it always happens.
>
> So, as usual Robert Morien is using bad logic to attack the ABX RM-2
> Compartor which I partially designed. His bad logic involves trating an
> article about things that can happen, as if it describes something that
> always happen.s
>
Considering how much time you spend on the "can",
Mr ****, we will grant your expertise on that particular word.
Clyde Slick
October 10th 05, 10:21 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
>> >> > oups.com...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
>> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
>> >> >> > voltages
>> >> > can
>> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
> according
>> > to
>> >> > the
>> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
> magnetic
>> >> > field of
>> >> >> > the relay coil."
>> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
>> >> > frequency of
>> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
> frequency
>> > of
>> >> > the
>> >> >> > tongues.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
>> >> > significant
>> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
>> > quagmire
>> >> > of
>> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box
>> >> >> anyway.
>> >> >>
>> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push it.
>> >> > Arny
>> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college,
>> > and
>> > the
>> > like?
>> >
>> >
>> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
>> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh about
>> your
>> incompetence?
>>
> I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
>
>
how many Bobs can fit on the head of a pin?
or, inside a pinhead?
Clyde Slick
October 10th 05, 10:25 PM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the flow
>> of
>> audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
>>
>That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted by
>those in the field of audio research.
>
He is talking about a particular machine right now, not about
DBT methodology
Robert Morein
October 10th 05, 10:37 PM
"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> >> >> > oups.com...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
> >> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
> >> >> >> > voltages
> >> >> > can
> >> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
> > according
> >> > to
> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
> > magnetic
> >> >> > field of
> >> >> >> > the relay coil."
> >> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
> >> >> > frequency of
> >> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
> > frequency
> >> > of
> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > tongues.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> >> >> > significant
> >> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
> >> > quagmire
> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box
> >> >> >> anyway.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push
it.
> >> >> > Arny
> >> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college,
> >> > and
> >> > the
> >> > like?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
> >> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh about
> >> your
> >> incompetence?
> >>
> > I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
> >
> >
>
> how many Bobs can fit on the head of a pin?
> or, inside a pinhead?
>
I think Mikey is hearing alot of voices right now.
October 11th 05, 12:06 AM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
>> >> > oups.com...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
>> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
>> >> >> > voltages
>> >> > can
>> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
> according
>> > to
>> >> > the
>> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
> magnetic
>> >> > field of
>> >> >> > the relay coil."
>> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
>> >> > frequency of
>> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
> frequency
>> > of
>> >> > the
>> >> >> > tongues.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
>> >> > significant
>> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
>> > quagmire
>> >> > of
>> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box
>> >> >> anyway.
>> >> >>
>> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push it.
>> >> > Arny
>> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college,
>> > and
>> > the
>> > like?
>> >
>> >
>> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
>> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh about
>> your
>> incompetence?
>>
> I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
>
>
Prove that an ABX box masks any differences.
Prove that ABX is not a valid protocol.
October 11th 05, 12:08 AM
"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>
>>> No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the flow
>>> of
>>> audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
>>>
>
>>That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted by
>>those in the field of audio research.
>>
>
> He is talking about a particular machine right now, not about
> DBT methodology
>
>
He's BEEN talking about both.
He can prove nothing about either.
The ABX box doesn't color the sound or mask any differnces.
The protocol is widely used in everyday audio research precisely because it
does reveal differences, WHEN THEY EXIST.
Robert Morein
October 11th 05, 04:45 AM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> >> >> > oups.com...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
> >> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC
> >> >> >> > voltages
> >> >> > can
> >> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
> > according
> >> > to
> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
> > magnetic
> >> >> > field of
> >> >> >> > the relay coil."
> >> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a
> >> >> > frequency of
> >> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
> > frequency
> >> > of
> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > tongues.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> >> >> > significant
> >> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
> >> > quagmire
> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box
> >> >> >> anyway.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push
it.
> >> >> > Arny
> >> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college,
> >> > and
> >> > the
> >> > like?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
> >> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh about
> >> your
> >> incompetence?
> >>
> > I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
> >
> >
> Prove that an ABX box masks any differences.
> Prove that ABX is not a valid protocol.
>
I am your conscience, Mikey. ABX is very bad. Very bad, Mikey.
Robert Morein
October 11th 05, 04:48 AM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>>
> >
> >>> No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the
flow
> >>> of
> >>> audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
> >>>
> >
> >>That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted by
> >>those in the field of audio research.
> >>
> >
> > He is talking about a particular machine right now, not about
> > DBT methodology
> >
> >
> He's BEEN talking about both.
>
> He can prove nothing about either.
>
> The ABX box doesn't color the sound or mask any differnces.
Yes it dies.
> The protocol is widely used in everyday audio research precisely because
it
> does reveal differences, WHEN THEY EXIST.
>
While ABX may be a useful tool for investigation of Hindi phonemes, it has
not become the primary tool for designers of high end equipment. Sighted
testing is commonly used.
October 11th 05, 05:54 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>
> "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages
> can
> be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to
> the
> reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field
> of
> the relay coil."
> When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a frequency
> of
> between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of
> the
> tongues.
>
> "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
> significant
> on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>
> Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire of
> unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>
So you still can't prove that there is any AUDIBLE problem with the relay.
Is there anything you CAN prove?
I mean aside from the fact that you are an idiot.
> IN FULL:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------------------
> The choice of an electromechanical relay to be included in a low-level
> signal circuit can be a crucial factor in determining the levels of
> electrical noise within an application.
>
> In basic terms, the electromechanical relay is a comparatively simple
> component and when included in an application, it is somewhat governed by
> its inherent operating characteristics.
>
> When small DC or AC voltages are switched with electromechanical relays,
> noise can be generated, causing possible corruption of the signals to be
> switched due to heating and material effects.
>
> Specific constructional techniques during the circuit design, along with a
> careful selection of materials by manufacturers, can be employed in order
> for such noise generation to be significantly lowered, if not completely
> eliminated.
>
> Electrical noise levels occur because of the unavoidability of transition
> points between materials along the paths travelled by the signal.
>
> The transition points are always a compromise between the practicalities
> of
> the relay design, compared against an ideal electrical characteristic.
>
> This is due to manufacturing requirements that dictate that the metal
> connections are routed into the interior of the relay via sealed or
> moulded
> glass entry points moulded into the metal casing.
>
> To prevent mechanical stress between the glass insulation and the PIN
> passing through it when the temperature changes, the coefficients of
> thermal
> expansion of the two materials must be matched.
>
> Unfortunately, this results in the use of contact materials that produce
> noise voltages if heated.
>
> The effective temperature differences largely depend on temperature
> distribution within the relay and thereby on the relay construction and
> the
> geometry of the connections.
>
> Moreover, the manufacturers' datasheets only very rarely give information
> on
> the thermo electromotive force of relays.
>
>
October 11th 05, 05:54 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > link.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
>> >> >> > oups.com...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
>> >> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small
>> >> >> >> > AC
>> >> >> >> > voltages
>> >> >> > can
>> >> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
>> > according
>> >> > to
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
>> > magnetic
>> >> >> > field of
>> >> >> >> > the relay coil."
>> >> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with
>> >> >> >> > a
>> >> >> > frequency of
>> >> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
>> > frequency
>> >> > of
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > tongues.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be
>> >> >> >> > extremely
>> >> >> > significant
>> >> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the
>> >> > quagmire
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box
>> >> >> >> anyway.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push
> it.
>> >> >> > Arny
>> >> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend college,
>> >> > and
>> >> > the
>> >> > like?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
>> >> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh about
>> >> your
>> >> incompetence?
>> >>
>> > I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
>> >
>> >
>> Prove that an ABX box masks any differences.
>> Prove that ABX is not a valid protocol.
>>
> I am your conscience, Mikey. ABX is very bad. Very bad, Mikey.
>
That must be why it is the sthandard for subtle difference detection.
October 11th 05, 05:55 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >>>
>> >
>> >>> No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the
> flow
>> >>> of
>> >>> audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
>> >>>
>> >
>> >>That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted by
>> >>those in the field of audio research.
>> >>
>> >
>> > He is talking about a particular machine right now, not about
>> > DBT methodology
>> >
>> >
>> He's BEEN talking about both.
>>
>> He can prove nothing about either.
>>
>> The ABX box doesn't color the sound or mask any differnces.
>
> Yes it dies.
>> The protocol is widely used in everyday audio research precisely because
> it
>> does reveal differences, WHEN THEY EXIST.
>>
> While ABX may be a useful tool for investigation of Hindi phonemes, it has
> not become the primary tool for designers of high end equipment. Sighted
> testing is commonly used.
>
Only by those that aren't doing anything original, and are relying on
previous work by other actual engineers.
Robert Morein
October 11th 05, 08:09 PM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >> >>> No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control the
> > flow
> >> >>> of
> >> >>> audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >> >>That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted
by
> >> >>those in the field of audio research.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > He is talking about a particular machine right now, not about
> >> > DBT methodology
> >> >
> >> >
> >> He's BEEN talking about both.
> >>
> >> He can prove nothing about either.
> >>
> >> The ABX box doesn't color the sound or mask any differnces.
> >
> > Yes it dies.
> >> The protocol is widely used in everyday audio research precisely
because
> > it
> >> does reveal differences, WHEN THEY EXIST.
> >>
> > While ABX may be a useful tool for investigation of Hindi phonemes, it
has
> > not become the primary tool for designers of high end equipment. Sighted
> > testing is commonly used.
> >
> Only by those that aren't doing anything original, and are relying on
> previous work by other actual engineers.
>
Sorry, Mikey. This is not true.
Robert Morein
October 11th 05, 08:11 PM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
[snip]
> So you still can't prove that there is any AUDIBLE problem with the relay.
> Is there anything you CAN prove?
> I mean aside from the fact that you are an idiot.
>
Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to understand
the wisdom of the Krell.
Robert Morein
October 11th 05, 08:12 PM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> >> > link.net...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> >> >> >> > oups.com...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small
> >> >> >> >> > AC
> >> >> >> >> > voltages
> >> >> >> > can
> >> >> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
> >> > according
> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
> >> > magnetic
> >> >> >> > field of
> >> >> >> >> > the relay coil."
> >> >> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
with
> >> >> >> >> > a
> >> >> >> > frequency of
> >> >> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
> >> > frequency
> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> >> > tongues.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be
> >> >> >> >> > extremely
> >> >> >> > significant
> >> >> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in
the
> >> >> > quagmire
> >> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box
> >> >> >> >> anyway.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who push
> > it.
> >> >> >> > Arny
> >> >> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend
college,
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > like?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
> >> >> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh
about
> >> >> your
> >> >> incompetence?
> >> >>
> >> > I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Prove that an ABX box masks any differences.
> >> Prove that ABX is not a valid protocol.
> >>
> > I am your conscience, Mikey. ABX is very bad. Very bad, Mikey.
> >
> That must be why it is the sthandard for subtle difference detection.
>
Sorry, Mikey, it is completely ignored by 20,000,000 consumers for subtle
detection of audio quality.
October 11th 05, 09:39 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > link.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> >> > link.net...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > oups.com...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect
>> >> >> >> >> > small
>> >> >> >> >> > AC
>> >> >> >> >> > voltages
>> >> >> >> > can
>> >> >> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed
>> >> > according
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the
>> >> > magnetic
>> >> >> >> > field of
>> >> >> >> >> > the relay coil."
>> >> >> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
> with
>> >> >> >> >> > a
>> >> >> >> > frequency of
>> >> >> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant
>> >> > frequency
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> > tongues.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be
>> >> >> >> >> > extremely
>> >> >> >> > significant
>> >> >> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in
> the
>> >> >> > quagmire
>> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his box
>> >> >> >> >> anyway.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who
>> >> >> >> > push
>> > it.
>> >> >> >> > Arny
>> >> >> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend
> college,
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > like?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
>> >> >> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh
> about
>> >> >> your
>> >> >> incompetence?
>> >> >>
>> >> > I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> Prove that an ABX box masks any differences.
>> >> Prove that ABX is not a valid protocol.
>> >>
>> > I am your conscience, Mikey. ABX is very bad. Very bad, Mikey.
>> >
>> That must be why it is the sthandard for subtle difference detection.
>>
> Sorry, Mikey, it is completely ignored by 20,000,000 consumers for subtle
> detection of audio quality.
>
Then why don't you ignore it as wll?
Why does a reliable methodology for detecting difference bother you so much?
Why do you consistently lie that it is not a standard for audio research?
ITU BS 1116-1
October 11th 05, 09:40 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > link.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >
>> >> >>> No I don't. You advocate using a complicated machine to control
>> >> >>> the
>> > flow
>> >> >>> of
>> >> >>> audio. It is your burden to prove it works properly.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >
>> >> >>That burden has been met, that's why ABX is widely used and accepted
> by
>> >> >>those in the field of audio research.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > He is talking about a particular machine right now, not about
>> >> > DBT methodology
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> He's BEEN talking about both.
>> >>
>> >> He can prove nothing about either.
>> >>
>> >> The ABX box doesn't color the sound or mask any differnces.
>> >
>> > Yes it dies.
>> >> The protocol is widely used in everyday audio research precisely
> because
>> > it
>> >> does reveal differences, WHEN THEY EXIST.
>> >>
>> > While ABX may be a useful tool for investigation of Hindi phonemes, it
> has
>> > not become the primary tool for designers of high end equipment.
>> > Sighted
>> > testing is commonly used.
>> >
>> Only by those that aren't doing anything original, and are relying on
>> previous work by other actual engineers.
>>
> Sorry, Mikey. This is not true.
>
You're half right, you're sorry.
October 11th 05, 09:43 PM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> link.net...
> [snip]
>
>> So you still can't prove that there is any AUDIBLE problem with the
>> relay.
>> Is there anything you CAN prove?
>> I mean aside from the fact that you are an idiot.
>>
> Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to understand
> the wisdom of the Krell.
>
I understand that they know what it takes to builkd an amp that will pass a
signal without audible distortion and then build way beyond that, thus
making equipment that while in no way audibly superior to other competently
designed amplifers, will last for a very long time. Nothing wrong with
that, I just don't see the need when normally constructed gear can last
15-20 years without the overbuilding.
Robert Morein
October 11th 05, 10:36 PM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> > [snip]
> >
> >> So you still can't prove that there is any AUDIBLE problem with the
> >> relay.
> >> Is there anything you CAN prove?
> >> I mean aside from the fact that you are an idiot.
> >>
> > Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to
understand
> > the wisdom of the Krell.
> >
> I understand that they know what it takes to builkd an amp that will pass
a
> signal without audible distortion and then build way beyond that, thus
> making equipment that while in no way audibly superior to other
competently
> designed amplifers, will last for a very long time. Nothing wrong with
> that, I just don't see the need when normally constructed gear can last
> 15-20 years without the overbuilding.
>
Sorry, your small mind cannot absorb the wisdom of the Krell.
Bret Ludwig
October 12th 05, 04:56 AM
wrote:
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> > [snip]
> >
> >> So you still can't prove that there is any AUDIBLE problem with the
> >> relay.
> >> Is there anything you CAN prove?
> >> I mean aside from the fact that you are an idiot.
> >>
> > Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to understand
> > the wisdom of the Krell.
> >
> I understand that they know what it takes to builkd an amp that will pass a
> signal without audible distortion and then build way beyond that, thus
> making equipment that while in no way audibly superior to other competently
> designed amplifers, will last for a very long time. Nothing wrong with
> that, I just don't see the need when normally constructed gear can last
> 15-20 years without the overbuilding.
The Krells are unlikely to be champions of reliability. The high
dissipation means the transistors will probably last several years, but
because of Krell's refusal to make documentation generally available,
repair will likely require a lot of reverse engineering and likely as
not modification to use the available devices in 20 to 50 years. Class
B solid state amps probably will last longer without major rework, but
not sound quite as good.
Sander deWaal
October 12th 05, 05:35 PM
"Robert Morein" > said:
>Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to understand
>the wisdom of the Krell.
Recently, I watched an episode of "Star Trek - Enterprise" where a
certain Krell, a Klingon general, wasn't so wise at all.
Or were you thinking about the "Forbidden Planet" Krell? :-)
--
"Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes."
- Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005
October 12th 05, 07:20 PM
"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > said:
>
>>Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to understand
>>the wisdom of the Krell.
>
>
> Recently, I watched an episode of "Star Trek - Enterprise" where a
> certain Krell, a Klingon general, wasn't so wise at all.
>
> Or were you thinking about the "Forbidden Planet" Krell? :-)
>
> --
>
One of the more interesting takes on Shakespeare's The Tempest, don't you
think?
Now, what do you think of the offer of proof?
Robert Morein
October 12th 05, 11:25 PM
"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> "Robert Morein" > said:
>
> >Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to
understand
> >the wisdom of the Krell.
>
>
> Recently, I watched an episode of "Star Trek - Enterprise" where a
> certain Krell, a Klingon general, wasn't so wise at all.
>
> Or were you thinking about the "Forbidden Planet" Krell? :-)
>
Forbidden Planet.
While it is true that mere humans cannot absorb the wisdom of the Krell,
Mikey's inferior mind could not absorb the wisdom of a Krell domestic pet.
Mikey, don't worry, be happy.
October 13th 05, 12:56 AM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Robert Morein" > said:
>>
>> >Mikey, you have an inferior mind. It is not possible for you to
> understand
>> >the wisdom of the Krell.
>>
>>
>> Recently, I watched an episode of "Star Trek - Enterprise" where a
>> certain Krell, a Klingon general, wasn't so wise at all.
>>
>> Or were you thinking about the "Forbidden Planet" Krell? :-)
>>
> Forbidden Planet.
>
> While it is true that mere humans cannot absorb the wisdom of the Krell,
> Mikey's inferior mind could not absorb the wisdom of a Krell domestic pet.
>
> Mikey, don't worry, be happy.
>
>
Rollover, Bobbie.
Have some Kibble.
October 14th 05, 06:33 AM
" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>>
>> "A further noise variable that can specifically affect small AC voltages
>> can
>> be observed with reed contacts and with relays constructed according to
>> the
>> reed principle - designs with their contact springs in the magnetic field
>> of
>> the relay coil."
>> When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation with a frequency
>> of
>> between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent resonant frequency of
>> the
>> tongues.
>>
>> "However a typical level for standard contacts can be extremely
>> significant
>> on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>>
>> Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in the quagmire of
>> unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>>
>
>
> So you still can't prove that there is any AUDIBLE problem with the relay.
> Is there anything you CAN prove?
> I mean aside from the fact that you are an idiot.
>
>
>> IN FULL:
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> The choice of an electromechanical relay to be included in a low-level
>> signal circuit can be a crucial factor in determining the levels of
>> electrical noise within an application.
>>
>> In basic terms, the electromechanical relay is a comparatively simple
>> component and when included in an application, it is somewhat governed by
>> its inherent operating characteristics.
>>
>> When small DC or AC voltages are switched with electromechanical relays,
>> noise can be generated, causing possible corruption of the signals to be
>> switched due to heating and material effects.
>>
>> Specific constructional techniques during the circuit design, along with
>> a
>> careful selection of materials by manufacturers, can be employed in order
>> for such noise generation to be significantly lowered, if not completely
>> eliminated.
>>
>> Electrical noise levels occur because of the unavoidability of transition
>> points between materials along the paths travelled by the signal.
>>
>> The transition points are always a compromise between the practicalities
>> of
>> the relay design, compared against an ideal electrical characteristic.
>>
>> This is due to manufacturing requirements that dictate that the metal
>> connections are routed into the interior of the relay via sealed or
>> moulded
>> glass entry points moulded into the metal casing.
>>
>> To prevent mechanical stress between the glass insulation and the PIN
>> passing through it when the temperature changes, the coefficients of
>> thermal
>> expansion of the two materials must be matched.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this results in the use of contact materials that produce
>> noise voltages if heated.
>>
>> The effective temperature differences largely depend on temperature
>> distribution within the relay and thereby on the relay construction and
>> the
>> geometry of the connections.
>>
>> Moreover, the manufacturers' datasheets only very rarely give information
>> on
>> the thermo electromotive force of relays.
>>
>>
>
>
Desperation time for the audiophools, now they're forging posts in order to
deceive.
The simple facts are these:
Wire is wire.
Amplifiers contribute nothing to imaging, that's a funtion of teh recording
and the speakers.
ABX is the accepted standard for audio research into subtle differences.
It is a simple matter thse days to build auio equipment that is sonically
neutral, that is neither adds nor subtracts from the input signal.
An ABX box does not mask any differences.
Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several orders of magnitude more
distortion than CD's, which is not to say that there are not some really
awfull sounding CD's.
Global feedback is not something that makes amps inferior, but if to much is
used it will affect the way an amp clips.
Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and hearing impaired
reviewers on the planet working for them and they frequently endorse snake
oil.
Jenn
October 14th 05, 07:08 AM
In article . net>,
" > wrote:
<snip>
> Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several orders of magnitude more
> distortion than CD's <snip>
Yeah, but to many ears, they can sound so much better than most CDs. Go
figure.
October 14th 05, 08:18 AM
"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article . net>,
> " > wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several orders of magnitude
>> more
>> distortion than CD's <snip>
>
> Yeah, but to many ears, they can sound so much better than most CDs. Go
> figure.
Stranger things have been known to happen.
How else do you explain SET amps?
Arny Krueger
October 14th 05, 11:34 AM
"Jenn" > wrote in message
> In article
> . net>,
> " > wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several orders
>> of magnitude more distortion than CD's <snip>
>
> Yeah, but to many ears, they can sound so much better
> than most CDs. Go figure.
OK, so sentimentality is affecting your perceptions.
Clyde Slick
October 14th 05, 01:07 PM
"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>> In article
>> . net>,
>> " > wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several orders
>>> of magnitude more distortion than CD's <snip>
>>
>> Yeah, but to many ears, they can sound so much better
>> than most CDs. Go figure.
>
> OK, so sentimentality is affecting your perceptions.
Sentimentality has nothing to do with appreciating LP sound.
I'm sentimental for 78's, and they sound like ****.
Arny Krueger
October 14th 05, 02:05 PM
"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> . net>,
>>> " > wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several
>>>> orders of magnitude more distortion than CD's <snip>
>>>
>>> Yeah, but to many ears, they can sound so much better
>>> than most CDs. Go figure.
>>
>> OK, so sentimentality is affecting your perceptions.
>
> Sentimentality has nothing to do with appreciating LP
> sound. I'm sentimental for 78's, and they sound like ****.
Art, I'll bet money you can't figure out how these two
statements contradict each other.
Robert Morein
October 14th 05, 09:37 PM
" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > " > wrote in message
> > link.net...
> >>
> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> > link.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> >> > link.net...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > " > wrote in message
> >> >> >> > link.net...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
> >> >> >> >> >
oups.com...
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect
> >> >> >> >> >> > small
> >> >> >> >> >> > AC
> >> >> >> >> >> > voltages
> >> >> >> >> > can
> >> >> >> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays
constructed
> >> >> > according
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in
the
> >> >> > magnetic
> >> >> >> >> > field of
> >> >> >> >> >> > the relay coil."
> >> >> >> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
> > with
> >> >> >> >> >> > a
> >> >> >> >> > frequency of
> >> >> >> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent
resonant
> >> >> > frequency
> >> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> >> >> > tongues.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be
> >> >> >> >> >> > extremely
> >> >> >> >> > significant
> >> >> >> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught in
> > the
> >> >> >> > quagmire
> >> >> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his
box
> >> >> >> >> >> anyway.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who
> >> >> >> >> > push
> >> > it.
> >> >> >> >> > Arny
> >> >> >> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend
> > college,
> >> >> >> > and
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > like?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
> >> >> >> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh
> > about
> >> >> >> your
> >> >> >> incompetence?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> Prove that an ABX box masks any differences.
> >> >> Prove that ABX is not a valid protocol.
> >> >>
> >> > I am your conscience, Mikey. ABX is very bad. Very bad, Mikey.
> >> >
> >> That must be why it is the sthandard for subtle difference detection.
> >>
> > Sorry, Mikey, it is completely ignored by 20,000,000 consumers for
subtle
> > detection of audio quality.
> >
> Then why don't you ignore it as wll?
> Why does a reliable methodology for detecting difference bother you so
much?
> Why do you consistently lie that it is not a standard for audio research?
> ITU BS 1116-1
>
ITU BS = I Tella You Bull ****
October 15th 05, 12:11 AM
"Robert Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> " > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > " > wrote in message
>> > link.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> > link.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> >> > link.net...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > " > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > link.net...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> "Robert Morein" > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > "Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >> >
> oups.com...
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Robert Morein wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > From http://www.electronicstalk.com/news/mat/mat150.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > "A further noise variable that can specifically affect
>> >> >> >> >> >> > small
>> >> >> >> >> >> > AC
>> >> >> >> >> >> > voltages
>> >> >> >> >> > can
>> >> >> >> >> >> > be observed with reed contacts and with relays
> constructed
>> >> >> > according
>> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > reed principle - designs with their contact springs in
> the
>> >> >> > magnetic
>> >> >> >> >> > field of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > the relay coil."
>> >> >> >> >> >> > When the contact is closed there is a damped oscillation
>> > with
>> >> >> >> >> >> > a
>> >> >> >> >> > frequency of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > between 2 and 3kHz, corresponding to the inherent
> resonant
>> >> >> > frequency
>> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > tongues.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > "However a typical level for standard contacts can be
>> >> >> >> >> >> > extremely
>> >> >> >> >> > significant
>> >> >> >> >> >> > on very low-level signal switching circuits."
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Once again, Arny and his amphibian sidekick are caught
>> >> >> >> >> >> > in
>> > the
>> >> >> >> > quagmire
>> >> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> >> >> > unscientific thought and sloppy design.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Yeah, but who gives a ****? You aren't going to use his
> box
>> >> >> >> >> >> anyway.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> > Responsibility for this device weighs heavily on those who
>> >> >> >> >> > push
>> >> > it.
>> >> >> >> >> > Arny
>> >> >> >> >> > should have spent his time synthesizing flu viruses.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > What is your educational level, Mikey? Do amphibians attend
>> > college,
>> >> >> >> > and
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > like?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Who are you really, sock puppet Morein?
>> >> >> >> Why do you feel the need to persecute people who tell the trtuh
>> > about
>> >> >> >> your
>> >> >> >> incompetence?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > I am your conscience, Mikey. I am inside your head.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Prove that an ABX box masks any differences.
>> >> >> Prove that ABX is not a valid protocol.
>> >> >>
>> >> > I am your conscience, Mikey. ABX is very bad. Very bad, Mikey.
>> >> >
>> >> That must be why it is the sthandard for subtle difference detection.
>> >>
>> > Sorry, Mikey, it is completely ignored by 20,000,000 consumers for
> subtle
>> > detection of audio quality.
>> >
>> Then why don't you ignore it as wll?
>> Why does a reliable methodology for detecting difference bother you so
> much?
>> Why do you consistently lie that it is not a standard for audio research?
>> ITU BS 1116-1
>>
> ITU BS = I Tella You Bull ****
>
We've known that about you for some time.
Bret Ludwig
October 15th 05, 04:33 AM
wrote:
<<snip>>
> Global feedback is not something that makes amps inferior, but if to much is
> used it will affect the way an amp clips.
Excessive amounts of global feedback are a detriment to sound and a
cheap fix for less than determined design. Almost all good sounding
amps use moderate to minimal amounts of global feedback.
>
> Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and hearing impaired
> reviewers on the planet working for them and they frequently endorse snake
> oil.
That well may be so, nonetheless, they are correct some of the time.
Arny Krueger
October 15th 05, 10:59 AM
"Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
oups.com
> wrote:
> <<snip>>
>> Global feedback is not something that makes amps
>> inferior, but if to much is used it will affect the way
>> an amp clips.
>
> Excessive amounts of global feedback are a detriment to
> sound and a cheap fix for less than determined design.
> Almost all good sounding amps use moderate to minimal
> amounts of global feedback.
>
>
>>
>> Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and
>> hearing impaired reviewers on the planet working for
>> them and they frequently endorse snake oil.
>
> That well may be so, nonetheless, they are correct some
> of the time.
So is a stopped clock - its correct twice a day, right? ;-)
paul packer
October 15th 05, 11:02 AM
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:33:05 GMT, "
> wrote:
(snip wrong headedness)
>Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several orders of magnitude more
>distortion than CD's, which is not to say that there are not some really
>awfull sounding CD's.
Well, at least you got that right. (Assuming of course that by
"iferior" you meant "inferior").
(snip wrong headedness)
Arny Krueger
October 15th 05, 11:21 AM
" > wrote in
message
link.net
> Desperation time for the audiophools, now they're forging
> posts in order to deceive.
Hardly new news. I find it ironic that self-proclaimed
guardians of truth so often resort to deception.
> The simple facts are these:
> Wire is wire.
Well, really thin speaker wire can hurt sound quality in
long lengths.
> Amplifiers contribute nothing to imaging, that's a
> funtion of teh recording and the speakers.
Well, other than really bad amps. I suspect that some SETs
are so bad that they do affect imaging, in a bad way.
> ABX is the accepted standard for audio research into
> subtle differences.
Well, ABX and ABC/hr. ABC/hr is not optimal for research
into subtle differences, but it can work well enough. ABC/hr
is better for quantifying audible degradation of sound
quality where it exists.
> It is a simple matter thse days to build auio equipment
> that is sonically neutral, that is neither adds nor
> subtracts from the input signal.
Certainly true for amps, preamps, digital players and
recorders, etc.
> An ABX box does not mask any differences.
When used properly by trained listeners.
> Vinyl LP's are an iferior medium and have several orders
> of magnitude more distortion than CD's, which is not to
> say that there are not some really awfull sounding CD's.
I still remember the first time I heard the comparison of LP
playback to playback of a high speed master tape. The LP
sounded pretty good by itself, but listening to the tape was
so much better.
> Global feedback is not something that makes amps
> inferior, but if to much is used it will affect the way
> an amp clips.
Designing feedback systems has traditionally been a junior
or senior level undergraduate topic in electrical
engineering. It takes skill to get it right. It takes
experience to get it right in real world product
development. Most of the people who damn global feedback
lack appropriate technical training and experience.
> Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and
> hearing impaired reviewers on the planet working for them
> and they frequently endorse snake oil.
I don't know if they are better or worse than some of their
competition. The whole market segment has spun out of
control. There is evidence that its dying at an increasing
rate. For example:
http://www.gedlee.com/downloads/Observations%20and%20Thoughts.pdf
John Atkinson
October 15th 05, 12:28 PM
Arny Krueger wrote:
> " > wrote in
> message
> link.net
> > Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and
> > hearing impaired reviewers on the planet working for them
> > and they frequently endorse snake oil.
>
> I don't know if they are better or worse than some of their
> competition. The whole market segment has spun out of
> control. There is evidence that its dying at an increasing
> rate. For example:
> http://www.gedlee.com/downloads/Observations%20and%20Thoughts.pdf
Other than the fact that Mr. Geddss is offering opinions, not
"evidence," he presents an interesting point of view (though not
one I agree with). However, Mike McKelvy was discussing Stereophile
and its reviewers, Mr. Geddes is discussing high-end audio as a
whole, not magazines.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
October 15th 05, 06:56 PM
"Bret Ludwig" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> wrote:
> <<snip>>
>> Global feedback is not something that makes amps inferior, but if to much
>> is
>> used it will affect the way an amp clips.
>
> Excessive amounts of global feedback are a detriment to sound and a
> cheap fix for less than determined design. Almost all good sounding
> amps use moderate to minimal amounts of global feedback.
>
Can be so, but it is not, as some people seem to believe a bad idea, in fact
it is a requirement.
>>
>> Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and hearing impaired
>> reviewers on the planet working for them and they frequently endorse
>> snake
>> oil.
>
> That well may be so, nonetheless, they are correct some of the time.
>
I want something better than some of the time.
I never want reviewers that aren't smart enough to call snake oil for what
it is.
October 15th 05, 07:04 PM
"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> " > wrote in
>> message
>> link.net
>> > Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and
>> > hearing impaired reviewers on the planet working for them
>> > and they frequently endorse snake oil.
>>
>> I don't know if they are better or worse than some of their
>> competition. The whole market segment has spun out of
>> control. There is evidence that its dying at an increasing
>> rate. For example:
>> http://www.gedlee.com/downloads/Observations%20and%20Thoughts.pdf
>
> Other than the fact that Mr. Geddss is offering opinions, not
> "evidence," he presents an interesting point of view (though not
> one I agree with). However, Mike McKelvy was discussing Stereophile
> and its reviewers, Mr. Geddes is discussing high-end audio as a
> whole, not magazines.
>
Feel free to apply my comments about Sp to all the other idiots who write
for other similar mags. Any mag that allows unchecked endorsements of snake
oil products should IMO more than just criticized, they should be charged
with whatever legal statutes apply to people who aid and abet fraud.
As editor of SP you bear a large portion of responsability for the idiotic
recomendations of some of the idiots who endorse things known to be
fraudulent.
Bottom line, find out what technical reasons if any are at work in any of
the products your writers endorse. If there are no reasons why something
could do what it is claimed, say so.
Robert Morein
October 15th 05, 10:45 PM
"John Atkinson" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Arny Krueger wrote:
> > " > wrote in
> > message
> > link.net
> > > Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and
> > > hearing impaired reviewers on the planet working for them
> > > and they frequently endorse snake oil.
> >
> > I don't know if they are better or worse than some of their
> > competition. The whole market segment has spun out of
> > control. There is evidence that its dying at an increasing
> > rate. For example:
> > http://www.gedlee.com/downloads/Observations%20and%20Thoughts.pdf
>
> Other than the fact that Mr. Geddss is offering opinions, not
> "evidence," he presents an interesting point of view (though not
> one I agree with). However, Mike McKelvy was discussing Stereophile
> and its reviewers, Mr. Geddes is discussing high-end audio as a
> whole, not magazines.
>
There might be a germ of truth in his viewpoint, even if it is not literally
true. You have commented in the past about the convergence of DACs, and the
resultant similarity of sound. I found this changed with the advent of
upsampling DACs, yet I do most of my listening on a system with a 15 year
old 18 bit ladder DAC. Perhaps I should change it, but for reasons unknown,
it works very well with a Acoustat panels.
At one of the Stereophile HT shows, where I had an opportunity to sample the
very high end, I found a spread that equally encompassed the very
unimpressive, as well as innovations with a capacity to surprise and
delight. I went home both disappointed and amazed, but not convinced that
great expenditures of money provide proportional reward. Since Dunlavy used
paper, and others used diamonds, there is the question of whether liberal
use of diamonds actually facilitates gem-like sound ;)
I do feel that at the beginning of the 90's, the desire for marketplace
differentiation caused somewhat of the effect Geddes writes of. Utilitarian
products have been significantly displaced. For example, Parasound has
replaced simply styled equipment with more impressively packages, but the
specifications for signal-to-noise have actually decreased. The perception
by manufacturers that appearance, rather than performance, registers with
today's buyer, may be causing an occult adulteration.
October 18th 05, 12:38 AM
"paul packer" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:33:05 GMT, "
> > wrote:
>
>
>An ABX box does not mask any differences.
>
>>Vinyl LP's are an inferior medium and have several orders of magnitude
>>more
>>distortion than CD's, which is not to say that there are not some really
>>awfull sounding CD's.
>
> Well, at least you got that right.
I got it all right. Nothing I said was incorrect.
I've put back the things you snipped so as to give you a chance to offer up
proof that I made an error. Other than spelling.
> Stereophile has some of the most incredibly idiotic and hearing impaired
reviewers on the planet working for them and they frequently endorse snake
oil.
I suppose I should actually have some data on their hearing, but judging by
the things that get good reviews, especially speakers, they don't seem to
have a clue most of the time.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.