What's wrong with Bob Morion?

[trotsky]

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.

[Arny Krueger]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
k.net...
> I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.

No Singh, it's simply a matter of handing out a bunch of figurative firearms
and ammo to guys with time on their hands and telling them to take as many
shots as they want at a poster of Saddam painted on the broad side of an old
barn. First they shoot away the dots of his eyes, and then they shoot away
his teeth, and after a while the whole barn wall comes down in splinters.

Singh, your little speaker company, such as it was, is the figurative broad
side of a barn.

BTW Singh, this is so obvious, I don't know why you didn't anticipate it and
keep your mouth shut. I guess you're just a masochist.

[dave weil]

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:10:15 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>
>"trotsky" > wrote in message
k.net...
>> I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
>> trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.
>
>No Singh, it's simply a matter of handing out a bunch of figurative firearms
>and ammo to guys with time on their hands and telling them to take as many
>shots as they want at a poster of Saddam painted on the broad side of an old
>barn. First they shoot away the dots of his eyes, and then they shoot away
>his teeth, and after a while the whole barn wall comes down in splinters.

Oh, I see. Now there's a behind-the-scenes conspircaty, with Arnold at
the helm.

Thank you for being so forthright.

>Singh, your little speaker company, such as it was, is the figurative broad
>side of a barn.
>
>BTW Singh, this is so obvious, I don't know why you didn't anticipate it and
>keep your mouth shut. I guess you're just a masochist.

I'm quite sure he anticipated it. In fact, he even alluded to such in
his opening post.

Thank you for meeting expectations, though. Nice of you to be so
predicatable.

Your gun, your foot, etc...

[trotsky]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "trotsky" wrote in message
> k.net...
>
> >I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> >trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
> instead.
>
>
> No Singh, it's simply a matter of handing out a bunch of figurative
> firearms
> and ammo to guys with time on their hands and telling them to take as many
> shots as they want at a poster of Saddam painted on the broad side of
> an old
> barn. First they shoot away the dots of his eyes, and then they shoot away
> his teeth, and after a while the whole barn wall comes down in splinters.
>
> Singh, your little speaker company, such as it was, is the figurative
> broad
> side of a barn.
>
> BTW Singh, this is so obvious, I don't know why you didn't anticipate
> it and
> keep your mouth shut. I guess you're just a masochist.



Again, I don't see anything about your response here that is the least
bit Christian. Sorry.

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
> trotsky said:
>
>
> >I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> >trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
> instead.
>
>
> Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.



He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely sad
to see you lying in this fashion. Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

[George M. Middius]

trotsky said:

> > Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.

> He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely sad
> to see you lying in this fashion.

There you go again! ;-)

You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
motivations for ignoring you.

> Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
> calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
being, though. Sorry.

[Lionel]

S888Wheel a écrit :
> Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with praise.
> That could be the kiss of death.

Are you experienced ?

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

[trotsky]

S888Wheel wrote:

> Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with
> praise.
> That could be the kiss of death.



Agreed--look what happened to Vengeance (sic).

[trotsky]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
> trotsky said to ****-for-Brains:
>
>
> >Again, I don't see anything about your response here that is the least
> >bit Christian. Sorry.
>
>
> Is it working? Is Krooger kowed?



I'd definitely say that I got a rise out of him. And you managed to get
him to agree with you. Not that we could attach a "score" to either of
these, of course.

[S888Wheel]

I said

>
>> Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with
>praise.
>> That could be the kiss of death

Lionel said

>
>Are you experienced ?

Nope. I have never experienced the praise of Arny Krueger. I think I would feel
compelled to take a show should such an unlikely event ever take place. I have
no respect for him or his opinions. I doubt that his praise would affect my
fortune one way or another. I am not in the audio business. I see you are still
stalking me on RAO though. Maybe you are trying to pass up Arny in creepyness?

[Lionel]

S888Wheel a écrit :

> I said
>
>
>>>Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with
>>
>>praise.
>>
>>>That could be the kiss of death
>
>
> Lionel said
>
>
>>Are you experienced ?
>
>
> Nope. I have never experienced the praise of Arny Krueger. I think I would feel
> compelled to take a show should such an unlikely event ever take place. I have
> no respect for him or his opinions. I doubt that his praise would affect my
> fortune one way or another. I am not in the audio business. I see you are still
> stalking me on RAO though. Maybe you are trying to pass up Arny in creepyness?
>
>
;-)

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

[George M. Middius]

trotsky said:

> > Is it working? Is Krooger kowed?

> I'd definitely say that I got a rise out of him.

Disagreed.(TM)

> And you managed to get him to agree with you.

Disagreed(TM) again.


> Not that we could attach a "score" to either of these, of course.

You certainly could. As far as I can tell, you give yourself a "score"
every time you draw a breath.

[Bob Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> trotsky said:
>
> > > Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.
>
> > He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely sad
> > to see you lying in this fashion.
>
> There you go again! ;-)
>
> You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
> motivations for ignoring you.
>
> > Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
> > calling you "sad" is okay in my book.
>
> Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
> you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
> huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
> being, though. Sorry.
>
You have my approval to add the latter term.

[Michael Mckelvy]

"Bob Morein" > wrote in message
...
>
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >
> > trotsky said:
> >
> > > > Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.
> >
> > > He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely
sad
> > > to see you lying in this fashion.
> >
> > There you go again! ;-)
> >
> > You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
> > motivations for ignoring you.
> >
> > > Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
> > > calling you "sad" is okay in my book.
> >
> > Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
> > you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
> > huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
> > being, though. Sorry.
> >
> You have my approval to add the latter term.
>
>
I thought that was the consensus anyway.

[Bob Morein]

"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bob Morein" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > trotsky said:
> > >
> > > > > Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.
> > >
> > > > He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely
> sad
> > > > to see you lying in this fashion.
> > >
> > > There you go again! ;-)
> > >
> > > You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
> > > motivations for ignoring you.
> > >
> > > > Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
> > > > calling you "sad" is okay in my book.
> > >
> > > Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
> > > you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
> > > huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
> > > being, though. Sorry.
> > >
> > You have my approval to add the latter term.
> >
> >
> I thought that was the consensus anyway.
>
Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.

[Bob Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Bobo, have you lost what's left of your mind?
>
> > > > > I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human being, though.
Sorry.
>
> > > > You have my approval to add the latter term.
>
> > > I thought that was the consensus anyway.
>
> > Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.
>
> No matter how much you despise trotsky, it's not worth teaming up with
> duh-Mikey. Last week, you finally accepted the truth about Krooger.
> You admitted I was right all along. Now I'm telling you that the Bug
> Eater should be shunned. Take my word for it, like you should have
> done with Krooger, and don't force yourself to find out first-hand
> what duh-Mikey brings to the table.
>
I know he belongs to the "all good electronics sound the same" crowd.
But really, George, you don't seem to have a working understanding of
Realpolitik.

[trotsky]

Bob Morein wrote:

> "Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> ...
>
> >"Bob Morein" wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >>"George M. Middius" wrote in message
> ...
> >>
> >>>
> >>>trotsky said:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.
> >>>
> >>>>He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely
> >
> >sad
> >
> >>>>to see you lying in this fashion.
> >>>
> >>>There you go again! ;-)
> >>>
> >>>You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
> >>>motivations for ignoring you.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
> >>>>calling you "sad" is okay in my book.
> >>>
> >>>Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
> >>>you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
> >>>huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
> >>>being, though. Sorry.
> >>>
> >>
> >>You have my approval to add the latter term.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I thought that was the consensus anyway.
> >
>
> Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.



No, that's not correct. I had you pegged from the first post. Should
we go over the bit about Tarantino again, hypocrite?

[George M. Middius]

Bobo said:

> > But if you want some rope, go hang yourself. I guarantee that whatever
> > game you're pretending to be playing will end up on the ash heap of
> > Usenet history.
>
> But George, all our games end up on the ash heap.

Not true, simple one.


> Our arguments are like the little Chinese umbrella in the daquiri.
> The drinker takes one look at it, twirls it in his fingers, and tosses it
> aside.

You haven't been paying attention.

> One doesn't have to pretend at a game.
> Pretense is necessary only to pretend it's something more.

You've just annulled the existence of half the games people play --
the role-playing one. Nicely done.

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :

>
> Bobo said:
>
>
>>>But if you want some rope, go hang yourself. I guarantee that whatever
>>>game you're pretending to be playing will end up on the ash heap of
>>>Usenet history.
>>
>>But George, all our games end up on the ash heap.
>
>
> Not true, simple one.
>
>
>
>>Our arguments are like the little Chinese umbrella in the daquiri.
>>The drinker takes one look at it, twirls it in his fingers, and tosses it
>>aside.
>
>
> You haven't been paying attention.
>
>
>>One doesn't have to pretend at a game.
>>Pretense is necessary only to pretend it's something more.
>
>
> You've just annulled the existence of half the games people play --
> the role-playing one. Nicely done.
>
>
"Nicely done Bob" LOL !
George, because you are *addict* he has just annulled 99% of your
reasons of life.
I suggest you to hang you to the remaining 1%. If you don't do that
urgently, you will disappear soon.

Nicely done Bob... you're really a killer

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
nk.net...
> Bob Morein wrote:
>
> > "Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > >"Bob Morein" wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> > >>"George M. Middius" wrote in message
> > ...
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>trotsky said:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>>Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.
> > >>>
> > >>>>He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely
> > >
> > >sad
> > >
> > >>>>to see you lying in this fashion.
> > >>>
> > >>>There you go again! ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>>You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
> > >>>motivations for ignoring you.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
> > >>>>calling you "sad" is okay in my book.
> > >>>
> > >>>Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
> > >>>you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
> > >>>huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
> > >>>being, though. Sorry.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>You have my approval to add the latter term.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >I thought that was the consensus anyway.
> > >
> >
> > Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.
>
>
>
> No, that's not correct. I had you pegged from the first post. Should
> we go over the bit about Tarantino again, hypocrite?
>
Why don't we go over the bit about what a **** you are, welcher?

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
k.net...
> I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.
>

The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.

[Arny Krueger]

"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message

> "trotsky" > wrote in message
> k.net...
>> I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
>> trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
>> instead.
>>
>
> The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
> to you.
>
> It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.
>
> Sad.

Do you really think that Singh's behavior has improved to the point of
smarminess?

[trotsky]

Michael Mckelvy wrote:

> "trotsky" wrote in message
> k.net...
>
> >I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> >trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
> instead.
> >
>
>
> The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
> to you.
>
> It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.
>
> Sad.
>
>


What does the bug eating make up for?

[trotsky]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
>
>
> >"trotsky" wrote in message
> k.net...
> >
> >>I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> >>trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
> >>instead.
> >>
> >
> >The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
> >to you.
> >
> >It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.
> >
> >Sad.
>
>
> Do you really think that Singh's behavior has improved to the point of
> smarminess?



Jeez, Arny, do you have to tell Mickey he's wrong about everything? How
would you describe your behavior, btw--as that of a good Christian?

[Michael Mckelvy]

"Langis" > wrote in message
...
> "Michael Mckelvy" > wrote:
>
> >> I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> >> trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.
> >
> >The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison to
you.
>
> Can you distinguish between newsgroups and the real world?
>
Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of which
were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke his word
then, what reason do we have to assume he will kep ever?

> >It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.
>
> Who said you could post anyway.
>
>
My ISP.
> --
> S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Michael Mckelvy wrote:
>
> > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > k.net...
> >
> > >I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> > >trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
> > instead.
> > >
> >
> >
> > The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
> > to you.
> >
> > It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.
> >
> > Sad.
> >
> >
>
>
> What does the bug eating make up for?
>
You're confusing George's nick name for me with reality.
Oddly enough I've never eaten a bug. I may have at some point made a joking
reference to a local auto dealer who claims he'll "eat a bug" if he can't
make you a deal.

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> > "Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> >
> >
> > >"trotsky" wrote in message
> > k.net...
> > >
> > >>I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
> > >>trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
> > >>instead.
> > >>
> > >
> > >The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
> > >to you.
> > >
> > >It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.
> > >
> > >Sad.
> >
> >
> > Do you really think that Singh's behavior has improved to the point of
> > smarminess?
>
>
>
> Jeez, Arny, do you have to tell Mickey he's wrong about everything? How
> would you describe your behavior, btw--as that of a good Christian?
>

Why don't you work on being a good human and forget about criticizing your
betters?

[Arny Krueger]

"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message


> Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
> which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
> his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?

Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence) that Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good speakers.

[Arny Krueger]

"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message


> "trotsky" > wrote in message
> ink.net...

>> Michael Mckelvy wrote:

>>> "trotsky" wrote in message
>>> k.net...

>>>> I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
>>>> trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
>>>> instead.

>>> The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
>>> to you.

>>> It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

>>> Sad.

>> What does the bug eating make up for?

> You're confusing George's nick name for me with reality.

Here's a question for discussion: who is less a part of the real world,
George or Singh? It seems to me that the obvious answer is George. I don't
know if it was his years of posting about Coneheads or years of posting
about the Borg...

LOL!

> Oddly enough I've never eaten a bug. I may have at some point made a
> joking reference to a local auto dealer who claims he'll "eat a bug"
> if he can't make you a deal.

If it wasn't that RAO discussions spill over into the real world like
Singh's speakers seem to, we could dismiss the whole thing!

[trotsky]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
>
>
>
> >Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
> >which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
> >his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?
>
>
> Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
> considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence) that
> Singh's
> speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
> predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> speakers.



That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny. Clearly you're not the target
audience because you can't hear. Out of ten or twenty thousand posts
that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your cognizance of
good speaker sound:



<crickets chirping>


Get the picture?

[Arny Krueger]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
ink.net
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>> "Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
>>> which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
>>> broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
>>> it, ever?
>>
>>
>> Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
>> evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
>> evidence) that Singh's
>> speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
>> predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
>> speakers.

> That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.

Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts about your
fascination with pedophilia, for example.

> Clearly you're not the
> target audience because you can't hear.

Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth, Singh?

BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow, other
than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?


>Out of ten or twenty
> thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
> cognizance of good speaker sound:

> <crickets chirping>

> Get the picture?

The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending > $1K
on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers rather
that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your spirit so
tragically.

[trotsky]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "trotsky" wrote in message
> ink.net
>
> >Arny Krueger wrote:
> >
> >
> >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
> >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
> >>>it, ever?
> >>
> >>
> >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> >>evidence) that Singh's
> >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
> >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> >>speakers.
>
>
> >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
>
>
> Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts about your
> fascination with pedophilia, for example.



Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my favorite
riddle:

Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
A: The lights on his modem are blinking.


>
>
>
> >Clearly you're not the
> >target audience because you can't hear.
>
>
> Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth, Singh?



You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
screwed in the head as you are?


>
>
> BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow,
> other
> than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?



The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.


>
>
>
>
> >Out of ten or twenty
> >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
> >cognizance of good speaker sound:
>
>
> >
>
>
> >Get the picture?
>
>
> The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending
> > $1K
> on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers rather
> that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> spirit so
> tragically.



I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology, or your
leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:55:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message

>
>> Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
>> which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
>> his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?
>
>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
>considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence)

C'mon Arnold, either you belive me or not. If you think I'm such a bad
observer, then perhaps *you* were wrong about your conclusions, since
you can't take what I say with even a grain of salt.

> that Singh's speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good speakers.

You're shooting yourself in the foot here.

Of course I knew that you'd find fault. I was going to tag the review
with a sarcastic line about waiting for your carping, but I decided
not to and just let you carp away.

Of course, *you* would never attempt such a review. You don't have the
balls or the character.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:55:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Michael Mckelvy" > wrote in message
>>

>>> Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
>>> which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
>>> broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
>>> it, ever?

>> Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
>> evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
>> evidence)

> C'mon Arnold, either you belive me or not.


I make a policy of not "beliv"-ing anybody, Weil.

>If you think I'm such a bad
> observer, then perhaps *you* were wrong about your conclusions, since
> you can't take what I say with even a grain of salt.

Weil, I think its possible that Singh's speakers are so bad that even a poor
observer such as yourself can be a valid source of information about them.

>> that Singh's speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the
>> ways we have predicting, there are even more reasons to look
>> elsewhere for good speakers.

> You're shooting yourself in the foot here.

Not at all. I've got lots of good speakers at hand, and also lots of other
good acoustic reproducers that aren't exactly speakers.

> Of course I knew that you'd find fault.


So Weil, you were sober enough to notice the nose on your face this morning?

LOL!

> I was going to tag the review
> with a sarcastic line about waiting for your carping, but I decided
> not to and just let you carp away.

I was simply being consistent with my previous evaluation of your
nearly-non-existent capabilities and qualifications as a reviewer, Weil.

> Of course, *you* would never attempt such a review.

Prove it.

> You don't have the balls or the character.

Heck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face masks to
safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I can probably borrow
a biohazard suit. Of course my eagerness to come in contact with something
made by someone who has trashed RAO with as many pedophile fantasies as
Singh has, is pretty limited.

I'll leave the dirty work to people like you Weil, who have the stomach for
working with and associating with people who have no known ethics or morals.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:46:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>eck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face masks to
>safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I can probably borrow
>a biohazard suit.

Considering the area that you live in, I hardly doubt this.

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" > wrote in message

> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:46:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>> eck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face
>> masks to safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I
>> can probably borrow a biohazard suit.
>
> Considering the area that you live in, I hardly doubt this.

So now Weil you're saying there are no biohazard suits in the Nashville
area? LOL!

http://nashville.gov/pw/div_streets_roads.htm says otherwise.

[dave weil]

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:11:49 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"dave weil" > wrote in message

>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:46:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> eck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face
>>> masks to safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I
>>> can probably borrow a biohazard suit.
>>
>> Considering the area that you live in, I hardly doubt this.
>
>So now Weil you're saying there are no biohazard suits in the Nashville
>area? LOL!
>
>http://nashville.gov/pw/div_streets_roads.htm says otherwise.

Yep, got him dancing now...

[trotsky]

trotsky wrote:

> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > ink.net
> >
> > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
> > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
> > >>>it, ever?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
> > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> > >>speakers.
> >
> >
> > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> >
> >
> > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
> about your
> > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
>
>
>
>
> Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my favorite
> riddle:
>
> Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >Clearly you're not the
> > >target audience because you can't hear.
> >
> >
> > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
> Singh?
>
>
>
>
> You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
> screwed in the head as you are?
>
>
> >
> >
> > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow,
> > other
> > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
>
>
>
>
> The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
> nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Out of ten or twenty
> > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
> > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> > >Get the picture?
> >
> >
> > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending
> > > $1K
> > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers rather
> > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> > spirit so
> > tragically.
>
>
>
>
> I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
> difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
> descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology, or your
> leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.
>

[trotsky]

trotsky wrote:

> trotsky wrote:
>
> > Arny Krueger wrote:
> >
> > > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > > ink.net
> > >
> > > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
> > > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> > > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
> > > >>>it, ever?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
> > > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> > > >>speakers.
> > >
> > >
> > > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
> > about your
> > > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my favorite
> > riddle:
> >
> > Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> > A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Clearly you're not the
> > > >target audience because you can't hear.
> > >
> > >
> > > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
> > Singh?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
> > screwed in the head as you are?
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow,
> > > other
> > > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
> > nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> > speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Out of ten or twenty
> > > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
> > > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Get the picture?
> > >
> > >
> > > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending
> > > > $1K
> > > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers
> rather
> > > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> > > spirit so
> > > tragically.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
> > difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
> > descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology, or your
> > leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.
>
>

[trotsky]

trotsky wrote:

> trotsky wrote:
>
> > trotsky wrote:
> >
> > > Arny Krueger wrote:
> > >
> > > > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > > > ink.net
> > > >
> > > > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The
> terms of
> > > > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> > > > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will
> keep
> > > > >>>it, ever?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > > > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > > > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > > > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we
> have
> > > > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> > > > >>speakers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
> > > about your
> > > > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my
> favorite
> > > riddle:
> > >
> > > Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> > > A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Clearly you're not the
> > > > >target audience because you can't hear.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
> > > Singh?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
> > > screwed in the head as you are?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to
> follow,
> > > > other
> > > > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
> > > nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> > > speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Out of ten or twenty
> > > > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen
> of your
> > > > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Get the picture?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was
> spending
> > > > > $1K
> > > > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers
> > rather
> > > > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> > > > spirit so
> > > > tragically.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
> > > difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
> > > descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology,
> or your
> > > leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.
> >
> >
>

[trotsky]

trotsky wrote:

> trotsky wrote:
>
> > trotsky wrote:
> >
> > > Arny Krueger wrote:
> > >
> > > > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > > > ink.net
> > > >
> > > > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The
> terms of
> > > > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> > > > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will
> keep
> > > > >>>it, ever?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > > > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > > > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > > > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we
> have
> > > > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> > > > >>speakers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
> > > about your
> > > > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my
> favorite
> > > riddle:
> > >
> > > Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> > > A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Clearly you're not the
> > > > >target audience because you can't hear.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
> > > Singh?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
> > > screwed in the head as you are?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to
> follow,
> > > > other
> > > > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
> > > nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> > > speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Out of ten or twenty
> > > > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen
> of your
> > > > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Get the picture?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was
> spending
> > > > > $1K
> > > > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers
> > rather
> > > > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> > > > spirit so
> > > > tragically.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
> > > difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
> > > descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology,
> or your
> > > leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.

[trotsky]

>
> > > trotsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > > > > ink.net
> > > > >
> > > > > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The
> > terms of
> > > > > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> > > > > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will
> > keep
> > > > > >>>it, ever?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > > > > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > > > > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > > > > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we
> > have
> > > > > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere
> for good
> > > > > >>speakers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
> > > > about your
> > > > > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my
> > favorite
> > > > riddle:
> > > >
> > > > Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> > > > A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >Clearly you're not the
> > > > > >target audience because you can't hear.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
> > > > Singh?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person
> gets as
> > > > screwed in the head as you are?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to
> > follow,
> > > > > other
> > > > > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that
> neither you
> > > > nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> > > > speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >Out of ten or twenty
> > > > > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen
> > of your
> > > > > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >Get the picture?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was
> > spending
> > > > > > $1K
> > > > > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers
> > > rather
> > > > > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> > > > > spirit so
> > > > > tragically.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as
> possible, the
> > > > difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
> > > > descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology,
> > or your
> > > > leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.
>

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> > "Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> >
> >
> >
> > >Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
> > >which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
> > >his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?
> >
> >
> > Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
> > considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence) that
> > Singh's
> > speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
> > predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> > speakers.
>
>
>
> That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny. Clearly you're not the target
> audience because you can't hear.

I thought that WAS the target audience.

Out of ten or twenty thousand posts
> that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your cognizance of
> good speaker sound:
>
But you're an idiot and a liar so we know what the above statement is worth.
>
> <crickets chirping>
>
That's just the tinutis in your ears.

> Get the picture?
>
Yes, your deaf stupid and a liar.

[Michael Mckelvy]

"trotsky" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > ink.net
> >
> > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
> > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
> > >>>it, ever?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
> > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
> > >>speakers.
> >
> >
> > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> >
> >
> > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts about
your
> > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
>
>
>
> Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my favorite
> riddle:
>
> Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >Clearly you're not the
> > >target audience because you can't hear.
> >
> >
> > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
Singh?
>
>
>
> You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
> screwed in the head as you are?
>
Ask yourself, you came here with bile.
>
> >
> >
> > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow,
> > other
> > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
>
>
>
> The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
> nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
>
Perhaps because Dave's comments serve to prove what we'd said all along.
Perhaps because his opinions are his and his alone and don't look to me like
they will cause a rush of orders for Eurotrash speakers made from second or
3rd rate components.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Out of ten or twenty
> > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
> > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> >
Likewise, regarding your own tin ears.
> > >
> >
> >
> > >Get the picture?
> >
> >
> > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending
> > > $1K
> > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers rather
> > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> > spirit so
> > tragically.
>
>
>

[trotsky]

>
> > > trotsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > > > > ink.net
> > > > >
> > > > > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The
> > terms of
> > > > > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
> > > > > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will
> > keep
> > > > > >>>it, ever?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > > > > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > > > > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > > > > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we
> > have
> > > > > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere
> for good
> > > > > >>speakers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
> > > > about your
> > > > > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my
> > favorite
> > > > riddle:
> > > >
> > > > Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> > > > A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >Clearly you're not the
> > > > > >target audience because you can't hear.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
> > > > Singh?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person
> gets as
> > > > screwed in the head as you are?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to
> > follow,
> > > > > other
> > > > > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that
> neither you
> > > > nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> > > > speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >Out of ten or twenty
> > > > > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen
> > of your
> > > > > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >Get the picture?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was
> > spending
> > > > > > $1K
> > > > > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers
> > > rather
> > > > > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
> > > > > spirit so
> > > > > tragically.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as
> possible, the
> > > > difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
> > > > descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology,
> > or your
> > > > leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.
>
>

[trotsky]

> > > > trotsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > "trotsky" wrote in message
> > > > > > ink.net
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Arny Krueger wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>>Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The
> > > terms of
> > > > > > >>>which were that if he lost he would not post here again.
> If he
> > > > > > >>>broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will
> > > keep
> > > > > > >>>it, ever?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
> > > > > > >>evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
> > > > > > >>evidence) that Singh's
> > > > > > >>speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we
> > > have
> > > > > > >>predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere
> > for good
> > > > > > >>speakers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
> > > > > about your
> > > > > > fascination with pedophilia, for example.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my
> > > favorite
> > > > > riddle:
> > > > >
> > > > > Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
> > > > > A: The lights on his modem are blinking.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Clearly you're not the
> > > > > > >target audience because you can't hear.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your
> mouth,
> > > > > Singh?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person
> > gets as
> > > > > screwed in the head as you are?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to
> > > follow,
> > > > > > other
> > > > > > than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that
> > neither you
> > > > > nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments re: my
> > > > > speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Out of ten or twenty
> > > > > > >thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen
> > > of your
> > > > > > >cognizance of good speaker sound:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Get the picture?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was
> > > spending
> > > > > > > $1K
> > > > > > on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i
> speakers
> > > > rather
> > > > > > that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed
> your
> > > > > > spirit so
> > > > > > tragically.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as
> > possible, the
> > > > > difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
> > > > > descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology,
> > > or your
> > > > > leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.
>
>