I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.

"trotsky" wrote in message
k.net...
I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.

No Singh, it's simply a matter of handing out a bunch of figurative firearms
and ammo to guys with time on their hands and telling them to take as many
shots as they want at a poster of Saddam painted on the broad side of an old
barn. First they shoot away the dots of his eyes, and then they shoot away
his teeth, and after a while the whole barn wall comes down in splinters.

Singh, your little speaker company, such as it was, is the figurative broad
side of a barn.

BTW Singh, this is so obvious, I don't know why you didn't anticipate it and
keep your mouth shut. I guess you're just a masochist.

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:10:15 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


"trotsky" wrote in message
nk.net...
I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.

No Singh, it's simply a matter of handing out a bunch of figurative firearms
and ammo to guys with time on their hands and telling them to take as many
shots as they want at a poster of Saddam painted on the broad side of an old
barn. First they shoot away the dots of his eyes, and then they shoot away
his teeth, and after a while the whole barn wall comes down in splinters.

Oh, I see. Now there's a behind-the-scenes conspircaty, with Arnold at
the helm.

Thank you for being so forthright.

Singh, your little speaker company, such as it was, is the figurative broad
side of a barn.

BTW Singh, this is so obvious, I don't know why you didn't anticipate it and
keep your mouth shut. I guess you're just a masochist.

I'm quite sure he anticipated it. In fact, he even alluded to such in
his opening post.

Thank you for meeting expectations, though. Nice of you to be so
predicatable.

Your gun, your foot, etc...

Arny Krueger wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
k.net...

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.


No Singh, it's simply a matter of handing out a bunch of figurative
firearms
and ammo to guys with time on their hands and telling them to take as many
shots as they want at a poster of Saddam painted on the broad side of
an old
barn. First they shoot away the dots of his eyes, and then they shoot away
his teeth, and after a while the whole barn wall comes down in splinters.

Singh, your little speaker company, such as it was, is the figurative
broad
side of a barn.

BTW Singh, this is so obvious, I don't know why you didn't anticipate
it and
keep your mouth shut. I guess you're just a masochist.



Again, I don't see anything about your response here that is the least
bit Christian. Sorry.

George M. Middius wrote:


trotsky said:


I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.


Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.



He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely sad
to see you lying in this fashion. Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

trotsky said:

Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.

He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely sad
to see you lying in this fashion.

There you go again! ;-)

You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
motivations for ignoring you.

Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
being, though. Sorry.

S888Wheel a écrit :
Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with praise.
That could be the kiss of death.

Are you experienced ?

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

S888Wheel wrote:

Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with
praise.
That could be the kiss of death.



Agreed--look what happened to Vengeance (sic).

George M. Middius wrote:


trotsky said to ****-for-Brains:


Again, I don't see anything about your response here that is the least
bit Christian. Sorry.


Is it working? Is Krooger kowed?



I'd definitely say that I got a rise out of him. And you managed to get
him to agree with you. Not that we could attach a "score" to either of
these, of course.

I said


Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with
praise.
That could be the kiss of death

Lionel said


Are you experienced ?

Nope. I have never experienced the praise of Arny Krueger. I think I would feel
compelled to take a show should such an unlikely event ever take place. I have
no respect for him or his opinions. I doubt that his praise would affect my
fortune one way or another. I am not in the audio business. I see you are still
stalking me on RAO though. Maybe you are trying to pass up Arny in creepyness?

S888Wheel a écrit :

I said


Look on the bright side. Krueger could be showering your speakers with

praise.

That could be the kiss of death


Lionel said


Are you experienced ?


Nope. I have never experienced the praise of Arny Krueger. I think I would feel
compelled to take a show should such an unlikely event ever take place. I have
no respect for him or his opinions. I doubt that his praise would affect my
fortune one way or another. I am not in the audio business. I see you are still
stalking me on RAO though. Maybe you are trying to pass up Arny in creepyness?


;-)

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

trotsky said:

Is it working? Is Krooger kowed?

I'd definitely say that I got a rise out of him.

Disagreed.(TM)

And you managed to get him to agree with you.

Disagreed(TM) again.


Not that we could attach a "score" to either of these, of course.

You certainly could. As far as I can tell, you give yourself a "score"
every time you draw a breath.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


trotsky said:

Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.

He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely sad
to see you lying in this fashion.

There you go again! ;-)

You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
motivations for ignoring you.

Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
being, though. Sorry.

You have my approval to add the latter term.

"Bob Morein" wrote in message
...

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


trotsky said:

Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.

He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely
sad
to see you lying in this fashion.

There you go again! ;-)

You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
motivations for ignoring you.

Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
being, though. Sorry.

You have my approval to add the latter term.


I thought that was the consensus anyway.

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
...

"Bob Morein" wrote in message
...

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


trotsky said:

Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.

He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely
sad
to see you lying in this fashion.

There you go again! ;-)

You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
motivations for ignoring you.

Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
being, though. Sorry.

You have my approval to add the latter term.


I thought that was the consensus anyway.

Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Bobo, have you lost what's left of your mind?

I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human being, though.
Sorry.

You have my approval to add the latter term.

I thought that was the consensus anyway.

Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.

No matter how much you despise trotsky, it's not worth teaming up with
duh-Mikey. Last week, you finally accepted the truth about Krooger.
You admitted I was right all along. Now I'm telling you that the Bug
Eater should be shunned. Take my word for it, like you should have
done with Krooger, and don't force yourself to find out first-hand
what duh-Mikey brings to the table.

I know he belongs to the "all good electronics sound the same" crowd.
But really, George, you don't seem to have a working understanding of
Realpolitik.

Bob Morein wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
...

"Bob Morein" wrote in message
...

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
. ..


trotsky said:


Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.

He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely

sad

to see you lying in this fashion.

There you go again! ;-)

You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
motivations for ignoring you.


Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
being, though. Sorry.


You have my approval to add the latter term.



I thought that was the consensus anyway.


Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.



No, that's not correct. I had you pegged from the first post. Should
we go over the bit about Tarantino again, hypocrite?

Bobo said:

But if you want some rope, go hang yourself. I guarantee that whatever
game you're pretending to be playing will end up on the ash heap of
Usenet history.

But George, all our games end up on the ash heap.

Not true, simple one.


Our arguments are like the little Chinese umbrella in the daquiri.
The drinker takes one look at it, twirls it in his fingers, and tosses it
aside.

You haven't been paying attention.

One doesn't have to pretend at a game.
Pretense is necessary only to pretend it's something more.

You've just annulled the existence of half the games people play --
the role-playing one. Nicely done.

George M. Middius a écrit :


Bobo said:


But if you want some rope, go hang yourself. I guarantee that whatever
game you're pretending to be playing will end up on the ash heap of
Usenet history.

But George, all our games end up on the ash heap.


Not true, simple one.



Our arguments are like the little Chinese umbrella in the daquiri.
The drinker takes one look at it, twirls it in his fingers, and tosses it
aside.


You haven't been paying attention.


One doesn't have to pretend at a game.
Pretense is necessary only to pretend it's something more.


You've just annulled the existence of half the games people play --
the role-playing one. Nicely done.


"Nicely done Bob" LOL !
George, because you are *addict* he has just annulled 99% of your
reasons of life.
I suggest you to hang you to the remaining 1%. If you don't do that
urgently, you will disappear soon.

Nicely done Bob... you're really a killer

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

"trotsky" wrote in message
nk.net...
Bob Morein wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message
...

"Bob Morein" wrote in message
...

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
. ..


trotsky said:


Bobo has some ****ed-up opinions, but he's got you pegged.

He says I make "lousy" speakers? How would he know? It's extremely

sad

to see you lying in this fashion.

There you go again! ;-)

You're as good at judging what's a lie as you are at divining others'
motivations for ignoring you.


Thankfully, I'm not Christian, so
calling you "sad" is okay in my book.

Why did you put "lousy" in quotes? I thought Bobo has been haranguing
you because he thinks you're (note correct usage) a liar, a fraud, a
huckster, etc. I'm sure he wouldn't mind calling you a lousy human
being, though. Sorry.


You have my approval to add the latter term.



I thought that was the consensus anyway.


Let's lather it on anyway. Trotsky has a problem with comprehension.



No, that's not correct. I had you pegged from the first post. Should
we go over the bit about Tarantino again, hypocrite?

Why don't we go over the bit about what a **** you are, welcher?

"trotsky" wrote in message
k.net...
I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me instead.


The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message

"trotsky" wrote in message
k.net...
I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.


The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.

Do you really think that Singh's behavior has improved to the point of
smarminess?

Michael Mckelvy wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
k.net...

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.



The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.




What does the bug eating make up for?

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message


"trotsky" wrote in message
nk.net...

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.


The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.


Do you really think that Singh's behavior has improved to the point of
smarminess?



Jeez, Arny, do you have to tell Mickey he's wrong about everything? How
would you describe your behavior, btw--as that of a good Christian?

"Langis" wrote in message
...
"Michael Mckelvy" wrote:

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.

The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison to
you.

Can you distinguish between newsgroups and the real world?

Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of which
were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke his word
then, what reason do we have to assume he will kep ever?

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Who said you could post anyway.


My ISP.
--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t

"trotsky" wrote in message
news
Michael Mckelvy wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
k.net...

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.



The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.




What does the bug eating make up for?

You're confusing George's nick name for me with reality.
Oddly enough I've never eaten a bug. I may have at some point made a joking
reference to a local auto dealer who claims he'll "eat a bug" if he can't
make you a deal.

"trotsky" wrote in message
ink.net...
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message


"trotsky" wrote in message
nk.net...

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.


The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.


Do you really think that Singh's behavior has improved to the point of
smarminess?



Jeez, Arny, do you have to tell Mickey he's wrong about everything? How
would you describe your behavior, btw--as that of a good Christian?


Why don't you work on being a good human and forget about criticizing your
betters?

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message


Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?

Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence) that Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good speakers.

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message


"trotsky" wrote in message
news

Michael Mckelvy wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
k.net...

I can only assume that he's racked with guilt at having no business
trying to write screenplays, and thus is trying to lash out at me
instead.

The fact that he's capable of guilt would make a giant in comparison
to you.

It seems you think that smarminess makes up for moral bankruptcy.

Sad.

What does the bug eating make up for?

You're confusing George's nick name for me with reality.

Here's a question for discussion: who is less a part of the real world,
George or Singh? It seems to me that the obvious answer is George. I don't
know if it was his years of posting about Coneheads or years of posting
about the Borg...

LOL!

Oddly enough I've never eaten a bug. I may have at some point made a
joking reference to a local auto dealer who claims he'll "eat a bug"
if he can't make you a deal.

If it wasn't that RAO discussions spill over into the real world like
Singh's speakers seem to, we could dismiss the whole thing!

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message



Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?


Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence) that
Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
speakers.



That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny. Clearly you're not the target
audience because you can't hear. Out of ten or twenty thousand posts
that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your cognizance of
good speaker sound:



crickets chirping


Get the picture?

"trotsky" wrote in message
ink.net
Arny Krueger wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message



Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
it, ever?


Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
evidence) that Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
speakers.

That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.

Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts about your
fascination with pedophilia, for example.

Clearly you're not the
target audience because you can't hear.

Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth, Singh?

BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow, other
than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?


Out of ten or twenty
thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
cognizance of good speaker sound:

crickets chirping

Get the picture?

The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending $1K
on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers rather
that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your spirit so
tragically.

Arny Krueger wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
ink.net

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message




Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
it, ever?


Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
evidence) that Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
speakers.


That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.


Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts about your
fascination with pedophilia, for example.



Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my favorite
riddle:

Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
A: The lights on his modem are blinking.





Clearly you're not the
target audience because you can't hear.


Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth, Singh?



You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
screwed in the head as you are?




BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow,
other
than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?



The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments my
speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.






Out of ten or twenty
thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
cognizance of good speaker sound:





Get the picture?


The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending
$1K
on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers rather
that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
spirit so
tragically.



I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology, or your
leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:55:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message


Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he broke
his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep it, ever?

Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor evidence
considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of evidence)

C'mon Arnold, either you belive me or not. If you think I'm such a bad
observer, then perhaps *you* were wrong about your conclusions, since
you can't take what I say with even a grain of salt.

that Singh's speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good speakers.

You're shooting yourself in the foot here.

Of course I knew that you'd find fault. I was going to tag the review
with a sarcastic line about waiting for your carping, but I decided
not to and just let you carp away.

Of course, *you* would never attempt such a review. You don't have the
balls or the character.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:55:26 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message


Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
it, ever?

Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
evidence)

C'mon Arnold, either you belive me or not.


I make a policy of not "beliv"-ing anybody, Weil.

If you think I'm such a bad
observer, then perhaps *you* were wrong about your conclusions, since
you can't take what I say with even a grain of salt.

Weil, I think its possible that Singh's speakers are so bad that even a poor
observer such as yourself can be a valid source of information about them.

that Singh's speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the
ways we have predicting, there are even more reasons to look
elsewhere for good speakers.

You're shooting yourself in the foot here.

Not at all. I've got lots of good speakers at hand, and also lots of other
good acoustic reproducers that aren't exactly speakers.

Of course I knew that you'd find fault.


So Weil, you were sober enough to notice the nose on your face this morning?

LOL!

I was going to tag the review
with a sarcastic line about waiting for your carping, but I decided
not to and just let you carp away.

I was simply being consistent with my previous evaluation of your
nearly-non-existent capabilities and qualifications as a reviewer, Weil.

Of course, *you* would never attempt such a review.

Prove it.

You don't have the balls or the character.

Heck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face masks to
safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I can probably borrow
a biohazard suit. Of course my eagerness to come in contact with something
made by someone who has trashed RAO with as many pedophile fantasies as
Singh has, is pretty limited.

I'll leave the dirty work to people like you Weil, who have the stomach for
working with and associating with people who have no known ethics or morals.

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:46:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

eck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face masks to
safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I can probably borrow
a biohazard suit.

Considering the area that you live in, I hardly doubt this.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:46:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

eck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face
masks to safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I
can probably borrow a biohazard suit.

Considering the area that you live in, I hardly doubt this.

So now Weil you're saying there are no biohazard suits in the Nashville
area? LOL!

http://nashville.gov/pw/div_streets_roads.htm says otherwise.

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:11:49 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:46:00 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

eck, I may even have enough spare pairs of rubber gloves and face
masks to safely touch something touched by Singh. If necessary, I
can probably borrow a biohazard suit.

Considering the area that you live in, I hardly doubt this.

So now Weil you're saying there are no biohazard suits in the Nashville
area? LOL!

http://nashville.gov/pw/div_streets_roads.htm says otherwise.

Yep, got him dancing now...

trotsky wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
ink.net

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message




Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
it, ever?


Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
evidence) that Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
speakers.


That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.


Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
about your
fascination with pedophilia, for example.




Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my favorite
riddle:

Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
A: The lights on his modem are blinking.





Clearly you're not the
target audience because you can't hear.


Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
Singh?




You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
screwed in the head as you are?




BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow,
other
than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?




The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments my
speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.






Out of ten or twenty
thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
cognizance of good speaker sound:





Get the picture?


The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending
$1K
on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers rather
that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
spirit so
tragically.




I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology, or your
leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.

trotsky wrote:

trotsky wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
ink.net

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message




Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will keep
it, ever?


Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
evidence) that Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
speakers.


That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.


Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
about your
fascination with pedophilia, for example.




Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my favorite
riddle:

Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
A: The lights on his modem are blinking.





Clearly you're not the
target audience because you can't hear.


Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
Singh?




You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
screwed in the head as you are?




BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to follow,
other
than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?




The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments my
speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.






Out of ten or twenty
thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen of your
cognizance of good speaker sound:





Get the picture?


The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was spending
$1K
on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers
rather
that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
spirit so
tragically.




I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology, or your
leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.

trotsky wrote:

trotsky wrote:

trotsky wrote:

Arny Krueger wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message
ink.net

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Michael Mckelvy" wrote in message




Yes. In both places Singh made a bet that he lost. The
terms of
which were that if he lost he would not post here again. If he
broke his word then, what reason do we have to assume he will
keep
it, ever?


Exactly. Now that's we have some evidence from Weil (****-poor
evidence considering the source, but nevertheless some kind of
evidence) that Singh's
speakers are as bad as we have been predicting, in the ways we
have
predicting, there are even more reasons to look elsewhere for good
speakers.


That's a nice, Christian sentiment, Arny.


Thanks Singh. Note that I didn't reference your many past posts
about your
fascination with pedophilia, for example.




Could be because that's a complete lie. That reminds me of my
favorite
riddle:

Q: How can you tell when Arny is lying?
A: The lights on his modem are blinking.





Clearly you're not the
target audience because you can't hear.


Based on what reliable evidence other than the bile in your mouth,
Singh?




You lie about me and I'm the one with bile? How does a person gets as
screwed in the head as you are?




BTW Singh, which system of ethics do you agree with and try to
follow,
other
than "tell whatever lies it takes to gratify me at the instant"?




The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. I noticed that neither you
nor Bob Morion had word one to say about weil's comments my
speakers. The both of you are just liars, frauds, and cowards.






Out of ten or twenty
thousand posts that I've read from you, here's what I've seen
of your
cognizance of good speaker sound:





Get the picture?


The picture I get is that when the chips were down and I was
spending
$1K
on a pair of speakers Singh, I bought a pair of NHT 2.5i speakers
rather
that Jupiter Europas. I am truly sorry that this has crushed your
spirit so
tragically.




I'm hardly crushed, Krueger. Tell us, as succinctly as possible, the
difference you can hear between the two speakers. If you have no
descriptive prose on this subject, then I expect a full apology,
or your
leaving this newsgroup permanently. TIA.