Re: RAO Pinheads

[Lionel]

Howard Ferstler a écrit :
>[snip]
> ..., with my goals
> being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
> goofballs.

....Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !

Lionel

[MiNE 109]

In article >,
Lionel <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote:

> Howard Ferstler a écrit :
> >[snip]
> > ..., with my goals
> > being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
> > goofballs.
>
> ...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !

Let me you recommend the pounds of Ferstler.

Stephen

[dave weil]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:04:09 GMT, MiNE 109 >
wrote:

>In article >,
> Lionel <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote:
>
>> Howard Ferstler a écrit :
>> >[snip]
>> > ..., with my goals
>> > being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
>> > goofballs.
>>
>> ...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !
>
>Let me you recommend the pounds of Ferstler.

What is this Ferstler thing?

Should we be paying atention?

[George M. Middius]

dave weil said:

> What is this Ferstler thing?
> Should we be paying atention?

Scientifically valid blind testing shows no difference between the
Ferstler phenomenon and the tapping of woodpeckers.

[S888Wheel]

<<
Hello, goofballs:

Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
which will include a second large AV room and system), and see that
most of those who are left on RAO are members of the nitwit brigade. I
see a handful of audio commentaries, with the remainder being mostly
pointless dreck. Of course, "pointless dreck" is a style most beloved
by audio know-nothings. It is their favorite alternative to substance.

God knows, some of you people need to shut off your computers and go
somewhere.

PS: The Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound project is moving right along
(out of my hands, now, however, with the Routledge editorial staff in
New York doing their thing), with the primary editor very satisfied
with all of my at-long-last complted input - including more than 100
short biographies and the various (and most definitely "original")
company histories. Apparently, I will be listed as a technical editor,
since I upgraded many of the technical articles from the earlier
edition and wrote quite a large number of additional ones.

And, hey, "I'll be back" into audio writing pretty soon, with my goals
being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
goofballs. Hopefully, I can help to put a few scammer operations out
of business, too.

Howard Ferstler

>>


More pointless dreck from the RAO resident plagarist and publisher of
fraudulant ABX listening tests. LOL did I say listening? You have to actually
listen for them to be listening tests right?

[MiNE 109]

In article >,
dave weil > wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:04:09 GMT, MiNE 109 >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > Lionel <lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr> wrote:
> >
> >> Howard Ferstler a écrit :
> >> >[snip]
> >> > ..., with my goals
> >> > being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
> >> > goofballs.
> >>
> >> ...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !
> >
> >Let me you recommend the pounds of Ferstler.
>
> What is this Ferstler thing?

His works are good for foreign audio fans trying to learn English.

> Should we be paying atention?

I suppose we could comment on his new credit and how it protects his
publishers, but what's the point?

Stephen

[George M. Middius]

S888Wheel said to the Feckless Ferstlerian:

> > goofballs. Hopefully, I can help to put a few scammer operations out
> > of business, too.

> More pointless dreck from the RAO resident plagarist and publisher of
> fraudulant ABX listening tests. LOL did I say listening? You have to actually
> listen for them to be listening tests right?

At least Clerkie has an active fantasy life, note.

[Sockpuppet Yustabe]

"Howard Ferstler" > wrote in message
m...
> Hello, goofballs:
>
> Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
> which will include a second large AV room and system), and see that
> most of those who are left on RAO are members of the nitwit brigade. I
> see a handful of audio commentaries, with the remainder being mostly
> pointless dreck. Of course, "pointless dreck" is a style most beloved
> by audio know-nothings. It is their favorite alternative to substance.
>
> God knows, some of you people need to shut off your computers and go
> somewhere.
>
> PS: The Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound project is moving right along
> (out of my hands, now, however, with the Routledge editorial staff in
> New York doing their thing), with the primary editor very satisfied
> with all of my at-long-last complted input - including more than 100
> short biographies and the various (and most definitely "original")
> company histories. Apparently, I will be listed as a technical editor,
> since I upgraded many of the technical articles from the earlier
> edition and wrote quite a large number of additional ones.
>
> And, hey, "I'll be back" into audio writing pretty soon, with my goals
> being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
> goofballs. Hopefully, I can help to put a few scammer operations out
> of business, too.
>
> Howard Ferstler

Got the old wrecking ball all polished up, ehh?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

[JBorg]

> Howard Ferstler said:







> Hello, goofballs:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of


shut the f*** **.



> Howard Ferstler


You just don't die do you? You got your head clubbed here
so many times, you just got to keep comin back for more now,
don't you? You're addicted to this RAO style clobbering so
much that you would even resort to shameful plagiarism and
self pity just so to satisfy your needs for more of these
clubbings. I'm beginning to think now this really is part
of your psychosis and not just an occasional random event
resulting from your corroded, rancid thoughts. How much more
pounding do you need? When some say of audio newsgroups as
some sort of club for people of common interest to gather and
talk, it means it's a place for persons with decent life and
normal sense to share views. Not a place for someone with
thicken skull (that's you) keen on entrenching its bean-shape
skull through a table's middle hole gloating for some buffalo
style clubbing and thwacking from every seasoned Rao'ers on
hand using hickory or mallet or wedge. And then you and your
head just keep sprouting back like a gelastic clown in-the-box
grinning with smile from the sullen blows to your intellectual
insipidity. Why do you do this to your head? Why, why, why.

[Marc Phillips]

Howard said:

>Hello, goofballs:
>
>Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
>which will include a second large AV room and system), and see that
>most of those who are left on RAO are members of the nitwit brigade. I
>see a handful of audio commentaries, with the remainder being mostly
>pointless dreck. Of course, "pointless dreck" is a style most beloved
>by audio know-nothings. It is their favorite alternative to substance.
>
>God knows, some of you people need to shut off your computers and go
>somewhere.
>
>PS: The Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound project is moving right along
>(out of my hands, now, however, with the Routledge editorial staff in
>New York doing their thing), with the primary editor very satisfied
>with all of my at-long-last complted input - including more than 100
>short biographies and the various (and most definitely "original")
>company histories. Apparently, I will be listed as a technical editor,
>since I upgraded many of the technical articles from the earlier
>edition and wrote quite a large number of additional ones.
>
>And, hey, "I'll be back" into audio writing pretty soon, with my goals
>being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
>goofballs. Hopefully, I can help to put a few scammer operations out
>of business, too.

Do you really think there is a single person here who is impressed with your
somewhat dubious achievements? No one here would trade places with you, slick,
in a million years. You're too immature and pathetic. There are people in
methadone clinics with more restraint and dignity.

You've been disgraced. Show some intelligence and stay away.

Boon

[Lionel]

Marc Phillips a écrit :

> Lionel said:
>
>
>>Howard Ferstler a écrit :
>>
>>>[snip]
>>>..., with my goals
>>>being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
>>>goofballs.
>>
>>...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !
>>
>
>
> He was caught plagiarizing for the Routledge book and left in utter disgrace.
> Tell me, Lionel, are you addicted to picking the wrong side, or are you merely
> filling the role of Internet geek by the saying things that are most likely to
> **** off as many people as possible?
>
> Boon
>
>
;-)

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel said:

>Marc Phillips a écrit :
>
>> Lionel said:
>>
>>
>>>Howard Ferstler a écrit :
>>>
>>>>[snip]
>>>>..., with my goals
>>>>being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
>>>>goofballs.
>>>
>>>...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !
>>>
>>
>>
>> He was caught plagiarizing for the Routledge book and left in utter
>disgrace.
>> Tell me, Lionel, are you addicted to picking the wrong side, or are you
>merely
>> filling the role of Internet geek by the saying things that are most likely
>to
>> **** off as many people as possible?
>>
>> Boon
>>
>>
>;-)

I forgot that in France, being a geek is a good thing. That explains the Jerry
Lewis phenomenon.

Boon

[trotsky]

Marc Phillips wrote:
> Lionel said:
>
>
>>Marc Phillips a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>Lionel said:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Howard Ferstler a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>..., with my goals
>>>>>being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
>>>>>goofballs.
>>>>
>>>>...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>He was caught plagiarizing for the Routledge book and left in utter
>>
>>disgrace.
>>
>>>Tell me, Lionel, are you addicted to picking the wrong side, or are you
>>
>>merely
>>
>>>filling the role of Internet geek by the saying things that are most likely
>>
>>to
>>
>>>**** off as many people as possible?
>>>
>>>Boon
>>>
>>>
>>
>>;-)
>
>
> I forgot that in France, being a geek is a good thing. That explains the Jerry
> Lewis phenomenon.


Don't forget that Germans love David Hasselhoff, either.

[George M. Middius]

trotsky said:

> Don't forget that Germans love David Hasselhoff, either.

Is that your special trotskyish dialect, or did you shoot off your
wiener again? Must be nice to pat yourself on the back for your
superb "language skill" while the rest of the world laughs at the
screwups of a functional illiterate.

[Lionel]

Marc Phillips a écrit :
> Lionel said:
>
>
>>Marc Phillips a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>Lionel said:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Howard Ferstler a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>..., with my goals
>>>>>being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
>>>>>goofballs.
>>>>
>>>>...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>He was caught plagiarizing for the Routledge book and left in utter
>>
>>disgrace.
>>
>>>Tell me, Lionel, are you addicted to picking the wrong side, or are you
>>
>>merely
>>
>>>filling the role of Internet geek by the saying things that are most likely
>>
>>to
>>
>>>**** off as many people as possible?
>>>
>>>Boon
>>>
>>>
>>
>>;-)
>
>
> I forgot that in France, being a geek is a good thing. That explains the Jerry
> Lewis phenomenon.
>
> Boon
>
>
Since my friends know you Phillips, they don't care about Jerry Lewis
anymore. ;-p

[Lionel]

George M. Middius a écrit :
>
> trotsky said:
>
>
>>Don't forget that Germans love David Hasselhoff, either.
>
>
> Is that your special trotskyish dialect, or did you shoot off your
> wiener again? Must be nice to pat yourself on the back for your
> superb "language skill" while the rest of the world laughs at the
> screwups of a functional illiterate.
>
>

Georgetta, are you still hunting and assassinating domestic animals ?

[tor b]

>
>Georgetta, are you still hunting and assassinating domestic animals ?
>
>
>
>

His English grows better as he tires of us no?

[Marc Phillips]

Lionel said:

>> I forgot that in France, being a geek is a good thing. That explains the
>Jerry
>> Lewis phenomenon.
>>
>> Boon
>>
>>
>Since my friends know you Phillips, they don't care about Jerry Lewis
>anymore. ;-p

If you couldn't make up stupid **** out of thin air, you wouldn't have anything
to say, would you.

What a moron.

Boon

[George M. Middius]

tor b said:

> His English grows better as he tires of us no?

I think "he" is a "she".

[Lionel]

Marc Phillips a écrit :
> Lionel said:
>
>
>>>I forgot that in France, being a geek is a good thing. That explains the
>>
>>Jerry
>>
>>>Lewis phenomenon.
>>>
>>>Boon
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Since my friends know you Phillips, they don't care about Jerry Lewis
>>anymore. ;-p
>
>
> If you couldn't make up stupid **** out of thin air, you wouldn't have anything
> to say, would you.
>
> What a moron.
>
> Boon
>
>
Sincerely ? You're right. :o)

[Howard Ferstler]

(Marc Phillips) wrote in message >...
> Lionel said:
>
> >Howard Ferstler a écrit :
> >>[snip]
> >> ..., with my goals
> >> being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
> >> goofballs.
> >
> >...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !
> >
>
> He was caught plagiarizing for the Routledge book and left in utter disgrace.
> Tell me, Lionel, are you addicted to picking the wrong side, or are you merely
> filling the role of Internet geek by the saying things that are most likely to
> **** off as many people as possible?

Over a year and a half I wrote original or updated about 300 articles
for the book. Many involved personal biographies of audio notables and
many also involved company histories (done only with truly significant
companies), and in most cases I contacted companies and they either
answered the list of questions I submitted or referred me to a
web-site history. In nearly all cases I took information from those
web sites and/or responses to questions and wrote 100% original
articles. (In nearly all cases, I submitted a draft to the company rep
for a lookover.) However, as time wore on and my deadline for
completing the work loomed nearer, I started to do an occasional
shortcut, at least if the web-site blurb was a good one. As best I can
tell, only the Quad write up was giving the "slight edit" treatment.
Wouldn't you know that it was the one I posted here. Incidentally, the
Quad article has sense been completely rewritten (by me, and it was my
idea and not the encyclopedia editor's), and is better than ever.

Anyway, I did not leave in "utter disgrace." I mean, how can you leave
a junk-pile chat group like this in disgrace? If there is any kind of
disgrace situation around here it involves you nitwits. I mean, some
of you believe in mumbo-jumbo about audio that would shame anyone with
a high-school level of knowledge about electronics, physics, or
acoustics. Talk about being a disgrace.

The one thing that truly does make me feel good is that tweak-style
high-end audio is apparently not doing particularly well at all. I
hope the trend continues, because the freaks deserve all the emotional
pain and suffering they get. The bunch of you have worked hard to ruin
a really nifty hobby.

And now, back to home renovating.

Howard Ferstler

[S888Wheel]

<< In nearly all cases I took information from those
web sites and/or responses to questions and wrote 100% original
articles. >>


This would appear to be an obvious lie given how Dave Weil caught you red
handed plagarizing the Quad website and giving no credit to the original
author.

[Lionel]

S888Wheel a écrit :

> << In nearly all cases I took information from those
> web sites and/or responses to questions and wrote 100% original
> articles. >>
>
>
> This would appear to be an obvious lie given how Dave Weil caught you red
> handed plagarizing the Quad website and giving no credit to the original
> author.

Do you know what Mr. Howard Ferstler, told us about you yesterday ?
He said that you are a well known p....h..e !
After what you have written here above he will surely write something
like this in his books :
"Long time ago I remembered that on RAO we were obliged to deal with
every kind of freaks. I particularly remember a guy call S888WheelChair
who was a famous dangerous p....h..e. He used to rape children and after
he ate them !"

My poor Mr. WheelChair, once again your reputation will suffer a lot,
and once again you will not be guilty.

Sue him, WheelChair, sue him !

If I was you I would start to sue God, Saints, Satan and his hell's
Angels because I am afraid that the day of your judgement....

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

[S888Wheel]

Looks like I have my own RAO stalker now. Lionel are you really this stupid?

[Lionel]

S888Wheel a écrit :
> Looks like I have my own RAO stalker now. Lionel are you really this stupid?

No *you* are stupid, too stupid and too conceited... How can you imagine
it is possible ?

LOL !

--
Lionel J. M. Chapuis
Unemployed Clown

(signed this way because of pending libel suit against Krueger scheduled
to begin on 9/20/03 per Mr. Wheeler - and the need to possibly provide
supportive documentary evidence that Mr. George M. Middius' daily
incitement to hatred, suicide, slandering, insults, murder is the real
guilty of Mr.Wheeler's grievances.)

[S888Wheel]

I said

>
>> Looks like I have my own RAO stalker now. Lionel are you really this
>stupid?

Lionel said

>
>No *you* are stupid, too stupid and too conceited... How can you imagine
>it is possible ?

That is a very witty comeback. how long did it take you to come up with it? You
don't even know why I asked the question do you? Keep on stalking Lionel. You
are showing your true colors.

[George M. Middius]

S888Wheel said:

> Looks like I have my own RAO stalker now.

Did I relinquish it? Oh well, you can have it.


> Lionel are you really this stupid?

Why yes. Yes she is.