Howard Ferstler a écrit :
[snip]
..., with my goals
being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
goofballs.

....Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !

Lionel

In article ,
Lionel lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote:

Howard Ferstler a écrit :
[snip]
..., with my goals
being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
goofballs.

...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !

Let me you recommend the pounds of Ferstler.

Stephen

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:04:09 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

In article ,
Lionel lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote:

Howard Ferstler a écrit :
[snip]
..., with my goals
being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
goofballs.

...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !

Let me you recommend the pounds of Ferstler.

What is this Ferstler thing?

Should we be paying atention?

dave weil said:

What is this Ferstler thing?
Should we be paying atention?

Scientifically valid blind testing shows no difference between the
Ferstler phenomenon and the tapping of woodpeckers.

Hello, goofballs:

Just dropped in for a second (still in the midst of home renovating,
which will include a second large AV room and system), and see that
most of those who are left on RAO are members of the nitwit brigade. I
see a handful of audio commentaries, with the remainder being mostly
pointless dreck. Of course, "pointless dreck" is a style most beloved
by audio know-nothings. It is their favorite alternative to substance.

God knows, some of you people need to shut off your computers and go
somewhere.

PS: The Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound project is moving right along
(out of my hands, now, however, with the Routledge editorial staff in
New York doing their thing), with the primary editor very satisfied
with all of my at-long-last complted input - including more than 100
short biographies and the various (and most definitely "original")
company histories. Apparently, I will be listed as a technical editor,
since I upgraded many of the technical articles from the earlier
edition and wrote quite a large number of additional ones.

And, hey, "I'll be back" into audio writing pretty soon, with my goals
being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
goofballs. Hopefully, I can help to put a few scammer operations out
of business, too.

Howard Ferstler




More pointless dreck from the RAO resident plagarist and publisher of
fraudulant ABX listening tests. LOL did I say listening? You have to actually
listen for them to be listening tests right?

S888Wheel said to the Feckless Ferstlerian:

goofballs. Hopefully, I can help to put a few scammer operations out
of business, too.

More pointless dreck from the RAO resident plagarist and publisher of
fraudulant ABX listening tests. LOL did I say listening? You have to actually
listen for them to be listening tests right?

At least Clerkie has an active fantasy life, note.

In article ,
dave weil wrote:

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:04:09 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

In article ,
Lionel lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote:

Howard Ferstler a écrit :
[snip]
..., with my goals
being the same as ever: to inform intelligent people and demoralize
goofballs.

...Looks like with this message you have already done a good job !

Let me you recommend the pounds of Ferstler.

What is this Ferstler thing?

His works are good for foreign audio fans trying to learn English.

Should we be paying atention?

I suppose we could comment on his new credit and how it protects his
publishers, but what's the point?

Stephen